作者起诉Anthropic涉嫌使用盗版书籍训练人工智能聊天机器人

币界网Publicado em 2024-08-20Última atualização em 2024-08-20

币界网报道:

总部位于加利福尼亚州的人工智能公司Anthropic因未经许可使用受版权保护的作品来训练其人工智能聊天机器人Claude而被起诉。三位作者Andrea Bartz、Charles Graeber和Kirk Wallace Johnson于周一在加利福尼亚州的一家联邦法院提起集体诉讼。他们声称,Anthropic使用了他们书籍和其他许多书籍的盗版来开发聊天机器人。

作者的指控是,Anthropic在开发Claude的过程中,将这些作品变成了其业务的一个组成部分。因此,它声称,当Anthropic使用这些材料时,没有适当的许可,这侵犯了作者的知识产权。

作者和创作者对人工智能公司采取法律行动

该诉讼是人工智能公司在培训大型语言模型时部署受版权保护的作品所面临的一系列法庭案件的又一个补充。作者对Anthropic的索赔是摄影、新闻和音乐版权所有者向科技公司寻求法律补救的更广泛模式的一部分。这些案例围绕着在训练生成性人工智能算法的过程中对其材料的假定无约束使用。

在一个无关的案件中,其他作者作为单独的团体起诉了OpenAI和Meta Platforms,指控他们在构建自己的人工智能聊天机器人时滥用了受版权保护的作品。这些案例表明,随着越来越多的创作者和所有者希望在数字时代保护他们的知识产权,人工智能公司的活动和数据使用实践正受到越来越多的关注。

Anthropic得到了亚马逊、谷歌和前加密货币亿万富翁Sam Bankman Fried等主要金融支持者的支持,现在将不得不应对其第二起重大诉讼。这是在去年音乐出版商提交的文件之后,他们指控他们在训练同一个人工智能系统克劳德时使用了受版权保护的歌词。

作者推动人工智能公司承担法律责任

最新诉讼的作者声称,除了侵犯他们的权利外,Anthropic还通过使用他们的作品获得了巨额利润。他们表示,克劳德已经通过使用盗版书籍作为培训数据,以牺牲创作者的利益为代价,发展成为一家价值数十亿美元的企业。该诉讼要求未指明的金钱赔偿,并寻求对Anthropic的禁令,永久禁止其在未经适当同意的情况下继续使用作者的作品。

截至周二,Anthropic尚未公开回应这起诉讼。此外,代表作者的律师没有就此案发表任何补充意见。事实上,人工智能公司如何出于培训目的处理受版权保护的作品,可能取决于这一诉讼结果,这将塑造人工智能的发展和未来的知识产权格局。

Leituras Relacionadas

muShanghai Discusses Consumer AI: After Continuous Iteration of Large Models, Product Competition Moves Towards Scenarios and Experience

The roundtable discussion "Innovative Practices and Path Exploration of the AI Consumption Ecosystem" at muShanghai AI Week, featuring experts from model platforms, cultural apps, the open-source ecosystem, and music creation, delved into the practical paths for consumer AI products. A key consensus emerged: while AI model advancements lower prototyping barriers, the real challenge for enduring products lies beyond raw technology. True differentiation comes from deep scene understanding, data organization, user education, delivering emotional value, and building open ecosystems. The competition is shifting from "who has the stronger model" to "who best understands the specific user and scenario." Participants highlighted that application-layer barriers, such as accumulated contextual data and cultural localization (e.g., FateTell's translation of Eastern metaphysics for global users), are not easily erased by model updates. They cautioned that AI simplifies prototyping but not the core entrepreneurial hurdles: user acquisition, community building, and commercialization. The discussion emphasized that value must return to human needs—like emotional comfort (FateTell) or preserving the creative *process* in music-making, as highlighted by musician-developer Gao Jiafeng, rather than just outputting a final product. With the rise of AI Agents, user education is evolving from manual documentation reading to more guided, interactive learning within the product experience itself. Looking ahead 3-5 years, panelists foresee AI moving into the physical world via hardware and robotics, enabling more personalized services and addressing growing needs for companionship amidst technological anxiety. The future points towards "technology democratization," where AI assists diverse lifestyles, and cultural forms may be recombined, with emotional connection becoming paramount. Ultimately, as models continue to evolve, the products that endure will be those that meet genuine human needs, foster understanding, and build meaningful connections.

marsbitHá 1h

muShanghai Discusses Consumer AI: After Continuous Iteration of Large Models, Product Competition Moves Towards Scenarios and Experience

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片