Vanguard, BlackRock lead the ETF wave as market remains in ‘extreme fear’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-26Last updated on 2026-02-26

The crypto market is sending mixed signals right now. On the price charts, things look better. At press time, the total market value had risen by 3.36% and was back to around $2.26 trillion. However, among investors, confidence is still very low.

Despite the prices going up, the Crypto Fear and Greed Index is still stuck in “Extreme Fear.” This shows that many people are still worried after the recent ups and downs. Instead of feeling excited, they are afraid the recovery won’t last.

And yet, according to LunarCrush, financial firms have dominated social media conversations over the past 24 hours.

This surge in attention around major financial firms can be closely tied to the growing influence of ETFs in both traditional markets and crypto.

Vanguard and BlackRock steal the spotlight

At the top of the list was Vanguard with 11.73k mentions. Social media chatter around Vanguard spiked by 146%, pushing daily mentions to an all-time high of 13.4k.

The post noted,

“Engagements are up 481% from the daily average.”

This was mainly because of massive inflows into its S&P 500 ETF, VOO. With over $30 billion added this year alone, Vanguard has become a key entry point for investors seeking stability.

Close behind was BlackRock with 9.27k mentions, whose Bitcoin [BTC] ETF has become the main gateway for institutional money into crypto.

Additionally, other sentiments around BlackRock are also adding to the hype.

“BLK is the firm people either trust with their retirement or point to when explaining why corporations behave badly. Both crowds were loud today.”

JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs trail behind

JPMorgan Chase has also gained attention with 8.2k mentions, as investors look for stability beyond crypto ETFs. Over 282+ spikes suggest fresh news, likely comments from CEO Jamie Dimon or new macro positioning, sparking renewed attention.

On the contrary, Goldman Sachs saw a noticeable drop in mentions, making it the only top-five firm losing social traction. This usually happens when market sentiment turns cautious.

Meanwhile, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) stood out as the only venture capital firm among trillion-dollar institutions. Its steady discussion was likely tied to its AI and crypto investments, along with visibility from co-founder Marc Andreessen.

Other major firms like Apollo Global Management, Fidelity Investments, Galaxy Digital, Blackstone, Temasek Holdings, KKR, Pantera Capital, and Bridgewater Associates were also part of the broader conversation.

Notably, Jane Street and Third Point saw unusually large spikes in attention, likely driven by specific trading or regulatory developments. Finally, Pantera’s rise reflected sustained momentum in crypto-focused discussions.

Social sentiment may be driving investor sentiment

The aforementioned data should be read within context though. Just recently, Google Trends revealed that global searches for “crypto” were at their lowest level in over a year. In August 2025, interest was at its peak. However, at press time, it had dropped to just 25.

That’s not all either as the “Bitcoin going to zero” phrase reached its highest level ever in February too.

Simply put, while most people are rushing for the exits, the world’s biggest money managers are quietly settling in and preparing for the next phase.


Final Summary

  • “Extreme Fear” reflects emotional exhaustion among retail investors, not necessarily market collapse.
  • Social media data suggested that attention may be shifting away from tokens and towards the institutions controlling access.

Related Reads

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手37m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手37m ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit44m ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit44m ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist5h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片