When U.S. Stocks Go On-Chain, Who Will Become the 'Version Prodigy' of the Next Cycle?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

The tokenization of US stocks on-chain is not a one-sided threat that will drain liquidity from the crypto ecosystem, but rather a development that could significantly expand the overall on-chain economy. While some crypto-native funds may flow into tokenized traditional assets like stocks, bonds, and gold, the inverse is likely: new capital from traditional markets may also enter crypto due to increased accessibility. The composability of on-chain finance could lead to an explosion in decentralized exchanges, perps, prediction markets, and new hybrid applications. This may create entirely new crypto-native sectors, similar to how previous cycles introduced innovative categories like DeFi and perpetual futures. Although the era of broad-based “altseason” is over, high-quality crypto projects—especially those in infrastructure such as L1/L2 chains, oracles, privacy tech, digital identity, and wallets—will continue to see demand. The next cycle may produce new “version winners”: projects that leverage composability, attract external liquidity, and offer unique value not found in traditional finance. While returns may be harder to achieve compared to earlier cycles, crypto remains a space for financial innovation and asymmetric opportunities. The next breakthrough may come from unexpected places—perhaps from those building quietly today.

Regarding the tokenization of U.S. stocks, one perspective is that it will be a fatal blow to crypto projects, leaving altcoins with almost no chance. The reason is that funds previously invested in crypto will be siphoned off by high-quality U.S. stocks. Admittedly, some of the money that was in crypto will flow into tokenized U.S. stocks. However, this is only one side of the coin—there is another side.

Because asset tokenization, including the tokenization of the U.S. dollar, U.S. bonds, U.S. stocks, and physical gold, will lead to a significant increase in on-chain asset volume. The crypto financial field is composable. If Ethereum scales and resolves issues like privacy, one possibility is an explosion in on-chain transactions, not only in DEX, perps, prediction markets, etc., but also the potential for some funds that previously played U.S. stocks to flow into the crypto market. Funds that wanted to invest in U.S. stocks but didn’t have the opportunity may also enter, overall expanding liquidity.

More importantly, the circulation of U.S. stocks on-chain is not entirely one-way; it could be bidirectional. However, the concern is that crypto project revenues are not solid enough to compete. But wealth effects are not entirely dependent on revenue; there are industries in this world with revenue but low market capitalization.

Of course, this also inevitably means the complete end of the kind of widespread altseason seen in the previous two cycles. But high-quality altcoins, as well as on-chain infrastructure—including public chains like Ethereum, DeFi, oracles, privacy technology, digital identity, wallets, etc.—will still be in demand. Even crypto AI agents, asset tokenization, and others are highly likely to combine to create new玩法, once again giving rise to new tracks similar to prediction markets/perps.

The core idea here is: don’t assume that just because U.S. stocks are being tokenized, doomsday is inevitable and liquidity will definitely be taken away. Once stablecoins and tokenized U.S. stocks are on-chain, they won’t just sit there idly; liquidity must be activated, and the composability of crypto will be fully utilized. Once there is a good narrative and good projects, not only will funds from the crypto circle come in, but funds from outside the circle will also flow in. This is merely competing on the same field.

A few high-quality projects in the crypto space, once they have a narrative, may not necessarily underperform U.S. stocks in terms of returns. In the next cycle, it is highly likely that projects similar to prediction markets and perps will emerge—projects that do not exist in traditional financial markets, with crypto-characteristic dream P/E ratios. Believe in the power unleashed by new on-chain liquidity and composability. The craving for money and the pursuit of innovation are so urgent that, in continuous exploration, new crypto species are created from the bottom up.

Furthermore, hoping for an altseason like in previous cycles is already unlikely. Even without the tokenization of U.S. stocks, a comprehensive altseason similar to the last two cycles has already exited the crypto stage. But a small number of high-quality crypto projects still have opportunities, especially those infrastructures and applications used to carry tokenized U.S. stocks.

Finally, every cycle has its version prodigy. The version prodigies of the cycle before last, the last cycle, and this cycle are all different; the next cycle will be no different.

The golden Wild West era of the crypto field is gradually coming to an end. With the entry of institutions, the crypto field has moved into a new stage of financial innovation.

In this stage, there are still opportunities for high returns. Compared to the previous golden period, the probability of hitting it big is much smaller, but it is not impossible. Perhaps the version prodigy of the next cycle is still in their fourth year of university, or maybe they lost a lot of money in this cycle, lying low in the fields, waiting for the opportunity to soar in the next cycle.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument against the tokenization of US stocks in the crypto space, and how does the author counter it?

AThe main argument is that tokenized US stocks would drain capital from crypto projects, leaving no opportunity for altcoins. The author counters by stating that while some crypto funds may flow into tokenized stocks, the increased on-chain asset volume and composability of crypto finance could attract traditional stock market funds and new capital into crypto, ultimately expanding overall liquidity.

QHow might the composability of crypto finance benefit from the tokenization of traditional assets like US stocks?

AThe composability of crypto finance allows tokenized assets like US stocks to be integrated into decentralized exchanges (DEX), perpetual contracts (perp), prediction markets, and other innovative applications. This could lead to new financial products and narratives, combining traditional assets with crypto-native features to create unique opportunities.

QWhy does the author believe that a 'universal altcoin season' like in previous cycles is unlikely to return?

AThe author argues that even without the tokenization of US stocks, the era of widespread altcoin rallies has ended due to increased institutional involvement and market maturation. However, high-quality altcoins and infrastructure projects may still thrive, especially those supporting asset tokenization and on-chain innovation.

QWhat opportunities does the author foresee for crypto-native projects in the next cycle despite competition from tokenized traditional assets?

AThe author expects crypto-native projects, such as those in DeFi, privacy technology, digital identity, AI agents, and prediction markets, to leverage on-chain composability and new narratives. These projects could offer unique returns and innovations not available in traditional finance, attracting both crypto and external capital.

QWhat does the author mean by 'version之子' (version之子) in the context of crypto cycles, and how might it manifest in the next cycle?

A'Version之子' refers to the dominant trends or standout innovations of each crypto cycle (e.g., DeFi in one cycle, NFTs in another). In the next cycle, it could emerge from combinations of asset tokenization, AI, and crypto infrastructure, potentially creating new sectors with high growth potential, even if overall market dynamics are more competitive.

Related Reads

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

Title: Arbitrum Poses as Hacker to Recover Stolen Funds from KelpDAO Last week, KelpDAO suffered a hack resulting in nearly $300 million in losses, marking the largest DeFi security incident this year. Approximately 30,765 ETH (worth over $70 million) remained on an Arbitrum address controlled by the attacker. In an unprecedented move, Arbitrum’s Security Council utilized its emergency authority to upgrade the Inbox bridge contract, adding a function that allowed them to impersonate the hacker’s address and initiate a transfer without access to its private key. The council’s action, approved by 9 of its 12 members, moved the stolen ETH to a frozen address in a single transaction before reverting the contract to its original state. The operation was coordinated with law enforcement, which attributed the attack to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. Community reactions are divided: some praise the recovery of funds, while others question the centralization of power, as the council can upgrade core contracts without governance votes. However, such emergency mechanisms are common among major L2s. Despite the partial recovery, over $292 million was stolen in total, with more than $100 million in bad debt on Aave and remaining funds scattered across other chains. The incident highlights escalating security challenges in DeFi, with state-sponsored hackers employing advanced tactics and L2s responding with elevated countermeasures.

marsbit8m ago

Arbitrum Pretends to Be the Hacker, 'Steals' Back the Money Lost by KelpDAO

marsbit8m ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

The article "iQiyi Is Too Impatient" discusses the controversy surrounding the Chinese streaming platform IQiyi's recent announcement of an "AI Actor Library" during its 2026 World Conference. IQiyi claimed over 100 actors, including well-known names like Zhang Ruoyun and Yu Hewei, had joined the initiative. CEO Gong Yu suggested AI could enable actors to "star in 14 dramas a year instead of 4" and that "live-action filming might become a world cultural heritage." The announcement quickly sparked backlash. Multiple actors named in the list issued urgent statements denying they had signed any AI-related authorization agreements. This forced IQiyi to clarify that inclusion in the library only indicated a willingness to *consider* AI projects, with separate negotiations required for any specific role. The incident, which trended on social media with hashtags like "IQiyi is crazy," is presented as a sign of the company's growing desperation. Facing intense competition from short-video platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou, as well as Bilibili and Xiaohongshu, IQiyi's financial performance has weakened, with revenues declining for two consecutive years. The author argues that IQiyi is "too impatient" to tell a compelling AI story to reassure the market, especially as it pursues a listing on the Hong Kong stock exchange. The piece concludes by outlining three key "AI questions" IQiyi must answer: defining its role as a tool provider versus a content creator, balancing the "coldness" of AI with the human element audiences desire, and properly managing the interests of platforms, actors, and viewers. The core dilemma is that while AI can reduce costs and increase efficiency, it risks creating homogenized, formulaic content and devaluing human performers.

marsbit1h ago

iQiyi Is Too Impatient

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片