Tether, Galaxy, Ledn Lead Crypto Lending Revival After Billions in Loans Were Wiped Out in 2023

ccn.comОпубликовано 2025-04-14Обновлено 2025-04-14

Key Takeaways

  • Tether, Galaxy and Ledn now dominate the centralized crypto lending market, accounting for 90% of CeFi loans.
  • The crypto lending market has recovered since its 2023 crash but remains 43% below its 2021 peak.
  • DeFi remains the sector’s backbone, with Ethereum leading the charge.

The crypto lending industry is on the rebound, clawing its way back after a brutal collapse in 2023 that wiped out billions in loans and shattered confidence in centralized players.

Now valued at $36.5 billion, the market remains well below its all-time high in late 2021 — but signs of resilience are beginning to show.

A new report by Galaxy Digital shows that a new cohort of centralized players — Tether, Galaxy and Ledn — has stepped in to fill the void left by failed lenders like Celsius, Genesis and BlockFi.

The trio accounts for roughly $9.9 billion in outstanding loans, or 90% of the current centralized lending market.

You May Also Like

CeFi’s Comeback: Smaller, Sharper, Still Struggling

Centralized finance (CeFi) lenders have bounced back from a low of $6.4 billion in outstanding loans in early 2023 to $11.2 billion today — a 73% rebound.

However, that figure is still nearly two-thirds from the 2021 peak of $29.4 billion when CeFi lending was primarily controlled by the now-defunct trio of Genesis, Celsius and BlockFi.

Their downfall, catalyzed by overleveraged loans and exposure to the collapse of the Terra Luna ecosystem, triggered a liquidity crunch that rippled across the entire industry.

crypto lending market over the years.
DeFi dominates crypto lending. | Credit: Galaxy Research

However, the new wave of CeFi lenders appears more cautious, leaning on stricter lending terms and more conservative strategies. Tether, for example, remains focused on secured loans backed by excess collateral, while Galaxy and Ledn have honed in on institutional clients.

DeFi Reclaims Its Dominance

Despite the CeFi resurgence, decentralized finance (DeFi) remains the primary force in crypto lending.

DeFi now accounts for 63% of total borrowing, up from 33% during the previous bull run. This shift underscores growing confidence in permissionless, transparent protocols — especially in the wake of CeFi’s credibility crisis.

According to Galaxy’s data, DeFi lending platforms now manage over $19.1 billion in outstanding loans across 12 blockchains and 20 platforms — a staggering 10x jump from their Q4 2022 lows. At that time, DeFi borrowing had bottomed out at just $1.8 billion.

Ethereum remains the dominant chain for DeFi activity, hosting $33.9 billion in deposited assets as of March 2025 — far outpacing all competitors.

The sector’s growth is underpinned by smart contracts, which enforce overcollateralization and minimize default risk.

Unlike CeFi, where borrowers can walk away from bad loans, DeFi protocols liquidate positions automatically when collateral thresholds are breached.

Institutions Eye Bitcoin-Backed Lending

With signs of recovery across both CeFi and DeFi, institutional interest is once again growing. Traditional financial players, particularly those focused on Bitcoin financing, are exploring new lending strategies.

Cantor Fitzgerald — a key custodian of Tether’s reserve assets — recently revealed plans to expand into crypto lending, potentially opening the door to more Bitcoin-collateralized loan products from traditional finance firms.

As both centralized and decentralized platforms evolve, the crypto lending landscape in 2025 looks very different from its speculative, loosely governed past.

Whether the market can sustain this newfound stability remains to be seen.

Was this Article helpful? Yes No

Похожее

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the "Accounting Era" Enterprise AI is shifting from the question of "whether to adopt" to "how to account for it." As AI inference costs evolve from experimental budgets into ongoing operational expenses, CEOs and CFOs are demanding proof of value: what tangible results does each dollar spent on tokens deliver? The core of "Token Budget Wars" is not simply about reducing AI bills, but about intelligently allocating compute resources. It involves determining which business processes warrant more computational power, which tasks can use cheaper models, which can be outsourced or handled manually, and which are merely inefficient consumption. A key insight is that AI usage (token consumption) does not equal value. While SaaS usage indicated software adoption, AI token usage only indicates the "meter is running." The same workflow can cost vastly different amounts due to factors like prompt quality, context, model choice, and retries. The critical metric for scaling is "marginal token utility"—the business value created per additional dollar of inference cost. However, this is difficult to measure due to challenges like the long tail of retries, context inflation (where costs can scale quadratically with context length), and inefficient model routing (defaulting to the most powerful model for all tasks). The competition for token allocation is intensifying because, in the AI era, influence is tied to how much intelligence one can command, not just team size. AI spending is essentially competing with labor costs, whether for replacing external BPOs, internal staff, or generating new revenue. BPO contracts provide a clearer benchmark as they are priced per completed unit. The missing layer is attribution from tokens to business outcomes. Companies need a system that connects inference spending to completed work and results, capturing the agent's decision trajectory—what it saw, retrieved, tried, and why it succeeded or failed. This recorded rationale becomes a valuable asset. Ultimately, those who master token-to-outcome attribution will control the allocation of AI resources within enterprises, deciding which workflows get more compute, which are capped, or which revert to humans. The first phase of enterprise AI proved models could do the work. The next phase will determine how much of that work is worth paying for.

marsbit16 мин. назад

Token Budget Wars: Enterprise AI Enters the 'Accounting Era'

marsbit16 мин. назад

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

Anthropic has overtaken OpenAI in revenue by at least 35%, according to a recent report. Anthropic's annualized revenue is now approximately $45 billion, compared to OpenAI's roughly $33 billion. This represents a dramatic five-fold revenue increase for Anthropic over the first five months of the year, while OpenAI saw growth of just over 50%. The profitability gap is even more significant. Anthropic is expected to post an operating profit in Q2 with around a 5% margin. In stark contrast, OpenAI reported a massive operating loss of over 100% of its revenue in Q1, equating to a loss of at least $7 billion for the quarter. OpenAI also faces substantial costs, including paying 20% of its revenue to Microsoft and high AI server rental fees. This financial reversal impacts their potential IPO timelines. Previously, OpenAI might have been favored to go public first, but now its leadership may view an accelerated IPO as a "more financially prudent choice" to avoid direct, unfavorable public market comparisons. If Anthropic, with its superior growth and profitability metrics, were to file for an IPO first, it would gain a significant valuation advantage. At its current growth rate, Anthropic's revenue could soon surpass major tech firms like Netflix and Salesforce within a year.

marsbit39 мин. назад

Anthropic's Revenue Surpasses OpenAI by at Least 35%, IPO Race Dynamics Shift

marsbit39 мин. назад

US Debt Exceeds $39 Trillion, Surpassing GDP for First Time: The 'Gray Rhino' Every Investor Must Face by 2026

The U.S. national debt has exceeded $39 trillion, with the debt-to-GDP ratio surpassing 100% in 2026 for the first time since WWII. The annual interest payment is projected to reach $1.039 trillion. Driven by structural factors like tax cuts, rising entitlement spending (Social Security, Medicare), and compounding interest, the deficit persists. The Congressional Budget Office warns the current fiscal path is unsustainable, projecting debt could reach 175% of GDP by 2056. While the U.S. is unlikely to default as it issues its own currency, the consequences include persistent inflation pressure, higher long-term interest rates (e.g., 30-year Treasury yields at 5.2%), and potential crowding out of private investment. A fiscal crisis could manifest as a sudden, sharp spike in borrowing costs if market confidence erodes. Major credit rating agencies have downgraded U.S. debt, reflecting these concerns. For investors, this signals the end of the era of permanently low interest rates. Equity investors should favor companies with strong current earnings over high-growth stocks reliant on low discount rates. Bond investors face headwinds for long-term Treasuries due to increased supply, making shorter-duration bonds and investment-grade corporates relatively attractive. Gold and real assets can provide a hedge against currency debasement risks. Three broad scenarios are possible: gradual stabilization through fiscal reform (unlikely given political gridlock), a slow-burn of high debt and interest rates dragging on growth (the most probable baseline), or a sudden loss of market confidence triggering a crisis. Key indicators to watch include CBO report updates, Treasury auction demand, and the 30-year Treasury yield. The core takeaway for investors is the need to adjust portfolios for a world of sustained higher government borrowing costs and interest rates.

