Upbit hack puts Binance’s emergency freeze policy under scrutiny

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

According to a KBS report, Binance froze only a small portion of funds linked to the November 27 hack of South Korean exchange Upbit. Police requested a freeze of approximately $370,000 in SOL tokens, but Binance blocked only about $55,000 after a 15-hour delay, citing the need for additional verification. The hack resulted in $36 million in unauthorized withdrawals. An expert emphasized the importance of rapid freezes to limit damage and suggested a global hotline between exchanges could improve responses. Both Upbit and Binance stated they are cooperating with authorities, who are actively investigating the incident.

According to South Korean broadcaster KBS, Binance reportedly froze only a portion of funds that police said were linked to a hack on local crypto exchange Upbit, one of South Korea’s largest exchanges, on Nov. 27.

KBS reported Friday that investigators requested Binance freeze approximately 470 million Korean won (approximately $370,000) in Solana (SOL) tokens believed to be associated with the incident. However, the exchange ultimately blocked about $55,000 (roughly 17% of the requested amount) after a delay of about 15 hours.

According to the report, Binance cited the need for additional verification when responding to the police request.

As a result of the hack, Upbit suffered unauthorized withdrawals of Solana‐based assets valued at roughly $36 million, prompting a formal police probe and efforts by the exchange to track and freeze stolen funds across multiple platforms.

The importance of rapid initial freezes

KBS quoted Cho Jae‐woo, director of Hansung University’s Blockchain Research Institute, as saying that rapid initial freezes can be important for limiting damage in hacking cases. However, exchanges often refer to litigation risks as “an excuse” for being resistant to such requests. He added that establishing a global hotline between exchanges with the emergency freeze authority could help to mitigate the damage.

Binance froze 17% of stolen funds from Upbit. Source: KBS

The incident draws attention to how major centralized exchanges respond in practice when foreign law enforcement agencies request freezes on assets suspected of being tied to hacking incidents.

Related: South Korea to impose bank-level liability on crypto exchanges after Upbit hack: Report

An Upbit spokesperson told Cointelegraph that they could not comment on the incident reported by KBS; however, they stressed that local law enforcement is “actively investigating” to identify the attackers.

“Upbit is working closely with the authorities, and we have additionally asked major global exchanges to freeze any assets detected from the related wallets.”

In a statement shared with Cointelegraph, a Binance spokesperson said that they could not comment as a matter of policy, but confirmed their commitment to “cooperating with relevant authorities and partners wherever appropriate.”

Binance responds to all law enforcement requests exclusively through an official channel, the spokesperson said, and works closely with agencies worldwide to support investigations into illicit activity.

Upbit said that it would provide further updates as they become available.

Related: South Korea targets sub-$680 crypto transfers in sweeping AML crackdown

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

WEEX Exchange Launches "TradFi Trading Competition" with a 50,000 USDT Prize Pool Amidst a crypto market downturn, WEEX Exchange highlights the growth of tokenized traditional finance (TradFi) assets as a key trend, allowing users to trade stocks, ETFs, and commodities using crypto. The platform has launched a "TradFi Trading Competition" from July 9th to 23rd, featuring a 50,000 USDT prize pool. The campaign offers three reward tiers: 1. **New User Bonus (25,000 USDT pool):** New users depositing ≥100 USDT, completing a specified spot trade, and one TradFi contract trade (margin ≥10 USDT) receive 200 USDT. 2. **Volume-Based Rewards (20,000 USDT pool):** All users can earn tiered bonuses for achieving TradFi contract trading volumes of 5,000 USDT (3 USDT), 20,000 USDT (10 USDT), and 100,000 USDT (50 USDT). Rewards are stackable. 3. **Participation Reward:** Any user opening a TradFi contract trade during the event receives 5 USDT instantly. The article promotes WEEX's TradFi features, which include trading tokenized shares of companies like NVIDIA and Tesla using USDT, 24/7 trading, fractional share investing starting from $5, and high leverage up to 100x for hedging. It positions these features as solutions to traditional investing barriers like high fees, strict trading hours, and high share prices. The summary concludes by encouraging users to join the competition and leverage WEEX's platform to access global TradFi markets.

marsbit1h ago

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

marsbit1h ago

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

Recent months have witnessed a wave of established blockchain projects migrating to new public chains, notably Base and Arbitrum, coupled with strategic pivots in their business models—essentially "re-starting" elsewhere. Examples include Sophon (moving from ZKsync to Base to cut $3M+ annual costs and focus on consumer apps), Moonbeam (shifting from Polkadot to Base to pursue decentralized AI), and Secret Network (planning a move from Cosmos to Arbitrum to explore privacy-AI integrations, though its token price plunged 30% post-announcement). A common thread is that these migrating projects are primarily layer-1 or layer-2 chains now seeking relevance in AI and real-world consumer applications. This trend highlights the relative stagnation of ecosystems like Polkadot and Cosmos, which are seeing significant outflows. However, the community remains skeptical about whether such chain-hopping truly enables a turnaround. Historical cases like y00ts NFTs (which moved from Solana to Polygon and back to Ethereum) and Synthetix (which retreated from a multi-chain strategy) show that migration often fails to deliver expected benefits and can add complexity. In today's more rational market, devoid of easy narrative or airdrop红利, simply changing chains is unlikely to be a silver bullet. For both migrating projects and destination chains, the real challenge lies not in attracting projects but in developing actual use cases that retain users.

marsbit1h ago

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片