XRPL prepares for ‘institutional DeFi’ – Will it boost XRP price?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-31Last updated on 2026-01-31

Abstract

Key stakeholders in the XRPL ecosystem are pushing for institutional DeFi adoption, with the upcoming 'XRP Lending Protocol' (XLS-66) seen as a critical upgrade. Evernorth, a major XRP treasury firm, announced it will make this protocol its core strategy, believing it could unlock a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity and fundamentally shift institutional on-chain liquidity. Currently, the XRPL DeFi ecosystem lags behind rivals like BNB Chain and Solana, with its TVL dropping to $100 million, compared to their billions. However, Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD has grown rapidly, surpassing $1 billion in supply. Market signals are mixed: 42 wallets holding over 1 million XRP have resumed accumulation for the first time since September, indicating long-term confidence. Yet, large holders remain net sellers overall, though selling pressure has slightly eased. XRP price consolidated around $1.7, awaiting broader market direction.

Key stakeholders in the Ripple-backed XRPL ecosystem want the chain optimized to drive institutional DeFi strategies and capital deployment similar to Ethereum’s ‘yield vaults.’

In a recent statement, Evernoth, one of the top XRP treasury firms, said it will make the upcoming ‘XRP Lending Protocol’ its core digital asset strategy.

“It’s (lending protocol) what we believe could be a fundamental shift in how institutional liquidity moves onchain.”

According to Asheesh Birla, CEO at Enernorth, the move will further drive XRP DeFi.

“By participating in this native lending ecosystem, Evernorth aims to help unlock what could be a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity for the XRP community.”

For the firm, the lending protocol is the ‘missing piece’ for XRP DeFi. The upgrade, also known as XLS-66, is currently on a testnet, seeks to enable single-asset vaults to drive fixed-rate loans.

State of XRPL DeFi

Although the XRPL DeFi ecosystem has seen some traction since 2025, the chain lags behind its rivals in the top 10 assets by market cap.

At press time, its DeFi ecosystem’s TVL (total value locked) had dropped from around $100 million to $60 million.

In contrast, its closest rivals, BNB chain and Solana, had $6.5 billion and $9.3 billion, respectively, in TVL. This signalled that the two chains had a deeper DeFi liquidity and, by extension, higher investor trust than XRPL.

Although the chain has scored several institutional partnerships, including Japan’s Gumi and SBI, its DeFi activity has lagged behind its perceived peers. It remains to be seen how the upcoming lending protocol upgrade will help it close the DeFi gap with its rivals.

However, Ripple’s stablecoin RLUSD is amongst the fastest-growing and recently crossed above $1 billion in supply.

XRP whales flash mixed signals

On the market side, 42 wallets with over 1 million XRP tokens have returned for the first time since September. Their recent accumulation spree was an ‘encouraging sign for the long-term prospect of the altcoin, noted analytics firm Santiment.

However, according to the 30-day XRPL Whale Flow, large XRP players are still net sellers at press time. But it’s worth pointing out that this pressure had eased slightly in January, as shown by the metric climbing slowly higher.

If the metric surges to the neutral position or turns positive, a firm XRP price recovery for the altcoin may be likely. At press time, XRP consolidated recent losses around $1.7, waiting for the next broader market direction.


Final Thoughts

  • XRP treasury firm Evernorth was betting on the upcoming ‘lending protocol’ upgrade as a key DeFi unlock and strategy.
  • XRP whales flashed mixed signals; wallets holding +1 million XRP tokens back to slow accumulation, but some were still dumping their stash.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main goal of the upcoming 'XRP Lending Protocol' (XLS-66) upgrade on the XRPL according to key stakeholders?

AThe main goal is to optimize the XRPL chain to drive institutional DeFi strategies and capital deployment, similar to Ethereum's 'yield vaults', by enabling single-asset vaults for fixed-rate loans. It is seen as the 'missing piece' to unlock a multi-billion-dollar annual yield opportunity for the XRP community.

QWhich analytics firm provided data on the return of large XRP wallets, and what did they consider this activity to signify?

AAnalytics firm Santiment provided the data, noting that the return of 42 wallets holding over 1 million XRP tokens for the first time since September was an 'encouraging sign for the long-term prospect' of the altcoin.

QHow does the Total Value Locked (TVL) of the XRPL DeFi ecosystem compare to its rivals BNB Chain and Solana?

AAt the time of writing, the XRPL DeFi TVL was around $60 million, which is significantly lower than its rivals. BNB Chain had a TVL of $6.5 billion, and Solana had a TVL of $9.3 billion, indicating they have deeper DeFi liquidity and higher investor trust.

QWhat recent milestone did Ripple's stablecoin, RLUSD, achieve?

ARipple's stablecoin RLUSD recently crossed above $1 billion in supply and is among the fastest-growing stablecoins.

QWhat was the mixed signal flashed by XRP whales according to the 30-day XRPL Whale Flow metric?

AThe mixed signal was that while a group of large wallets had returned to slow accumulation, the overall large XRP players were still net sellers at the time of writing, though the selling pressure had eased slightly in January.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit2h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手4h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片