玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-12-26Última atualização em 2023-12-26

Resumo

比特币生态中的「技术清真派」Atomicals 社区,有哪些「天体物理学」资产可以埋伏?

原文作者:Jaleel、Luccy,BlockBeats

在探索比特币生态这个宏大而神秘的数字领域时,Ordinals 和 Atomicals 以截然不同的方式塑造和维系着这个生态的新进展。

Atomicals 主要是关注于在比特币网络上创建和管理复杂的代币系统,而 Ordinals 则专注于在比特币区块链上创建和交易唯一的 NFTs 和数据。它们各自在比特币生态系统中发挥着不同的作用。

随着之后 Atomicals Indexer 1.3.6 版本的发布,ARC 20 代币将可以实现通过拆分以更小的单位进行交易,UniSat 团队宣布从今天开始支持 ARC 20 , 12 月 28 日开放 ARC 20 资产交易, 12 月 30 日为 ARC 20 资产提供服务。这不仅仅是比特币数字领域的新篇章,也预示着像 OKX 和 Binance 这样的大型交易平台或将也很快加入这场盛宴,开始支持 ARC 20 资产。

Atomicals Protocol 是一种简单灵活的协议,它可以被用来在类似 Bitcoin 的基于 UTxO 模型的区块链上实现数字对象(Digital Objects)的铸造、转移和更新。一个 Atomical 是一种整合数字对象的创建、传输和更新的方式——它本质上是根据一些简单规则定义的数字所有权链。Atomicals 的理念是: No transaction history,not your digital object(没有交易历史,就不是你的数字对象)。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

为了帮助更多用户快速入手 Atomicals,律动 BlockBeats 在本文中,整理了 Atomicals 生态中常见的几种资产和工具。

工具箱

1. Wizz Wallet(前 ATOM Wallet)钱包

2. 铸造代打平台

3. 官方域名查询

4. ATOM 铭文浏览器

5. Atomical Market 交易市场

6. Wizz Cash 钱包仪表板、资产转账工具看板

7. mempool 比特币链上出块查询

8. Atomicals 与 Ordinals 数据对比

9. Atomicals 数据

ARC 20 

BRC 20 的代币铭文多以动物园元素为主,而 Atomicals 的代币则更像它的名字,探索宇宙和天体物理学的神秘。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

目前,Atomicals 的代码仓库在 github 月趋势榜中排名第六。进入 Atomicals 的社区群聊,扑面而来的也是部署比特币全节点,部署环境,代码分享的技术文化性,坐满了许多科学家,如果有人说 Ordinals 像 BAYC,那从这个角度而言,Atomicals 则更像 Punk。

Atom

不同于 Cosmos 项目所发行的代币 Atom,Atomicals 的首个生态代币$Atom 总量 21000 张,每张 1000 个币。距今,Atom 也成为了比特币生态中不可多得的万倍币。目前 Atomicals 的大部分流动性和交易量仍集中在 ATOM。

据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,Atom 价格为 14.5 美元,市值超 2.8 亿美元, 24 小时交易量超 171 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

AVM 虚拟机

AVM,总供应量 2100 万枚代币,在电子中子等代币出现之前的很长一段时间都扮演着龙二的地位,不过如今的市值已经被超过了。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,AVM 价格为 0.284 美元,市值超 570 万美元, 24 小时交易量超 71 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

Electron 电子

Electron 挖矿难度 7 ,是 11 月 19 日创建的 ARC 20 代币,总供应量 18400 张,每张 54600 枚代币。据官方推文消息,Electron 挖矿耗时长达半个月。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,Electron 价格为 0.008 美元,市值超 760 万美元, 24 小时交易量超 11 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

Neutron 中子

Neutron 挖矿难度 8 ,总供应量为 21000 张,每张 10 万枚代币。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,Neutron 价格为 0.002 美元,市值超 390 万美元, 24 小时交易量超 30 万美元。

Neutron 的特点是「赋能比特币」(Empowered Bitcoin),即建立在传统比特币的基础技术之上,同时引入了增强的特性和功能。这一概念集成了先进的协议和创新机制,创建了一种更加通用和高效的加密货币形式。Neutron Protocol 团队使用 nSequence 字段来增加随机数,使 ARC 20 代码优化的挖掘速度提高了 10 倍。

此外,赋能比特币注重挖矿过程的包容性和公平性。它采用了改进的工作量证明(PoW)算法,不仅可以确保交易的安全性和完整性,还可以使更广泛的参与者更容易进行挖矿,从而摆脱大规模挖矿业务的主导地位。这种方法使采矿过程民主化,允许在社区内更公平地分配奖励和机会。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

QUARK 夸克

QUARK 挖矿难度 6 ,目前仍在铸造中。

总供应量为 50 万张,每张 2 万个币。目前,打一张成本约为 25 u 左右。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,QUARK 价格为 0.001 美元,市值超 34 万美元, 24 小时交易量超 4.3 万美元。

与 SATS 类似,sats 是 bitcoin 的最小单位,而 quark 是构成物质的基本单位,因此 QUARK 在一定程度上具有 meme 属性。从参与度角度看,一方面 QUARK 总量 50 万,需长时间才能挖完,可以让很多人都参与进来,凝聚一定的共识。另一方面,QUARK 挖矿难度相较于 Electron 和 Neutron 来说较为简单,再配合上最近的多线程优化,让大多数人都有机会体验到挖矿的快感。

此外,QUARK 的初始市值高、持币地址多、基础共识强,因此有社区成员认为 QUARK 有望成为 Atomicals 生态中能出圈的 meme 币。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

Quantum 量子

Quantum 挖矿难度 9 ,总供应量为 2.2932 亿枚代币。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,Quantum 价格为 0.001 美元,市值超 11 万美元, 24 小时交易量超 3.7 万美元。

目前,Quantum 正在 Atomic 中开放 Dmint,其中 0000-9000 号为免费, 9001-9999 需要阅读详细的教程并支付 1000 sat。但考虑到 Quantum 挖矿难度极高,二级市场是个不错的选择。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

Realm 领域

官推:@realmname

目前,Atomicals 中也有一个以「$realm」为同名的代币,不过这并不是真正的 Realm。

那么,什么是「领域」(Realm Name)呢?简单来说,它就像是你在网络上的独一无二的标签或地址。通常我们在网上看到的域名,比如「.com」或「.org」,都是后缀。但在 Realm 的世界里,每个人注册的都是前缀的文本,并且拥有给所有后缀定价的权力。

现在,想象一下你拥有了一个 Realm,比如「+abc」。在 Atomicals 的世界里,这不仅仅是一个名字,它是一扇大门,通往无限的可能性。你可以用它建立社区、组织,甚至整个比特币生态系统中的团体。它可以应用于游戏、社交、土地、勋章等方面。

具体点说,Realm 可以用作收款地址(就像是你的个性支付名),也可以用来建立社区、做身份验证、创建社交档案、标记特权,甚至分发资产。它就像是一个身份和数字资产的综合体,没有传统域名的限制,开头是一个加号,比如「+username」。

所以当你拥有一个 Realm,你不仅拥有了所有子领域的定价权,还能变成一种「注册局」,让别人来注册子领域,从而赚取注册费。这是一种全新的东西,完全颠覆了我们对传统域名的理解,它甚至可以成为对整个 DNS 系统的一种替代方案。

总之 Realm 不仅仅是一个域名,它是网络世界的一扇门和钥匙,连接着各种社区、组织和团体,为整个比特币生态系统带来了全新的拓展和应用。

目前,Realm 领域中纯字母的共识性最好,其次是数字,其中又以 2 位数和 3 位数的最为珍贵。有数字和字母混合的被社区称为「 3 杂」,据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,「 3 杂」地板为 25 U 上下;3 纯字母的在 200 U 左右;2 杂的在 2000 u 左右。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

NFT

Atomicals 的 NFT 铸造方法叫做 Dmint。这个方法很有意思,它在设计上大量借鉴了比特币的 POW(工作量证明)挖矿方式,名字叫 Bitwork。这个更新在比特币社区引起了不小的轰动,使得有很多人下载并安装了相关的环境,以至于 Atomicals 的 GitHub 代码库一度成为了热门话题,排名总榜市场靠前。

那么,Dmint 到底是什么,为什么它这么受关注呢?

简单来说,Atomicals 不仅能像 BRC 20 那样发行 Token(代币),还能制作所有数据都存储在比特币(BTC)区块链上的 NFT。而且,它的做法和 Ordinals 不一样。

Dmint 这种 NFT 铸造方法被认为是更公平、更去中心化的。当 NFT 的创造者想要发行一系列的 NFT 时,他们需要给每一张图片编号(比如从 0000 到 9999),然后 Atomicals 协议会计算每张图片文件的哈希值,并为每张图片生成一个单独的 json 文件。

接下来,这个协议会用这些图片的哈希值,通过所谓的默克尔树计算出一个证明。这个证明可以用来验证这个系列中的任何一张 NFT。

NFT 的部署者会把这个证明,连同 NFT 的名称、描述、Logo、挖矿难度等信息一起,写入一个交易并发送到比特币网络上,完成这个系列的注册。

这样,部署者在注册过程中只需要发送 NFT 图片的证明,而不是每一张图片本身。就算一次性部署 1000 万张 NFT,也不会花费太多的 sats(比特币的最小单位)。

然后,NFT 项目方会公开每张 NFT 的图片和 json 文件。用户挑选喜欢的 NFT 后,自己发送比特币交易,将图片数据和 json 文件记录在比特币区块链上,完成单张 NFT 的铸造(也就是认领)。

这些 NFT 图片的哈希值可以和注册交易中的默克尔树证明相互验证,这样就完成了整个 NFT 系列的发行和铸造过程。

11 月 31 日,鳄鱼(atomtoothy)、水豚(AtomCapybaras)和科学家(SCIENTISTS)这三个项目是第一批开始 Dimnt 的 NFT 项目,但因为科学家的总量更少,成本更高,水豚的共识度没有鳄鱼高。

因此过了快一个月,目前小鳄鱼 TOOTHY 成了 Atomicals 名副其实的龙头 NFT。

小鳄鱼 TOOTHY

TOOTHY 总量一万个,最高曾涨到 2000 U,小鳄鱼也被戏称为「金融巨鳄」。据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,TOOTHY 价格为 1580 美元, 24 小时交易量超 9.7 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

科学家 SCIENTISTS

科学家 SCIENTISTS 总量 400 ,据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,SCIENTISTS 价格为 1046 美元, 24 小时交易量超 0.11 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

鱼脸男 FISHFACEMAN

FISHFACEMAN 是 12 月 23 日开启 Dmint 的 NFT 项目,总量一万个,铸造的 GAS 成本价约为 50 U,在上线 Atomical Market 交易市场后,最高涨至 300 U,是目前的龙二项目。

据 Atomical Market 数据,截至撰稿时,FISHFACEMAN 价格为 221 美元, 24 小时交易量超 10 万美元。

玩转Atomicals生态:常见资产和工具一览

参考资料: 

  1. Atomicals Guidebook

  2. 白皮书

Leituras Relacionadas

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbitHá 2m

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbitHá 2m

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

After only a few days of the World Cup, AI models are being widely used for match predictions, with mixed early results. These models analyze details like scores, upsets, red cards, and key players, offering users in prediction markets an extra layer of analysis beyond odds and news. Qwen gained early attention for its remarkably accurate calls on the opening day, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa and Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic, while also highlighting red card risks and match flow. Copilot had its own highlights, accurately forecasting the Mexico 2-0 result, the Korea 2-1 win, and a surprising 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco. However, it also misjudged several matches, like predicting a Swiss win that ended in a draw with Qatar and missing Australia's upset over Turkey. ChatGPT provided detailed pre-match analysis and correctly called the Mexico 2-0 score, explaining factors like home-field advantage. Yet, it struggled to anticipate upsets, often siding with the stronger team on paper, as seen in its missed calls for the Australia-Turkey and Japan-Netherlands matches. Social media tests pitted models like Gemini, Grok, and Claude against each other for the same games, revealing different predictive "scripts" even for the same fixture. Overall, while AI models like Qwen and Copilot have shown promising, high-profile successes in early matches, their consistency and ability to predict genuine upsets remain in question. As the tournament progresses, more data will be needed to determine which models offer the most reliable insights for prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报Há 6m

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

Odaily星球日报Há 6m

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

Following a major fundraising round involving several prominent investment institutions, DaXiao Robotics, a company backed by SenseTime, has secured hundreds of millions of US dollars in financing for the first half of 2026. This move signals SenseTime's renewed and substantial bet on "Physical AI" through embodied intelligence, following the relative underperformance of its autonomous driving unit, Jueying. While Jueying achieved mass production partnerships in the smart vehicle sector, it failed to become a pivotal player in the high-level autonomous driving landscape, leading to its gradual independence from SenseTime's core financials. DaXiao Robotics now emerges as SenseTime's next major venture into the physical world. The new funding will focus on developing a "world model" and integrated hardware-software solutions for commercial applications like retail, security, and hospitality. This ambition is significantly more complex and capital-intensive than previous projects. A world model requires understanding spatial relationships, physics, and causality to guide robots in long-term tasks, demanding immense computational resources, data, and engineering. The article highlights several challenges. First, the massive funding, while substantial, may still be strained by the high costs of R&D, data collection, and commercial deployment. Second, SenseTime itself, despite narrowing losses, continues its high-investment growth model and cannot solely bankroll this new, expensive endeavor. Third, DaXiao Robotics, led by SenseTime co-founder Wang Xiaogang, carries the technical heritage and resources of its parent company but also potentially its organizational inertia. It operates in a field increasingly dominated by agile, young technical founders. Ultimately, DaXiao Robotics represents SenseTime's attempt to secure a leading industrial position in embodied intelligence—a goal its Jueying unit did not fully achieve in autonomous driving. The new venture starts with strong capital backing, but faces the critical task of rapidly transitioning from technological narrative to sustainable commercial delivery in an early-stage, costly, and highly competitive arena.

marsbitHá 15m

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

marsbitHá 15m

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight NewsHá 23m

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight NewsHá 23m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片