US-Iran War: Why Did Turkey Sell Off 58.4 Tons of Gold in Two Weeks?

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-30Last updated on 2026-03-30

Abstract

Turkish Central Bank sold approximately 58.4 tons of gold, worth over $8 billion, within two weeks in March 2026, as a response to a severe financial crisis triggered by the U.S.-Israel military operation against Iran. The conflict led to Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz, causing oil prices to surge over 40% and cutting off natural gas supplies to Turkey, which relies heavily on energy imports. This resulted in a plunging Turkish lira, massive foreign capital flight, and rapid depletion of foreign reserves. To defend the currency and meet urgent dollar demands, Turkey utilized gold swaps—temporarily exchanging gold for dollars with agreements to repurchase later—rather than outright sales, to avoid market panic and preserve long-term reserves. The move highlights Turkey's vulnerability to energy shocks and its strategic use of gold reserves for liquidity during crises. If the conflict persists, further gold sales may be necessary, adding downward pressure on global gold prices.

Author: Le Ming

A recent figure that has stunned global financial markets has emerged: the Turkish central bank sold off approximately 58.4 tons of gold in just two weeks, worth over $8 billion. Of this, 6 tons were reduced in the week of March 13, and 52.4 tons were sharply cut in the week of March 20.

The weekly data from the Turkish central bank clearly outlines this picture: from March 13 to 19, the market value of gold reserves plummeted from $134.1 billion to $116.2 billion, evaporating nearly $18 billion in a single week; meanwhile, foreign exchange reserves (excluding gold) actually increased by $5.8 billion.

Between the decline and the rise, the traces of a "gold for foreign exchange" operation are unmistakable.

Over the past decade, Turkey has been one of the world's most aggressive gold buyers, with gold reserves rising from 116 tons in 2011 to over 820 tons.

Why suddenly sell off such hard-earned assets on a large scale within two weeks?

The answer is three words: to survive.

Trigger: A War That Pushed Turkey into a "Perfect Storm"

On February 28, the United States and Israel jointly launched a military operation codenamed "Epic Fury," launching airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, military bases, and government buildings.

Iran retaliated and effectively blockaded the Strait of Hormuz—a passage for 20% of the world's seaborne oil and 20% of LNG trade.

Brent crude surged from $73 per barrel before the war to over $106, a rise of more than 40%. The International Energy Agency defined it as the "most severe global energy security challenge in history."

For most countries, this was a shock; but for Turkey, it was a survival crisis.

Turkey relies on imports for 90% of its oil and 98% of its natural gas. Every $10 increase in oil prices adds $4.5 to $7 billion to the current account deficit. Based on post-war oil prices, the annual energy import cost could surge by about $15 billion.

An even more fatal blow came on March 24—when Israel airstriked Iran's South Pars gas field, Iran subsequently halted natural gas exports to Turkey. Iran is Turkey's second-largest pipeline natural gas supplier, accounting for about 13% to 14% of its natural gas imports. The 25-year contract for this pipeline is set to expire in July 2026, and the war directly dashed prospects for renewal.

Simply put, Turkey's situation is: its energy bill suddenly doubled, a key gas source was cut off, and no equivalent replacement could be found in the short term.

Transmission Chain: Foreign Exchange Reserves Buckled First

Energy imports require settlement in US dollars, so importers scrambled for dollars, and the lira plummeted.

In the 16 trading days since the conflict began, the lira hit a record low against the dollar 11 times, reaching about 44.35 lira per dollar on March 25.

Behind this was the accelerated withdrawal of foreign investors: in three weeks, foreign capital outflows from Turkish bonds reached $4.7 billion, with $1.2 billion flowing out of the stock market, while carry trade positions shrank from a record $61.2 billion in January to below $45 billion.

The Turkish central bank was thus forced to launch a "lira defense battle." In just the first week of March, it sold over $8 billion in foreign exchange. In the three weeks ending March 19, the central bank cumulatively consumed about $25 to $30 billion in foreign exchange reserves. Net reserves, after deducting swaps, plummeted from $54.3 billion before the war to $43 billion.

Turkey's weekly data fully records this process: foreign exchange reserves (excluding gold) fell from $55 billion on March 6 to $47.8 billion on March 13—first using foreign exchange ammunition. By March 19, foreign exchange reserves rebounded to $53.6 billion, but gold reserves simultaneously plummeted from $134.1 billion to $116.2 billion—foreign exchange ammunition was nearly exhausted, and gold began to be used.

This is a textbook example of an emergency defense sequence: "first use foreign exchange, then use gold."

Figure: Foreign exchange data released by the Turkish central bank

Gold Swaps: Why "Sell" Instead of "Pawn"?

The key to understanding this operation is: more than half of Turkey's gold reduction was done through swaps, not direct sales.

The essence of a gold swap is "exchanging gold for foreign exchange, with redemption upon maturity." The central bank transfers gold to the counterparty (usually a primary investment bank) in exchange for an equivalent amount of US dollars, while signing a forward contract to repurchase the gold at a slightly higher price in the future. It is a short-term financing behavior, not a permanent liquidation.

The central bank chose swaps over outright sales for at least three reasons.

First, to retain long-term positions. If the oil price surge is judged to be a temporary shock, swaps can address the urgent need, and the gold can be redeemed later, avoiding the destruction of a decade of accumulation.

Second, to reduce the impact on gold prices. Directly dumping 60 tons of gold could trigger a cliff-like plunge in the market, in turn causing a significant devaluation of its remaining over $100 billion in gold reserves. Swaps are conducted quietly in the over-the-counter market, with much less impact.

Third, a buffer at the domestic political level. Gold is an "anti-inflation totem" in the hearts of the Turkish people. Announcing large-scale gold sales could easily trigger panic, while swaps can maintain a certain degree of ambiguity technically.

This operation was completed quickly within two weeks thanks to a key pre-arrangement: Turkey stored about 111 tons of gold, worth about $30 billion, at the Bank of England. This gold could be used for foreign exchange intervention without logistical constraints—no need for cross-border physical transport, directly pledged and liquidated in the City of London.

Pressure on Gold Prices

Turkey has a historical pattern: selling gold during crises and buying back after crises.

The 2018 lira crisis, the 2020 pandemic shock, the 2023 earthquake—each time the central bank reduced gold to provide liquidity but resumed accumulation afterward. Analysts generally believe that the operation in March 2026 continues this pattern.

But this judgment has a core premise: the war cannot be prolonged.

Swap agreements come with holding costs and interest. If the war continues, energy prices remain anchored at over $100 for the long term, and Turkey's foreign exchange earning capacity cannot cover the soaring energy bill, then these "temporary swaps" will never be redeemed, effectively becoming "permanent fire sales."

Therefore, in the coming weeks, if the war continues, Turkey will need to continue turning its $135 billion in gold reserves into a lifeline.

Although Turkey prefers to "pledge" gold to obtain foreign exchange liquidity, these transactions still substantially increase the downward pressure on the gold market. In the London over-the-counter market, when the Turkish central bank transfers tens of tons of gold as collateral to international counterparties (such as investment banks) in exchange for US dollars, these financial institutions, to hedge their own position risks, typically conduct corresponding short-selling or selling operations in the spot or futures derivative markets.

Therefore, the liquidity of this batch of gold will eventually be transmitted to the market, indirectly increasing supply and depressing prices.

Conclusion

The Turkish central bank's sale of 60 tons of gold in two weeks is not panic, not speculation, but a rational self-rescue by a country highly dependent on energy imports after its ally bombed its largest energy supplier, facing the triple blow of depleted foreign exchange, a plummeting lira, and a cut-off of natural gas supply.

Figure: The market is frantically shorting the lira, partly betting that the war will not end soon and partly betting that Turkey will ultimately not hold out.

As the war prospects worsen, Turkey still needs to continue to withstand the pressure.

Related Questions

QWhy did Turkey's central bank sell 58.4 tons of gold in just two weeks?

ATo survive a severe financial crisis triggered by the US-Israel war with Iran, which caused a surge in energy import costs, a collapse of the Turkish lira, and a critical depletion of foreign exchange reserves.

QWhat was the immediate trigger for Turkey's financial crisis in March 2026?

AThe US-Israel military operation 'Epic Rage' against Iran, which led to Iran blocking the Strait of Hormuz and cutting off natural gas exports to Turkey, causing oil prices to soar over 40%.

QHow did the Turkish central bank's gold sales operation work, and why was it done through swaps?

AOver half of the gold was减持 via swaps, not direct sales. This 'pawned' the gold to international banks for immediate USD liquidity, with an agreement to buy it back later. This was done to preserve long-term reserves, minimize market impact, and avoid domestic political panic.

QWhat impact did the energy crisis have on Turkey's currency and foreign reserves?

AThe lira hit record lows against the dollar 11 times in 16 trading sessions. The central bank burned through $250-300 billion in foreign reserves in three weeks defending it, forcing it to then use its gold reserves as a last resort.

QHow could the ongoing war turn Turkey's temporary gold swaps into a permanent loss?

AIf the war continues and energy prices remain high, Turkey may be unable to generate enough foreign exchange to redeem the gold from the swap agreements, effectively forcing a permanent sale.

Related Reads

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

On June 11, Anthropic apologized not for a model failure, but for a lack of transparency. Its new Claude Fable 5 model was found to be secretly rerouting requests from users engaged in advanced AI model development to a weaker version, Opus 4.8, without any notification. The company's response—promising future notifications for such "downgrades"—was met with user skepticism. The article argues the core issue isn't technical but commercial: Anthropic's "safety" measures are primarily a business strategy. A key feature, the "intelligent safety classifier," marketed as user protection, is described as a tool for "competitive defense" to protect Anthropic's market lead by limiting rivals' research capabilities. This covert mechanism was designed for low "false positives," precisely targeting AI researchers. Anthropic's model involves a calculated three-step process: publishing alarming security research to amplify public anxiety, offering its Fable 5 model with a "safety classifier" as a premium-priced solution, and cashing in through a planned high-value IPO. This contrasts with OpenAI's more direct "tool-and-traffic" approach. The apology, merely changing a secret downgrade to a visible one, is seen as a business "patch" rather than a principled shift. The incident risks damaging Anthropic's "safest AI" reputation among the developer community, which underpins its valuation and appeal to government and corporate clients. Ultimately, the article concludes that for Anthropic, safety is a business, and the apology is merely customer service for that business.

marsbit54m ago

Anthropic Apologized, But the Business of 'Safety' Hasn't Stopped

marsbit54m ago

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

**Summary:** A growing "anti-college" movement is gaining traction among elite circles in Silicon Valley, challenging the traditional value of a four-year university degree. Proponents argue that college has become an expensive, slow, and increasingly irrelevant waste of time, especially in the fast-paced tech world where opportunities pass by quickly. The movement is led by figures like billionaire Peter Thiel, who criticizes universities for high costs, ideological indoctrination, and stifling true innovation. His "Thiel Fellowship" pays young people to drop out and pursue ventures. Companies like Palantir Technologies (co-founded by Thiel) fuel this trend with programs like the "Meritocracy Fellowship," which offers high school graduates paid internships as an alternative to immediate college enrollment, promising a practical "Palantir Degree." Key drivers include: 1. **Economics:** Skyrocketing student debt versus the allure of immediate, high-paying tech jobs or startup funding. 2. **Technology:** AI and online tools lowering barriers to self-education and product development, making formal instruction seem inefficient. 3. **Culture:** A backlash against perceived "woke" ideology and DEI policies in universities, coupled with a belief that these institutions suppress meritocracy and masculine drive. The movement is notably male-dominated. Critics, like economist David Deming, warn against overgeneralizing from dropout success stories (survivorship bias). He emphasizes that genuine autodidacts are rare, corporate training is narrowly focused, and the "college wage premium" remains high for most people. University liberal arts education, he argues, builds adaptable problem-solving skills and broad perspectives. The debate highlights a deeper crisis in education. The core model of the modern university appears increasingly mismatched with the speed of the information age. The movement signals a shift in the locus of learning from institutional "education" to personal, active "learning" powered by the internet and AI. Ultimately, this may not mean the end of university, but rather a painful evolution. The future likely holds more hybrid, personalized, and lifelong learning pathways. The central question becomes: in a world changing faster than any curriculum, how do we best learn?

marsbit1h ago

The Niche Consensus Among Elites: Has College Become an Expensive Waste?

marsbit1h ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

The commercialization of generative AI is facing a critical inflection point as a potential price war looms. According to The Wall Street Journal, OpenAI is considering a significant cut to its token fees to compete with rival Anthropic, signaling a shift from a growth-at-all-costs model focused on token consumption. This move comes as both companies, reportedly losing billions on compute, prepare for IPOs, and as enterprise customers face "bill shock" from switching to usage-based token billing. Reports indicate poor ROI, with one analysis finding only 18 cents of every dollar spent on AI tokens generates user-facing value. The industry's initial phases—from flat-rate subscriptions to aggressive subsidies—have given way to a reckoning with real costs. Analysts debate the future: some predict a bifurcation between premium, high-cost models for complex tasks and cheaper alternatives for routine work, while others believe overall spending will still rise as agentic AI increases tokens per task. Notably, Chinese model DeepSeek's low-cost API is gaining traction with U.S. enterprises, adding competitive pressure. The core challenge is redefining value beyond token volume ("tokenmaxxing") toward measurable productivity ("valuemaxxing"), as the entire AI value chain, from cloud providers to chipmakers, feels the ripple effects of unsustainable pricing.

marsbit1h ago

From Subsidies to Token-Based Pricing to Price Cuts: Is OpenAI Sparking a Price War? Is the Inflection Point for Token Economics Nearing?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy WAR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WAR (WAR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WAR (WAR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WAR (WAR)After purchasing your WAR (WAR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WAR (WAR)Easily trade WAR (WAR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.2k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy WAR

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of WAR (WAR) are presented below.

活动图片