Those Who Wanted to Buy Have Already Bought: SpaceX Retail Frenzy Subsides, Real Selling Pressure Arrives in August

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-23Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

SpaceX (SPCX) debuted on June 12 at $150, soared to a record $225 by June 16 in a retail-fueled frenzy, then collapsed, losing over $600 billion in market cap in a single day this week and crashing back near its IPO price. Analysts note the initial surge was driven by record retail inflows exceeding those for major tech stocks, but momentum evaporated swiftly after the peak. The sell-off occurred with only 5% of shares freely tradable. The real pressure is yet to come: lock-up expirations starting in August could release up to 44% of insider shares by early September, potentially increasing the float ninefold. With retail buying exhausted and massive supply looming, analysts warn the path higher is now severely challenged, posing a broader risk to a market sustained by speculative momentum.

Original Author: Tyler Durden (ZeroHedge pseudonym)

Original Compilation: Source: ZeroHedge

Guide: SpaceX fell for three consecutive days, plummeting 16.4% on Monday alone, erasing $600 billion in market value, dropping back to the $150 opening price. This analysis bluntly argues that those who wanted to buy have already done so, and more critically, the selling pressure hasn't truly arrived yet. This pump-and-dump used only 5% of the float. Insiders could sell up to 44% of the shares by early September.

It began with a bang. SpaceX went public on June 12, opening at $150 per share, well above the $135 IPO price. Within two days, aggressive traders started furiously buying 380-strike call options expiring two days later, trying to launch the stock price into the stratosphere, creating a gamma squeeze.

@zerohedge tweet: They're really going to do it

In a report this morning, Canaccord described the "new wave of optimism" accompanying SpaceX's listing:

"The SPCX tape shows the market has entered a new phase of euphoria. Prior to this historic IPO, we felt AI optimism was already full, sometimes excessive, but buying was primarily from rational (albeit exuberant) institutions—large, well-funded public companies and PE investors. In our view, SPCX has turned a new page, with dramatically heightened retail participation, propelling the stock into the global top six by market cap and adding the equivalent of half of META's market value in its first week. Its market cap far surpasses that of its sister company TSLA, while revenue is only about one-fifth. Despite the company being named SpaceX, revenue is actually skewed towards connectivity—Starlink contributed $113.9B, launch services only $41B, and AI compute capacity was $32B in 2025."

Vanda Track put it even more starkly. In a review published earlier Monday, it wrote: "SpaceX's debut week set records. Retail investors net bought $405 million of SPCX in the first five trading days, the strongest retail participation in an IPO in recent years. Buying was extremely aggressive in the first few days, cooling somewhat towards the week's end. The flow characteristics increasingly resemble building a long-term position, not chasing a short-term meme stock."

Caption: Retail flow for SPCX in its first five trading days

Source: Vanda Track

The scale of retail buying in SPCX becomes even more staggering in context. Last week's retail purchases of SPCX exceeded their combined buying of all other Mag 7 stocks—NVDA, MSFT, AMZN, META, GOOGL, and GOOG totaled only $278 million over those five days. Retail buying of SPCX also surpassed the combined retail flow into the SPY and QQQ ETFs ($352 million). A stock that began trading just last week is already competing with the market's largest individual stocks and ETFs for retail dollars.

Caption: SPCX retail buying vs. Mag 7 stock retail buying

Source: Vanda Track

The old playbook unfolded again. Alongside the explosive buying of the stock, retail investors rapidly poured into various SpaceX leveraged products, with similarly strong demand. In the first few trading days, retail bought $65.8 million worth of the Leverage Shares 2x Long SPCX Daily ETF—a significant number, but still well below typical levels during speculative retail manias. Even so, it crushed recent thematic new issues: Roundhill's Memory ETF (DRAM) attracted only $5.6 million in its first four days. It took DRAM 22 trading days to surpass the cumulative retail buying that the SpaceX leveraged ETF had already absorbed.

Caption: SPCX leveraged ETF retail flow vs. contemporaneous thematic ETF retail flow

Source: Vanda Track

Out of the gate, the momentum quickly stalled, and the fantasy of "riding a reusable rocket all the way into orbit via gamma squeeze" evaporated. June 16th was the peak, when SPCX hit a record high of $225, briefly surpassing Microsoft in market cap. Since then, daily retail flows have collapsed, with retail turnover almost vanishing.

