Bitcoin’s short-term price prospects slightly improved, but most traders are far from optimistic

CointelegraphОпубликовано 2022-06-28Обновлено 2022-06-28

Введение

A mild sense of hope emerged among Bitcoin (BTC) investors after the June 18 drop to $17,600 becomes more distant and an early ascending pattern points toward $21,000 in the short-term.

Bitcoin 12-hour USD price at FTX. Source: TradingViewRecent negative remarks from lawmakers continued to curb investor optimism. In an interview with Cointelegraph, Swiss National Bank (SNB) deputy head Thomas Muser said that the decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem would cease to exist if current financial regulations are implemented in the crypto industry.
An article published in "The People's Daily" on June 26 mentioned the Terra network's collapse and local blockchain expert, Yifan He referred to crypto as a Ponzi scheme. When asked by Cointelegraph to clarify the statement on June 27, Yifan He stated that "all unregulated cryptocurrencies including Bitcoin are Ponzi schemes based on my understanding."
On June 24 Sopnendu Mohanty the chief FinTech officer of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) pledged to be "brutal and unrelentingly hard" on any "bad behavior" from the cryptocurrency industry.
Ultimately, Bitcoin investors face mixed sentiment as some think the bottom is in and $20,000 is support. Meanwhile, others fear the impact that a global recession could have on risk assets. For this reason, traders should analyze derivatives markets data to understand if traders are pricing higher odds of a downturn.
Bitcoin futures show a balanced force between buyers and sellers
Retail traders usually avoid monthly futures because their price differs from regular spot markets at Coinbase, Bitstamp and Kraken. Still, those are professional traders' preferred instruments as they avoid the funding rate fluctuation of the perpetual contracts.
These fixed-month contracts usually trade at a slight premium to spot markets because investors demand more money to withhold the settlement. Consequently, futures should trade at a 5% to 10% annualized premium in healthy markets. One should note that this feature is not exclusive to crypto markets.

Bitcoin 3-month futures’ annualized premium. Source: LaevitasWhenever this indicator fades or turns negative, this is an alarming, bearish red flag signaling a situation known as backwardation. The fact that the average premium barely touched the negative area while Bitcoin traded down to $17,600 is remarkable.
Despite currently holding an extremely low futures premium (basis rate), the market has kept a balanced demand between leverage buyers and sellers.
To exclude externalities specific to the futures instrument, traders must also analyze the Bitcoin options markets. For instance, the 25% delta skew shows when Bitcoin whales and arbitrage desks are overcharging for downside or upside protection.
During bearish markets, options investors give higher odds for a price crash, causing the skew indicator to rise above 12%. On the other hand, a market's generalized FOMO induces a negative 12% skew.

Bitcoin 30-day options 25% delta skew: Source: LaevitasAfter peaking at 36% on June 18, the highest-ever record, the indicator receded to the current 15%. Options markets had shown extreme risk-aversion until June 25, when the 25% delta skew finally broke below 18%.
The current 25% skew indicator continues to display higher risks of a downside from professional traders but it no longer sits at the levels reflecting extreme risk aversion.
The bottom could be in according to on-chain data
Some metrics suggest that Bitcoin may have bottomed on June 18 after miners sold significant quantities of BTC. According to Cointelegraph, this indicates that capitulation has already occurred and Glassnode, an on-chain analysis firm, demonstrated that the Bitcoin Mayer Multiple fell below 0.5 which is extremely rare and hasn't happened since 2015.
Whales and arbitrage desks might take some time to adjust after key players like Three Arrows Capital face serious contraction and liquidation risks due to lack of liquidity or excessive leverage. Until there's enough evidence that the contagion risk is alleviated, Bitcoin price probably continue to trade below $22,000.

Похожее

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbit1 мин. назад

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbit1 мин. назад

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1 ч. назад

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1 ч. назад

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1 ч. назад

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

Blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs reports a governance exploit against the Token of Power protocol, resulting in a loss of approximately $1.58 million in WETH. The attacker exploited a missing timelock in the protocol's Aragon DAO setup, allowing them to propose, vote on, and execute a malicious action within a single block. The attacker funded the operation with 662 ETH from Tornado Cash, purchased enough TOP tokens to gain majority voting power, minted 10 billion new TOP tokens, and swapped them for WETH via a Balancer pool before moving funds back through Tornado Cash. The incident underscores that governance design is a critical security risk in DeFi, where parameters like timelocks provide essential reaction time. It also highlights how mixers and liquidity pools can be utilized in exploits without being directly compromised. Observers are now watching for any movement of the stolen funds and further remediation details from involved parties. This event is part of a broader shift in crypto, emphasizing the importance of underlying infrastructure, security, and governance alongside market movements.

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

Token Of Power Governance Exploit Drains $1.58 Million In WETH, TRM Says

bitcoinist4 ч. назад

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist6 ч. назад

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы