The Structure, Risks, and New Cycle of the On-Chain Lending Market

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-28Last updated on 2026-01-28

Abstract

On-chain lending is evolving from a tool primarily for leverage into a fundamental infrastructure for capital allocation, now representing 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL at approximately $64.3 billion. Aave dominates the sector with around 50% market share. The integration of Real-World Assets (RWA), such as credit assets and U.S. Treasuries, is emerging as a key growth driver, supported by improving macroeconomic conditions and regulatory clarity. However, the market faces significant risks including liquidity volatility, collateral liquidations, credit defaults, and cross-chain security vulnerabilities. Future trends point toward institutional adoption, tokenization of securities, fixed and floating rate products, and a bifurcation between compliant and high-risk lending layers. The sector is transitioning into a mature component of the global financial system.

Author: CoinW Research Institute

Key Takeaways

On-chain lending functionality is gradually transforming, evolving from an early tool primarily for leverage into a fundamental infrastructure for capital allocation. On-chain lending has become a crucial component of the DeFi ecosystem. Currently, the TVL of on-chain lending protocols is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL.

Aave has become the leading protocol in the on-chain lending sector, with a TVL of about $32.9 billion, representing roughly 50% of the total lending sector TVL. Meanwhile, protocols like Morpho continue to consolidate their market share, resulting in a competitive landscape characterized by one dominant player and several strong contenders.

Credit-based assets have become a significant part of on-chain Real World Assets (RWA). As more types of debt instruments are introduced on-chain and institutional demand for compliant, traceable collateral increases, RWA lending is poised to become another major growth engine. Simultaneously, improvements in both the macroeconomic monetary environment and regulatory frameworks are collectively reducing the costs associated with capital flow and compliance, creating smoother external conditions for market development.

On-chain lending protocols also face multiple risks. Firstly, they are highly dependent on collateral value and market liquidity, making them susceptible to liquidations during market volatility. Secondly, the introduction of unsecured lending and RWA increases credit default and counterparty risks. Additionally, over-reliance on token incentives can artificially inflate scale, and cross-chain expansion exposes vulnerabilities in bridge security. Therefore, on-chain lending protocols must balance security, liquidity, and compliance while pursuing growth.

With the gradual tokenization of securities and the entry of compliant assets like U.S. Treasuries onto the chain, on-chain lending is evolving from a crypto-native financing tool into mainstream financial infrastructure, with a more robust collateral foundation. In this process, inter-institutional on-chain lending is expected to be a significant source of growth. At the same time, the coexistence of fixed and floating interest rates will drive the maturation of the on-chain interest rate system. Regulatory and capital logic may also lead to a market structure divided into a compliant, stable layer and a high-risk, innovative layer. On-chain lending will accelerate its integration into the global capital market through asset compliance and institutional alignment.

I. Overview of the On-Chain Lending Market

1.1. Market Size and Capital Flow
1.2. Macro and Industry Drivers
1.3. Regulatory Dynamics and Compliance

II. Classification of On-Chain Lending Markets

2.1. Collateralized Lending Protocols
2.2. Uncollateralized Lending Protocols
2.3. Modular Lending Protocols
2.4. Integration of RWA and Lending

III. Competitive Landscape

3.1. Leading Protocol Landscape and TVL Changes
3.2. Revenue Structure and Profit Model Comparison
3.3. User Profile and Asset Structure
3.4. Multi-Chain Deployment and Ecosystem Integration

IV. Risks, Dilemmas, and Challenges

4.1. Liquidity Risk
4.2. Credit Default Risk
4.3. Incentives and Growth Illusion
4.4. Cross-Chain Risk

V. Potential Development Trends

5.1. On-Chain Transformation of Inter-Institutional Lending
5.2. On-Chain Tokenization of Securities and Collateral Potential
5.3. U.S. Treasuries as Core Lending Assets
5.4. Coexistence of Fixed and Floating Interest Rates
5.5. Two-Tier Structural Differentiation in the Lending Market

VI. Conclusion

References

On-chain lending protocols have become a vital part of the DeFi ecosystem. Evolving from initial tools for leverage expansion, they now encompass diverse capital markets including stablecoins and RWA. These protocols not only steadily carry liquidity but are increasingly becoming centers for capital pricing and crucial hubs for capital allocation. Currently, the TVL of on-chain lending protocols is approximately $64.3 billion, accounting for about 53.54% of the total DeFi TVL (nearly $120.2 billion). Specifically, Aave alone holds about 50% of the lending TVL, approximately $32.9 billion; protocols like Morpho hold respective market shares.

Furthermore, the diversity of funding sources and asset classes in on-chain lending is increasing, with RWA becoming a new engine for protocol growth. The structure of the on-chain lending market faces a situation of coexisting growth and challenges. On one hand, protocol TVL has gradually recovered, showing a overall market recovery trend. On the other hand, the market still faces structural challenges: severe liquidity fragmentation, dispersed funds across protocols and chains, and a lack of efficient liquidity integration mechanisms; traditional stablecoin lending is nearing saturation, while RWA and institutional credit supply remains insufficient, leading to interest rate differentiation and differences in risk appetite. Below, this report will provide a systematic analysis of the operational logic, current development status, and trends of the on-chain lending sector from the perspectives of market overview, market classification, and competitor landscape.

Full report available at: https://www.coinw.com/zh_CN/research/on-chain-lending-market-structure-risks-and-the-new-cycle/106

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won's high-profile divorce case, involving a record 1.38 trillion won settlement, has drawn attention to the succession plans for Korea's second-largest conglomerate, especially its crown jewel, SK hynix. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts centered on the eldest son, Chey's three children from his marriage to former President Roh Tae-woo's daughter, Roh Soh-yeong, are carving distinct, non-traditional paths. Eldest daughter Chey Yun-jung (b. 1989) is seen as the most evident successor. With a scientific and consulting background, she holds executive roles at SK bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth support department, focusing on future strategy and biopharma. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional business alliance. Second daughter Chey Min-jung (b. 1991) took a unique route, voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including an anti-piracy deployment. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting her to U.S. defense and policy circles—networks crucial for a global semiconductor giant. The only son, Chey In-geun (b. 1995), who studied physics like his father, worked briefly at SK E&S before joining McKinsey. Despite fitting the traditional "heir" profile as the eldest son, he remains silent and holds no public position or shares in SK, suggesting the old succession playbook is obsolete. As SK hynix's valuation soars, becoming a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the heirs' legitimacy is no longer automatic. They must prove themselves in fields like AI biotech, global policy, and strategic consulting. Their marriages also reflect new elite networks in tech and defense, not old political alliances. Their inheritance is the complex challenge of navigating a globalized, tech-driven world, not just a corporate throne.

marsbitYesterday 09:06

The Verdict in Choi Tae-won's Divorce Case: Revealing the Inheritance Undercurrent Behind SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire

marsbitYesterday 09:06

Banks oppose stablecoin yield deal – Can CLARITY Act find 60 votes?

The Bank Policy Institute (BPI) has opposed the latest draft of the CLARITY Act, criticizing its provisions on stablecoin yield and illicit finance. The banking industry sought a total ban on stablecoin yield, but the bill's compromise only prohibits passive yield on idle balances. This opposition has influenced lawmakers, reducing tentative Republican Senate support to potentially 49 votes. With the 60-vote threshold needed, securing sufficient Democratic support appears difficult as some pro-crypto Democrats also oppose the bill due to ethics and illicit finance concerns. Senate Majority Leader John Thune expressed doubt the bill can pass before the August recess. Market odds for the bill's passage in 2026 have fallen, leaving its future uncertain.

