The DeepSeek Fundraising Story

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-18Last updated on 2026-06-18

Abstract

"The DeepSeek Funding Story: Insights from the $2.15 Billion Round" This article details behind-the-scenes narratives from DeepSeek's recent massive funding round. Key highlights include the legendary four-hour online investor meeting where CEO Liang Wenfeng, despite not being a charismatic speaker, impressed attendees with his focus on AGI and team stability. He emphasized the philosophy of "ordinary people doing extraordinary things" and a steadfast commitment to solely advancing intelligence. The fundraising process, initiated in April, saw initial demands for a minimum investment of 5 billion RMB, no syndication, and a pure RMB structure. These terms were later adjusted to a 1.5 billion RMB minimum to accommodate more investors. A notable absence was the lack of participation from major VC firms Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital, despite early rumors, making IDG the only established VC in the final lineup. The investor list, while showing 10 entities, actually involved nearly 100 underlying institutions and individuals upon closer examination. Significant participants included Monolith Capital, which doubled its commitment to 3 billion RMB, and Zhenxingu Capital, an unexpected entrant. Liang Wenfeng's paramount condition for all investors was a strict agreement not to poach DeepSeek employees. The article reflects on DeepSeek's unexpected openness to funding and the mix of strategies—synergy, insight, brand alignment, and persistence—that secured investors a stake. ...

Author:@Liu Jing, elsewhere

Information about DeepSeek's funding is already widespread.

For the known information, "elsewhere" will not reiterate. What follows are some untold stories or details we have learned.

The Legendary Four-Hour Meeting

Let's start with that investor meeting, the one passed around by word of mouth, the "four-hour meeting."

In mid-May, DeepSeek organized this online meeting using the Tencent Meeting system. By then, the investor lineup was mostly settled, with each institution having two attendance slots.

Liang Wenfeng spoke first, followed by a Q&A session where investors asked questions and Liang provided answers.

Legend has it that a CVC investor spent a full ten minutes asking questions: first a lengthy self-introduction, then three long questions. The atmosphere became somewhat awkward at one point—this scene is easy to imagine. Some people whispered among themselves, asking who that person was.

But Liang didn't mind, answering each question seriously. Although after answering the second question, he momentarily forgot the third one and asked the investor to repeat it.

Before this, most of the investors who got in hadn't even met Liang Wenfeng in person offline, so this was their first interaction with him. As a result, after the meeting ended, many felt the experience lingered with them.

Liang Wenfeng's memorable quotes and spirit began to circulate in the market.

Restraint and AGI

Liang Wenfeng is not an exceptionally eloquent speaker; his pace of speech is not fast either. But a few quotes from that meeting are often mentioned (paraphrased, the exact wording might vary slightly)—

"We have no fame or influence; we are a group of very ordinary people."

"The narrative I like is ordinary people accomplishing extraordinary things.For DeepSeek, our core is ensuring team stability—this is more important than money or resources. This is the greatest risk and also the greatest challenge."

"Assuming AGI will account for 20% of GDP, those who want 5% will lose to those who want 1%, and those who want 1% will lose to those who want 0.1%."

"What we want to do are things related to improving intelligence; we won't do anything else."

"AGI is a sufficiently big thing; everything else is just part of the process."

Throughout the four hours, Liang Wenfeng repeatedly emphasized the same themes: pursuing only AGI; less is more; restraint, etc.

From 5 Billion to 1.5 Billion

Formal fundraising roughly started in April this year. There was reportedly a so-called "fund whitelist": a list of institutions with strong investment capacity and good brands.

Initially, DeepSeek required a minimum ticket size of 5 billion RMB, prohibited syndicating shares, and required a pure RMB structure.

Against this backdrop, an investment tycoon initially rumored to be a sure participant but ultimately not involved was, according to market gossip, excluded because they had allegedly pitched shares to Middle Eastern LPs.

But in China, there are very few market-oriented funds capable of a single investment of 3 billion RMB. So, some VCs repeatedly negotiated whether multiple fund entities could participate.

Therefore, looking at the outcome, the minimum fund commitment was reduced to 1.5 billion RMB, and the fundraising method became more flexible.