Caption: SPCX daily retail flow—cliff-like drop after peaking on June 16

Source: Vanda Track

This brings us back to Canaccord's statement. Based on SpaceX's early trading, the firm judged that "tech stocks likely have enough momentum to sustain them in the near term," but it also warned: "There's now an added layer of dangerous vacuum beneath these stocks."

Sure enough, once momentum dissipated, coupled with market awareness of trillions of shares about to unlock, the stock fell for three consecutive days, culminating in Monday's crash. On that day, as SpaceX sought to issue over $20 billion in investment-grade bonds for the first time—taking advantage of still-euphoric debt markets to replace a much higher-interest bridge loan before the window closed—SPCX plunged 16.4%, erasing a record $600 billion in market value in a single day. Including Wednesday's 5% drop and Thursday's 3.5% decline, the stock is now only slightly above its $150 opening price from two weeks ago.

Caption: SPCX price action since IPO—retreat from $225 high to around $150

Source: ZeroHedge

Worse, after hours, SPCX briefly touched the $150 IPO opening price. If it opens below that level tomorrow, everyone who bought and held in the secondary market will be underwater.

Caption: SPCX after-hours drop to near $150 IPO opening price

Source: ZeroHedge

Particularly noteworthy is that this pump-and-dump occurred with only 5% of the float available for trading—95% of shares are still locked up. But that will change soon.

Caption: SPCX lock-up structure—currently only 5% float, 95% locked

Source: ZeroHedge

22V Research strategist Jeff Jacobson says that after SpaceX reports earnings in early to mid-August, a 20% block of insider shares will unlock. Additionally, if the stock price remains 30% above the IPO price, a further 10% will unlock. Another 7% unlocks around August 21st and September 10th.

Caption: SPCX lock-up expiration schedule

Source: 22V Research

Jacobson says insiders could potentially sell up to 44% of SpaceX shares by early September, expanding the current float by approximately 900%.

In other words, lifting the stock price from here will only become increasingly difficult. Meanwhile, JonesTrading chief market strategist Michael O'Rourke says "the sellers have regained control," adding: "Everyone in the world who wanted to buy, has already bought."

Bloomberg, commenting on today's decline, wrote that SpaceX's slide today "dragged down most of the market."

Whether that's truly the case remains to be seen. But in this market—which has run almost entirely on retail euphoria and momentum-chasing since the March lows—once retail truly gets cold feet, starting with SpaceX, then the memory bubble, and finally the semiconductor stocks that have feasted on the AI trade...

@zerohedge tweet: The divergence between hyperscale cloud providers and semiconductors is unsustainable: massive capital expenditure is the key variable.

...then, it will be time to invert Eliot's line: The whimper of selling will become a bang.

Related Questions

QWhat are the main reasons for the sharp decline in SpaceX's stock price after its initial spike?

AThe main reasons for the sharp decline are the rapid exhaustion of retail investor buying momentum, the company's announcement of a large bond offering, and the looming threat of significant share lock-up expirations (up to 44% of shares potentially becoming available for sale by early September).

QHow significant was retail investor participation in the first week of SpaceX's trading, according to Vanda Track?

AAccording to Vanda Track, retail investors were extremely significant, with a record net purchase of $405 million in SPCX shares in the first five trading days. This surpassed their combined purchases in all other Mag 7 stocks and even exceeded their combined flows into SPY and QQQ ETFs.

QWhat percentage of SpaceX shares are currently freely tradable, and what will happen to this figure by September?

ACurrently, only about 5% of SpaceX shares are freely tradable, with 95% locked up. However, according to 22V Research, insiders could potentially sell up to 44% of the company's shares by early September, which would increase the available float by approximately 900%.

QWhat was the 'gamma squeeze' strategy mentioned in the context of SpaceX's early trading, and what happened to it?

AThe 'gamma squeeze' strategy involved aggressive traders buying short-dated, extremely out-of-the-money call options (like $380 strike) shortly after the IPO. The goal was to force market makers to buy the underlying stock to hedge their positions, thereby driving the stock price up dramatically. This momentum-based strategy failed as buying interest faded and the stock price reversed.

