Tiger Research: How Is This Crypto Winter Different?

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Tiger Research analyzes the distinct nature of the current crypto market downturn, arguing it differs fundamentally from past "crypto winters." Previous cycles were triggered by internal industry crises—the Mt. Gox hack, ICO scams, and the FTX collapse—which shattered trust and drove talent away. In contrast, the recent market movement is driven by external factors: the approval of Bitcoin ETFs fueled the bull run, while tariff policies and interest rate shifts caused the decline. Post-regulation, the market has fragmented into three layers: a compliant zone (e.g., tokenized RWA, regulated exchanges), a non-compliant zone (speculative, experimental apps), and shared infrastructure (e.g., stablecoins, oracles). Capital no longer flows between these layers as before; ETF inflows remain largely confined to Bitcoin within the compliant zone and do not trickle down to altcoins. For the next bull market to emerge, two conditions are necessary: a new killer application must originate from the non-compliant zone (similar to how DeFi summer began), and the macro environment must become supportive (e.g., with lower interest rates). The era of a unified "crypto season" where all assets rally together is likely over due to this market segmentation.

Author: Ryan Yoon

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: As the market enters a downward cycle, skepticism towards the crypto market is growing. Tiger Research believes this time is different from the past: previous winters were triggered by internal issues (Mt. Gox hack, ICO scams, FTX collapse), while this cycle's rise and fall are both driven by external factors (ETF approval brought the bull market, tariff policies and interest rates caused the decline).

Post-regulation, the market has split into three layers: the compliant zone, the non-compliant zone, and shared infrastructure. Capital no longer flows via 'trickle-down' effects as it did before. ETF capital stays with Bitcoin and does not flow into altcoins.

The next bull run requires two conditions: a killer app must emerge from the non-compliant zone + a supportive macro environment.

Full text below:

As the market enters a downward cycle, skepticism towards the crypto market is growing. The question now is, have we entered a crypto winter?

Core View

Crypto winters follow a sequence: Major event → Collapse of trust → Talent drain
Past winters were caused by internal problems; the current rise and fall are driven by external factors; it is neither winter nor spring
Post-regulation, the market has split into three layers: Compliant zone, Non-compliant zone, Shared infrastructure; The trickle-down effect has disappeared
ETF capital stays with Bitcoin; it does not flow out of the compliant zone
The next bull run requires a killer use case + a supportive macro environment

1. How did the previous crypto winters unfold?

The first winter occurred in 2014. Mt. Gox was the exchange handling 70% of global Bitcoin trading volume at the time. Approximately 850,000 BTC disappeared in a hack, causing a collapse in market trust. New exchanges with internal controls and audit functions emerged, and trust began to recover. Ethereum also entered the world through ICOs, opening up new possibilities for vision and fundraising methods.

This ICO wave became the catalyst for the next bull market. When anyone could issue a token and raise funds, the 2017 boom was ignited. Projects raising billions with just a whitepaper flooded in, but most had no substance.

In 2018, regulatory measures poured out from South Korea, China, and the US, the bubble burst, and the second winter arrived. This winter did not end until 2020. Post-COVID, liquidity poured in, and DeFi protocols like Uniswap, Compound, and Aave gained attention, bringing capital back.

The third winter was the most severe. When Terra-Luna collapsed in 2022, Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, and FTX collapsed in turn. This wasn't just a simple price drop; the very structure of the industry was shaken. In January 2024, the US SEC approved the spot Bitcoin ETF, followed by the Bitcoin halving and Trump's pro-crypto policies, and capital began to flow in again.

2. The Crypto Winter Pattern: Major Event → Collapse of Trust → Talent Drain

All three winters followed the same sequence. A major event occurs, trust collapses, talent leaves.

It always starts with a major event. The Mt. Gox hack, ICO regulation, and the FTX bankruptcy following the Terra-Luna collapse. The scale and form of each event were different, but the result was the same. The entire market was thrown into shock.

Shock quickly spread into a collapse of trust. Those who had been discussing what to build next began to question whether cryptocurrency was truly meaningful technology. The collaborative atmosphere among builders disappeared, and they began to blame each other for who was responsible.

Doubt led to a talent drain. The builders who had been creating new momentum in blockchain fell into doubt. In 2014, they moved to fintech and big tech companies. In 2018, they moved to institutions and AI. They went to places that seemed more certain.

3. Is the current situation a crypto winter?

The pattern of past crypto winters is visible today.

Major Event:
Trump's tariff policies caused market turbulence
Shift in Federal Reserve interest rate policy
Overall crypto market decline
Collapse of Trust: Skepticism is spreading within the industry. The focus has shifted from what to build next to mutual blame.
Pressure of Talent Drain: The AI industry is growing rapidly. It promises faster exits and greater wealth than crypto.

However, it's hard to call this a crypto winter. Past winters erupted from within the industry. Mt. Gox was hacked, most ICO projects were exposed as scams, FTX collapsed. The industry itself lost trust.

Now it's different.

ETF approval started the bull market, tariff policies and interest rates drove the decline. External factors lifted the market, external factors also pushed it down.

Builders are not leaving either.

