US-Based Crusoe Energy To Use Flared Gas In Oman For Bitcoin Mining

zycryptoОпубликовано 2022-06-02Обновлено 2022-06-02

Введение

US-based firm Crusoe Energy has signed a deal with the Oman Investment Authority (OIA) to use stranded natural gas in the Middle East country to power crypto mining.

US-based firm Crusoe Energy has signed a deal with the Oman Investment Authority (OIA) to use stranded natural gas in the Middle East country to power crypto mining.

According to a report by Bloomberg, the deal came after the authority acquired a stake in the US Company as part of an April $350 million in Series C venture capital funding raised for flared gas Bitcoin mining.

Flaring entails burning off excess gas, or that which escapes from the delivery tunnels into the atmosphere. While this had been a standard process aimed at minimizing environmental and health hazards, it is still under scrutiny due to its hazardous carbon emissions during the burning process.

The energy firm had earlier acquired $155 million in addition to the $350m in new credit facilities. Apart from OAI, its mission is backed by about other 21 firms including Coinbase, Polychain Capital, Winklevoss Capital, Lowercarbon Capital, Bain Capital Ventures, and Founders Fund.

According to Chase Lochmiller, CEO of Crusoe, the firm will open an office in Oman to help with the Bitcoin mining operations. This will help with the deployment of power generators and mining equipment to capture the gas at designated sites.

“We’ve always felt it was important for us to have a presence in the Mena region,” said Lochmiller. “Having the buy-in from nations that are actively trying to solve the flaring issues is what we are looking for.”

According to a report by the world bank, the Middle East and North African(MENA) region account for about 57% of the world’s oil reserves and 41% of proven natural gas resources making it a notorious hotspot for flared gas emissions. The expansion by Crusoe into the region, particularly in Oman could thus reduce the conflicts between crypto and climate.

Crusoe already has deployments in various US locations including North Dakota, Montana and Colorado and is one of the biggest bitcoin miners in North America. The company claims to slash CO2 emissions from flaring gas by up to 63% through bitcoin mining-this is like taking about 1700 fuel cars off the road.

Crusoe is however not the only energy firm that is looking to use natural gas to power its bitcoin mining operations. ConocoPhillips, an oil and gas exploration behemoth has also been using excess natural gas in Dakota to fuel bitcoin mining operations, with others like Exxon selling excess gas to bitcoin miners. Recently, Russian authorities have also expressed support for the brilliant idea, with Russian based oil and gas firm Gazpromneft already operating a bitcoin mining facility in Siberia using flaring gas.

Похожее

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

Analysis of Bitcoin Trading Strategies: Why Celebrity Forecasts and Classic Models Fail, Leaving Only These Four Reliable Indicators This analysis examines the failure of common Bitcoin prediction methods and identifies four reliable indicators for constructing a trading strategy. The author reviewed all major BTC prediction approaches from 2017-2025, categorizing them into three groups: celebrity price targets (consistently over-optimistic), analytical models like Stock-to-Flow (broken post-2022), and on-chain signals. The key finding is that more data often creates confusion, not clarity. The strategy discards unreliable elements: celebrity predictions (incentivized to be extreme), pure models (invalidated by post-ETF market changes), and the Fear & Greed Index used alone (too many false signals). Four reliable indicators were selected: 1. **MVRV Z-Score:** Accurately identifies cycle bottoms when entering its green zone (e.g., 2018, 2020, 2022). Note: Its ability to call tops is now ineffective post-2024. 2. **SOPR (28-day MA):** Consistently signals bottoms when below 1.0, indicating holders are selling at a loss. 3. **ETF Net Flow:** A crucial post-2024 metric showing institutional momentum (e.g., sustained inflows = buying). 4. **Macro Liquidity (Fed policy & M2):** Sets the overall directional bias (e.g., bullish during easing cycles). The core strategy involves waiting for a multi-signal共振 (resonance). For example, a bottom signal requires MVRV in the green zone + SOPR < 1.0. A top signal requires overheated on-chain data + sustained ETF outflows. Macro policy sets the overall direction. The Fear & Greed Index is only used as a weighted confirmatory signal, never alone. Action is only taken when three or more indicators align. The author automated this into a monitoring system that sends Telegram alerts only when signals trigger. As of the article's date (April 15, 2026), the system showed a strong bottom signal: extreme fear (F&G=12), MVRV in the buy zone, and SOPR < 1.0. The only contrary signal was weak ETF flows. Historically, such triple on-chain共振 has preceded 100%+ returns. The conclusion emphasizes building a personal framework over relying on external predictions, allowing for iterative improvement and customization based on individual risk tolerance.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Bitcoin Trading Strategy Breakdown: Celebrity Predictions and Classic Models All Fail, Only These Four Indicators Remain

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片