今日币价7月12日:比特币维持在 30,500 美元左右,随着市场等待关键 CPI 数据,山寨币和美国股市上涨

Tap Chi BitcoinОпубликовано 2023-07-12Обновлено 2023-07-12

Введение

随着市场等待美国重要的 CPI 数据,比特币价格维持在 30,500 美元左右。

随着市场等待美国重要的 CPI 数据,比特币价格维持在 30,500 美元左右。

BTC 价格图表 – 1 小时 | 来源:TradingView

美股

周二(7月11日)美股继续上涨,投资者等待本周公布的重要美国通胀数据。

截至收盘,道琼斯指数上涨317.02点(涨幅0.93%)至34,261.42点。标准普尔 500 指数上涨 0.67%,至 4,439..26;纳斯达克综合指数上涨 0.55%,至 13,760.7。

在该公司宣布将在 8 月份提高股价后,Salesforce 股价上涨近 4%。在联邦法官拒绝联邦贸易委员会的命令请求后,动视暴雪股价上涨 10%。阻止微软收购视频游戏公司的初步请求。这一决定意味着两家公司更接近完成交易。

美国6月消费者物价指数(CPI)报告定于周三(7月12日)公布,6月PPI报告定于周四(7月13日)公布,将揭示通胀是否会持续下跌并为未来利率方向奠定基础。道琼斯调查的经济学家预测该指数上个月将比去年同期增长3.1%。

美国5月CPI为4%,核心CPI则跌至5.3%。本月,专家估计两者都将出现更大幅度的跌幅。CPI预期将降至3.1%,包括汇丰银行和花旗在内的许多银行预测为3%。

投资者预计美联储将在7月25-26日的会议上加息25个基点。然而,上周持续强劲的就业数据引发了人们对政策制定者将在六月暂停后恢复加息的担忧,因此他们仍未决定央行在会议上将采取什么行动。

第二季度财报季将于本周晚些时候拉开帷幕,摩根大通、富国银行和花旗集团等主要金融机构以及贝莱德、百事可乐和达美航空等主要金融机构将公布财报。

与此同时,周二(7月11日)金价上涨,因美国通胀数据公布前美元和美债收益率下跌,该数据可能为美国加息路线图提供更多信息。美联储)。

截至收盘,现货黄金合约上涨0.4%至1932.03美元/盎司,连续第三个交易日上涨。黄金期货上涨 0.3%,至每盎司 1,937.1 美元。

受美元疲软、发展中国家需求增加的希望以及主要石油出口国减产的推动,周二油价上涨 2%。

截至收盘,布伦特原油合约上涨1.71美元(相当于2.2%)至79.4美元/桶。WTI 石油合约上涨 1.84 美元(即 2.5%),至每桶 74.83 美元。

比特币和山寨币

由于消费者价格指数(CPI)预计将“放缓”,比特币价格和加密货币市场预计将上涨。

在上个月两次未能突破 31,000 美元大关后,顶级加密资产目前的交易价格约为 30,500 美元。

然而,3% 的通胀率可能会帮助 BTC 恢复上涨势头。

BTC/USD 图表 – 1 天 | 来源:TradingView

如果CPI数据符合预测并且BTC成功突破31,000美元,这对加密货币市场的其他部分来说将是一个看涨信号。

在美国关键消费者物价指数 (CPI) 数据公布之前,比特币继续徘徊在 30,500 美元区域上方,山寨币市场略显看涨。

Compound (COMP) 是当天表现最好的项目,反弹超过 13%,抹去了过去 7 天的所有跌幅。

前 100 名中的其他山寨币如 Aave (AAVE)、Theta Network (THETA)、Render Token (RNDR)、Enjin Coin (ENJ)、Kava (KAVA)、Coinflux (CFX)、Zilliqa (ZIL)、Stacks (STX) 、Hedera (HBAR)、Axie Infinity (AXS)……白天均小幅上涨 3-6%。

资料来源:Coinmarketcap

在 7 月 10 日被 1,900 美元拒绝后,以太坊 (ETH) 仍在努力突破该区域。目前,市值第二大的资产交易价格约为 1,882 美元,与 24 小时前相比几乎持平。

ETH 价格图表 – 1 小时 | 来源:TradingView

“今日币价”栏目将于每日9:00更新市场动态,欢迎读者关注。

Похожее

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit1 ч. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片