U.S. Stock Market Trend: Dow Plunges Below 50,000 Points, Strongest Earnings Can't Save Oracle

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-11Last updated on 2026-06-11

Abstract

U.S. stocks fell sharply on Wednesday, June 10th, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1.87% to close below the 50,000 point mark. The sell-off was driven by a dual shock: hotter-than-expected inflation data and a significant escalation in U.S.-Iran military conflict, which pushed the VIX fear index above 20. While the May CPI matched expectations, afternoon news of retaliatory strikes between the U.S. and Iran triggered a broad market retreat, particularly hitting industrial and tech sectors. The prospect of renewed inflationary pressure from rising oil prices has fully priced in a Fed rate hike by December, shifting the monetary policy narrative. Concurrently, the AI investment theme faced a severe reality check. Super Micro Computer's stock plummeted nearly 28% after announcing a major fundraising plan to fulfill orders, highlighting the massive capital demands of the AI infrastructure build-out. This was underscored by Oracle's post-market reaction: despite posting a strong quarterly earnings beat and a massive $850 billion increase in remaining performance obligations (RPO), its stock fell due to negative free cash flow and a new $40 billion financing plan for data centers. The market's pivot towards defensive plays like Coca-Cola and TJX Companies, which hit record highs, signals a shift from growth to safety. Analysts view the downturn as a convergence of an "AI credit cycle"—where the market questions the funding for massive capital expenditures—and a "ge...

Author: Chaoxiang Research

On Wednesday (U.S. Eastern Time, June 10th), Wall Street was caught in a simultaneous squeeze on two fronts: inflation returning to 4.2% and the escalating U.S.-Iran conflict. At the close, all three major indexes were near their intraday lows.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted by 953.33 points (-1.87%) to 49,918.78 points, losing the critical 50,000-point threshold. Just on June 4th, the Dow had hit a record high. In a week, the "safe haven" narrative for blue-chip stocks was shattered. The S&P 500 fell 1.62% to 7,266.99 points, and the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.98% to 25,169.50 points, pulling back roughly 7% from its June 1st historical peak of 27,086.81 points. The Russell 2000 index fell only 1.10%, making it the best-performing major index for the day.

The VIX fear index surged 11.83% to 22.22, reclaiming the 20-point warning line.

Inflation and War: A New Chapter of an Old Script

The May CPI released in the morning showed a year-on-year increase of 4.2%, a three-year high, and a month-on-month increase of 0.5%. The numbers were ugly but in line with market expectations, and the core CPI rose only 0.2% month-on-month, below forecasts. The bond market's reaction told the whole story: the 10-year Treasury yield touched 4.55% intraday before falling back to 4.52%, essentially flat. In other words, the CPI alone wasn't enough to trigger this sell-off.

What truly ignited the selling was geopolitical news in the afternoon. After Iran shot down a U.S. Apache helicopter, the U.S. military conducted a "defensive strike" on Tuesday night, to which Iran responded with attacks on U.S. military facilities in Gulf countries including Bahrain, Jordan, and Kuwait. Trump posted on Truth Social that Iran "has stalled negotiations for too long and will now pay the price," stating America "will hit them very hard." As the news spread, sector after sector turned from green to red, with industrials down over 3%, and technology and materials sectors down over 2%.

WTI crude oil settled up 2.07% at $90.03 per barrel, while Brent crude rose 1.8% to $93.10. Oil prices and inflation fuel each other, a combination the market fears most: interest rate futures now fully price in a 25-basis-point rate hike by December. In 2026, the U.S. stock market faces a Fed discussing "rate hikes" rather than "rate cuts." This is the true Damocles' sword for valuations.

AI Giants Queue Up for Money

If macro factors are the background noise, the main theme of U.S. stocks this week is another story: the AI arms race burning cash has reached shareholders.

Super Micro Computer (SMCI) crashed 27.98% to $29.27 on Wednesday, its worst single-day drop. The trigger was the company's announcement of plans to raise up to $7 billion, including a $5 billion underwritten public offering and a $2 billion at-the-market offering, to procure components for fulfilling customer orders. For a company making AI servers, receiving so many orders that it needs to dilute nearly one-third of its market cap to fund the working capital? The market did the math quickly.

The Philadelphia semiconductor supply chain suffered across the board: Broadcom down 5.12%, TSMC down 4.44%, NVIDIA down 3.73%, Micron down 4.70%, Tesla down 3.80%. Apple bucked the trend with a modest 0.35% gain, for a straightforward reason: among the "Magnificent Seven," it carries the lightest capex burden.

