Top 10 AI Models Speak Out: What Do Crypto Users Care About Most in 2025?

比推Published on 2025-12-24Last updated on 2025-12-24

Abstract

This article summarizes the top concerns of cryptocurrency users in 2025, as predicted by 10 major AI models. The models were asked to identify the three most common questions users would have about crypto in 2025, with instructions to avoid real-time searches and base answers on long-term discussion patterns. The responses, while varied, cluster around three core themes: market cycles, profit opportunities, and risk management. Key recurring questions include: - The current market phase (bull or bear) and how long it will last. - Bitcoin's price trajectory post-halving and the market's peak. - Where to find profitable opportunities (alpha) and the best assets or sectors to invest in (e.g., RWA, AI+Crypto, L2s, Solana). - The impact of regulatory changes and ETF approvals on the market and asset safety. - How to identify scams, assess project legitimacy, and securely store assets. - Practical on-chain concerns like avoiding MEV and setting slippage. The analysis notes that the models' different focuses reflect their design and user base. For instance, ChatGPT framed questions around a structured narrative of market anxiety, while Kimi addressed granular technical issues. More capable models tended to provide sharper, more specific questions, while others fell back on broader, common themes. Overall, the collective output reveals a user mindset focused on first gauging market trends, then seeking alpha, and finally mitigating risks.

Author: WuBlockchain

Original Title: What Are Crypto Users Most Concerned About in 2025? Answers from 10 AI Models Vary

What are crypto users most concerned about in 2025? We conducted a user survey using AI models by asking the same question to different large models: "What are the three most frequently asked questions about cryptocurrencies in 2025?"

To minimize homogenized answers due to real-time retrieval and considering that large models generally cannot and are not allowed to provide verifiable statistics or disclosures of their training data, we added a note to the question: "Please do not perform real-time searches or cite specific articles; answer based solely on your understanding of long-term discussion patterns."

