Trump’s crypto advisor confirms ‘agreement in principle’ on CLARITY Act

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-21Last updated on 2026-03-21

Abstract

Trump's crypto advisor Patrick Witt confirmed a bipartisan 'agreement in principle' has been reached between the Senate and White House to advance the stalled CLARITY Act, a major crypto market structure bill. The breakthrough addresses banking industry concerns over stablecoin yields by blocking rewards on passive balances to prevent deposit flight, while permitting activity-based rewards for transactions and utility. This compromise, brokered by Senators Tillis and Alsobrooks, aims to unblock the legislation which had been stalled since January 2026. The bill's passage now depends on banking industry support, with a Senate markup expected after Easter recess if approved. The legislation faces a tight timeline to pass before the August recess and upcoming elections.

There is a little relief that the stalled crypto market structure bill, the CLARITY Act, may regain momentum soon.

On the 20th of March, Patrick Witt, President Donald Trump’s chief crypto advisor, confirmed that the Senate and the White House had reached an ‘agreement in principle’ to advance the bill.

Witt hailed the deal as a ‘major milestone’ to unlock the bill and credited Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) for brokering the deal. He added,

More work to be done to close out this and other outstanding issues, but this is a major milestone toward passing the CLARITY Act.

With the bipartisan support now secured, the ball will be in the banking industry’s court. At the time of writing, neither the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) nor the American Bankers Association (ABA) had issued a statement on the agreement yet.

So, what’s the deal all about?

Details of the agreement

The Digital Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act) was passed in the House last July. However, it has stalled in the Senate since January 2026 due to the stablecoin yield issue.

The banking industry worried that the stablecoin reward loophole in the GENIUS Act could trigger a flight of deposits. In response, it opposed the CLARITY Act unless the issue was addressed. There have been three negotiations to finalize a yield deal between the banking sector and the crypto industry. But all failed to resolve the issue.

The latest stablecoin yield compromise now seeks to block rewards on passive stablecoin balances. This would address banks‘ deposit flight concerns, as payment stablecoins will not operate like an interest-bearing savings account.

At the same time, activity-based rewards will be allowed for transfers, remittances, platform utility, and others. According to negotiators, this would ensure innovation isn’t stifled. It’s unclear whether the banks will agree to this compromise.

But a section of the crypto industry wasn’t entirely happy with it. Some leaders, such as Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev, called for flexibility on what attracts yield.

It’s important that Congress and regulators remain flexible in determining the activities that allow for the payment of interest or yield.

Path to passage

Should the banks back the compromise, the Senate Banking Committee will likely hold another formal markup to advance the bill. This would likely happen after Easter recess.

However, whether the bill will be brought to the Senate floor for a vote and subsequently reconciled by the House before the U.S. elections remains unclear.

According to Kristin Smith of the Solana Policy Institute, the bill has until the August recess to advance.


Final Summary

  • The Senate and the White House have reached a partisan agreement on a stablecoin yield compromise that could reignite momentum for the CLARITY Act.
  • It remains to be seen whether the banking industry will support the stablecoin yield deal

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the CLARITY Act and why has it been stalled in the Senate?

AThe CLARITY Act, or the Digital Market Clarity Act, is a crypto market structure bill that was passed in the House last July. It has been stalled in the Senate since January 2026 due to disagreements over the stablecoin yield issue, with the banking industry concerned it could trigger a flight of deposits.

QWho confirmed the 'agreement in principle' to advance the bill and which senators were credited for brokering it?

APatrick Witt, President Donald Trump's chief crypto advisor, confirmed the 'agreement in principle' between the Senate and the White House. He credited Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD) for brokering the deal.

QWhat is the key compromise in the new agreement regarding stablecoin yields?

AThe key compromise seeks to block rewards on passive stablecoin balances to address banks' deposit flight concerns, ensuring payment stablecoins do not operate like interest-bearing accounts. However, it will permit activity-based rewards for transfers, remittances, and platform utility to ensure innovation isn't stifled.

QWhat is the banking industry's main concern with the original bill, and which organizations represent their interests?

AThe banking industry's main concern is that a loophole in the related GENIUS Act regarding stablecoin rewards could trigger a flight of deposits from traditional banks. Their interests are represented by organizations like the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) and the American Bankers Association (ABA).

QWhat is the timeline for the CLARITY Act to advance, according to Kristin Smith of the Solana Policy Institute?

AAccording to Kristin Smith of the Solana Policy Institute, the bill has until the August recess to advance through the legislative process.

Related Reads

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit24m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit24m ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

The Coldcard hardware wallet has been compromised, with hackers stealing approximately 594.5 Bitcoin (~$40 million) from 500 addresses in just 25 minutes. The root cause was a critical software bug, undetected for five years, which disabled the device's secure chip for generating true random numbers. This led to the creation of private keys based on predictable data like the processor's serial number, drastically reducing cryptographic security. The attackers exploited this offline by brute-forcing possible seed phrases, finding active addresses on the public ledger, and signing transactions. Initially, Coinkite (Coldcard's maker) claimed only older models were at risk but later admitted all devices running the compromised firmware were vulnerable. CEO Rodolphe Novak (NVK) apologized but ruled out financial compensation for affected users. To secure funds, owners must urgently update their firmware to specific safe versions, generate a completely new seed phrase on the updated device, and transfer all assets to new addresses created with that new seed. While a BIP-39 passphrase can help, it does not replace this migration process. Other Coinkite products like TAPSIGNER were not affected. This incident underscores that even specialized hardware requires rigorous, independent code audits, especially for cryptographic functions. It parallels past failures, like a 2006 OpenSSL bug in Debian, and raises questions about whether automated code analysis can ever fully replace human scrutiny in critical security areas.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Coldcard Hardware Wallet Hacked: 594 Bitcoin Withdrawn in 25 Minutes

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片