There was also talk that participating institutions ideally should not have invested in other large models. This was highly unlikely, for a simple reason—being a top-tier fund without having invested in large models is contradictory.

At the investor meeting, Liang Wenfeng also expressed that DeepSeek was willing to help other companies—even including large model companies. Of course, the premise remained that they wouldn't poach his people.

Monolith

Monolith Capital appeared early on the investor list. The change was that the initial version was 1.5 billion, and the final amount was 3 billion.

The change in numbers is said to be related to the adjustment in Guozhitou's allocation, which freed up some shares—judging from the latter's figure of 980 million RMB, it seems designed to be just under 1 billion.

Regardless, being willing to make big bets is indeed Cao Xi's distinctive style. He has already proven it once with Kimi.

Monolith is likely the youngest VC among the participating institutions in this round.

Zhengxingu

Zhengxingu is probably the most surprising presence on the final list.

Many interpret it as Zhengxingu not having invested in any Chinese large model company before, thus being more eager to get on board. But according to our information, they actually invested in Kimi, roughly between $6 billion and $10 billion valuation. However, relative to their fund size, the invested amount was relatively limited.

One market interpretation is that Zhengxingu's founder comes from a secondary market background, seemingly having more connection with Huafang. But actually, in the secondary market, quantitative investing and fundamental investing are two distinct circles, even with different values.

According to our understanding, besides Lin Lijun and his partnerYe Chunyan, this investment also happened due to the efforts of a new investor who joined.

Zhengxingu was also one of the earliest VCs to communicate with DeepSeek.

Could DeepSeek Be the Biggest Miss for Sequoia and Hillhouse?

Now to the most surprising part of this deal.

In the initial rumors, Hillhouse would participate, investing 5 billion. Zhang Lei also reportedly told friends multiple times that since 2025, he has occasionally communicated with Liang Wenfeng, visiting Liang's home when in Beijing.

But this narrative later evolved into: Hillhouse would not participate, but Zhang Lei would invest personally. The reasons vary, some say it's related to Hillhouse's fundraising rhythm, others say it's related to regulation.

In the end, neither Zhang Lei nor Hillhouse appeared on the list.

As for Sequoia China, it was almost considered from the beginning as not participating. The most widespread version concerns worries about overseas LPs. We asked many people close to Sequoia, and they roughly expressed similar sentiments. Of course, there are other circulating theories.

The final result is that Sequoia and Hillhouse, the two institutions that seemed almost certain to be involved, ultimately did not appear. A senior lawyer told us that, in theory, companies with an RMB structure cannot be hidden.

Among the old-guard VCs, only IDG invested.

Thus, someone asked us a question: Could DeepSeek become the biggest miss for Sequoia and Hillhouse?

That's hard to assess. However, according to our understanding, DeepSeek may not only raise this one round.

Nearly 100 Institutions and Individuals

Looking at the investor list, only 10 entities participated. But "elsewhere" simply conducted a preliminary look-through of the fund entities and found that the actual number of participants is quite high.

For example, the behind-the-scenes investors of CATL-affiliated off-balance-sheet CVC—Puquan Capital—include: state-owned capital from Xiamen, Ordos, etc., entities related to CATL, and the National Green Development Fund.

Several funds related to IDG Capital in this transaction have strong insurance capital attributes, accounting for a very high proportion of the 3 billion. Additionally, there are entities related to Nongfu Spring, Septwolves, etc.

Monolith's current LPs are mainly state-owned capital from Zhejiang and Shanghai, as well as listed companies like By-health and Yanghe Brewery.

Furthermore,iHealth Labs Inc. (Jiu'an Medical)is also a participant. In fact, Jiu'an is also an LP behind many GPs.

A rough estimate, after a shallow look-through and simple deduplication, shows that nearly 100 institutions or individuals participated in this round of DeepSeek's financing.

The Biggest Requirement: Don't Poach People

We won't elaborate on DeepSeek's investment terms here. Just one additional point: Whether towards large corporations or VC funds, Liang Wenfeng's most important requirement is: Do not poach DeepSeek's people or encourage them to start their own ventures.

