The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-11Last updated on 2026-05-11

Abstract

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

Court evidence and testimonies in Musk's lawsuit against Altman reveal the complete role played by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati (now founder of AI startup Thinking Machines Lab) during the November 2023 coup: a key behind-the-scenes force driving the dismissal, and also the first to sign for Altman's return after the winds shifted.

The root of the conflict dates back a year before the coup. An internal document from September 2022 shows that Murati directly handed a complaint list to Altman. OpenAI's primary target at the time was $100 million in revenue. Altman's attitude was "must achieve by any means necessary," but Murati wrote, "Making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." A research-focused company being pressured to chase revenue put the executive team in a difficult position. She complained that Altman constantly shifted priorities, created panic, often urging "we're not fast enough" while also saying "I'm not sure about the situation either, maybe I'm mistaken," essentially pressuring the team based on incomplete understanding.

By 2023, Murati began providing screenshots, Slack records, and internal documents in bulk to co-founder Sutskever, also informing him that Altman had management issues during his time at Y Combinator. Sutskever compiled these into a 52-page memo for the board. In another piece of court testimony, Murati stated that Altman had also lied to her about AI safety review issues: Altman claimed the legal department deemed a certain model didn't need to go before the safety committee. Upon checking with Chief Legal Officer Jason Kwon, she found the story didn't match, so she submitted the model for review herself. Former board member Toner testified that the materials provided by Murati and Sutskever "greatly facilitated" the board's decision.

On November 16, the four board members unanimously signed the document to dismiss Altman. Murati was appointed interim CEO and volunteered to notify Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

The court released 78 text messages between Murati and Altman, spanning from Sunday evening to early Monday morning. Murati relayed the board's tough stance to Altman: they "don't care if everyone resigns," they just "don't want you touching AGI," and had already found "someone from Twitch" (former Twitch CEO Emmett Shear) as the new CEO. Yet, within the same batch of texts, Murati also told Altman, "I hope Nadella can help overturn this." As the board-appointed interim CEO, she was already secretly seeking external help for the person whose dismissal she had helped engineer.

The turning point came when Murati judged the board couldn't hold out. On Sunday, the board issued a statement "firmly supporting the dismissal decision." Murati texted Nadella: "I won't be signing this." Early Monday morning, she informed Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott: "The board is about to resign." Scott replied, "For real this time?" She answered, "Seems like it, Ilya signed our petition." Subsequently, 750 employees signed a petition demanding the board resign and Altman be reinstated; Murati's signature was the first on the list.

Toner's assessment in testimony was direct: Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly negative" after Altman's dismissal, "completely unwilling to tell the team that her conversations with the board significantly contributed to the decision to fire Altman." She was the only one who could have defended that decision, but she refused to step forward. As a result, employees thought it was a sudden move by a few external board members and quickly sided with Altman. Toner's exact words: "She was waiting to see which way the wind was blowing, but she didn't realize she herself was the wind."

From secretly handing over materials to push for the dismissal, refusing to endorse it after the fallout while turning to pull in Microsoft, and finally leading the signing of the petition to demand Altman's return, Murati stood only on her own side throughout the entire coup.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat key role did Mira Murati play in Sam Altman's ouster from OpenAI in November 2023, based on the court documents?

AAccording to court evidence and testimony, Mira Murati played a central role by actively providing internal documents, screenshots, and complaints about Altman's management to co-founder Ilya Sutskever, who compiled them into a key memo for the board. This material was described as "significantly driving" the board's decision to fire Altman.

QWhat actions did Mira Murati take as interim CEO immediately after Altman's dismissal?

AAs the board-appointed interim CEO, Murati took on the task of informing Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella about Altman's firing. However, she also simultaneously began secretly texting Altman, relaying the board's stance while expressing hope that Nadella could help overturn the decision, effectively working against the board that appointed her.

QHow did Murati's position change when she sensed the board was losing support?

AWhen Murati judged that the board could not withstand the pressure—particularly after Ilya Sutskever signed a petition for Altman's return—she switched sides. She refused to sign a statement supporting the board's decision, informed Microsoft executives the board was about to resign, and became the first signatory on a staff petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman.

QWhat was former board member Helen Toner's critique of Murati's behavior during the crisis?

AHelen Toner testified that Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly passive" after Altman's firing. She refused to tell the team that her conversations with the board had significantly contributed to the decision. Toner stated Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew" but failed to realize "she was the wind," meaning her actions created the situation but she wouldn't defend the outcome.

QWhat internal conflict between Murati and Altman predated the 2023 coup, according to the article?

AAn internal document from September 2022 shows Murati directly complained to Altman. She criticized his relentless focus on hitting a $100 million revenue target, stating "making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." She also complained about Altman's shifting priorities, creating panic, and pressuring the team based on incomplete information, which planted the seeds of later conflict.

Related Reads

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News1h ago

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News1h ago

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片