Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-12-26Última atualização em 2023-12-26

Resumo

打新获得份额仍是一个不错的赚钱机会。

原创 | Odaily星球日报

作者 | Asher

编辑 | 秦晓峰

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

最近,由于整体行情上行,头部 Launchpad 平台项目打新表现突出,获得了较高的关注度。哪家  Launchpad 平台的财富效应表现最为突出?

通过对项目情况、社交数据等多方面指标的综合考量,Odaily星球日报整理了一份涵盖近期热门 Launchpad 平台发布的项目表,如下所示:

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Bounce Brand(AUCTION)

项目简介

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Bounce Brand

Bounce Brand,原为 Bounce Finance,是一个去中心化的拍卖协议,使用户提供在多个区块链网络上创建和参与各种类型的拍卖。Bounce Finance 专注拍卖服务,具体包括代币与 NFT 拍卖、现实世界收藏品拍卖、广告空间拍卖、SDK 与插件。真正 AUCTION 热度爆火,是在推出其 Launchpad 项目 MUBI 之后,下面盘点 Bounce Brand 后续推出的一个热度超过的 Launchpad 项目。

官方推特:https://twitter.com/bounce_finance

Launchpad项目

1、MultiBit(MUBI)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

MultiBit

MultiBit 专为 BRC-20 和 ERC-20 代币之间轻松跨网络传输而设计。其主要目标是扩大这些代币的流动性和可访问性,增强跨链互操作性。由于当时 BRC-20 生态的火爆,MUBI 项目得到各大社区关注。

拍卖当天,在 ERC 20 进行的拍卖部分,在拍卖开始不到一分钟时间就完成了 88 ETH 的筹款目标。在 BRC-20 进行的拍卖部分,在拍卖开始后 30 分钟内完成,共募集了 4.64 BTC。并且,当日最高涨幅超过 2000% , 24 小时交易量达到 1500 万美元。目前,MUBI 已超过 2.1 亿美元(如下图)。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

coingecko

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Multibit_Bridge

2、BitStable(BSSB)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

BitStable

BitStable 协议是一个去中心化平台,任何地方的任何人都可以通过比特币生态系统抵押资产生成 DAII 稳定币,对于 DAII,通过比特币生态代币超额抵押获得,支持代币由 BSSB Governance 决定,早期仅支持 ORDI 和 MUBI。

11 月 27 日,Bounce Finance 宣布与 BitStable 合作,在 Bounce Private Launchpad 上推出其治理代币 BSSB。BSSB 代币发行将分两部分进行——其中 60% 用于质押拍卖, 40% 用于固定价格拍卖,募资总额为 50 万美元,BSSB 代币一度上涨超过了 45 倍。据 coinmarketcap 显示,目前其市值约为 5500 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

coinmarketcap

官方推特:https://twitter.com/bssbstable

3、Bdid(BDID)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Bdid

GoDID 是去中心化身份 (DID) 的市场聚合器,其核心功能是 DID 的批量搜索、注册、交易和管理。目前为 ENS、Space ID 和比特币 Ordinals DID 提供服务。它提供了用户友好且具成本效益的 ENS 平台,其具有多种功能,包括使用 OpenSea 的 Seaport 合同构建的 ENS 模块等。

BDID 是 GoDlD 的原生代币,总供应量为 5 亿枚,其中 80% 用于公平启动和用户增长,团队持有 5% (6 个月锁定, 12 个月线性解锁),空投挖矿占 5% ,流动性占 10% 。GoDlD 在 12.15 至 12.17 在 Bounce 完成 IDO,目前 BDID 价格为 0.018 美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

dexscreener

官方推特:https://twitter.com/godid_io

4、BitSwap&Ladder(AMMX)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

AMMX

Bounce Brand 上第四个 Launchpad 项目,又为”一石二鸟“发射,推出该消息后,AUCTION 应声上涨 50% 。 该项目是由 BitSwap 与 Ladder 联合推出,代币为 AMMX。BitSwap 协议是 BRC-20 和比特币生态系统的跨链交换协议,为跨不同区块链的 BRC-20 资产提供无缝交易体验;Ladder 是一种去中心化自动做市商 (AMM) 协议,为 NFT 提供即时流动性,支持多种标准以及桥接的 BRC-20 代币。

