U.S. government confirms it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-16Last updated on 2026-01-16

Abstract

The U.S. government has not sold the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet, according to a confirmation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The statement refutes earlier claims that the assets were liquidated, which would have violated Executive Order 14233 requiring forfeited Bitcoin to be retained. The DOJ clarified that the Bitcoin remains on the government’s balance sheet as part of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. On-chain data from Arkham supports this, showing no significant outflows from known U.S. government wallets. The confusion stemmed from historical precedent where seized Bitcoin was auctioned, but current policy under the executive order mandates holding such assets. The U.S. government continues to hold over 328,000 BTC, valued at more than $31 billion.

The U.S. government has confirmed that it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet. The confirmation addresses earlier claims that the assets had been liquidated in violation of federal policy governing forfeited digital assets.

U.S. DOJ clarification addresses liquidation claims

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said the Department of Justice [DOJ] has confirmed that the seized Bitcoin “have not been liquidated and will not be liquidated”.

He added that the assets will remain on the U.S. government’s balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The clarification follows reports earlier this month suggesting that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York [SDNY] had sold Bitcoin forfeited by developers associated with Samourai Wallet.

The alleged sale potentially contradicts Executive Order 14233, which mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

According to Witt, the DOJ confirmed that the forfeited digital assets remain in the U.S. government’s possession and comply with the executive order. The statement directly counters claims that the Bitcoin had already been liquidated following the Samourai plea agreement.

The DOJ has not publicly detailed operational handling of the assets beyond confirming they remain on the government’s balance sheet.

However, the confirmation removes uncertainty around whether the seizure resulted in market sales or contributed to recent Bitcoin price movements.

On-chain data aligns with U.S. government statement

Independent blockchain data from Arkham supports the U.S. DOJ’s position. Publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings show no material reduction in Bitcoin balances consistent with a sale linked to the Samourai case.

As of mid-January, on-chain analytics indicate the U.S. government continues to hold more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion, alongside smaller balances of ether and stablecoins. No abnormal outflows tied to the Samourai forfeiture have been observed.

Why the confusion emerged

Historically, the U.S. government has sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, particularly in earlier cases such as Silk Road.

That precedent shaped market expectations and led to the assumption that newly forfeited Bitcoin would also be liquidated.

However, Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift, requiring certain seized Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset rather than sold.

The Samourai case appears to fall under this updated framework, marking a departure from earlier forfeiture practices.

For now, the DOJ’s confirmation closes the question of whether Samourai-related Bitcoin entered the market.


Final Thoughts

  • The DOJ’s confirmation resolves claims that Samourai Wallet–related Bitcoin had been liquidated, reinforcing that the assets remain held under current federal policy.
  • The episode highlights how legacy expectations around seized Bitcoin sales continue to clash with the U.S. government’s evolving approach.

Related Questions

QWhat did the U.S. government confirm regarding the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet?

AThe U.S. government confirmed that it did not sell the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet and that the assets will remain on the government's balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

QWhich executive order mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold?

AExecutive Order 14233 mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

QHow much Bitcoin does the U.S. government currently hold according to on-chain analytics as of mid-January?

AAs of mid-January, the U.S. government holds more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion.

QWhy did confusion emerge about the liquidation of the seized Bitcoin from Samourai Wallet?

AConfusion emerged because historically the U.S. government sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, which shaped market expectations, but Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift requiring certain Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset.

QWhat role did on-chain data from Arkham play in this situation?

AIndependent blockchain data from Arkham supported the U.S. DOJ's position by showing no material reduction in Bitcoin balances in publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings, consistent with no sale linked to the Samourai case.

