Why Ethereum’s fundamentals could outweigh ETH prices in 2026

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-03Last updated on 2026-01-03

Abstract

Ethereum's 2025 performance highlighted a divergence between its strong fundamentals and weak price action. While the network achieved record transaction volumes, maintained over 50% DeFi market share, and saw a 212% surge in real-world asset (RWA) value, it faced a 53% drop in L2 earnings and nearly $100 million in lost revenue due to lower gas fees. This compressed revenue model puts Vitalik Buterin's increased focus on decentralization under scrutiny. Despite ETH ending 2025 with an 11% loss, fundamentals like reduced exchange reserves and major developments such as JPMorgan's tokenization suggest a shift toward long-term value over speculation. The 2026 roadmap, emphasizing decentralization and utility, aims to offset volatility and support future growth.

Layer-1 networks are busy rolling out their 2026 roadmaps.

With 2025 highlighting a clear divergence between price action and fundamentals, devs. Focus is shifting. Ultimately, volatility has reinforced a key lesson: Over the long run, fundamentals matter more than speculation.

Building on this momentum, Vitalik Buterin, the founder of the Ethereum [ETH] network, welcomed 2026 with a renewed emphasis on Ethereum’s “decentralization,” paired with a stronger focus on real-world applications.

The big question is whether this approach actually paid off in 2025.

Fundamentally, Ethereum had its strongest operational year yet, with record transaction volumes, major network upgrades, a sustained 50%+ share of DeFi, and a sharp 212% jump in total RWA value.

That said, the growth came with trade-offs. According to Growthpie data, L2 networks saw a 53% drop in earnings, which weighed on Ethereum’s revenue model and translated into nearly $100 million in lost income.

In essence, network expansion weakened Ethereum’s balance sheet as gas fees declined. This puts Vitalik’s decentralization thesis under scrutiny. If revenues stay compressed, can Ethereum still deliver on its roadmap?

Decentralization push fuels long-term Ethereum value

Ethereum’s 2025 fundamental-driven approach has divided investors.

On one hand, the growing gap between technicals and on-chain data favors commitment over short-term speculation, which clearly hurts STHs. ETH’s 2025 ROI ended with a 10.97% loss, justifying this caution.

On the other hand, some argue that Ethereum’s lower costs and higher capacity will eventually offset lost revenue as more apps are built, with JPMorgan’s recent tokenization on Ethereum serving as a strong example.

Looking ahead, 2026 may widen this divide.

The outcome? Deeper long-term commitment. Ethereum closed 2025 with exchange reserves down 20% to 16.6 million, despite volatile price action, highlighting how fundamentals are starting to outweigh speculation.

Now, with Vitalik hinting at an even stronger push for decentralization, the network is setting the stage for long-term value creation. Over time, this could help offset volatility, supporting Tom Lee’s 2026 ETH projections.


Final Thoughts

  • 2025 saw Ethereum record network growth, but L2 revenue drops and lower gas fees pressured the balance sheet.
  • Despite short-term losses, lower fees, higher capacity, and moves like JPMorgan’s tokenization set the stage for stronger ETH value in 2026.

Related Questions

QWhat was the key lesson reinforced by the market volatility in 2025, according to the article?

AThe key lesson reinforced was that over the long run, fundamentals matter more than speculation.

QWhat two main areas did Vitalik Buterin emphasize for Ethereum in 2026?

AVitalik Buterin emphasized 'decentralization' and a stronger focus on 'real-world applications'.

QDespite its strong operational year, what was a significant financial trade-off for Ethereum in 2025?

AA significant trade-off was a 53% drop in L2 network earnings, which translated into nearly $100 million in lost income and weakened Ethereum's balance sheet due to declining gas fees.

QHow did the performance of Ethereum's fundamentals in 2025 affect investor behavior, as indicated by exchange reserves?

ADespite volatile price action, Ethereum's exchange reserves decreased by 20% to 16.6 million, indicating a shift towards long-term holding and that fundamentals were starting to outweigh speculation.

QWhat is one major real-world application example provided in the article that supports the argument for Ethereum's long-term value?

AJPMorgan's recent tokenization on Ethereum is cited as a strong example of how lower costs and higher capacity could eventually offset lost revenue.

Related Reads

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit17m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit17m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片