Intel Soars 20%, CPUs Return to Center Stage in the Agent Era

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-24Última atualização em 2026-04-24

Resumo

Intel's stock surged 20% after reporting exceptional Q1 2026 results, with revenue of $13.6 billion (up 7% YoY) and non-GAAP EPS of $0.29, beating expectations by 29x. The rebound is driven by the resurgence of CPUs in the AI era, particularly as workloads shift from training to inference and agent-based applications. Intel’s Data Center and AI (DCAI) division hit a record $5.1 billion in revenue, up 22% YoY, marking a U-shaped recovery since mid-2025. The growth is attributed to strong demand for Xeon 6 "Granite Rapids" processors and increased AI infrastructure refresh cycles. While NVIDIA and AMD dominated the AI training phase, Intel is benefiting from the focus on AI agents, where CPU performance becomes critical—accounting for 50-90% of workflow latency in agent orchestration. This shift, coupled with management changes and strategic refocus on CPUs (including canceling the Falcon Shores GPU project), has repositioned Intel. New CEO Lip-Bu Tan emphasized that CPUs are re-establishing themselves as essential infrastructure in the AI era.

Last night, Nvidia's price reached $70 during the trading session, soaring 20% after hours because its latest earnings report exceeded everyone's expectations.

Intel disclosed its Q1 2026 fiscal year results on Thursday, with revenue of $13.6 billion, a 7% year-over-year increase, beating Wall Street consensus expectations by 11%. Non-GAAP earnings per share were $0.29, compared to analyst expectations of $0.01, exceeding expectations by 29 times—a rare discrepancy for a large-cap stock. Following the news, Intel's stock rose as much as 20% in after-hours trading.

The Q2 guidance also pointed in a more aggressive direction, with a revenue range of $13.8 billion to $14.8 billion, above the median of consensus expectations. New CEO Lip-Bu Tan used one sentence during the earnings call as a summary of the performance,大意是 the CPU is re-embedding itself into an indispensable foundational position in the AI era.

This has been one of the most discussed propositions for Intel over the past two years, as the company was once thought to have completely missed the first wave of AI.

On one hand, it failed to produce a GPU that could compete with Nvidia's; on the other hand, its advanced manufacturing nodes couldn't keep up with TSMC's. But over the past 12 months, as more and more AI deployments shifted from model training to inference and autonomous "agent" orchestration, the CPU—this once被视为基础款的 "computer brain"—has instead become needed again. Intel's rebound this quarter is the first financial落地 of this technology narrative.

Data Center Business Emerges from a U-Shaped Reversal

Breaking down the $13.6 billion in Q1, the most critical change came from the Data Center and AI (DCAI) line. According to Intel's earnings report, DCAI's quarterly revenue was $5.1 billion, a 22% year-over-year increase, hitting a record high.

This isn't a one-time爆发. Looking back to 2025, DCAI did $4.1 billion in Q1, dropped to $3.9 billion in Q2, and returned to $4.1 billion in Q3. This横盘 in mid-2025 once made the market doubt whether the so-called "CPU recovery" was just a narrative. Then in Q4, according to the disclosure caliber整理ed by Tom's Hardware, DCAI jumped from $4.1 billion in Q3 to $4.7 billion, a quarter-over-quarter increase of +15%, the fastest quarterly sequential growth rate for the company in a decade.

Entering Q1 2026, the figure of $5.1 billion allows the entire curve to画出了一个清晰的 U-shape, with the谷底 in mid-2025, the拐点 in Q4 2025, and confirmation in Q1 2026. Management's explanation was that the Xeon 6th Gen "Granite Rapids" processor began scaling up volume,叠加 the AI infrastructure refresh cycle. The company even主动牺牲ed part of its client CPU capacity, giving wafer allocation to the data center, raising the entire DCAI segment's profit margin. According to Intel's Q3 2025 earnings report, this segment's operating margin rose from 9.2% in Q3 2024 to 23.4%, almost 2.5 times higher.

The Same AI Narrative, Three Companies Paint Three Different Trends

Placing Intel's rebound within a peer comparison reveals a chart more interesting than just the gains and losses.

Using January 2023 as a baseline, by April 2026, Nvidia's stock index had surged to 1023, AMD rose to 406, and Intel was at 245. The three lines started from the same point, but the endpoints differed by nearly five times. But what's more worth looking at is the shape of Intel's blue line. It didn't slowly climb; it first探ed down to 64 in September 2024 (equivalent to a 36% drop from the starting point), then画出一道 V-shaped rebound, only catching up to 245 in early 2026.

This chart actually tells the story of the market's two pricings of "who really makes money in the AI capital cycle." From 2023 to 2024, money flowed to Nvidia because training requires GPUs. AMD啃下 the second piece of the cake with its MI300 series, and its stock price followed. Intel, however, was系统性地划掉ed from the AI交易名单 because Gaudi accelerator sales fell short of expectations and advanced process mass production lagged. According to third-party estimates cited by《Fortune》in January 2025, Nvidia's share of the AI chip market rose from 25% in 2021 to 86% in 2024, while Intel's fell from 68% to 6%.

The second pricing occurred from the second half of 2025 to early 2026, when the market began重新讨论一个问题: if AI moves from training to inference and the Agent stage, will the demand structure for computing power change? The answer to this question directly determines how far Intel's blue line can go.

The Closer the Scenario is to Agent, the More CPUs Return to Center Stage

Breaking down the AI workflow into three types of scenarios, the weight of the CPU varies greatly among them. According to estimates from Deloitte's 2026 Technology Trends report, in the large model training phase, the CPU only accounts for about 8% of the workflow bottleneck, with the remaining 92% of the computing pressure on the parallel synchronization of GPU clusters—this is Nvidia's主场. Entering the large-scale inference phase, the CPU's weight rises to 25%, but GPU parallel throughput and memory bandwidth remain the bottlenecks.

The real change happens in Agent orchestration scenarios. According to a study jointly published by Georgia Tech and Intel in November 2025, CPU processing for tool calls in Agent workflows accounts for 50% to 90% of the total latency of the entire process, with the specific proportion depending on the tool type and orchestration complexity. In other words, when an AI Agent is doing things like "calling APIs, pulling data, coordinating subtasks, managing contextual memory," the bottleneck is not the GPU, but the CPU.

This trend has quantifiable magnitude for reference. According to Deloitte estimates, the proportion of inference workload in total AI computing power was about 1/3 in 2023, about 1/2 in 2025, and is expected to reach 2/3 by 2026. According to Futurum Group calculations, the server CPU market size will grow from $26 billion in 2025 to $60 billion in 2030, with growth exceeding the historical long-term average. A more specific signal is OpenAI's disclosed computing power roadmap; the company plans to acquire "hundreds of thousands of the most advanced Nvidia GPUs, as well as computing power scalable to tens of millions of CPUs to support Agent workloads." GPUs are still the boss, but the magnitude of CPUs is publicly placed on the same line for the first time.

The Rebound Didn't Start in Q1 2026

Overlaying Intel's stock price over the past five years with six key events, the 20% after-hours jump in Q1 is actually the尾声 of a series of earlier decisions.

In February 2021, Pat Gelsinger returned as CEO, presenting the "IDM 2.0" strategy to make Intel both a chip designer and an open foundry. When Gaudi 3 was released in April 2024, Intel set its 2024 AI accelerator sales target at $500 million.

On August 2, 2024, the Q2 2024 earnings report爆雷ed, with revenue of $12.8 billion down year-over-year, GAAP EPS of -$0.38, announcing 15% layoffs and a dividend suspension. The stock fell 26% in a single day, its worst single day since 1974. According to Intel's disclosure at the time, management subsequently admitted that Gaudi 3 would not achieve the full-year $500 million target and took a $300 million inventory write-down.

According to Intel's official announcement, Gelsinger left on December 1, 2024, and the company entered an interim co-CEO phase. In February 2025, the new management decided to cancel the independent GPU project "Falcon Shores," which aimed to compete with Nvidia, admitting that its self-developed AI accelerator roadmap could not outrun Nvidia's ecosystem lock-in. On March 18, 2025, former Cadence CEO and semiconductor veteran Lip-Bu Tan officially became Intel's CEO. This time point corresponded to an Intel stock price around $22, only up a little over 20% from the September 2024 low of $18.

From Lip-Bu Tan's appointment to this Q1 earnings report, Intel's stock price rose from $22 to $65 before the report. Coupled with the 20% after-hours jump, it意味着 just touched around $78. If the period from August 2024 to December 2024 was the company's至暗时期, then the true starting point of the rebound was not Q1 2026, but the moment when Falcon Shores was canceled and Tan was selected as CEO. The company abandoned its fantasy of competing with Nvidia and returned to its true strength—the CPU主场.

The 29x EPS beat is a financial signal, but behind it, two things happened simultaneously. The market began重新定价 the position of the CPU in the AI architecture, and Intel恰好 completed its management change and product line取舍. Neither of these things happened in Q1.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Intel's stock surge 20% after its Q1 2026 earnings report?

AIntel's stock surged due to significant outperformance in its Q1 2026 results, with revenue of $13.6 billion (up 7% YoY, 11% above expectations) and non-GAAP EPS of $0.29 (29 times higher than the expected $0.01). The rebound was driven by strong growth in its Data Center and AI (DCAI) segment, which hit a record $5.1 billion in revenue, up 22% YoY, fueled by the adoption of Xeon 6 'Granite Rapids' processors and the shift in AI workloads toward inference and agent-based computing.

QHow has the role of CPUs changed in the AI era according to the article?

ACPUs have regained importance as AI workloads shift from training to inference and agent orchestration. In agent scenarios, CPUs handle 50-90% of the workflow latency for tasks like API calls, data retrieval, and context management, making them critical alongside GPUs. This contrasts with training phases, where GPUs dominate with 92% of compute pressure.

QWhat was the performance trend of Intel's Data Center and AI (DCAI) business leading up to Q1 2026?

AIntel's DCAI business showed a U-shaped recovery: it generated $4.1 billion in Q1 2025, dipped to $3.9 billion in Q2, recovered to $4.1 billion in Q3, jumped 15% to $4.7 billion in Q4 (fastest quarterly growth in a decade), and reached a record $5.1 billion in Q1 2026, indicating a sustained rebound.

QHow does Intel's AI-related stock performance compare to Nvidia and AMD from 2023 to 2026?

AFrom January 2023 to April 2026, Nvidia's stock index rose to 1023, AMD's to 406, and Intel's to 245. Intel's performance was distinct: it declined sharply to a low of 64 (down 36%) by September 2024, then underwent a V-shaped recovery, reflecting market reassessment of CPU relevance in AI inference and agent workloads after initial dominance by GPU-focused companies like Nvidia.

QWhat strategic shifts did Intel make under new leadership to drive its turnaround?

AIntel's turnaround began with key leadership and strategic changes: Pat Gelsinger's IDM 2.0 plan in 2021, followed by his departure in December 2024. Under new CEO Lip-Bu Tan (appointed March 2025), Intel canceled the Falcon Shores GPU project (acknowledging inability to compete with Nvidia directly) and refocused on its CPU strengths, aligning with market demand for AI inference and agent computing.

Leituras Relacionadas

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbitHá 26m

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbitHá 26m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbitHá 31m

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbitHá 31m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报Há 40m

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报Há 40m

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHá 2h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ERA

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Caldera (ERA) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Caldera (ERA)Depois de comprar o teu Caldera (ERA), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Caldera (ERA)Transaciona facilmente Caldera (ERA) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

543 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar ERA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ERA (ERA) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片