"China's Largest Listed Company"

If we return to viewing this as an investment, what kind of odds does DeepSeek really have?

One participating investor once expressed an overly worried thought: Could this be too much of a consensus investment? According to investment industry experience, consensus outcomes are often mediocre.

But for DeepSeek, it's hard to say that. Or rather, we cannot understand it through a simple investment lens. Whether it's its significance for China's AGI industry or its spiritual meaning.

As one investor put it: "They are doing all this with immense goodwill. He seems to be telling us: The world should have been like this all along."

So while some hesitated, others believed, "couldn't find any reason not to invest"—if, as some expect, it goes for an IPO, could DeepSeek potentially become China's largest listed company on the A-share market?

Low Profile and Ambition

While following DeepSeek's fundraising progress, a prominent feeling emerged: For most people, DeepSeek was probably a completely unexpected answer. Even the most competitive investors didn't expect it to open for funding one day.

So as mentioned before, most well-known investment figures also only recently connected with the company. Objectively, Liang Wenfeng has indeed long avoided meeting investors.

When the fundraising news broke, many institutions didn't even try to seek an investment opportunity. But looking at the result, some got their ticket based on so-called synergies, some on insight, some on brand ethos, and some simply on sheer effort.

"elsewhere" tried to ask some investors; most didn't want to discuss this investment much. The sensitivity of the deal is one aspect, but more so it seems a conscious desire to maintain this low profile, feeling honored to be part of it.

One participating investor said that throughout the transaction process, he treasured every document, hoping to frame them someday. Another investor repeated twice the 16-character phrase released with DeepSeek V4 Preview:"Not seduced by praise, not intimidated by slander, act according to the Way, uphold oneself with integrity."

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat were the core philosophies and quotes of Liang Wenfeng (梁文锋) during the legendary four-hour investor meeting for DeepSeek's fundraising?

ADuring the four-hour investor meeting, Liang Wenfeng emphasized philosophies of humility, focus, and restraint. Key quotes attributed to him include: 'We have no fame or influence, we are a group of very ordinary people.' 'My favorite narrative is a group of ordinary people doing extraordinary things.' 'Our core at DeepSeek is ensuring team stability—this is more important than money or resources. This is the biggest risk and the biggest challenge.' 'Assuming AGI will account for 20% of GDP, those who want 5% will lose to those who want 1%, and those who want 1% will lose to those who want 0.1%.' 'We focus only on things related to improving intelligence, we won't do anything else.' 'AGI is a sufficiently big thing; everything else is just a process.' He consistently stressed pursuing only AGI, the principle of 'less is more,' and the virtue of restraint.

QHow did DeepSeek's fundraising terms and participant list evolve from the initial plan to the final outcome?

ADeepSeek's fundraising started around April with an initial plan requiring a minimum commitment of 5 billion RMB per fund, no syndication of shares, and a pure RMB structure. Due to the scarcity of Chinese funds capable of single commitments of 3 billion RMB, the minimum was eventually lowered to 1.5 billion RMB, and the fundraising method became more flexible. While there was a preference for funds that hadn't invested in other LLM companies, this was largely impractical. The final list of 10 direct institutional investors included Monolith (increasing from 1.5B to 3B RMB), Zhenxingu, IDG Capital, and溥泉资本 (associated with CATL), among others. Notably, Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital, initially rumored to participate, were absent from the final list. A shallow穿透 analysis revealed nearly 100 underlying entities (including LPs like local SOEs, insurers, and listed companies) ultimately participated.

QWhat was the most important requirement set by Liang Wenfeng for DeepSeek's investors?

AThe most important requirement set by Liang Wenfeng for DeepSeek's investors, whether large corporations or VC funds, was that they must not poach DeepSeek's employees or encourage them to leave and start their own ventures. This condition was emphasized to protect the company's core asset and biggest challenge: team stability.

QWhy were Sequoia China and Hillhouse Capital absent from DeepSeek's final investor list, despite early rumors of their involvement?