marsbit39 мин. назад

US Debt Exceeds $39 Trillion, Surpassing GDP for First Time: The 'Gray Rhino' Every Investor Must Face by 2026

marsbit39 мин. назад

Bitcoin Sentiment Back To Extreme Fear As Price Slips Under $76,000

The Bitcoin Fear & Greed Index has fallen back into "extreme fear" territory with a value of 25, following a recent price retracement. Bitcoin's price has slipped below $75,500 after briefly recovering above $77,000. Historically, such extreme fear levels have been associated with potential market bottoms, though the indicator can remain in this zone for extended periods before a reversal. Concurrently, social media sentiment analysis shows bearish commentary currently outweighing bullish sentiment, reflecting broader market pessimism.

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

Bitcoin Sentiment Back To Extreme Fear As Price Slips Under $76,000

bitcoinist1 ч. назад

A 10,000-Word Interpretation of the "Optical Interconnect" Industry Chain: The AI Infrastructure Bottleneck Obscured by GPU Glare

**Summary: The Rise of Optical Interconnect in AI Infrastructure** This analysis explores the critical, yet often overlooked, role of optical interconnects in large-scale AI data centers. While GPUs provide raw computational power, the efficiency of AI clusters depends heavily on high-speed data transfer between thousands of cooperating GPUs during both training and inference tasks. Copper-based electrical connections are hitting physical limits in bandwidth, distance, and power consumption. Fiber optics, using light signals, offer a superior solution with exponentially higher bandwidth and lower energy use over longer distances. This shift is driving rapid growth in the optical interconnect market. The core translation device is the pluggable optical transceiver (or module), which converts electrical signals from GPUs into optical signals for fiber transmission and vice versa. Its manufacturing involves two distinct semiconductor domains: indium phosphide (InP) for optical chips (lasers, modulators, detectors) and silicon for digital signal processing (DSP) chips. A transformative next-generation technology is Co-Packaged Optics (CPO). CPO moves the optical engine (a silicon photonic integrated circuit, or PIC) much closer to the GPU or switch inside the same chip package, drastically reducing power loss and latency. CPO necessitates an external laser source and relies on silicon photonics (using Silicon-on-Insulator/SOI wafers) for integration with silicon chips. The optical interconnect ecosystem is highly fragmented, unlike the concentrated GPU market. Key bottlenecks and players span the entire supply chain: InP substrates (e.g., AXT), epitaxial wafers (e.g., IQE), laser chips (e.g., Sivers, Lumentum, Coherent), silicon photonics foundries (e.g., Tower Semiconductor), SOI wafers (e.g., Soitec), DSP/switch chips (e.g., Broadcom, Marvell), and underlying fiber (e.g., Corning). The article posits that AI infrastructure competition is extending from "who has more GPUs" to "who can secure the scarce optical interconnect supply chain." CPO represents the largest potential growth variable, with projections suggesting it could become a market worth tens of billions of dollars by 2028. Investment opportunities vary from conservative (large, diversified players) to aggressive (small, high-beta companies focused on specific bottleneck technologies), but the sector carries significant volatility and execution risks.

marsbit1 ч. назад

A 10,000-Word Interpretation of the "Optical Interconnect" Industry Chain: The AI Infrastructure Bottleneck Obscured by GPU Glare

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow