Polygon drops 11% – Can POL’s $0.90 demand zone stop more losses?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-01Última atualização em 2026-03-01

Resumo

Polygon (POL) has declined by 11% in the past 24 hours, pushing its price toward a critical demand zone at $0.90. This level is now a key support, and a breakdown below it could lead to further losses. On-chain metrics show mixed signals: exchange reserves are flattening, suggesting reduced immediate sell pressure, while a drop in withdrawing addresses indicates holders are waiting rather than selling. However, negative inflow trends reflect weak demand. The Stochastic RSI suggests selling pressure may be fading as it nears oversold conditions. The price action at the $0.90 level will likely determine POL's short-term direction—a hold could trigger a rebound, but a break below may intensify bearish momentum.

Polygon [POL] has declined by 11% over the past 24 hours. This pullback has pushed the price closer to a critical demand zone near $0.90.

That level now acts as the last major line of defense if bearish pressure continues.

Demand zone in focus

On the daily chart, the $0.90 zone previously served as strong support. If buyers step in again, it could trigger a technical rebound. However, repeated tests of support often weaken it.

At press time, POL’s stochastic RSI pointed to fading selling pressure. The key momentum indicator was approaching an oversold region as well. Notably, the price action proximity to the demand zone aligned with the momentum indicator.

This affirmed the zone as a key turning point, especially with withdrawal addressing shrinking.

The chances of bearish momentum cannot be completely ignored. If bearish momentum accelerates, a breakdown below $0.90 could open the door to further downside.

Exchange reserve shows early signs of stabilization

Exchange reserves were beginning to flatten during this time as well, showing that aggressive POL deposits to exchanges may be slowing.

Typically, dropping reserves on the network indicated reduced immediate sell pressure. That slightly improves the odds of stabilization.

Polygon’s on-chain metrics spark mixed signals

The number of withdrawing addresses on the Polygon network has dropped significantly over the same period.

Usually, fewer withdrawals reflect a reduced short-term movement. It also highlights that holders are waiting rather than actively repositioning.

At the same time, negative inflow trends offered caution. According to AMBCrypto’s recent analysis of exchange data, Polygon’s Mean Exchange Inflows declined sharply over the last 24 hours.

This created mixed sentiment signals.

Lower inflows reduce direct sell pressure, but falling activity can also reflect weak demand.

What comes next for POL?

Polygon now sits at a critical technical level.

As it stands, if buyers defend $0.90 and reserves remain stable, a relief bounce is possible. However, if bearish pressure resumes, the bearish risk will increase.

Meanwhile, the next reaction at the demand zone will likely determine short-term direction.


Final Summary

  • Polygon drops 11% as the price approaches the critical $0.90 demand zone.
  • Flattening exchange reserves offer hope, but mixed inflow signals keep downside risks still alive.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the critical demand zone price level mentioned for Polygon (POL)?

AThe critical demand zone price level mentioned for Polygon (POL) is $0.90.

QBy what percentage did Polygon (POL) decline over the past 24 hours according to the article?

APolygon (POL) declined by 11% over the past 24 hours.

QWhat does the flattening of exchange reserves for POL indicate, according to the analysis?

AThe flattening of exchange reserves indicates that aggressive POL deposits to exchanges may be slowing, which suggests reduced immediate sell pressure and slightly improves the odds of price stabilization.

QWhat on-chain metric showed a significant drop, suggesting holders are waiting rather than actively repositioning?

AThe number of withdrawing addresses on the Polygon network showed a significant drop, suggesting reduced short-term movement and that holders are waiting.

QWhat are the two possible short-term price scenarios for POL based on the $0.90 level?

AThe two possible short-term price scenarios are: 1) If buyers defend the $0.90 level and reserves remain stable, a relief bounce is possible. 2) If bearish pressure resumes and the price breaks down below $0.90, it could lead to further downside.

Leituras Relacionadas

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbitHá 19m

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbitHá 19m

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbitHá 1h

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbitHá 1h

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ruHá 3h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PUSH

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Push Protocol (PUSH) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Push Protocol (PUSH)Depois de comprar o teu Push Protocol (PUSH), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Push Protocol (PUSH)Transaciona facilmente Push Protocol (PUSH) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

576 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar PUSH

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PUSH (PUSH) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片