ambcryptoYesterday 09:02

Banks oppose stablecoin yield deal – Can CLARITY Act find 60 votes?

ambcryptoYesterday 09:02

2 Months, Valuation Soars from $8.8B to $68B! The Largest AI Model Hub OpenRouter May Be Acquired

Stripe is reportedly in talks to acquire AI model marketplace OpenRouter for a price nearing $10 billion, a dramatic increase from its $1.3 billion valuation just two months prior. The deal, which could be announced within a month, would see the payment giant absorb a key "router" or aggregation layer in the AI infrastructure stack. OpenRouter provides developers with a single API to access over 400 large language models (LLMs), automatically routing queries to the most suitable model based on cost, capability, and speed. This allows AI applications to optimize expenses while maintaining user experience. Founded in 2023 by ex-OpenSea co-founder Alex Atallah and Louis Vichy, OpenRouter has grown rapidly, reaching $50 million in annualized revenue by April and serving over one million developers. For Stripe, the acquisition of OpenRouter follows its late-2025 purchase of usage-based billing platform Metronome. The combined strategy aims to create an integrated suite for the AI economy: OpenRouter would handle model selection and routing, Metronome would manage granular usage-based billing, and Stripe's core platform would process payments. This positions Stripe to control a critical part of the AI application value chain, influencing which models get used while simplifying cost management for enterprise customers.

链捕手Yesterday 08:59

2 Months, Valuation Soars from $8.8B to $68B! The Largest AI Model Hub OpenRouter May Be Acquired

链捕手Yesterday 08:59

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His 'Exit at the Peak' Playbook?

From OpenSea to OpenRouter: Is Alex Atallah Repeating His "Exit at the Peak" Playbook? According to the Wall Street Journal, payments giant Stripe is in talks to acquire the AI model aggregation platform OpenRouter in a potential deal valuing the company near $100 billion. This would mark founder Alex Atallah's second creation of a company reaching a $100 billion valuation, following his co-founding of NFT marketplace OpenSea. OpenRouter, founded just over three years ago, has grown rapidly by acting as a unified gateway for developers to access over 400 AI models. It currently has about 10 million users and processes over 200 trillion tokens monthly. While the platform's annualized revenue is around $50 million, its valuation has skyrocketed from $1.3 billion in March 2026. The potential acquisition by Stripe, a company OpenRouter's founder once likened it to, represents a major expansion into AI infrastructure for the payments leader. This move echoes Atallah's previous timing with OpenSea, where he departed before the NFT market's significant downturn. For OpenRouter, selling now may be strategic. Despite its scale, its business model—charging a 5-5.5% fee on AI inference calls—faces pressure from competition, open-source models, and potential price wars among model providers, limiting its profitability narrative for an IPO. A key asset for potential acquirers like Stripe is OpenRouter's vast repository of real-world AI usage data, which offers unique insights into model performance and developer preferences that are difficult to replicate. Whether this potential deal signifies a new valuation benchmark for AI infrastructure or another market peak signal remains to be seen.

链捕手Yesterday 08:42

Pons V2 brings RWA trading pairs as Robinhood Chain broadens its ambitions

Pons, a key launchpad on Robinhood Chain, has launched its V2 upgrade. The update aims to boost liquidity, remove trading restrictions for most users via an ETH-denominated bonding curve, and introduces support for custom tokenized real-world asset (RWA) trading pairs. This aligns with Robinhood Chain's broader RWA focus. The upgrade also allows creators to collect fees in ETH by default. The network itself is growing rapidly, surpassing $300 million in Total Value Locked. Its cumulative DEX volume has exceeded $9 billion, with about 80% coming from speculative memecoin trading. However, data shows 63% of traders are at a loss, with profits concentrated in a small number of wallets. The introduction of RWAs could help drive more organic adoption for the chain, which is positioning itself as a major player for speculative trading, challenging networks like Base and Solana.

ambcryptoYesterday 08:26

Trading

Spot