After hours, the real protagonist took the stage. Oracle's Q4 earnings report was nearly flawless: revenue of $19.2 billion, up 21% YoY, beating expectations; non-GAAP EPS of $2.11, above the expected $1.97; Remaining Performance Obligations (RPO) surged by a staggering $85 billion in the quarter, from $553 billion to $638 billion. Yet the stock plunged over 7% in after-hours trading.

The reasons lie in three other numbers: cloud revenue missed expectations; Fiscal 2026 free cash flow was negative $23.7 billion; and the company announced plans to raise approximately $40 billion through a combination of equity and debt to fund data center construction. Just two months ago, the company laid off 30,000 employees.

Putting this week's clues together: Alphabet seeking $85 billion in financing, Super Micro raising $7 billion, Oracle borrowing another $40 billion. The AI narrative is shifting from "how big are the orders" to "where does the money come from." The market once cheered for every dollar of RPO; now it's questioning the payback period for every dollar of capital expenditure. Oracle's $638 billion order book and negative $23.7 billion in cash flow sit on the same balance sheet, embodying the entire contradiction of the AI trade in June 2026.

Where Did the Money Go?

The selling was not indiscriminate. Coca-Cola and TJX hit all-time highs on Wednesday against the trend, with Morgan Stanley naming Coca-Cola its top pick in the sector that same day. Selling AI hardware, buying companies that sell sugary drinks and discount clothing—the capital flight to safety is almost brutally clear. The Russell 2000's smaller decline also confirms this: small-cap stocks largely missed the AI party and thus carry the lightest baggage in the pullback.

The selling pressure also spread to Asia: South Korea's KOSPI plunged 4.5%, led by Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix; Japan's Nikkei 225 fell 1.9%, with SoftBank Group down 8.3%. The deleveraging of the AI supply chain is global.

In the view of Chaoxiang Research, the nature of this decline is more akin to a resonance between the "AI credit cycle" and the "geopolitical inflation cycle," rather than a single-event shock. The former determines whether the capital expenditures of tech stocks can continue to be funded by the capital markets, while the latter dictates the direction of the risk-free rate. Both lines worsened simultaneously this week, which is the fundamental reason for the Nasdaq's persistent bleeding since June 5th.

To play devil's advocate: within the CPI details, core inflation rose only 0.2% month-on-month, and the energy shock hasn't significantly spilled over into services prices; Oracle's cloud infrastructure revenue growth is still a robust 93%, indicating real demand; historically, after escalations in Middle East conflicts, risk asset pullbacks have often recovered within weeks. If Thursday's PPI is moderate, coupled with any sign of de-escalation in the Iran situation, an oversold bounce could appear at any time.

However, one change is structural: AI giants have moved from "using profits to build data centers" to "using equity and debt to build data centers." Once this step is taken, it's hard to reverse. When the financing market begins to price risk premiums for AI capital expenditures, the valuation anchor shifts.

The next test comes on Thursday: the PPI data and the market's digestion of Oracle management's guidance for fiscal year 2027. The order book or the cash flow—which one will Wall Street ultimately believe?

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what were the two main factors that led to the sharp decline in the U.S. stock market on June 10?

AThe decline was driven by a combination of two factors: a hotter-than-expected CPI inflation report showing a 4.2% year-on-year increase for May, and a significant escalation in geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and Iran following military strikes.

QWhy did Oracle's stock price drop in after-hours trading despite reporting strong Q4 earnings that beat expectations?

AOracle's stock fell due to three key concerns: its cloud revenue missed expectations, it reported negative free cash flow of $23.7 billion for the fiscal year 2026, and it announced plans to raise approximately $40 billion in new financing to fund data center construction, highlighting the immense capital expenditure burden of its AI ambitions.

QWhat does the article suggest is the fundamental shift in market perception regarding the AI narrative, as evidenced by the reactions to companies like Super Micro Computer and Oracle?

AThe market narrative is shifting from celebrating the size of AI-related orders to questioning the return cycle on the massive capital expenditures required. Investors are now scrutinizing where the funding for this AI arms race will come from and pricing in the risk premium for the associated debt and equity financing.

QWhich major U.S. stock index performed the best on June 10, according to the article, and what does this suggest about investor behavior?

AThe Russell 2000 index performed the best, falling only 1.10%. This suggests investor rotation towards smaller-cap stocks that were less involved in the prior AI investment boom and therefore carry less downside risk in the current sell-off, indicating a flight to perceived safety.

QWhat specific event triggered the massive 27.98% single-day drop in Super Micro Computer's stock price?

ASuper Micro Computer's stock crash was triggered by the company's announcement that it planned to raise up to $7 billion in financing (through a public offering and an ATM program) to purchase components needed to fulfill customer orders, signaling a heavy funding need that would significantly dilute shareholder value.

Related Reads

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

SpaceX's trillion-dollar valuation is built on its three core businesses: Starlink (profitable, 60% of revenue), rockets (driving down launch costs), and AI (a major investment area). This creates a financial cycle: Starlink funds rocket development, which enables low-cost launches for AI hardware, generating future revenue. This cycle fuels annual capital expenditures of tens of billions, flowing to a vast supply chain. Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability. The first group includes irreplaceable players like NVIDIA (GPU/CUDA ecosystem), Eutelsat (critical radio spectrum), Filtronic (specialized amplifiers), Materion (strategic beryllium), and STMicroelectronics (antenna chips). The second group consists of hard-to-replace suppliers due to high switching costs, such as Honeywell (flight control), Carpenter Technology (specialty alloys), Hexcel (carbon fiber), Broadcom (data exchange), and Linde (industrial gases). The third group comprises high-volume, cost-critical suppliers for mass-produced items like Starlink terminals. Key names include Wistron NeWeb (primary manufacturer) and several A-share companies like Shenzhen Sunway (connectors), Pies New Materials (forgings), Western Superconducting (alloys), and Yingliu (castings). Other niche players include Trimble (timing), Astronics (power distribution), and CTS (thermal management). The article argues that investing in these suppliers, rather than SpaceX stock directly, offers an alternative opportunity. The rationale is threefold: procurement is just beginning to scale, SpaceX's IPO brings new transparency to its supply chain, and the situation mirrors early stages of past "super terminal" ecosystems like Apple or Tesla. While risks exist (commodity cycles, geopolitical factors, technology shifts), the core thesis is that SpaceX's massive, ongoing procurement will translate into reliable revenue for its key suppliers, regardless of its own stock price volatility.

marsbit9m ago

The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who is Dividing Up Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

marsbit9m ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

**Title: The Foundation of SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation: Who Benefits from Musk's Annual $100 Billion Capital Expenditure?** This article argues that investors seeking to benefit from SpaceX's growth might find greater opportunities in its supply chain rather than directly investing in the company itself, drawing parallels to historical successes with Apple, Tesla, and NVIDIA suppliers. **SpaceX's Business Model & Cash Flow:** SpaceX generates revenue from three main areas: 1. **Starlink:** Its profitable core, earning $11.3B in 2023 (60% of revenue), funding other ventures. 2. **Rockets (Falcon/Starship):** Requires $3B+ in annual R&D but achieves the world's lowest launch costs. 3. **AI:** Currently unprofitable (-$6B+ in 2023), investing heavily in ground-based supercomputers (220,000 GPUs) and future orbital data centers. The cycle is: Starlink profits → fund cheaper rockets → low-cost launches deploy AI hardware → AI compute rentals generate future revenue. This cycle drives annual procurement spending of tens of billions of dollars. **The Supply Chain Beneficiaries:** Suppliers are categorized by their replaceability: **1. Nearly Irreplaceable (High Barriers to Entry):** * **NVIDIA:** Powers the Colossus supercomputer; its CUDA ecosystem creates immense switching costs. * **Eutelsat (SATS):** Controls critical radio spectrum for satellite communications; holds a ~3% stake in SpaceX. * **Filtronic (FTC):** Supplies millimeter-wave signal amplifiers for Starlink satellites; SpaceX constitutes 83% of its revenue. * **Materion (MTRN):** Global leader in beryllium production, a strategic material used in Starship structures. * **STMicroelectronics (STM):** Supplies phased-array antenna chips for Starlink satellites. **2. Replaceable, but Switching Cost is Prohibitively High:** * **Honeywell (HON):** Provides flight control and inertial navigation systems with decades of certification. * **Carpenter Technology (CRS):** Manufactures ultra-pure specialty steel alloys for Raptor engines. * **Hexcel (HXL):** Supplies custom carbon fiber composites developed over a decade with SpaceX. * **Broadcom (AVGO):** Manages high-speed data switching. * **Linde Group:** Supplies industrial gases (liquid oxygen/nitrogen) from facilities built near SpaceX launch sites. **3. High-Volume, Cost-Critical Manufacturing:** Focuses on mass-producing components like Starlink user terminals (target: 30 million units). * **Key Players:** Wistron NeWeb (6285, primary terminal manufacturer), several Chinese A-share companies (e.g., Sunway Communication, PAX New Materials, Western Metal Materials, Yingliu Co.), and smaller US firms like Trimble (TRMB, timing systems). **Why Now?** Three factors make the supply chain opportunity timely: 1. **Volume Ramp-Up:** SpaceX plans 100 launches in 2026, aims for 30 million Starlink terminals, and will deploy AI data centers, meaning procurement will accelerate. 2. **Increased Transparency:** The IPO provides public financial data, allowing investors to track supplier order growth. 3. **Historical Precedent:** The current phase is likened to Tesla's early mass-production stage (circa 2018), suggesting a long growth runway for suppliers. **Conclusion:** The article posits that while investing in SpaceX stock is betting on Elon Musk's ambitious vision at a high valuation, investing in its established suppliers is a bet on the tangible, recurring revenue from its massive procurement budget, which is largely decoupled from day-to-day stock price volatility.

链捕手13m ago

SpaceX's Trillion-Dollar Valuation Base: Who's Sharing in Musk's Annual Tens of Billions in Capital Expenditure?

链捕手13m ago

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

Last Friday, the U.S. Commerce Department issued an enforcement letter that forced Anthropic to take its two most advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, offline. The stated reason was unspecified national security concerns, initially linked to potential "jailbreaks" of the models' safeguards. However, new details suggest the action stemmed more from a deteriorating relationship between the Trump administration and Anthropic, rather than a genuine technical threat. According to reports, the government cited a little-known export control regulation, compelling Anthropic to block access for all non-U.S. persons, including its own international employees. The company complied, shutting down the models without a court order or specific technical details from the government. Cybersecurity expert Katie Moussouris revealed she was privately shown a research paper detailing a potential safeguard bypass in Fable 5. She argued the described method was minor and did not warrant an export ban, stating that attempts to "fix" it would only weaken the model's defensive capabilities. Moussouris and other experts have since called for the order to be revoked, warning it dangerously removes advanced cybersecurity tools from U.S. defenders. Analysts like Justin Hendrix suggest the move appears retaliatory and sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that the U.S. government can unilaterally shut down a tech company's products. The incident has raised concerns about the reliability of American AI and the potential for political interference in the tech industry, serving as a warning to the broader sector.

marsbit16m ago

The U.S. Government Blocked the Anthropic Model. It Wasn't About 'Jailbreaking' at All.

marsbit16m ago

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

In his latest notes, Ray Dalio addresses a critical question for investors amid the AI-driven stock market surge: how should one allocate assets during a transformative technological revolution? Dalio emphasizes that technological advancement does not automatically make related stocks attractive. Historical tech cycles—marked by excitement, crowding, volatility, and eventual shakeouts—show that even long-term winners like Microsoft and Apple experienced severe drawdowns. Today's AI sector faces similar uncertainties: overinvestment, intensifying competition, geopolitical tensions (e.g., Taiwan's chip supply), tax policy shifts, anti-AI sentiment, and potential disruption from future technologies like quantum computing. Dalio's core argument focuses on the highly concentrated market structure, where a few tech giants dominate major indices. He warns investors against unknowingly holding concentrated, correlated exposures. Instead of chasing a handful of AI leaders, he advocates for a robust, diversified portfolio of 15 or more high-quality, uncorrelated investments, risk-balanced to match an investor's volatility tolerance. Mathematically, such diversification significantly improves the risk-return ratio—for example, holding 15 uncorrelated assets can boost the ratio by over four times compared to a single concentrated bet. Dalio cautions that future equity returns appear low, with his bubble indicator suggesting real returns could be negative over the next 5-10 years. He stresses that knowing what you don't know is as important as knowing what you do. In an environment of high uncertainty and concentration, avoiding large, concentrated bets on AI stocks is prudent. The optimal strategy is disciplined diversification—the "holy grail" of investing—to navigate this technologically driven cycle with lower risk and comparable or better returns.

marsbit20m ago

Ray Dalio: AI Bull Market Continues to Soar, Should Investors Go All In or Cash Out and Leave the Field?

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片