US Court Dismisses Coinbase User’s IRS Summons Challenge

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-19Last updated on 2026-03-19

Abstract

A California court dismissed a Coinbase user's petition to block an IRS summons for his financial records. Roger Metz filed the petition in May 2025, arguing the summons violated his privacy and was overly broad, despite having already filed an amended return and paid additional taxes. The court ruled against him on procedural grounds, as he failed to notify the U.S. Attorney General within the required 90-day window. This ruling reinforces the IRS's authority to obtain user data from centralized crypto exchanges, following a similar dismissed case involving another Coinbase user in 2025.

A user of Coinbase who attempted to block an IRS summons for his financial records got blocked by a California court.

As per the information from PACER, Roger Metz filed a petition in the Northern District of California in May 2025 to cancel an IRS summons that looked for his financial records in connection with an audit of his 2022 tax return.

The case of the petitioner was based on the argument that the summons breached his privacy rights and was overinclusive. His lawyers had also claimed that he had recognised the error himself and had filed an amended return and paid the additional tax, but that did not help to stop the IRS action.

Although US District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin ruled against the petitioner on March 18 after finding that he did not become involved in notifying all needed government parties within the 90-day window. The judge has expelled the case on procedural grounds.

The Grounds of The Ruling

The ruling is grounded on federal civil procedure rules, where defendants must be officially notified of lawsuits to make sure they get notice and the opportunity to reply. Court documents suggest Metz had worked for the US Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California and the IRS but did not notify the US Attorney General in Washington.

As per the government lawyers, this was enough for dismissal. The ruling by Judge Martinez-Olguin mentions that in his opposition brief, Metz does not provide any explanation for his failure to serve the US within 90 days after filing his petition.

In 2025, one more Coinbase user, named James Harper, claimed the IRS breached his Fourth Amendment rights after a John Doe summons was used to get his data from a crypto exchange.

The court, although it was on the IRS’s side, dismissed hearing his case. The result reinforces the IRS’s authority to get user financial records from centralised crypto exchanges.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Chainlink (LINK) Weakens: Is a Breakdown Below $6 Imminent?

TagsCoinbaseIRSLawsuit

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the main reason the US court dismissed Roger Metz's challenge against the IRS summons?

AThe court dismissed the case on procedural grounds because Metz failed to notify the US Attorney General within the required 90-day window after filing his petition.

QWhich cryptocurrency exchange user attempted to block an IRS summons for financial records in this case?

ARoger Metz, a user of Coinbase, attempted to block the IRS summons for his financial records.

QWhat two main arguments did Metz's lawyers use to challenge the IRS summons?

AMetz's lawyers argued that the summons breached his privacy rights and was overinclusive, and that he had already recognized the error, filed an amended return, and paid the additional tax.

QWhat precedent does this ruling reinforce regarding the IRS and cryptocurrency exchanges?

AThe ruling reinforces the IRS's authority to obtain user financial records from centralized cryptocurrency exchanges.

QWho was the US District Judge that ruled against Roger Metz in this case?

AUS District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin ruled against Roger Metz on March 18.

Related Reads

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit5m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit5m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit54m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit54m ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片