VanEck Debuts First U.S.-Based Avalanche ETF as AVAX Stays Under Pressure

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-27Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-27

Анотація

VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF (VAVX) on January 26, offering direct exposure to AVAX and staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX remained under pressure, trading below $12 with a weekly decline of nearly 7%. The fund will waive fees for the first $500 million in assets until February 28, 2026, and can stake up to 70% of its holdings, potentially reducing market supply. Currently priced at $11.77, AVAX shows weak momentum with a declining trading volume. Key support lies at $11, while a break above $13 could lead to a move toward $14–$15.

Asset Manager VanEck launched the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF on January 26, and the product began trading on Nasdaq under the ticker VAVX, offering direct exposure to AVAX along with staking rewards. Despite this, AVAX continued under pressure, trading below $12 and experiencing a weekly fall of almost 7%.

During the period of VanEck Avalanche ETF from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026, VanEck will waive the entire Fee for the first $500 million of the assets. If the Trust’s assets exceed $500 million before February 28, 2026, the Fee charged on assets over $500 million will be 0.20%, as per the document.

In addition, the fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings, which could lock a meaningful portion of supply and reduce tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

AVAX Price Analysis

With that, AVAX price is currently trading at $11.77, with 1.11% up today. Despite the modest daily bounce, the 24-hour trading volume is declining more than 20%, as it is down nearly 8% over the past month, as of writing.

Then, the open interest climbed 10.43% to $492 million, which indicates that traders are opening new positions despite slowing trading volume, as per Coinglass data. Which is a phase that could lead to a sharper price move once AVAX breaks out of its current range.

AVAX is trading around the $11.50-$12.00 support zone, and the overall trend is staying bearish as prices continue to create lower highs and lower lows.

Further indicators, RSI (Relative Strength Index), which is sitting at 39, a neutral zone, indicate a weak momentum. Meanwhile, MACD (Moving Average Convergence and Divergence) is showing strong selling pressure, as confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

The price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10; while on the upside, a clear push above $13.00 might allow the price to stretch beyond the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

‌US Wall Street Indexes Close Higher as Crypto Market Maintains its Trade Price

Пов'язані питання

QWhat is the name and ticker symbol of the first U.S.-listed Avalanche ETF launched by VanEck?

AThe ETF is called the VanEck Avalanche ETF and it trades on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol VAVX.

QWhat is the fee waiver period and condition for the new VanEck Avalanche ETF?

AVanEck will waive the entire fee for the first $500 million of assets from January 26, 2026, to February 28, 2026. Assets over $500 million will be charged a fee of 0.20%.

QWhat percentage of its AVAX holdings can the VanEck ETF stake, and what potential market effect could this have?

AThe fund can stake up to 70% of its AVAX holdings. This could lock a significant portion of the supply and reduce the number of tokens available on the open market if demand holds up.

QAccording to the price analysis, what are the key technical indicators suggesting about AVAX's momentum?

AThe RSI at 39 indicates weak momentum in a neutral zone. The MACD shows strong selling pressure, confirmed by the MACD line being below the signal line.

QWhat are the identified critical support and resistance levels for the AVAX price?

AThe price has immediate support at $11, with a further pullback potentially exposing the $10 level. On the upside, a clear push above $13.00 could allow the price to move toward the $14.00-$15.00 range.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit10 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit10 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit18 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit18 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News22 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News22 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit29 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit29 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit38 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit38 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот