SEC doubles down on decision to reject Grayscale spot ETF

Financial TimesPublicado em 2022-12-20Última atualização em 2022-12-20

Resumo

US regulator reiterates position that bitcoin futures funds are safer than proposed spot bitcoin funds would be

Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Copying articles to share with others is a breach of FT.com T&Cs and Copyright Policy. Email licensing@ft.com to buy additional rights. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found at https://www.ft.com/tour.

https://www.ft.com/content/3f113f11-b5ea-4cf3-b2bb-2d9059f6b18c

The Securities and Exchange Commission doubled down last week on its decision to reject Grayscale’s bid to launch a bitcoin ETF, repeating its stance that such products are prone to fraud and manipulation, court records show.

Grayscale had claimed over the summer that the SEC was applying an unfair double standard by allowing bitcoin futures ETFs on the market and repeatedly denying proposals for ETFs that invest in spot bitcoin.

In June, the SEC rejected Grayscale’s proposal to convert its Bitcoin Trust into an ETF. Later that day, Grayscale sued the regulator, alleging the commission violated the Administrative Procedure Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by discriminating between issuers of the two types of ETFs on an “arbitrary and capricious” basis.

In October 2021, the ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF became the first bitcoin futures ETF. The fund had $575mn in assets as of December 9, according to CFRA’s ETF database. Other bitcoin futures ETFs on the market include the $20mn Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF and the $21mn VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF.

The reply brief, filed last week, marks the SEC’s first response to Grayscale’s lawsuit. In it, the commission reiterated its stance that it had approved bitcoin futures ETFs because they are monitored closely by the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Spot bitcoin ETFs, meanwhile, lack that level of federal oversight, the brief says.

NYSE Arca, where Grayscale wants its ETF to be listed, claims that the index that its proposed spot bitcoin ETF would track uses an advanced algorithm to mitigate fraud, manipulation and other anomalous trading activity. However, the SEC argues that those provisions are not sufficiently effective, its reply brief shows. Plus, bitcoin is an unregulated spot market without adequate surveillance, the commission noted.

“The SEC has remained consistent in its belief that while a futures-based bitcoin ETF is permissible, a spot-based one is not because there was risk of fraud and manipulation,” said Todd Rosenbluth, head of research at VettaFi. “Grayscale has a high burden to overcome in part because the SEC has blocked any such ETF numerous times as a wave of filings occurred under the current leadership.”

The SEC has rejected applications for bitcoin ETFs from a raft of companies, including WisdomTree, Fidelity and VanEck.

The SEC also argued that bitcoin futures ETFs and spot bitcoin ETFs should be treated differently from one another because they pose different risks for investors. The commission urged the Washington, DC, appeals court, where the case is filed, to affirm its view that it acted reasonably when rejecting Grayscale’s plans to convert its Bitcoin Trust, the regulator wrote.

The US Chamber of Commerce, NYSE Arca, Coinbase and the Blockchain Association have voiced their support for Grayscale’s lawsuit, filing amicus briefs in October that argue bitcoin futures ETFs are riskier than the proposed spot bitcoin ETFs.

“Coinbase champions the value of private-sector market surveillance adopted voluntarily by unregulated spot-trading platforms and asserts that ‘the largest players in the bitcoin market’ have investors’ best interests at heart,” the SEC wrote. “But Congress passed the securities laws on the premise that voluntary regulation is not always sufficient.”

The SEC is creating an “uneven playing field” by approving bitcoin futures-based ETFs and continuously denying spot bitcoin ETFs, and this puts Bitcoin Trust shareholders at an unfair disadvantage, Grayscale said in a statement posted to its website last week.

Grayscale and its lawyer at Davis Polk did not respond to requests for comment.

The regulator is also holding spot bitcoin to a higher standard than futures contracts without articulating a “sound basis for this decision”, Grayscale said. Since the November 8 collapse of FTX, the CoinDesk Bitcoin Price Index that Grayscale’s spot bitcoin ETF would have tracked has priced very similarly to the bitcoin futures index on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, the Stamford, Connecticut-based company said.

Bitcoin futures ETFs have also closely tracked bitcoin prices lately, said Aniket Ullal, head of ETF data and analytics at CFRA Research. Bitcoin’s spot price and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF have both returned negative 63 per cent year to December 9, according to CFRA data.

Despite the massive decline in bitcoin’s value, the seven bitcoin futures ETFs on the market have attracted a net $338mn in flows in the year to December 9, according to CFRA. Combined, the ETFs had $723mn in assets as of that date, the database shows.

“That number is meaningful relative to the current asset base in these products, but very small compared to the overall flows into US ETFs,” he said.

Overall, the $6.8tn US ETF market recorded $544bn in net inflows year to date through November 30, according to Morningstar Direct.

“Crypto investors are calling for more regulated options,” Grayscale said. “It is time that the SEC answers that call.”

The firm has until January 13 to respond to the SEC’s brief, court records show.

Leituras Relacionadas

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

Title: Report Interpretation: What Moves Is Coherent Making Amid the CPO Boom? Summary: JP Morgan analyst Samik Chatterjee reiterates an Overweight rating on Coherent (COHR), citing undervalued growth potential across three core areas: data center optical transceivers, co-packaged optics (CPO) chips, and industrial lasers/thermal management. COHR's 1.6T data center transceivers are in high demand, with pricing remaining firm. The rise of CPO is seen not as a threat but as a catalyst, creating higher demand for sophisticated optical components, an area where COHR holds a competitive edge with its comprehensive portfolio (lasers, isolators, VCSELs, thermoelectric coolers). Each CPO chip offers significantly greater revenue potential than traditional transceivers. Furthermore, its Optical Circuit Switch (OCS) technology targets a potential $4B market with reliability and power advantages. The company is expanding its InP (Indium Phosphide) device capacity fourfold within two years, securing substrate supply and transitioning to more cost-effective 6-inch wafers. As one of only two major suppliers of high-quality pump lasers—currently in severe shortage—COHR can now move up the value chain from components to complete line cards/systems, boosting ASP over tenfold. Gross margin targets (>42%) may be revised upward due to high-end product premiums, cost improvements from the wafer transition, and contributions from new high-margin products like CPO and OCS. Its efficient thermadite thermal material also offers long-term growth. Industrial segment revenue grows at a steady 5-10%, supported by semiconductor equipment orders. Changes in Apple's Face ID protocol present a re-competition opportunity for 3D sensing. Overall, Coherent is positioned as a key infrastructure provider, with AI-driven compute demand fueling the need for high-speed optical interconnectivity. Growth from CPO/OCS, stable industrial performance, and margin improvement support the bullish thesis. *Disclaimer: This summary interprets a third-party analyst report from JP Morgan. It does not constitute investment advice.*

marsbitHá 22m

Report Analysis: What Is Coherent Planning as CPO Booms?

marsbitHá 22m

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

Dan Koe's article argues that the real threat in the AI era is not technology itself, but financial dependency on employers. He critiques the "wage slavery" of unfulfilling work and identifies five core skills for resilience: agency, taste, persuasion, persistence, and iteration. These are developed not by consuming content, but by starting your own venture. The key to escaping the "employee mindset" is a radical identity shift. This requires: 1) Drastically changing your environment and daily inputs, 2) Choosing a creative medium (like content or code) that provides real-world feedback through trial and error, and 3) Using that feedback to learn and adapt. Koe strongly advocates for content creation over coding for beginners, as it builds irreplaceable subjective taste and audience connection. The practical starting point is a 15-minute self-inquiry to define your "life's work." Answer: What do you know deeply? What innate abilities do you have? What childhood interests were suppressed? Then, identify your contrarian beliefs—what does the mainstream get wrong in your area? The overlap is your unique direction. The final, non-negotiable step is to publish your first piece of content tomorrow. Embrace that it will be bad; the goal is to enter the feedback loop of creation, learning, and iteration, which is the true path to independence.

marsbitHá 32m

Dan Koe's New Article: Escape the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive in the Tide of AI Replacement?

marsbitHá 32m

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

Following the completion of a months-long organizational restructuring, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) announced a 20% workforce reduction (approximately 54 employees) on June 23rd. It reorganized its teams into five new core clusters: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional (plus Operations/Management support units). Officially, this move implements the EF's 2026 Mandate and 2025 Treasury Management Policy, aiming to create a more focused and "self-sovereign" organization. The restructuring prioritizes the CROPS principles—Censorship Resistance, Openness & Freedom, Privacy, and Security—as foundational organizational tenets. The Protocol cluster will focus on core protocol R&D, including MEV reduction and zkEVM. The Access cluster emphasizes preserving user "zero option" for non-custodial, permissionless interaction. The User, Community, and Institutional clusters will manage external engagement, with the latter handling institutional and regulatory matters. While offering enhanced severance and transition support for affected employees, the EF did not disclose budget allocations or specific KPIs for the new clusters. This has led to market uncertainty about the impact on project funding and development priorities. Analysts note the announcement's positive tone of mission focus contrasts with a backdrop of recent EF leadership changes and broader ecosystem pressures. The true impact—whether this signifies strategic realignment or reactive contraction—will become clearer as the new structure's resource allocation and project prioritization are revealed in the coming months.

marsbitHá 33m

After Laying Off 20% of Staff, What Are the Key Points of EF's New Structure?

marsbitHá 33m

Top-Tier MEV Bot Loses $7.5 Million: Is 'Approval' the Most Overlooked Fatal Risk On-Chain?

The article discusses a sophisticated attack on a prominent Ethereum MEV (Miner Extractable Value) bot, Jaredfromsubway.eth, resulting in a loss exceeding $7.5 million. Unlike typical exploits involving key leaks or smart contract bugs, this attack was a carefully orchestrated "reverse hunt." The attacker spent weeks deploying fake tokens and liquidity pools that mimicked legitimate assets like WETH and USDC. These pools were designed to appear as profitable arbitrage opportunities, tricking the automated bot's trading logic. During its normal operation, the bot was induced to grant ERC-20 token approvals to the malicious contracts. Once sufficient permissions were accumulated, the attacker drained the bot's funds by calling these pre-approved allowances. This incident highlights the often-underestimated risks associated with token approvals in Web3. The article explains that approvals are a fundamental mechanism, allowing smart contracts (like DEXs) to move a user's tokens on their behalf. However, risks arise from practices like granting infinite approvals, the persistence of approvals even after disconnecting from a dApp, and the potential for a once-trusted contract to become compromised later. The piece concludes with advice for managing approval risks: users should adopt the principle of least privilege (approving only the needed amount), use separate wallets for storage versus interactions, and regularly audit and revoke unnecessary approvals using tools like Revoke.cash. It also emphasizes the role of wallets like imToken in providing proactive defenses, such as risk warnings and clear, readable transaction signing interfaces, to help users make informed decisions. Ultimately, wallet security must extend beyond private key protection to include active management of token approvals.

marsbitHá 37m

Top-Tier MEV Bot Loses $7.5 Million: Is 'Approval' the Most Overlooked Fatal Risk On-Chain?

marsbitHá 37m

Precious Metals Decline Alongside, What Signal is Gold Sending to the Market?

Gold and silver prices have declined recently, moving in tandem with a sell-off in risk assets like South Korean semiconductor stocks. This is unusual, as gold typically rises when equities fall due to its safe-haven status. The synchronized drop signals a shift in market focus: it's not about finding safety, but about the rising cost of holding assets that do not yield interest. This cost is the real interest rate. The key driver is a change in Federal Reserve policy expectations under new Chair Kevin Warsh. Despite holding rates steady, the Fed's rhetoric has turned more hawkish, emphasizing persistent inflation risks. This has led markets to price in a "higher for longer" rate environment, increasing the appeal of cash and bonds while pressuring zero-yield assets like gold and tech stocks with high future cash flow valuations. Technically, gold breached the $4,100/oz support level, approaching the critical $4,000 psychological and technical zone. A break below could trigger accelerated selling from momentum traders and ETFs. While long-term supportive factors like central bank buying and geopolitical risks remain, short-term price action is dominated by liquidity and opportunity cost dynamics. The South Korean market meltdown, driven by crowded AI-trade unwinding, is a symptom—not the cause—of this broader macro repricing. Both markets are reacting to the same pressures: higher real rates and a stronger US dollar. In summary, the concurrent decline in equities and precious metals highlights that diverse assets can share exposure to a common macro variable—the price of money. The near-term path for gold and silver depends primarily on the persistence of Fed hawkishness, dollar strength, and real yields, which currently override their traditional safe-haven narratives.

marsbitHá 47m