QWhat broader market risk does the article suggest might follow if retail investor enthusiasm continues to fade?

AThe article suggests that a continued fade in retail investor enthusiasm could lead to a broader market sell-off. It speculates that the weakness could spread from SpaceX to other speculative areas like the memory bubble, and ultimately to the semiconductor stocks that have benefited most from the AI trade boom.

Related Reads

A 60-Day Window Depresses Oil Prices, So Why Is the Market Falling Instead?

International oil prices continued to decline on June 23, extending significant losses from the previous session. The market shifted focus from Middle East military risks to actual supply changes following a temporary U.S.-Iran arrangement. The immediate trigger was the resumption of traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a critical oil shipping chokepoint, with two tankers passing through, signaling eased near-term supply disruption fears. Prices retreated as the "worst-case scenario" was temporarily averted. A reported 60-day window in a U.S.-Iran understanding allows Iran to sell oil during this period, further dampening supply concerns. However, this arrangement is temporary, linked to nuclear talks, and does not guarantee a long-term solution. Market sentiment remains cautious because the deal could still unravel, potentially reinstating sanctions or disrupting shipping. While these developments have lowered immediate risk premiums, prices have not fully returned to pre-conflict levels. Geopolitical news, particularly regarding the stability of the Strait of Hormuz or the progress of negotiations, could quickly reverse the price drop. Additionally, low U.S. strategic petroleum reserves limit the emergency buffer available if supply shocks reemerge. Therefore, the current price decline reflects a reduction in near-term panic, not a complete elimination of Middle East supply risks.

marsbit6m ago

A 60-Day Window Depresses Oil Prices, So Why Is the Market Falling Instead?

marsbit6m ago

SK Hynix Market Cap Exceeds Samsung for First Time in 26 Years, Korean Broker Calls for 50% More Upside

SK Hynix's market capitalization surpassed Samsung Electronics for the first time in 26 years on June 22, reaching 208.1 trillion won. The shift reflects a market trend where companies directly benefiting from AI infrastructure, like SK Hynix, are receiving higher valuation premiums than diversified giants. The surge is driven by AI-driven demand for High Bandwidth Memory (HBM), where SK Hynix holds a dominant 70-80% market share. Its Q1 2026 revenue exceeded 50 trillion won for the first time, with an operating profit margin of 72%. Hanwha Investment & Securities significantly raised its price target for SK Hynix to 430,000 won, the highest among Korean brokerages. The key rationale is that Long-Term Supply Agreements (LTAs) and robust HBM demand have fundamentally reduced the company's historical profit volatility. Several other brokers have also raised targets, arguing the valuation framework for memory semiconductors is being rewritten, moving away from a cyclical model. Despite the bullish outlook, the stock experienced a pullback of over 5% in regular trading on June 23 after briefly surpassing 3 million won pre-market, amid broader tech sector weakness. Some analysts caution that the市值 overtaking Samsung, whose profit scale and growth forecasts remain higher, could signal short-term overheating. However, high-return investors viewed the dip as a buying opportunity.

marsbit24m ago

SK Hynix Market Cap Exceeds Samsung for First Time in 26 Years, Korean Broker Calls for 50% More Upside

marsbit24m ago

GPU Rental Prices Drop 30% in Three Weeks: AI Value Chain Migrating from Nvidia to Memory Chips

GPU rental prices for Nvidia's flagship B200 chip have fallen by approximately 30% over three weeks, dropping from a high of $6.11/hour to $4.22/hour. This decline signals a potential easing of the "compute scarcity" narrative that has long supported AI hardware valuations. Concurrently, the semiconductor market is witnessing a significant divergence: while the VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has risen 15% in the past month, with memory giants Micron and SanDisk each surging nearly 60%, Nvidia's stock has declined about 3% over the same period. Analysts suggest this shift indicates that the AI value chain's bottleneck and profits are migrating from compute (GPUs) to memory. Demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) remains intensely strong, with contract prices soaring over 100% in H1 2026, granting memory manufacturers significant pricing power. In contrast, increased B200 supply from improved manufacturing yields and competitive pressure from new cloud providers are softening GPU rental rates. While long-term contracts, like SpaceX's $30 billion deal with Google, show sustained large-scale demand for Nvidia hardware, the softening spot prices pressure the margins of cloud providers and could eventually impact Nvidia's order flow if chip prices don't adjust. The key takeaway for investors is not a weakening AI thesis, but a recalibration within the sector: pricing power appears to be strengthening for memory chipmakers while showing signs of strain for leading GPU suppliers.