AAccording to the article, Sequoia China was largely considered unlikely to participate from the beginning. The most widespread reason cited was concerns regarding its overseas Limited Partners (LPs), though other explanations also circulated. For Hillhouse Capital, early rumors suggested it would invest 5 billion RMB, with founder Zhang Lei having regular contact with Liang Wenfeng. Later, it was said Hillhouse as a firm wouldn't participate, but Zhang Lei might invest personally. The final absence was attributed to factors like Hillhouse's fundraising rhythm or regulatory considerations. Ultimately, neither firm appeared on the list, making IDG Capital the only traditional major VC to invest.

QWhat broader significance does DeepSeek's fundraising hold beyond a mere financial investment, according to perspectives in the article?

ABeyond a financial transaction, DeepSeek's fundraising holds significant symbolic meaning. It is seen not just through a simple investment lens but for its importance to China's AGI industry and its spiritual or philosophical impact. One investor described the DeepSeek team as operating with 'immense goodwill' and showing 'how the world ought to be.' Another pondered if DeepSeek, upon a potential IPO, could become the largest listed company in China's A-share market. The participants displayed a sense of honor and a conscious desire to maintain the company's low-profile ethos, with some treasuring deal documents as artifacts and citing DeepSeek's motto: '不诱于誉,不恐于诽,率道而行,端然正己' (Not lured by praise, not frightened by slander, follow the path, and correct oneself uprightly).

Related Reads

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

A bettor known as "fishalive" made a stunning profit of nearly $9 million on the Polymarket prediction platform by correctly wagering against favorites during the 2026 FIFA World Cup group stage. The account, registered just before the tournament, risked roughly $400,000 on two contracts for a Spain vs. Cape Verde match: one that Spain would *not* win, and another on a Cape Verde +2.5 goal handicap. The resulting 0-0 draw triggered both payouts. This single event, with a total market volume of $64 million, highlighted extreme profit-and-loss divergence. Other traders, like "betoor619" and "leeeeroyjenkins," lost millions by betting heavily on favorites Spain and Belgium to win outright—contracts that become worthless in a draw. The article explains that while markets heavily favored strong teams, the "team to win" contracts are binary and do not account for the common outcome of a draw. This creates high-risk, low-reward scenarios for favorite backers, while asymmetric profits flow to those betting on underdogs or against outright wins. The transparency of Polymarket's on-chain ledger publicly documents these massive wins and losses, driving mainstream media coverage. As the tournament progresses, the author suggests traders may shift towards hedging strategies that account for draws. The piece also notes growing regulatory scrutiny in the US and Europe, questioning whether such large-scale, anonymous sports prediction markets should be regulated as gambling or financial derivatives.

Foresight News26m ago

Football Draw Harvests Whales: Extreme Profit-Loss Divergence on Polymarket's World Cup

Foresight News26m ago

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

In a landmark shift three and a half years after its debut, ChatGPT's global market share in the AI assistant market has fallen below 50% for the first time, dropping to 46.4% as of May 2026. This signals the end of its initial dominance, with the market now diversifying among competitors like Gemini (27.7%) and Claude (10.3%). The report from Sensor Tower indicates the AI assistant landscape has matured from a phase of awe and experimentation into one of product comparison, ecosystem integration, and monetization. Users are increasingly pragmatic, readily switching between assistants based on specific use cases, brand trust, and value propositions. The industry is moving past the "free lunch" era, with users demonstrating a willingness to pay for premium features, driving significant in-app expenditure. Major players are adopting varied monetization strategies: Claude boasts a high subscription conversion rate, while ChatGPT is increasingly testing ads and shopping integrations to complement its subscription revenue. However, this growth comes with immense costs, as exemplified by OpenAI's soaring cash burn for model training and infrastructure. While ChatGPT remains the largest single player, its declining share symbolizes a broader normalization of AI. The technology is no longer a novelty but an integral, scrutinized part of daily digital life, judged on practical utility, price, and seamless integration. The battle has shifted from proving AI's potential to competing in a crowded field where no single product holds a permanent monopoly.

marsbit37m ago

ChatGPT Loses Half Its Market: From Monopoly to Shared Market in Three and a Half Years

marsbit37m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片