RWA, perpDEX (perpetual decentralized exchanges), prediction markets, InfoFi, privacy. New narratives keep emerging, they are still being created. They haven't pulled the entire market like DeFi did, but they haven't disappeared either. The industry hasn't collapsed; the external environment has changed.

We didn't create spring, so there is no winter.

4. Changes in Market Structure Post-Regulation

Behind this is a major shift in market structure post-regulation. The market has split into three layers: 1) The Compliant Zone, 2) The Non-Compliant Zone, and 3) Shared Infrastructure.

The Compliant Zone includes RWA tokenization, exchanges, institutional custody, prediction markets, and compliance-based DeFi. They undergo audits, make disclosures, and have legal protection. Growth is slow, but the capital scale is large and stable.

However, once in the compliant zone, it's hard to expect explosive returns like in the past. Volatility is lower, and potential upside is limited. But downside risk is also limited.

On the other hand, the Non-Compliant Zone will become more speculative in the future. The barrier to entry is low, and speed is fast. Scenarios of 100x in one day and -90% the next will happen more frequently.

However, this space is not meaningless. Industries born in the non-compliant zone are creative, and once validated, they move into the compliant zone. DeFi did this, prediction markets are doing it now. It acts as an experimental field. But the non-compliant zone itself will become increasingly separated from compliant zone businesses.

Shared Infrastructure includes stablecoins and oracles. They are used in both the compliant and non-compliant zones. The same USDC is used for institutional RWA payments and for Pump.fun trading. Oracles provide data for tokenized treasury validation and for anonymous DEX liquidations.

In other words, as the market splits, capital flows have also changed.

In the past, when Bitcoin rose, altcoins rose too through a trickle-down effect. Now it's different. Institutional capital entering through ETFs stays with Bitcoin, full stop. Compliant zone capital does not flow into the non-compliant zone. Liquidity only stays where value has been proven. And even Bitcoin has not yet proven its value as a safe-haven asset relative to risk assets.

5. Conditions for the Next Bull Run

Regulation is being sorted out. Builders are still building. So two things remain.

First, a new killer use case must emerge from the non-compliant zone. Something that creates value that didn't exist before, like DeFi Summer in 2020. AI agents, InfoFi, and on-chain social are candidates, but they haven't reached the scale to drive the entire market yet. The process where experiments in the non-compliant zone are validated and move into the compliant zone must be recreated. DeFi did this, prediction markets are doing it now.

Second, the macroeconomic environment. Even if regulation is sorted out, builders are building, and infrastructure is accumulating, if the macroeconomic environment is not supportive, the upside is limited. The 2020 DeFi Summer erupted when liquidity was released post-COVID. The post-ETF approval rise in 2024 also coincided with expectations of rate cuts. No matter how the crypto industry performs, it cannot control interest rates and liquidity. For what the industry builds to gain traction, the macroeconomic environment must turn.

A 'crypto season' where everything rises together like in the past is unlikely to reappear. Because the market has split. The compliant zone grows steadily, the non-compliant zone experiences big rises and falls.

The next bull run will come. But it won't come for everyone.

China's First Embodied Data Compliance Outbound: How Does Paxini Become a Game-Changer for Industry Development?

"Embodied Intelligence Data Compliance Goes Global: A Breakthrough Moment. At the 2026 World Intelligent Industry Expo, Paxini, the sole Chinese company authorized for cross-border embodied data transfer, launched a pioneering project in Tianjin. This marks the first officially approved case of its kind in China, resolving a major industry bottleneck for compliant international data flow. As the ultimate direction of AI evolution, embodied intelligence relies on vast, multi-modal physical world interaction data. Despite booming global demand, stringent compliance had previously trapped the domestic industry. Paxini's breakthrough establishes a formal compliance framework, setting a benchmark for standardized development. The core of Paxini's success lies in its industry-leading data infrastructure and compliant security architecture, aligning with national data strategy. It operates a large-scale 'data collection factory' for high-quality, multi-modal data and has established a full-chain compliant pathway from 'collection-processing-certification-outbound transfer'. This dual advantage in data scale/quality and compliance secures its leadership. Beyond immediate commercial impact, the project signifies long-term strategic value: international market validation from top-tier financial institutions and the compounding benefits of ecosystem building. High-quality physical world data possesses enduring value. By solving fundamental infrastructure and compliance challenges, Paxini not only contributes a 'Chinese model' to the global embodied intelligence industry but also solidifies a key competitive moat for the long haul. This enables safe, efficient global flow of China's quality embodied data, amplifying its influence in the intelligent manufacturing landscape."

marsbit2m ago

China's First Embodied Data Compliance Outbound: How Does Paxini Become a Game-Changer for Industry Development?

marsbit2m ago

Full Decoding of SpaceX's Roadshow: Humanity's Largest IPO in History, Aiming to Send GPUs into Space