marsbit34m ago

GPU Rental Prices Drop 30% in Three Weeks: AI Value Chain Migrating from Nvidia to Memory Chips

marsbit34m ago

From Corning to Ciena: The 10X Stock Opportunities in the AI Optical Communication Chain

From Copper to Light: The AI-Driven Optical Communication Supply Chain and Investment Opportunities The exponential data demands of AI are pushing data centers beyond the physical limits of copper cables, forcing a critical transition to optical communication. This shift from electrical to photonic signals over distances greater than ~3 feet solves heat, power, and bandwidth constraints. The real investment opportunity lies not just in headline chipmakers, but across the entire essential photonics supply chain. **Key Investment Layers & Companies:** * **Glass & Fiber:** **Corning** is a dominant, irreplaceable supplier of advanced fiber to all major cloud/AI players (Meta, Amazon, Google, MSFT, OpenAI, NVIDIA), with multi-billion-dollar, multi-year contracts locked in years ahead of delivery. Its profit growth (93%) far outpaces revenue growth (36%), showing pricing power. * **Interconnects:** **Amphenol**, a consolidating giant in high-speed connectors (both copper and optical), shows robust growth (>80% in AI data centers) and expanding margins post-acquisition. **Credo Technology** bridges old and new worlds, extending copper's life in racks while moving into optics. It has hyper-growth but carries high customer concentration risk. * **Systems:** **Ciena** is a leader in coherent optics, enabling massive data capacity upgrades on existing fiber. It has a massive, growing order backlog ($~7B) and strong ties with cloud providers. * **Upstream & Enablers:** **AXT** produces mission-critical indium phosphide wafers for lasers, creating a supply bottleneck, but faces significant geopolitical/export license risk from its China-based manufacturing. **VEO Solutions** is the essential "picks and shovels" play, providing test equipment needed by every component in the optical chain, regardless of the eventual winner. A new pure-play photonics ETF (**FOTO**) offers a consolidated investment vehicle for this theme, though it is new and small. The core thesis is clear: the move from copper to light is inevitable and accelerating, with wealth creation spreading across this critical, multi-layered supply chain.

marsbit53m ago

From Corning to Ciena: The 10X Stock Opportunities in the AI Optical Communication Chain

marsbit53m ago

A Chip Company Releases AIDC Energy Storage Certification Standards. Why NVIDIA? Computing Power Reshapes Power Supply Logic. Who's in the Lead and Who's Left Out?

NVIDIA has released a "Battery Energy Storage System Self-Certification Guide," setting strict technical standards for energy storage systems specifically for AI data centers (AIDC). The guide focuses solely on certifying the Power Conversion System (PCS), not the batteries, with 10 mandatory performance metrics and 12 validation tests requiring real-world and simulation comparisons. Key requirements include rapid dynamic response to AI workloads, high-frequency system telemetry, and detailed electromagnetic transient models. The move is driven by the extreme and fluctuating power demands of next-generation AI hardware. Modern AIDCs require energy storage systems to act as intelligent, controllable grid assets, not just passive backup, to manage instantaneous, massive power load shifts that traditional UPS systems cannot handle. This redefines the competitive landscape for energy storage providers, shifting focus from capacity and cost to advanced control capabilities and system integration. While the market potential is significant—with forecasts of hundreds of GWh in new demand by 2030—the certification creates a high barrier to entry. It requires proven PCS delivery volumes and credible plans for rapid capacity scaling, favoring established, well-resourced players. Early movers like Fluence (partnering with Siemens) and several Chinese companies have secured projects ahead of the standard, but new entrants must now navigate this rigorous, costly, and time-intensive certification process to compete in the AIDC energy storage market.

marsbit1h ago

A Chip Company Releases AIDC Energy Storage Certification Standards. Why NVIDIA? Computing Power Reshapes Power Supply Logic. Who's in the Lead and Who's Left Out?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片