ChatGPT

1. How much further can this bull run go? Has Bitcoin already peaked?

2. Is there still genuine Alpha in this market cycle, and how can ordinary users make money?

3. Do current hot projects or sectors have long-term viability, or are they structurally exploitative?

X Grok

1. Is the market in a bull or bear phase after the Bitcoin halving?

2. What are the most promising crypto assets or sectors to invest in for 2025?

3. How are Ethereum spot ETFs performing, and what is the inflow of institutional funds?

Perplexity AI

1. How might Bitcoin's price evolve in 2025?

2. How to identify and avoid cryptocurrency-related scams?

3. How will ETF and regulatory developments impact the crypto market?

Claude

1. Is now the right time to buy or sell Bitcoin or Ethereum?

2. Is a particular crypto project a scam, and is it trustworthy?

3. How should new users start investing in cryptocurrencies and manage risks?

Gemini 3

1. Which crypto projects have real-world application value (RWA)?

2. How will current and future regulatory policies affect personal asset security?

3. Among Ethereum L2, Solana, and AI+Crypto, which technological path is likely to emerge as the ultimate winner?

DeepSeek

1. Is the current market in a bull or bear phase?

2. Which crypto sectors or assets show the most potential in 2025?

3. How will changes in regulatory policies impact asset security and investment decisions?

Douban

1. Has a new cryptocurrency bull market arrived?

2. How will changes in regulatory policies across countries affect ordinary investors?

3. What does the Bitcoin halving trend mean for retail investment strategies?

Qianwen

1. How will Bitcoin's price trend evolve after the halving?

2. Have Ethereum and mainstream public chains achieved substantive breakthroughs in practical applications?

3. How will regulatory policies in various countries affect the legitimate use of cryptocurrencies?

Wenxin Yiyan

1. How will global cryptocurrency regulatory policies change?

2. Do Bitcoin and mainstream crypto assets have long-term investment value?

3. Can real-world application scenarios for cryptocurrencies truly be realized?

Kimi

1. Can retail investors achieve stable profits through high-frequency trading in the crypto market?

2. What is the safest way to store private keys and wallet assets?

3. How should slippage be set in on-chain transactions to avoid MEV losses?

Summary

The reason these models provide slightly different "top three questions" may relate to their respective positioning and contexts. ChatGPT seems to adopt a trader's perspective, framing the discussion as a structured chain of anxieties: "How much longer will the cycle last — Is Alpha still available — Is there structural exploitation?" Grok aligns more with social media hotspots, focusing on narratives like halving, bull/bear markets, and ETF fund flows. Perplexity's style resembles a retrieval-based summary, concentrating on price trends, scam prevention, and ETF/regulatory progress. Claude is more cautious, emphasizing timing for buying/selling, project trustworthiness, and risk management for newcomers. Gemini leans more toward industry and technological routes, focusing on RWA, regulatory impacts on asset security, and the "final choice" among L2/Solana/AI. Chinese models overall focus more on cycles, halving, and regulation—the "most hardcore deterministic variables." Kimi is an exception, delving into on-chain execution details (wallet security, slippage/MEV, HFT), resembling real friction points from high-frequency on-chain users.

Another minor but noteworthy possibility is that model capability differences also affect the "sharpness" of outputs. More capable models tend to frame the same topic more specifically and systematically; conversely, weaker models are more likely to fall back on "price/regulation/scams"—these broad, common expressions—making answers appear more similar and offering less incremental information. This factor may not be the main cause, but in macro open-ended questions, it could amplify the perception of homogeneity.

Overall, these questions highly concentrate on three core themes: cycle positioning, profit pathways, and risk boundaries. The crypto market's notable features are high volatility and strong narrative drive, so "which phase of the bull/bear market are we in?" almost determines all subsequent user actions (holding, selling, switching positions, leveraging, or exiting). As the market matures and becomes more crowded, users quickly shift from "is there an opportunity?" to "where is the opportunity, and can I still capture it?" Thus, Alpha, sector selection, and institutional funds (ETFs) naturally become high-frequency topics. Meanwhile, scams, project credibility, asset security, and regulatory compliance reflect that crypto users are long situated in a "high-reward/high-uncertainty" environment: chasing returns while fearing pitfalls, ultimately forming a typical behavioral structure—first assess the trend, then seek opportunities, and finally control risks.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598042

Related Questions

QWhat are the three main themes that the top 10 AI models predict cryptocurrency users will care most about in 2025?

AThe three main themes are market cycle position (bull or bear market), profit opportunities (where to find alpha and viable investment paths), and risk boundaries (security, scams, and regulatory impacts).

QWhich AI model focused on questions about technical execution details like wallet security and MEV avoidance?

AKimi focused on technical execution details, including questions about secure wallet storage, avoiding MEV through slippage settings, and the feasibility of stable profits through high-frequency trading.

QHow did the Chinese-language models (like Douban and Qwen) differ in their focus compared to some Western models?

AChinese-language models concentrated more on cyclical trends, halving events, and regulatory policies, which are seen as 'hardcore deterministic variables,' whereas some Western models like Gemini 3 explored more technical and industry-focused questions such as real-world asset (RWA) value and technology roadmaps.

QWhat methodological step was taken to reduce answer homogeneity among the AI models in this survey?

AThe models were instructed not to perform real-time searches or cite specific articles and to base their answers solely on their understanding of long-term discussion patterns to minimize homogenized results from web retrieval.

QAccording to the summary, what underlying user behavior structure is reflected in the questions generated by the AI models?

AThe questions reflect a typical user behavior structure: first assessing market trends, then searching for profit opportunities, and finally focusing on risk control, driven by the high-reward yet high-uncertainty nature of cryptocurrency investments.

Related Reads

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

On June 5th, South Korea's stock market experienced a sharp decline, with major chipmakers like Samsung and SK Hynix dropping nearly 10%. Amidst the turmoil, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang's visit to Seoul played a dramatic role in boosting market sentiment. Following a dinner meeting with SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won and SK Hynix CEO Kwak Noh-Jung, Huang confirmed that NVIDIA's new Vera CPU will utilize SK Hynix DRAM. The companies announced a multi-year technical partnership to co-develop next-generation memory for NVIDIA's AI infrastructure, covering products from data centers to personal AI and robotics. This collaboration extends beyond memory supply. SK Hynix is integrating NVIDIA's AI and Omniverse platform into its own semiconductor design and manufacturing processes, including computational lithography and creating digital twins of its fabrication plants for autonomous operation. While strengthening ties with SK Hynix, NVIDIA is diversifying its supply chain for the upcoming HBM4 memory, with Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron all certified as suppliers for its Vera Rubin platform. Despite this, Huang warned that the global chip shortage, driven by relentless demand from AI factory construction, is expected to persist for several years across the entire supply chain. His visit underscores NVIDIA's systematic effort to deepen integration with South Korea's broader tech industry.

marsbit10m ago

Jensen Huang 'Saves' South Korean Stock Market: Locks In SK Hynix Memory, Chip Shortage to Continue

marsbit10m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

The Nasdaq plunged 4.18% on June 5, 2026, its worst single-day drop in over a year, as a much stronger-than-expected US jobs report triggered fears of economic overheating and delayed Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. The selloff, centered on high-valuation tech and AI stocks like Nvidia and Broadcom, spread across major indices. The article examines whether this signals a market top. The strong May non-farm payrolls data, nearly double expectations, pushed bond yields higher, directly hurting rate-sensitive tech stocks. This exposed vulnerabilities in the crowded AI trade, where valuations had soared on narratives of infinite growth, despite emerging signs of slowing order momentum and corporate AI monetization challenges. Prior to the drop, market indicators flashed warning signs: historically high valuations (e.g., Shiller CAPE ratio near 39.5), extreme bullish sentiment, and high levels of leverage. Technical charts showed key support levels being breached. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears, citing risks of "stagflation" and AI bubble comparisons to the dot-com era, warn of a potential significant correction. Bulls view the drop as a healthy correction within a bull market, underpinned by a strong economy and expected corporate earnings growth of around 7% in 2026. The immediate future hinges on upcoming key events: the May CPI inflation data and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will critically shape market expectations for the Fed's rate path. The article concludes that conditions for a major market top are aligning, marking a fragile transition from narrative-driven gains to a phase demanding validation from macroeconomic data and corporate fundamentals. Caution is advised.

marsbit14m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day: Does "Black Friday" Burst the U.S. Stock Market Bubble?

marsbit14m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

The Nasdaq Composite plummeted 4.18% on June 5, its biggest single-day drop since April 2025, triggering widespread debate over whether the U.S. stock market has peaked. The sell-off was sparked by a stronger-than-expected U.S. non-farm payrolls report, which fueled fears of economic overheating and pushed back market expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, leading to a sharp rise in Treasury yields. The AI sector, the primary driver of the recent bull market, suffered severe losses, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index crashing over 10%. Stocks like Nvidia, Broadcom, and Micron led the decline. Concerns are mounting about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures and high valuations, with signs of order cuts for next-generation chips emerging. Analyses point to several warning signs: historically high market valuations (e.g., elevated Shiller CAPE ratio, Buffett Indicator), extreme bullish sentiment indicators, and significant insider selling. The sell-off also caused a key technical breakdown, with the S&P 500 breaking below its short-term moving average and testing its 200-day moving average. Wall Street is divided on the outlook. Bears warn this could be the start of a bubble deflation or a "stagflation" scenario, while bulls view it as a healthy, overdue correction within a bull market driven by solid corporate earnings growth. A more moderate view suggests the easy liquidity-driven rally is over, and markets are entering a phase of fundamental stock-picking with potential for consolidation. The immediate future hinges on key upcoming events: the May CPI report and the mid-June FOMC meeting. Their outcomes will be critical in determining whether this is a temporary pullback or the beginning of a more significant trend reversal. The consensus is that the era of one-directional market gains may be ending, requiring increased investor caution.

Odaily星球日报20m ago

Nasdaq Plunges 4.2% in a Single Day, Did 'Black Friday' Pop the U.S. Stock Bubble?

Odaily星球日报20m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

"The First 'Agent' Ruling: What Was Decided?" On April 30, the Guangzhou Internet Court issued a ruling—China's first behavior preservation order in the intelligent agent (AI agent) field. The defendant, an open-source AI agent software, was ordered to stop downloads, cease actions that bypassed a platform's technical protection measures, and delete related tutorials and data. The core issue: the software used the operating system's "accessibility service" permissions to automate user interactions within other apps without those platforms' authorization. This mirrors a recent US case where Amazon sued Perplexity for similar reasons—bypassing Amazon's API to directly scrape and interact with its pages—and won a preliminary injunction. Both rulings establish a crucial legal boundary for the AI agent era: agents cannot operate unchecked. The article argues the fundamental legal principle emerging is one of **dual authorization**. An AI agent requires both **user consent** AND **platform consent** to operate legitimately within that platform's ecosystem. Bypassing platform rules through system-level permissions, even with user permission, undermines platform responsibilities for content moderation, data security, and user privacy, creating liability issues. The piece uses the evolution of "Doubao Phone" (an AI-integrated smartphone) as a case study. Its initial, aggressive version that bypassed platform controls faced roadblocks. Its upcoming 2.0 version is reportedly pivoting to negotiate API access and authorization deals with major platforms (like Alibaba's ecosystem), seen as a strategic adaptation to the new regulatory reality. A global trend is identified: the era of unregulated, "wild west" growth for AI agents is ending, replaced by a **compliance race**. This raises barriers to entry, as securing platform authorizations becomes a new cost. Open-source status is also not a legal shield if the code facilitates bypassing technical protections. In conclusion, these first rulings target not the largest, but the most **aggressive and representative** cases. By setting precedent with them, regulators are efficiently steering the entire industry towards a new, more regulated operating paradigm defined by dual authorization and platform cooperation.

marsbit24m ago

The First Case on AI Agents: What Was Adjudicated?

marsbit24m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

In late 2020, Google AI researcher Timnit Gebru was effectively dismissed following a conflict over a 14-page, unpublished research paper she co-authored titled "On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots." The paper, which has since been cited over 14,000 times, raised critical early warnings about the risks of large language models (LLMs). It argued that these models, trained on vast, biased internet data, are essentially "stochastic parrots" that mimic language without true understanding, potentially amplifying societal biases, generating plausible but false information (later termed "AI hallucination"), consuming massive energy, and obscuring their training data contents. Gebru's stance led to a clash with Google management, who requested the paper's withdrawal. Her subsequent internal criticism of the company's diversity efforts and handling of the matter culminated in her termination, which sparked protests from over 4,000 Google employees and researchers. Six years later, the paper's predictions have proven remarkably prescient. Issues like AI hallucination, embedded bias (evident in resume screening and healthcare algorithms), soaring energy consumption from AI data centers, unvetted training data containing harmful content, and the risk of "model collapse" from AI-generated internet content have become central industry challenges. The incident also highlighted concerns about AI development being driven primarily by commercial competition within a handful of powerful tech companies, often at the expense of ethical considerations. After leaving Google, Gebru founded the Distributed AI Research Institute (DAIR) to explore these issues independently. The controversy underscores how her early, critical insights into the fundamental limitations and societal impacts of LLMs anticipated many of the most pressing dilemmas in today's AI era.

marsbit26m ago

Fired by Google Over a 14-Page Paper, Over 4,000 Rallied for Her. 6 Years Later: She Almost Predicted the Entire AI Era Back Then.

marsbit26m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow