Vitalik Buterin Says Ethereum Has Solved the Blockchain Trilemma

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-05Last updated on 2026-01-05

Abstract

Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, claims the network has solved the blockchain trilemma through key upgrades like PeerDAS and ZK-EVMs. PeerDAS, introduced in the recent Fusaka upgrade, enhances data handling and scalability. ZK-EVMs, though still in alpha, combine zero-knowledge proofs with Ethereum's virtual machine to provide decentralized consensus and high bandwidth. Buterin outlined a timeline for full implementation, expecting ZK-EVMs to be operational within four years, with significant network improvements between 2026 and 2030. This progress, built on a decade of work, aims to balance decentralization, security, and scalability without compromise.

The co-founder of Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, has claimed that Ethereum has been successful in solving one of the biggest challenges in crypto, which is the blockchain trilemma.

On January 4, Buterin highlighted the power of peer data availability sampling (PeerDAS) and zero-knowledge Ethereum virtual machines (ZK-EVMs), mentioning that these two upgrades have pushed Ethereum to become a fundamentally new and more robust kind of decentralised network.

He further added that, with Ethereum, when amalgamated with PeerDAS and ZK-EVMs, the community gets a decentralised consensus and high bandwidth. Talking about PeerDAS, it is a scalability enhancement rolled out in the Fusaka upgrade in the last month, enabling Ethereum to handle more data easily.

Adding more to this, ZKEVMs are virtual machines having compatibility for both ZK proofs and the current virtual machine. Buterin further mentioned that ZKEVMs are currently in their alpha stage, as they are performance-ready but need extra security improvements. Within four years, ZKEVMs will be in a complete operating stage. After this thing, the vision of solving Buterin will be officially obtained.

The Upcoming 4 Years

In the coming 4 years, we expect to witness a complete launch of this vision. This year, big non-ZKEVM-dependent gas limit surges because of BALs and ePBS, and we will have the opportunity to run a ZKEVM node.

The years 2026 to 2028 will witness things such as gas repricings, changes to state structure, exec payload going into blobs, and further changes that make higher gas limits secure. Furthermore, the 2027 to 2030 era will witness further gas limit increases, as ZKEVM becomes the main source of validating blocks on the network.

Around 10 years of continued work has finally led Ethereum to be in a position of being able to solve the trilemma, Buterin mentioned. He also highlighted his first post regarding solving data-availability problems, which was made in 2017.

The blockchain trilemma is the complexity of making a blockchain network that fairly achieves decentralisation, security and scalability simultaneously, without any one interfering in the others.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

SEC Loses Its Strongest Crypto Skeptic as Commissioner Steps Down

TagsETHETHEREUMvitalik Buterin

Related Questions

QWhat two key upgrades did Vitalik Buterin highlight as solving the blockchain trilemma for Ethereum?

AVitalik Buterin highlighted peer data availability sampling (PeerDAS) and zero-knowledge Ethereum virtual machines (ZK-EVMs) as the key upgrades.

QWhat is the primary function of PeerDAS, as mentioned in the article?

APeerDAS is a scalability enhancement that enables Ethereum to handle more data easily.

QAccording to Buterin, what is the current development stage of ZKEVMs and when are they expected to be fully operational?

AZKEVMs are currently in their alpha stage, being performance-ready but needing extra security improvements, and are expected to be in a complete operating stage within four years.

QWhat are the three components of the blockchain trilemma?

AThe three components of the blockchain trilemma are decentralization, security, and scalability.

QIn what year did Vitalik Buterin first post about solving data-availability problems, as mentioned in the article?

AVitalik Buterin first posted about solving data-availability problems in 2017.

Related Reads

The Right Way to Use Skills: 5 Reflections After Anthropic Publicly Shared Its Internal Methodology

A deep dive into Anthropic's internal methodology for building effective AI "Skills" reveals five key insights for maximizing their value. First, Skills should focus on capturing "Gotchas" and tacit organizational knowledge—like common pitfalls and undocumented rules—rather than restating general information the AI already knows. Second, think of Skills as a form of "Context Engineering"; they are best structured as folders, not monolithic documents. A core `SKILL.md` file should act as a navigational index, progressively pulling in detailed references, examples, and assets only as needed to avoid overwhelming the model's context window. Third, whenever possible, automate repetitive tasks with scripts. This preserves the model's reasoning capacity for judgment and analysis, while scripts reliably handle the execution, saving tokens and improving accuracy. Instructions within a Skill provide the "why" and the expert judgment, while scripts provide the concrete "how." Fourth, a Skill's description is critical and often misunderstood. It should not be a list of features but a routing rule that clearly signals *when* the Skill should be triggered based on user intent and common phrasing. Finally, as Skills scale from personal tools to team-wide assets, management is crucial. Anthropic advocates for a lightweight, organic approach: let new Skills spread organically within small groups first. Those that prove genuinely useful through adoption naturally graduate to a formal marketplace, ensuring the curated library contains only high-value, battle-tested tools.

marsbit5m ago

The Right Way to Use Skills: 5 Reflections After Anthropic Publicly Shared Its Internal Methodology

marsbit5m ago

Vying for the AI Payment Track: Traditional Card Networks Face Off Against Coinbase

As AI agents increasingly conduct commercial transactions, a battle for control over the underlying payment infrastructure is unfolding. The competition centers on two divergent and incompatible technical approaches for autonomous AI payments. One camp, led by traditional card networks Visa and Mastercard, relies on tokenized card credentials within the established banking rails. Visa's "Intelligent Commerce" and Mastercard's "Agent Pay" services extend their existing tokenization technology to authorized AI agents for consumer retail transactions, leveraging decades of fraud protection and dispute resolution systems. Their partners include major AI firms like Anthropic, OpenAI, and Microsoft. The opposing camp, spearheaded by Coinbase, advocates for an open internet protocol using stablecoins. Coinbase's x402 protocol utilizes the HTTP 402 status code to enable direct, machine-to-machine micropayments with USDC on-chain. This model eliminates card fees and is designed for high-frequency, low-value transactions between AI agents, such as paying for API calls or data streams, where traditional card costs are prohibitive. Currently, application scenarios are clearly divided. Mainstream consumer-facing AI shopping services (e.g., ChatGPT's "one-click checkout," Amazon's AI-assisted shopping) predominantly use card channels due to their mature consumer protections and merchant networks. Conversely, the stablecoin channel dominates machine-to-machine payments, as seen in Amazon Bedrock's core payment service using Base blockchain. Significantly, traditional card networks are not solely defending their turf; they are also investing in the stablecoin arena. Visa has rapidly expanded its stablecoin settlement volume and partnered with Coinbase on interoperability, while Mastercard moved to acquire stablecoin platform BVNK. This dual-strategy indicates their intent to become the fee-collecting gateway for all payment flows, regardless of the underlying rail. The short-term outlook is for coexistence: cards for personal retail, stablecoins for machine transactions. The long-term outcome hinges on whether AI-driven commerce will resemble traditional retail or evolve into a vast network of machine micropayments. Visa and Mastercard's hedging strategy suggests they are prepared for either future, while companies betting on a single channel face greater risk.

Foresight News7m ago

Vying for the AI Payment Track: Traditional Card Networks Face Off Against Coinbase

Foresight News7m ago

For the First Time, Pure Human Video Pretrained VLA for Dexterous Manipulation: Deployable with Minimal Fine-Tuning Data

For the first time, a purely human-video-pretrained Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model for dexterous manipulation requires only a small amount of data for fine-tuning to achieve successful real-world deployment. Achieving human-level dexterous manipulation remains a core challenge in robotics. While multi-fingered hands offer hardware potential, Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models lag behind due to the high cost of collecting diverse, high-quality robot data. A novel framework, VITRA, developed by Microsoft Research Asia and Tsinghua University, addresses this by automatically transforming massive, unlabeled real-world human activity videos into a structured V-L-A training dataset. Key innovations include precise 3D hand motion annotation from monocular video, atomic action segmentation based on hand-speed minima, and automated instruction generation using VLMs combined with 3D trajectory visualization. This process created a massive dataset of 1 million clips. Pretrained exclusively on this human video data, the VLA model (combining a VLM backbone with a Diffusion Transformer action expert) demonstrates strong zero-shot hand motion prediction in unseen environments. Crucially, it requires minimal fine-tuning (~1.2k demonstrations) on real robot data to achieve high-success-rate dexterous manipulation tasks like grasping, placing, pouring, and sweeping on hardware like the Realman robot with the XHAND1 dexterous hand. The model shows exceptional generalization to novel objects and environments. The research also observes promising scaling behavior, where performance improves with more pretraining data, paving the way for more generalized embodied intelligence.

marsbit18m ago

For the First Time, Pure Human Video Pretrained VLA for Dexterous Manipulation: Deployable with Minimal Fine-Tuning Data

marsbit18m ago

Ray Dalio: The Revival of a China-led 'Tribute System', and the AI Industry Will Develop Like the EV Industry

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, discusses shifting global power dynamics and the AI competition between the U.S. and China. He argues U.S. credibility as a global power willing to fight for its interests is declining, while China is accumulating wealth and influence. Dalio observes a trend where world leaders visit China, which he compares to a modern "tribute system"—not oppressive, but a hierarchy where nations acknowledge China's strength, affecting trade and security. This shift creates market uncertainty, prompting investors to seek asset diversification, including gold. Regarding AI, Dalio contrasts the U.S. and Chinese approaches. U.S. companies like OpenAI focus on monetization and subscriptions for revenue. In contrast, China treats AI as a public utility, akin to electricity or water, aiming for widespread worker accessibility over immediate profitability. He draws a parallel to China's electric vehicle industry success, where companies like BYD achieved rapid market growth. Dalio and JPMorgan's Mary Callahan Erdoes note China lacks U.S.-style fear of AI displacing jobs; instead, it focuses on leveraging AI for development and dominance in next-generation industries like robotics.

Odaily星球日报44m ago

Ray Dalio: The Revival of a China-led 'Tribute System', and the AI Industry Will Develop Like the EV Industry

Odaily星球日报44m ago

Michael Saylor's Latest Thoughts: The Four Beliefs That Determine Bitcoin's Future

Michael Saylor outlines four key ideologies shaping Bitcoin's future: Bitcoin Maximalists view it as the dominant monetary network and a breakthrough in economic empowerment. Bitcoin Capitalists focus on integrating Bitcoin into the global economy—into capital markets, banking, and corporate strategies—to realize its full potential as digital capital. Bitcoin Technologists advocate for ongoing protocol improvements in scalability, privacy, and security to ensure Bitcoin evolves with technological demands and threats. Bitcoin Fundamentalists prioritize protecting Bitcoin's core principles of self-custody, decentralization, and its use as sound money, guarding against dilution or capture. Each group addresses a vital aspect: Maximalists provide conviction, Capitalists drive adoption, Technologists tackle technical challenges, and Fundamentalists defend the protocol's integrity. The article argues that Bitcoin's path forward requires a balanced synthesis of these perspectives—maintaining a secure, immutable core while enabling disciplined innovation and integration in higher layers. The ultimate challenge is for Bitcoin to remain true to its principles while becoming useful to the broader world.

marsbit59m ago

Michael Saylor's Latest Thoughts: The Four Beliefs That Determine Bitcoin's Future

marsbit59m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow