The Pentagon's Pizza, Polymarket's Money

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-04Last updated on 2026-01-04

Abstract

Summary: During the Cold War, Soviet agents monitored late-night pizza deliveries to the Pentagon as an indicator of imminent military action, a pattern later dubbed the "Pentagon Pizza Index." In 2024, a Twitter account @PenPizzaReport automated this surveillance using Google Maps data to track foot traffic at pizzerias near the Pentagon, accurately predicting events like Israel's airstrike on Iran and the U.S. raid in Venezuela. Concurrently, on the prediction market Polymarket, three newly created wallets placed large, well-timed bets on Venezuelan leader Maduro's ousting, netting $630,000 just hours before the operation. This highlights a shift in how information is accessed and monetized: once a secret intelligence tool, predictive signals are now public, blurring lines between open data, insider knowledge, and speculative profit.

Written by: Wawa, Shenchao TechFlow

During the Cold War, Soviet agents had a routine task:

Counting how many lights were on at night in the Pentagon and how many cars were in the parking lot.

At the same time, they monitored another metric: how many late-night pizza deliveries were made.

The logic was simple. If a war was imminent, people would work overtime, and working overtime required food. The only thing that could be delivered to the Pentagon at 2 a.m. was pizza.

In 1990, a Domino's franchisee in Washington, Frank Meeks, told the Los Angeles Times a story.

On the night of August 1, his store delivered 21 pizzas to the CIA.

It was a single-night record.

The next day, Iraq invaded Kuwait, and the Gulf War began.

Meeks recalled that this wasn't the first time. The night before the invasion of Grenada in 1983, late-night orders at his store jumped from the usual 40-50 to nearly 100. Before the invasion of Panama in 1989, orders at three pizzerias in Washington tripled.

CNN's Pentagon reporter at the time, Wolf Blitzer, heard this story and said something that would be quoted repeatedly later:

"A reporter's bottom line: always watch the pizza."

This pattern later got a name: the "Pentagon Pizza Index."

During the Clinton impeachment in 1998, the White House ordered $2,600 worth of pizza from Domino's over three days. In December of the same year, when the U.S. military bombed Iraq, pizza orders on Capitol Hill were 32% higher than usual.

In 2004, Frank Meeks passed away at the age of 48.

But the observation he left behind lived on.

In August 2024, someone registered a Twitter account called @PenPizzaReport.

This account does one thing: uses Google Maps' "Popular Times" feature to monitor the foot traffic of several pizzerias near the Pentagon in real-time. District Pizza Palace, Domino's, We the Pizza, Papa John's—when each store is busier than usual, and by how much, can all be seen.

The account quickly grew to 80,000 followers.

Someone went a step further and created a website called pizzint.watch, automating the monitoring. The homepage of the website has an index called "Pizza DEFCON," ranging from 1 to 5, where 5 is peacetime and 1 is imminent war. It updates every 10 minutes.

What Soviet agents during the Cold War had to stake out and count, anyone can now see by opening a webpage.

At 7 p.m. on June 12, 2025, @PenPizzaReport tweeted: "Huge spikes in foot traffic at almost every pizza place near the Pentagon."

The attached image was a screenshot from Google Maps showing District Pizza Palace's real-time foot traffic significantly higher than usual.

At the same time, foot traffic at a gay bar near the Pentagon was unusually low. This is also an old indicator: if people at the Pentagon are working overtime, nearby bars will be quiet.

A few hours later, Israel launched an airstrike on Iran.

At 10:38 p.m. on June 22, @PenPizzaReport issued another alert: Papa John's foot traffic was abnormal.

An hour later, Trump announced that U.S. forces had launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities.

Alex Selby-Boothroyd, head of data journalism at The Economist, wrote on LinkedIn: "The Pizza Index has been a surprisingly reliable predictor of major global events since the 1980s."

Does the Pentagon know about this?

Yes.

Last October, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was asked about the pizza tracking account during an interview with Fox News. He said: "I'm aware of the account. I've thought about ordering a bunch of pizzas on a random night to mess with them."

A Pentagon spokesperson also responded, saying there is plenty of food inside the building—pizza, sushi, sandwiches, donuts—so no need for delivery.

But the orders still spike.

Rumors say that after the 1991 Gulf War, the Pentagon started spreading orders across multiple restaurants to avoid abnormal spikes at a single pizzeria.

But Google Maps doesn't care which store you order from. It monitors foot traffic for the entire area.

On January 3rd, in the early morning, U.S. forces raided Venezuela and captured Maduro.

After the fact, someone checked the records on pizzint.watch. Hours before the operation, the Pizza DEFCON had risen to level 4, with foot traffic nearly double the usual level.

@PenPizzaReport had also issued an alert.

But this story isn't just about pizza.

On-chain analyst lookonchain discovered that three wallets on Polymarket had heavily bet on "Maduro's ouster" just hours before the action.

These three wallets had several things in common:

They were all created just days before. They only bet on Venezuela-related markets. They had no other transaction history.

One wallet registered on December 27th bet $34,000 when the odds for "Maduro ousted by January 31st" were only 6%. Another bet $5,800, and a third bet $25,000.

By the time Trump posted on Truth Social at 4:21 a.m., the total profit for the three wallets was:

$630,000.

According to a report by The New Republic, the U.S. military had discussed the operation on Christmas Day. On December 27th, one of the wallets was registered.

Coincidence?

The Wall Street Journal estimated that the Polymarket markets related to Maduro attracted a total of $56.6 million in bets. Of that, $40 million was bet on him being ousted by the end of November or December, and all lost.

These three wallets bet on before January 31st.

But who are these three wallets?

No one knows. The on-chain addresses are public, but the people behind them are not. Polymarket operates on the Polygon chain, with servers outside the U.S.

U.S. Congressman Ritchie Torres said he would introduce a bill called the "Public Integrity Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026," prohibiting federal officials and political insiders from betting on prediction markets.

But even if it was someone from the White House placing the bets, you couldn't prove it.

Some call this insider trading.

But others say, maybe they just looked at the Pizza Index.

Putting the timeline together:

1980s: Soviet agents staked out and counted pizza deliveries. This was a professional skill of intelligence agencies.

1990s: Frank Meeks told this pattern to journalists. It became an urban legend.

2024: Someone used Google Maps to turn it into a public website. Anyone could see it.

2026: Someone looked at this public information and made $630,000 on a prediction market.

By the way, The New York Times and The Washington Post also knew about the operation before it began. But both newspapers chose to hold the story. The reason was to protect the safety of U.S. troops, in line with "a long-standing American news tradition."

While traditional media was still debating whether to publish, the information had already gotten out.

Today, the old order of information is loosening. "Who knows first" is being redefined.

In the new order, information is scattered across various public data, waiting to be discovered, combined, and priced.

When the Pentagon's appetite becomes a global oracle, we realize:

The fog of war still exists, but it no longer smells of gunpowder; it might smell like pizza.

Related Questions

QWhat is the 'Pentagon Pizza Index' and how did it originate?

AThe 'Pentagon Pizza Index' is an informal metric that suggests a correlation between a surge in late-night pizza deliveries to the Pentagon and impending military action or significant government events. It originated from observations by Soviet spies during the Cold War, who monitored indicators like the number of lights on and cars parked at the Pentagon, as well as late-night pizza deliveries. The term was later popularized by stories from a Domino's franchise owner, Frank Meeks, who noted spikes in pizza orders before events like the Gulf War.

QHow did the @PenPizzaReport Twitter account and pizzint.watch website modernize the Pentagon Pizza Index?

AThe @PenPizzaReport Twitter account and the pizzint.watch website modernized the Pentagon Pizza Index by using publicly available data from Google Maps' 'Popular Times' feature. They automatically monitored real-time customer traffic at several pizza shops near the Pentagon, such as District Pizza Palace, Domino's, We the Pizza, and Papa John's. The website even featured a 'Pizza DEFCON' index, which ranged from 1 (imminent war) to 5 (peacetime), updating every 10 minutes to provide a public, automated warning system.

QWhat suspicious activity was detected on Polymarket related to the US military operation in Venezuela?

AOn Polymarket, a prediction market platform, three newly created wallets were identified placing large bets that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro would be ousted before January 31st. These wallets were created just days before the operation, only bet on Venezuela-related markets, and had no other transaction history. They invested a total of approximately $64,800 and profited around $630,000 after the US military operation resulted in Maduro's capture.

QHow did traditional media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post handle the information about the impending operation in Venezuela?

ATraditional media outlets like The New York Times and The Washington Post were aware of the impending US military action in Venezuela but chose to withhold the information from publication. They cited the reason as protecting the safety of US troops, adhering to a long-standing American journalistic tradition of not reporting on sensitive operations that could jeopardize security.

QWhat does the article suggest about the changing nature of information dissemination and 'who knows first' in the modern era?

AThe article suggests that the old order of information control is eroding. In the new era, critical information is often scattered within various public data sources, waiting to be discovered, combined, and priced by anyone. Publicly available indicators like the Pentagon Pizza Index and decentralized prediction markets like Polymarket can allow individuals to access and act on information faster than traditional media or official channels, redefining 'who knows first' about significant events.

Related Reads

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit5m ago

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit5m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit6m ago

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit6m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit21m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit21m ago

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbit55m ago

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbit55m ago

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

Zcash (ZEC), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency, experienced a severe crash on June 5th, plummeting over 56% in a single day and erasing nearly two months of gains. The flash crash was triggered by the disclosure of a critical zero-knowledge proof vulnerability within Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, which had existed since the pool's launch in May 2022. The flaw theoretically allowed an attacker to forge unlimited ZEC undetectably due to the pool's privacy features. The vulnerability was discovered on May 29th by independent security researcher Taylor Hornby during a proactive audit commissioned by Shielded Labs, utilizing AI-assisted analysis. The Zcash development team responded swiftly, implementing an emergency soft fork to disable Orchard transactions on June 2nd and executing a permanent hard fork fix (NU6.2) on June 3rd. Despite the technical fix, a major crisis of confidence emerged. The core issue is that Orchard's privacy design makes it cryptographically impossible to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited over the past four years, casting permanent doubt on the historical supply integrity of ZEC. While Shielded Labs argues exploitation was unlikely, the inability to provide definitive proof has severely damaged market trust. This sentiment was exacerbated when BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, a prominent ZEC supporter, announced he was selling his entire position. He stated that privacy assets require "perfect security" rather than "probable safety." The combined effect of the disclosure and Hayes's exit ignited widespread panic selling, leading to massive liquidations and significant price decline. Analysts note the event highlights a fundamental tension within privacy coins: the conflict between verifiable supply and cryptographic privacy.

链捕手58m ago

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

链捕手58m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片