Crypto executives hint the 'tide is turning’ on digital asset market regulation

FinboldОпубликовано 2022-04-15Обновлено 2022-04-15

Введение

Despite the tough regulatory stance toward the fast-growing decentralized finance (DeFi), executives of major cryptocurrency platforms are not losing hope and are even optimistic about the future.

Despite the tough regulatory stance toward the fast-growing decentralized finance (DeFi), executives of major cryptocurrency platforms are not losing hope and are even optimistic about the future.
One of them is Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the CEO of Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange. He has expressed his views while speaking to CNBC during the Paris Blockchain Week Summit, as the news network reported on April 15. 
In 2021, the regulators in the United Kingdom banned Zhao’s company from carrying out any regulated activity there. At the same time, the central bank of Singapore stated that Binance’s services could be in violation of the local laws, forcing the platform to limit its operations.
However, as he told CNBC:
“The tide is definitely turning.”
These words echo the sentiment he expressed in his speech opening the summit on April 13, saying that regulatory discussions concerning crypto have moved from “negative” to “positive.”
Zhao’s views are shared by other important figures in the industry, including Nicolas Cary, the co-founder of crypto wallet maker Blockchain.com. Talking to CNBC, Cary said that:
“The regulatory landscape around the world is coming up to speed quickly.” 
Entering the regulatory framework
Indeed, although the Chinese authorities have made it clear they didn’t want anything to do with crypto, Great Britain and the United States are planning to bring the budding market under regulatory control, as they seek to become leaders in crypto innovation and investment.
In line with this stance, the U.K. government has recently announced plans to recognize stablecoins as a valid form of payment. At the same time, the country’s Finance Minister Rishi Sunak has asked the Royal Mint to create a non-fungible token (NFT), which will be issued by the summer.
As Cary sees it:
“The U.K. could be a dark horse in this whole situation. Post-Brexit, they sort of have a policy decision to make and a strategy decision to make. Do they rebuild Brussels in London, or do they become the Singapore of the West, invite all this innovation, all this technology and all this wealth generation and really own the future of the Web?”
France, the host of the Paris Blockchain Week Summit, is another country mentioned in a positive context. Namely, Zhao considers it “very progressive and very welcoming towards cryptocurrencies,” as well as “far more advanced in their understanding.”
Commenting on the authorities’ cautiousness regarding the ‘dark side’ of the industry, including money laundering and other illegal transactions, the co-founder of Tezos (XTZ), Arthur Breitman, has said that:
“I think they’re starting to take it seriously [but] I don’t think they’re getting a warm and fuzzy feeling about it. Naturally, they are going to have a conservative bias.”
Some experiences differ
That said, some crypto executives have had a bitter experience with financial regulators recently, including the CEO of Ripple, Brad Garlinghouse, whose company is in the middle of a legal battle with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
He said:
“When I give advice to entrepreneurs that are thinking about building a crypto or blockchain company, I tell them do not incorporate in the United States. The lack of clarity and a lack of certainty means that you are at risk for the exact kind of lawsuit the SEC brought against us.”
Notably, the SEC is accusing the firm of illegally selling over $1 billion worth of the XRP token between 2013 and 2020.

Похожее

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News17 мин. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News17 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit27 мин. назад

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit27 мин. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

Anthropic has published an article titled "When AI builds itself," discussing the emerging concept of "recursive self-improvement," where AI begins to actively participate in designing, training, testing, and optimizing its own subsequent versions. The company presents internal data showing that by May 2026, over 80% of code merged into its codebase was written by Claude, its AI model. Claude's capabilities have expanded to handling complex, open-ended engineering tasks, achieving a 76% success rate in such areas, and even contributing to research processes, such as optimizing code performance and conducting AI safety experiments. Anthropic outlines an evolution from human-driven development to AI-assisted workflows, culminating in the current stage where AI agents can autonomously write, run, and delegate code. The company cautions that the path toward a "closed loop," where AI continuously improves itself, is becoming visible. It calls for coordinated global mechanisms to potentially slow or pause frontier AI development to allow safety research and societal structures to catch up. However, the timing of this warning coincides with Anthropic's preparations for an IPO, framing the narrative not just as a safety concern but also as a demonstration of Claude's advanced capabilities and its integral role in accelerating Anthropic's own R&D—creating a potential "flywheel" effect for competitive advantage. This contrasts with OpenAI's recent, more policy-oriented discussion of the same risks, highlighting the competitive dynamics in the AI industry as companies position themselves in both the technological and regulatory landscape.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Anthropic Cries Wolf: Is the AGI Threat Real, or Just an IPO Story?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片