关于 AMMX 参与情况,共三个池子可参与。其中,AUCTION 质押池目前已经超额认购, 1430 地址共质押 2, 380, 230 个 AUCTION(如下图);DAII 质押池也超额认购, 187 个地址质押 72, 243, 600 DAII;MUBI 随机抽奖池中 20000 张门票已全部售完。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

AUCTION 质押池

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Ladder_NFT

https://twitter.com/Bitswap_BTC

BakerySwap(Bake)

项目简介

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

BakerySwap

BakerySwap 是 BNB Chain 一个老牌的 AMM 与 NFT 交易所,成立 2020 年,并于 2021 年 4 月获得了“币安 1 亿美元种子基金”投资。BitcoinCats IDO 完成了 150 倍的超额认购,让 BakerySwap 在比特币生态上的布局迎来开门红。

官方推特:https://twitter.com/bakery_swap

Launchpad项目

1、Bitcoin Cats (1CAT)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Bitcoin Cats

BitcoinCats 是比特币生态系统的 GameFi 平台。通过将比特币资产(BRC 20、Ordinals NFT 等)映射到以太坊(和其他 Layer 2)网络,BitcoinCats 为比特币资产带来了许多新元素,包括 Play 2 Earn、Stake、Farmland、SocialFi 等。

12 月 19 日,Bitcoin Cats 的 Launchpad 发售共有 37, 383 枚 ETH、 7300 万枚 BAKE 参与,参与代币总价值达 1.06 亿美元。 此次 Launchpad 超额认购 150 倍,超出部分将在 12 小时内退款。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Launchpad 募集情况

官方推特:https://twitter.com/BitcoinCats1Cat

2、Bitland (BLLB)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Bitland

BitLand 是基于比特币生态系统的 3D 元宇宙项目。BitLand 目标是营造一个优先考虑用户社交、游戏体验的环境,并允许用户在元宇宙中使用其比特币资产(BRC-20、Ordinals NFT 等)。通过桥接 ERC-20 和 BRC-20 之间的资产,Bitland 将为比特币生态系统带来许多新用户,并缩小比特币生态系统和 EVM 生态系统之间的壁垒。

关于 Launchpad 发售规则如下:

BLLB 的发行价格为: 1 ETH = 4160 万 BLLB;

参与代币:$BAKE(BSC)、 1 CATEthereum);

参与上限: 10 ETH 对应等值 BAKE (BSC)或 1 CAT (Ethereum);

发售时间:UTC 时间 12 月 28 日上午 8 点。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

BitLand Launchpad

官方推特:https://twitter.com/bakery_swap

Analysoor

项目简介

Analysoor 是 Solana 上铭文跨链协议,旨在解决 meme 和 NFT 的公平发布和流动性引导问题,其中首个项目 ZERO 采取独特的抽奖中签玩法(9.5% 的中签率),使用 SOL 作为抽奖代币,吸引大量的关注,而 Analysoor 第二个项目 ONE 也已通过抽奖机制完成铸造。

官方推特:https://twitter.com/analysoor

发行项目

1、第一个代币:ZERO;第一个 NFT:ONE

相关内容,可查看之前的文章:https://www.odaily.news/post/5191766

2、第一个 Memem 代币:WHEN

由于某些原因,WHEN 项目推迟了 Mint 时间,今天官方在推特中确认最终的 Mint 时间并确认不会再次改变,细则如下:

Mint 时间: 2023.12.26 晚上 10 点(北京时间);

发售方式:公平发售、抽奖,每次抽奖花费 0.05 SOL + 1 ZERO(未中奖的资金用于提供流动性);

Mint 持续时长:超过一小时。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

WHEN

TurtSat(TURT)

项目简介

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

TurtSat

TurtSat 同 Bounce Brand 扮演的角色很相似,是一个新诞生的 Launchpad 平台,目标是成为 Ordinals 世界的 Gitcoin,任何人都可以通过 Turtsat 构建、捐赠 Ordinals 生态协议,参与到 Ordinals 的生态建设并从中获益。

上线至今,TurtSat 平台已经累计发射了多个项目(如下图),这些项目都是早期的 BRC 20 基础设施建设平台,且在项目发射后都有不错表现。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

TurtSat 已发行项目

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Turtsat

Launchpad项目

1、MultiChain FOOX(FOOX)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

MultiChain FOOX

MultiChain FOOX 是一个基于 BRC 20 标准的多链 meme 项目,以一只可爱的狐狸为吉祥物。该项目旨在通过将多链技术与独特的概念相结合,为用户提供充满活力和娱乐性的加密体验。

关于发售,其 FOOX 的单价为 11 Sats,每张票的价格为 110, 000  Sats (约合 50 美元)。其最高价格达到 315 Sats,目前为 96 Sats,当前市值约为 880 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/foox_brc20

2、ZOOPIA(ZOOA)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

ZOOPIA

Zooopia 是一个致力于比特币生态系统质押的创新平台,为加密货币持有者提供安全、高效、有吸引力的质押服务。其愿景是创建一个充满活力的数字动物园,用户可以在其中质押他们的 BRC-20 代币,在参与自动复利过程的同时获得稳定而丰厚的回报。

关于发售,其 ZOOA 的单价为 0.7 Sats,每张票的价格为 86, 800 Sats (约合 37 美元)。其最高价格达到 89 Sats,目前为 78 Sats,当前市值约为 3400 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Zoopia_Staking

3、Svarga(SVGA)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Svarga

Svarga 目标是重塑比特币网络上的 NFT 世界。将传统的 PFP NFT 转变为动态的、交互式的 Avatar 资产,解锁 NFT 传奇中的新叙事。

关于发售,其 SVGA 的单价为 7.4 Sats,每张票的价格为 518, 000 Sats (约合 210 美元)。其最高价格达到 183 Sats,目前为 91 Sats,当前市值约为 400 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Svarga_cc

4、Rabbit(RAIT)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

Rabbit

Rabbit 是一个比特币生态系统游戏平台,致力于为用户提供安全、可扩展且卓越的在线游戏体验。其目标是打造一个植根于社区和所有权的娱乐天堂,鼓励用户积极参与并享受游戏的乐趣。

关于发售,其 RAIT 的单价为 0.23 Sats,每张票的价格为 115, 000 Sats (约合 50 美元)。其最高价格达到 28 Sats,目前为 10 Sats,当前市值约为 4270 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/Rait_io

5、Dova Liquidity Protocol(DOVA)

Dova 协议集成了 MultiBit 桥,使用户能够通过 MultiBit 跨链桥无缝地跨链转移 BRC-20 代币。用户可以利用以太坊网络上的 Dova 协议,使用转移的 BRC-20 代币进行抵押贷款。

关于发售,其 DOVA 的单价为 0.27 Sats,每张票的价格为 135, 000 Sats (约合 50 美元)。其最高价格达到 115 Sats,目前为 57.4 Sats,当前市值约为 5250 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/dova_protocol

6、NXHUB(NHUB)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

NXHUB

NxHub 是一个基于 Ordinals 的聚合市场。通过采集 UniSat、OKX、MagicEden、OrdinalsWallet 等平台的挂单数据并聚合展示,用户可以批量购买 BRC-20 代币和 NFT,实现多平台挂单。

关于发售,其 NHUB 为 Free Launch。其最高价格达到 115 Sats,目前为 57.4 Sats,当前市值约为 300 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/NxHub_io

7、CHAX Bitcoin(CHAX)

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

CHAX Bitcoin

Chamcha 是可编程流动性的 Ordinals 资产构建者和提供商。它通过支持智能铭文改变了进入机制,使任何人都可以更轻松地参与 Ordinals 生态系统。

关于发售,其 CHAX 的单价为 0.00045 美元,每张票的价格为 50 美元。其最高价格达到 115 Sats,目前为 29.8 Sats,当前市值约为 2720 万美元。

Launchpad平台造富效应哪家强?

