XRP’s rise trapped by overhead supply – Can price regain strength?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

XRP is currently trading near $1.30, facing persistent resistance due to significant overhead supply concentrated between $1.90 and $2.20. This selling pressure stems from short-term holders who entered during the 2024–2025 rally and now approach breakeven levels, prompting reactive selling. Daily realized losses have ranged between $20 million and $110 million, reflecting ongoing distribution rather than strategic repositioning. Approximately 56% of XRP’s supply remains underwater, with 69% held in wallets under one year old—36.9% of which are in the 6–12 month cohort. These holders are highly responsive to price movements, causing repeated stalling near the $1.43 realized price level. While demand at lower prices has prevented deeper declines, the market is undergoing a slow rotation where weaker hands exit and stronger accumulators gradually absorb supply. This dynamic extends XRP’s bottom formation process, capping near-term recovery but potentially building a more stable foundation over time.

XRP currently holds near $1.3, reflecting sustained weakness after failing to reclaim levels above $2. However, the pressure runs deeper than price alone, as positioning imbalances continue to unwind.

During the 2025 rally toward $3.66, heavy retail inflows expanded short-term holder exposure, which now drives reactive selling. As prices declined from late 2024, realized losses accelerated, consistently ranging between $20 million and $110 million per day.

Source: Glassnode

These losses clustered within newer cohorts, showing forced exits rather than strategic rotation. Meanwhile, XRP remained below the $1.43 realized level, keeping roughly 56% of its supply underwater.

As this overhang persists, recovery faces resistance, although gradual absorption could stabilize the structure over time.

XRP’s cost-basis overhang caps recovery

This persistent imbalance becomes clearer when viewed through cost-basis positioning, which shows where that pressure is actually coming from.

As XRP’s price dropped from above $2.5 toward the $1.2–$1.3 range, large supply clusters remained concentrated between $1.9 and $2.2.

Source: Glassnode

When price attempted to recover into this zone, holders from the 2024–2025 inflow period approached breakeven, which drove steady sell-side pressure.

Instead of a single capitulation, the February loss spike extended into continued distribution through March.

At the same time, some demand absorbs supply near lower levels, which prevents deeper breakdowns. This creates a slow rotation dynamic, where recovery stays capped, yet structure gradually strengthens as weaker hands exit.

Altcoin bottoms shift to slow absorption cycles

This resistance around cost-basis levels does more than cap XRP; it begins to redefine how altcoin bottoms take shape. While price holds below the $1.43 realized level, recovery attempts repeatedly stall near overhead supply.

Source: Glassnode

At the same time, about 69% of supply sits in wallets under one year, with 36.9% concentrated in the 6–12 month band. These cohorts remain sensitive to price swings, so each rally invites exit-driven selling as holders approach breakeven.

Source: Glassnode

Meanwhile, roughly 56% of XRP’s supply stays underwater, keeping pressure active but not extreme. This creates a slow rotation, where weak hands exit and stronger hands absorb.

As this unfolds, recoveries stretch out, although the same process gradually builds a more stable base.


Final Summary

  • $20–$110 million in daily realized losses and a 56% underwater supply sustain XRP’s sell pressure near the $1.43 cost basis.
  • Supply clusters at $1.9–$2.2 and 69% held short-term, extending bottom formation timelines.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main factor currently capping XRP's price recovery according to the article?

AThe main factor capping XRP's recovery is the persistent overhead supply, with large supply clusters concentrated between $1.9 and $2.2. When the price attempts to recover into this zone, holders from the 2024-2025 inflow period approach breakeven, which drives steady sell-side pressure.

QWhat percentage of XRP's supply is currently underwater, and what is the significance of this?

ARoughly 56% of XRP's supply is currently underwater (held at a loss). This sustains active selling pressure as these holders are more likely to sell when prices approach their breakeven levels, preventing a swift recovery.

QHow does the article describe the nature of the selling pressure from newer XRP holders?

AThe article describes the selling from newer cohorts as 'forced exits rather than strategic rotation,' indicated by the consistent daily realized losses ranging between $20 million and $110 million. This shows reactive, panic-driven selling rather than planned portfolio adjustments.

QWhat new dynamic is redefining how altcoin bottoms are formed, as mentioned in the article?

AThe article states that altcoin bottoms are shifting to 'slow absorption cycles.' This means recovery is capped by overhead supply and sell pressure near cost-basis levels, leading to extended bottom formation timelines where weak hands gradually exit and stronger hands absorb the supply, building a more stable base over time.

QWhat two key statistics from the 'Final Summary' highlight the extent of XRP's current challenges?

AThe two key statistics are: 1) $20–$110 million in daily realized losses, and 2) 56% of the supply being underwater. These factors sustain sell pressure near the $1.43 cost basis and prolong the bottom formation process.

Related Reads

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit51m ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit51m ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit1h ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit1h ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

In May 2026, Alipay announced over 300 million AI payment transactions. Shortly after, WeChat opened its mini-programs for AI integration, sparking controversy by requiring developer source code access. This highlights their diverging approaches to AI integration. Alipay is testing "Project Treasure," an optional AI-native interface replacing traditional app grids with a conversational window. Users can command complex tasks (e.g., "book a ride and order coffee") handled end-to-end by AI. This shift follows an abandoned standalone AI app, focusing instead on enhancing its existing user base. For unmodified mini-programs, Alipay's AI uses "screen-reading" to simulate user interactions, bypassing the need for developer overhaul. It also introduced "Token Pay" for micro-transactions and "AI Wallets" for autonomous agent spending. WeChat, prioritizing its core social function, is taking an embedded approach. Its AI agent will operate within existing contexts like group chats and official accounts, assisting without a separate interface. To enable this, WeChat offers developers two paths: granting source code access for direct AI control ("Automatic Mode") or manually encapsulating services into standardized "Skills." Both place significant burden on developers. Key differences emerge in handling legacy services: WeChat demands developer cooperation (code or labor), while Alipay's screen-reading offers immediate, if potentially less stable, compatibility. Alipay's 3 billion AI transactions demonstrate user acceptance of AI-driven commercial actions. The divergent strategies may reshape mini-program ecosystems—Alipay passively "AI-fying" services, WeChat potentially favoring resource-rich developers—and set competing technical standards. Ultimately, the competition centers on where users entrust the command to "help me get things done."

marsbit1h ago

Fully Entering the AI Era: Alipay Bets on Conversation, WeChat Holds Fast to Social

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片