SpaceX launches IPO roadshow for potentially largest offering ever, targeting $1.75T valuation. Key points: The company presents a three-pillar strategy: Space (low-cost launches via reusable rockets), Starlink (profitable satellite internet, ~103M users in Q1 2026), and AI (recently merged xAI, currently a major cash burn). The most ambitious vision is orbital AI data centers, leveraging Starship to deploy compute satellites for unlimited solar power and heat dissipation, aiming to overcome ground-based power grid limitations. While Starlink provides a solid financial anchor, the valuation premium hinges on long-term bets like space-based computing and lunar/Mars economies. Analysts note significant risks, including xAI's massive losses, Musk's control via dual-class shares, and potential sell-pressure post-lockup expiration in late 2026.

marsbit9m ago

Full Decoding of SpaceX's Roadshow: Humanity's Largest IPO in History, Aiming to Send GPUs into Space

marsbit9m ago

Macroeconomic Origins of the African Payments Market Structure

Africa’s payment landscape exhibits the world’s highest mobile money penetration and fastest cryptocurrency adoption. This is not a market anomaly but a macroeconomic inevitability driven by deep structural factors: a vast, young population, heavy reliance on commodity exports and remittances generating massive cross‑border payment needs, and a chronically underdeveloped formal banking system plagued by de‑risking, high inflation, and currency instability. This vacuum has allowed mobile money (e.g., M‑Pesa) to become the primary payment channel domestically, while cryptocurrencies—particularly stablecoins—serve as a store of value against local‑currency depreciation and a lower‑cost cross‑border medium. The key divide is the Sahara: North Africa integrates with the MENA oil‑centric financial system, while Sub‑Saharan Africa, facing acute dollar shortages and fragmented currencies, is the epicenter of this fintech surge. Structural reliance on dollars, driven by trade deficits and weak local currency credibility, creates persistent dollar scarcity, which crypto and mobile payments effectively address. Efforts like the Pan‑African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS) aim at de‑dollarization, but these alternatives will remain essential as long as underlying economic constraints—commodity dependence, limited industrialization, and financial exclusion—persist.

marsbit14m ago

Macroeconomic Origins of the African Payments Market Structure

marsbit14m ago

A Memory Reduction Report Triggers a Plunge: Is It an Overreaction?

A supply chain report regarding NVIDIA's Rubin platform's system memory configuration triggered a significant sell-off in AI memory stocks. The report suggested a potential reduction in per-rack CPU-side system memory (SOCAMM/LPDDR) from ~55TB to ~28TB, impacting the perceived value per cabinet. This led to sharp declines for Micron and SK Hynix, as the market broadly reacted to the negative headline of "memory cut," without initially distinguishing between CPU system memory and GPU-side HBM4. The article clarifies that the reported adjustment primarily affects the CPU-side system memory profit pool, not the HBM4 demand tied directly to GPUs, which remains a critical and supply-constrained component. The sell-off is interpreted as a high-position, sentiment-driven reaction in a crowded trade, rather than a fundamental reassessment of HBM. While the cost reduction per cabinet could theoretically boost overall rack shipments, this remains speculative. The key going forward is concrete data on final Rubin BOMs, actual shipment volumes, and revenue splits for companies like Micron (exposed to SOCAMM/DRAM) and SK Hynix (focused on HBM). The event highlights a market shift from buying a broad AI memory narrative to scrutinizing specific profit pools within the AI hardware chain.

marsbit15m ago

A Memory Reduction Report Triggers a Plunge: Is It an Overreaction?

marsbit15m ago

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

On June 4th, despite a significant sell-off in the broader AI and semiconductor sector triggered by Broadcom's disappointing guidance, Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) surged over 11%, showcasing a sharp divergence in market sentiment. Broadcom's warning about potential supply chain diversification by key customer Google and a weaker-than-expected outlook punctured the high-flying AI valuation narrative. This led to heavy selling in names like Broadcom (-12.6%) and Micron (-7%), with funds rotating into traditional industrial stocks. AAOI defied this trend. The stock has experienced high volatility recently, driven by bullish analyst coverage, notably from Rosenblatt which raised its price target to $220. Key catalysts include initial 800G optical module revenue from Amazon, potential certification from Oracle, and strong demand across its product portfolio. The company has reported cumulative orders for 800G/1.6T modules exceeding $324 million and is aggressively expanding manufacturing capacity in Texas, targeting an annualized run-rate of $1.4 billion for its module business by Q3 2027. However, AAOI's fundamentals present a mixed picture. Its Q1 2026 results missed expectations, showing a GAAP net loss, and Q2 guidance points to merely breakeven adjusted EPS. Risks include a delayed 800G production ramp to the second half of the year and high dependence on a few key cloud customers. Recent stock sales by company executives near price highs also noted. The article suggests AAOI's rally reflects a market beginning to differentiate within the AI ecosystem. While Broadcom's issues prompted a reassessment of custom ASIC and customer concentration risks, funds flowing into AAOI indicate a belief that the "physical bottleneck" narrative for optical connectivity—where supply remains tight—remains intact and is somewhat decoupled from the current sector weakness. The sustainability of AAOI's premium valuation now hinges on the successful execution of its production plans and upcoming quarterly results.

marsbit20m ago

AAOI Defies Trend with Over 10% Surge, 'New Stock God' Serenity Predicts Potential to Double Again

marsbit20m ago

Trading

Spot

Futures