Related Reads

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

The article explores the sudden shift in WeChat's strategy towards AI assistants from mobile phone manufacturers, transitioning from strict opposition to active collaboration. For over a year, WeChat fiercely resisted attempts by phone AI assistants (like ByteDance's Doubao in late 2025) to control its features via GUI automation ("simulated clicking"), citing security and data control concerns. This stance created a significant barrier for system-level AI integration. Now, Tencent has initiated A2A (Agent-to-Agent) partnerships with major phone brands like Honor, Xiaomi, OPPO, and vivo. This model allows a phone's system AI (e.g., Honor's YOYO) to parse a user's voice command and send a structured request directly to WeChat's own internal AI agent via secure APIs. WeChat then executes the action (e.g., sending a message) and returns the result. The article attributes Tencent's "change of face" to strategic pressure. While leading in social app usage, Tencent trails rivals like ByteDance and Alibaba in standalone AI app popularity. WeChat, with its vast mini-program ecosystem, is Tencent's key asset for an AI comeback. The upcoming WeChat AI agent aims to handle tasks like booking and payments within the app. However, phone system assistants remain the primary AI entry point for most users. The A2A collaboration allows Tencent to extend WeChat's AI reach to this crucial system layer while maintaining control over its core functions and data. For phone manufacturers, embracing A2A is a pragmatic move. The GUI route proved unviable due to WeChat's blocks. A2A offers a compliant path to integrate a vital service, enhancing their AI assistants' usefulness. It allows them to focus on developing their own AI ecosystems for other services while cooperating on WeChat access. The collaboration is framed as a mutual, strategic necessity: Tencent gains a distribution channel, and manufacturers gain a key functionality. The partnership relies on a "dual authorization" mechanism for security, requiring both user and app consent for each action. While questions about long-term data privacy practices remain, experts note A2A is more secure and compliant than GUI automation. Ultimately, this cooperation is seen as a tentative, calculated truce. Tencent's long-term goal is to make WeChat an AI-powered "service OS." Phone manufacturers aim to make their system AI the central user interface. Their paths may converge or clash in the future, but for now, the A2A deal represents the opening chapter in the battle for the AI-era user入口, driven by necessity and strategic calculus on both sides.

marsbit1h ago

From Banning Doubao to Embracing Honor: Why Did WeChat Suddenly 'Change Its Face'?

marsbit1h ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

"On-Chain Numbers on the Eve of the World Cup: $1.6 Billion Traded Before Kick-off" Analysis of on-chain markets before the 2026 FIFA World Cup reveals significant crypto integration into football. The most striking figure is the approximately **$1.6 billion** in total trading volume on the single "World Cup Winner" contract on the Polymarket prediction market platform, accumulated before a single match was played. This represents explosive growth for a sector whose annual volume surged from ~$16B in 2024 to ~$64B in 2025. The ecosystem is maturing beyond speculation. Key developments include: 1) **Infrastructure upgrades** like Polymarket's migration to native, regulated USDC stablecoin for settlements; 2) **Reliable data oracles**, such as Chainlink, being used to resolve real-world match outcomes on-chain; and 3) **Official recognition**, with FIFA appointing its first-ever "Prediction Markets" partner. Over 100 contracts now cover everything from the outright winner to individual match results and even non-sporting risks like venue relocation. This evolution marks a fundamental shift. While crypto firms are absent from FIFA's top-tier sponsor list, the technology has deeply penetrated the tournament's financial and predictive infrastructure through regulated stablecoin settlements, decentralized oracles, and new official partnership categories. The regulatory landscape remains complex and varies by jurisdiction, but on-chain markets for the World Cup are already a multi-billion-dollar reality.

marsbit1h ago

On-Chain Figures on the Eve of Kickoff: 1.6 Billion Traded Before the World Cup Even Begins

marsbit1h ago

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

From the SpaceX IPO, which targets a $750 billion raise at a $1.77 trillion valuation, we can extrapolate capital flow trends relevant to crypto. The focus shifts from speculative narratives to foundational infrastructure and real-world asset (RWA) integration. Key crypto sectors poised to benefit include: 1. **AI Infrastructure**: The narrative is moving from consumer-facing AI applications to underlying, scarce resources like compute power and decentralized GPU networks (e.g., TAO, RENDER, AKT, IO). These protocols are positioning as the essential "picks and shovels" providers for the AI economy. 2. **Real-World Assets (RWA)**: Beyond tokenized treasury bonds, RWA's future lies in on-chain equity and pre-IPO assets like SpaceX. This could democratize access to high-growth assets and reshape global capital flows, benefiting infrastructure projects like ONDO, LINK, and Plume that facilitate issuance, data, and liquidity. 3. **Core Financial Infrastructure**: Stablecoins, payment networks, and DePIN (Decentralized Physical Infrastructure Networks) are critical for settling the future on-chain economy. Their role expands from internal trading tools to foundational layers for global finance, AI systems, and real-world asset networks, leading to potential value reassessment. In summary, the next cycle may prioritize long-term infrastructure value—AI compute, asset tokenization networks, and settlement layers—over short-lived application hype, mirroring the broader market's shift towards funding the foundational systems of the future.

marsbit2h ago

From SpaceX's IPO to the Future of Crypto: Which Crypto Sectors Will Host the Trillion-Dollar Narrative?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片