Crypto Regulation: Polish Parliament Fails To Overturn Presidential Veto Again

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-04-19Last updated on 2026-04-19

Abstract

Poland's Parliament has again failed to override President Karol Narcowski's veto of the Crypto Asset Market Act, which aimed to align national regulations with the EU's MICA framework. The vote fell short of the required majority, marking the second unsuccessful attempt to pass the legislation. The President has consistently opposed the bill, citing overregulation, ambiguity, and increased burdens on small businesses. Government ministers criticized the veto, with the Finance Minister warning that the lack of regulation fosters a risky environment for investors. Prime Minister Donald Tusk also accused Poland's largest crypto exchange, Zondacrypto, of having alleged ties to Russian intelligence and funding opposition politicians, linking these concerns to the legislative push. The government has vowed to continue its efforts to pass the bill.

Once again, Poland’s Parliament has failed to override the presidential veto of a controversial piece of cryptocurrency legislation, deepening tensions between the country’s legislative branch and its head of state.

Polish Lawmakers Face Consecutive Defeat Against Nawrocki Over Crypto Bill

According to a local media outlet, TVP World, members of the lower house of the Polish Parliament, i.e., Sejm, failed to reach the required third-fifth majority to overturn a second presidential veto of the Crypto Asset Market Act. President Karol Narcowski initially vetoed the cryptocurrency regulation bill in December 2025, citing overregulation, ambiguity, and an increased regulatory burden on small businesses.

The Polish lawmakers, led by Prime Minister Donald Tusk, failed to override this first veto, which would have aligned Poland’s digital asset regulations with the general European Union’s MICA regulations. In February, the same measure was passed again and vetoed by President Narcowski, citing the same reasons as before.

In an attempt to bypass the President’s assent, the lawmakers held a vote on Friday, with 191 members of parliament voting in favor of the veto and 243 dissenting. Ultimately, this result fell short of the constitutionally required 263 votes to override the President’s veto in Poland. According to Narcowski in December, the proposed digital asset regulation “threatens the freedom of Poles, their property, and the stability of the state.”

Polish Ministers React To Foiled Override Attempt

Following Friday’s botched efforts to pass the Crypto Asset Market Act, several members of the Polish Parliament have responded in various ways.

Finance Minister Andrzej Domański strongly criticized President Narcowski’s veto, stating that the absence of updated regulations compromised the integrity of the Polish digital asset market. Domanski described the present environment as an environment of fraudsters that threatens the protection of investors and entrepreneurs.

Another interesting aspect of this regulation is Prime Minister Tusk’s recent allegations against Poland’s largest exchange, Zondacrypto, which has also lobbied against the Crypto Asset Market Act. Prime Minister Tusk claimed that Zondacrypto was established by Russia mafia, and resources linked to the Russian intelligence agencies.

Considering these funding sources, Tusk questions the exchange’s involvement in Polish politics, citing reports from security agencies that the company’s CEO, Przemysław Kral, has donated to opposition candidates.

Interior Minister Marcin Kierwiński linked the push for the Crypto Asset Market Act to this government concern, stating:

The plan is to keep addressing this until we succeed, until the awareness of the threats and these strange interests connecting certain right-wing politicians with this [cryptocurrency] exchange finally reaches the president.

Total crypto market cap valued at $2.52 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason given by President Karol Narcowski for vetoing the Crypto Asset Market Act in December 2025?

APresident Karol Narcowski cited overregulation, ambiguity, and an increased regulatory burden on small businesses as the main reasons for vetoing the Crypto Asset Market Act.

QHow many votes were required to override the presidential veto in Poland's Parliament, and did they succeed?

A263 votes were constitutionally required to override the presidential veto, but the attempt failed with 191 votes in favor and 243 dissenting, falling short of the required majority.

QWhat did Finance Minister Andrzej Domański claim about the current state of the Polish digital asset market due to the lack of updated regulations?

AFinance Minister Andrzej Domański stated that the absence of updated regulations compromises the integrity of the Polish digital asset market, creating an environment of fraudsters that threatens investor and entrepreneur protection.

QWhat allegation did Prime Minister Donald Tusk make against Zondacrypto, Poland's largest cryptocurrency exchange?

APrime Minister Donald Tusk alleged that Zondacrypto was established by the Russian mafia and resources linked to Russian intelligence agencies, and questioned its involvement in Polish politics through donations to opposition candidates.

QWhat was the goal of the Crypto Asset Market Act in relation to European Union regulations?

AThe Crypto Asset Market Act aimed to align Poland's digital asset regulations with the European Union's MICA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) regulations.

Related Reads

An Open-Source AI Tool That No One Saw Predicted Kelp DAO's $292 Million Vulnerability 12 Days Ago

An open-source AI security tool flagged critical risks in Kelp DAO’s cross-chain architecture 12 days before a $292 million exploit on April 18, 2026—the largest DeFi incident of the year. The vulnerability was not in the smart contracts but in the configuration of LayerZero’s cross-chain bridge: a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN) setup allowed an attacker to forge cross-chain messages with a single compromised node. The tool, which performs AI-assisted architectural risk assessments using public data, identified several unremediated risks, including opaque DVN configuration, single-point-of-failure across 16 chains, unverified cross-chain governance controls, and similarities to historical bridge attacks like Ronin and Harmony. It also noted the absence of an insurance pool, which amplified losses as Aave and other protocols absorbed nearly $300M in bad debt. The attack unfolded over 46 minutes: the attacker minted 116,500 rsETH on Ethereum via a fraudulent message, used it as collateral to borrow WETH on lending platforms, and laundered funds through Tornado Cash. While an emergency pause prevented two subsequent attacks worth ~$200M, the damage was severe. The tool’s report, committed to GitHub on April 6, scored Kelp DAO a medium-risk 72/100—later acknowledged as too lenient. It failed to query on-chain DVN configurations or initiate private disclosure, highlighting gaps in current DeFi security approaches that focus on code audits but miss config-level and governance risks. The incident underscores the need for independent, AI-powered risk assessment tools that evaluate protocol architecture, not just code.

marsbit17m ago

An Open-Source AI Tool That No One Saw Predicted Kelp DAO's $292 Million Vulnerability 12 Days Ago

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片