图源:OK WEB3 交易市场

官方推特:https://twitter.com/0x Chamcha

综述

从以上分析来看,头部 Launchpad 平台发布的项目只要获得份额,一定会有不错的收益率。其中,TurtSat 由于发布的项目与比特币铭文板块更为紧密,收益率惊人。目前,Launchpad 板块的热度持续走高,打新获得份额仍是一个不错的赚钱机会。

Leituras Relacionadas

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbitMesmo agora

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbitMesmo agora

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

After only a few days of the World Cup, AI models are being widely used for match predictions, with mixed early results. These models analyze details like scores, upsets, red cards, and key players, offering users in prediction markets an extra layer of analysis beyond odds and news. Qwen gained early attention for its remarkably accurate calls on the opening day, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa and Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic, while also highlighting red card risks and match flow. Copilot had its own highlights, accurately forecasting the Mexico 2-0 result, the Korea 2-1 win, and a surprising 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco. However, it also misjudged several matches, like predicting a Swiss win that ended in a draw with Qatar and missing Australia's upset over Turkey. ChatGPT provided detailed pre-match analysis and correctly called the Mexico 2-0 score, explaining factors like home-field advantage. Yet, it struggled to anticipate upsets, often siding with the stronger team on paper, as seen in its missed calls for the Australia-Turkey and Japan-Netherlands matches. Social media tests pitted models like Gemini, Grok, and Claude against each other for the same games, revealing different predictive "scripts" even for the same fixture. Overall, while AI models like Qwen and Copilot have shown promising, high-profile successes in early matches, their consistency and ability to predict genuine upsets remain in question. As the tournament progresses, more data will be needed to determine which models offer the most reliable insights for prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报Há 5m

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

Odaily星球日报Há 5m

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

Following a major fundraising round involving several prominent investment institutions, DaXiao Robotics, a company backed by SenseTime, has secured hundreds of millions of US dollars in financing for the first half of 2026. This move signals SenseTime's renewed and substantial bet on "Physical AI" through embodied intelligence, following the relative underperformance of its autonomous driving unit, Jueying. While Jueying achieved mass production partnerships in the smart vehicle sector, it failed to become a pivotal player in the high-level autonomous driving landscape, leading to its gradual independence from SenseTime's core financials. DaXiao Robotics now emerges as SenseTime's next major venture into the physical world. The new funding will focus on developing a "world model" and integrated hardware-software solutions for commercial applications like retail, security, and hospitality. This ambition is significantly more complex and capital-intensive than previous projects. A world model requires understanding spatial relationships, physics, and causality to guide robots in long-term tasks, demanding immense computational resources, data, and engineering. The article highlights several challenges. First, the massive funding, while substantial, may still be strained by the high costs of R&D, data collection, and commercial deployment. Second, SenseTime itself, despite narrowing losses, continues its high-investment growth model and cannot solely bankroll this new, expensive endeavor. Third, DaXiao Robotics, led by SenseTime co-founder Wang Xiaogang, carries the technical heritage and resources of its parent company but also potentially its organizational inertia. It operates in a field increasingly dominated by agile, young technical founders. Ultimately, DaXiao Robotics represents SenseTime's attempt to secure a leading industrial position in embodied intelligence—a goal its Jueying unit did not fully achieve in autonomous driving. The new venture starts with strong capital backing, but faces the critical task of rapidly transitioning from technological narrative to sustainable commercial delivery in an early-stage, costly, and highly competitive arena.

marsbitHá 14m

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

marsbitHá 14m

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight NewsHá 22m

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight NewsHá 22m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片