Tether Major Shareholder Invests £12 Million to Support the 'British Trump' in the Crypto Sphere

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

British political party Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage (often called the "British Trump"), received over £12 million in donations in 2025, with a significant portion from Christopher Harborne (also known as Chakrit Sakunkrit). A major Tether shareholder and Thai-based aviation fuel tycoon, Harborne is a key financial backer of the right-wing party. His donations align with Reform UK's pro-crypto policies, which include tax cuts and a national Bitcoin reserve—policies announced after his funding began. This mirrors a U.S. trend of crypto interests influencing politics. Harborne, a dual UK-Thai citizen and early crypto investor, holds ~12% of Tether’s parent company, making his financial support a strategic investment in favorable regulation. Reform UK is now a top-funded UK party, with rising poll numbers.

Yesterday, the Financial Times reported that the UK Labour government is set to announce a new regulation: Companies donating to UK political parties must now disclose the true identity of the individuals behind the donations.

This new rule stems from a series of scandals involving foreign funds infiltrating British politics. However, when it comes to foreign funds, one cannot overlook a 'stealth' crypto billionaire with dual citizenship funding the 'British Trump'.

According to the latest quarterly political donation data released by the UK Electoral Commission on March 5, 2026, the Reform UK party topped the list of UK political parties' quarterly fundraising with £5.5 million, but one donation of £3 million came from a single individual, with the source listed as Thailand.

The donor is named Christopher Harborne. Sometimes, he goes by Chakrit Sakunkrit.

He resides in Thailand, holds Thai citizenship, controls approximately 12% of the parent company of the world's largest stablecoin, Tether, under his Thai name, operates one of the world's largest private aviation fuel networks, and channels political funds to a right-wing party thousands of miles away in the UK. Over the past two years, he has used this wealth to bet on one thing: placing Farage and the Reform UK party in a position of power in British politics.

Cambridge Engineer & Bangkok Recluse

In December 1962, Christopher Charles Sherriff Harborne was born in England. He completed his secondary education at Westminster School, an institution whose alumni list includes British prime ministers, judges, and bankers, representing the very top tier of the imperial elite pipeline.

This was followed by Downing College, Cambridge, with dual degrees in engineering and management. Then, the European Institute of Business Administration (INSEAD) in Fontainebleau, France, where he obtained an MBA, graduating in 1988.

His first job was as a management consultant at McKinsey & Company, where he worked for five years. McKinsey consultants of that era typically had career trajectories leading to executive seats in investment banks or multinational corporations. But Harborne did not. He went to Asia, started a research company, and in 2000 founded Sherriff Global Group, a commodities trading company initially focused on high-risk offshore services, named after his paternal family surname.

Around 2005, he moved his family to Thailand. That same year, he registered AML Global Ltd. there, an aviation fuel brokerage company. Today, AML Global has over 1,200 supply points worldwide and is one of the largest private aircraft fuel brokers.

In 2011, he officially obtained Thai citizenship, taking the name Chakrit Sakunkrit. A British citizen certificate and a Kingdom of Thailand nationality certificate have coexisted in the same person's pocket ever since.

No one knows his family situation. No spouse, no children, no verifiable records of private life. He never gives media interviews, almost never appears in public, and has no social media accounts. In an attention economy that runs on exposure, he uses complete invisibility as his shield.

Crypto Sphere布局 (Layout in the Crypto Sphere)

In 2011, when Bitcoin was still a secret jargon within geek circles, Harborne bought in. In 2014, he bought Ethereum, earlier than the vast majority of institutional investors.

But what truly changed his status in the crypto world was a hacking attack in August 2016.

That summer, the Bitfinex exchange was attacked, losing Bitcoin worth approximately $72 million—which, at today's prices, is close to $7 billion. Bitfinex could not immediately fully compensate users, so it adopted a controversial solution at the time: issuing a token called BFX to all affected users, representing a claim on the exchange, promising future redemption.

Most users chose to sell, panic-discounting, eager to exit.

Harborne chose to buy, and kept buying, eventually accumulating, under the name Chakrit Sakunkrit, approximately 12% of the shares in DigFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

This was no small bet. DigFinex's Tether is today the issuer of the world's largest stablecoin, USDT, with daily trading volumes consistently among the highest globally for crypto assets and a market cap exceeding $140 billion. Holding 12% of DigFinex shares means Harborne stands within the core circle of the global crypto-dollar system.

But this equity also brought him trouble. In March 2023, The Wall Street Journal published an investigative report on Tether and Bitfinex's banking arrangements. The article linked Harborne and his aviation fuel company AML Global to the path Tether/Bitfinex used to access the US banking system, suggesting he may have concealed his identity using his Thai name, Chakrit Sakunkrit, when opening an account at Signature Bank.

Harborne promptly filed a lawsuit, accusing The Wall Street Journal of publishing false allegations of "fraud, money laundering, and financing terrorism," and formally filed the case in the Superior Court of Delaware in February 2024.

The Wall Street Journal subsequently removed the paragraphs involving Harborne and AML Global from the report and stated in an editor's note: "This paragraph has been removed to avoid any possible implication... that Mr. Harborne or AML concealed or falsified information in the account application process."

The lawsuit was allowed to proceed.

The Biggest Variable in UK Politics

Beyond aviation fuel and crypto equity, Harborne has a third identity: one of the biggest individual donors in UK political history.

His political path is a traceable trajectory of right-wing bets. He previously donated to the Conservative Party and gave £1 million to support Boris Johnson's campaign. But in 2019, when Brexit negotiations repeatedly stalled in the Conservative-dominated parliament, he felt the Conservatives lacked the determination to push Brexit through and instead poured £6 million into Farage's Brexit Party, becoming its largest donor that year. The Brexit Party subsequently won big in the European Parliament elections.

In September 2023, he accompanied Johnson to Ukraine as a "Boris Johnson office adviser" to attend the Yalta European Strategy Forum, reportedly meeting with senior Ukrainian officials and President Zelensky. This role was never been publicly explained.

In 2024, the Conservative Party suffered a crushing defeat in the general election, and the Labour Party came to power. Both major traditional parties had lost their usefulness: Labour holds a clearly skeptical stance on cryptocurrency, with MP Rushanara Ali publicly calling for a ban on parties accepting crypto donations, calling them a "potential channel for foreign interference in democracy"; the Conservatives have been slow to act on crypto regulation, remaining at the level of statements.

Farage's Reform UK was the only option. Farage is also often called the British Trump.

Third quarter of 2025, £9 million. The largest single donation from a living donor to a single party in UK political history, setting a record in one go. Fourth quarter, another £3 million. For the full year 2025, his donations to Reform UK exceeded £12 million.

An Investment with Expected Returns

Harborne rarely speaks publicly about his donation motives. A rare exception was when he briefly stated: "The UK has not made the most of Brexit; we have not kept pace in 21st-century technology."

But it's hard for outsiders to ignore another, clearer logic: he holds approximately 12% of the parent company of the world's largest stablecoin, Tether. The UK becoming a crypto-friendly regulatory environment has direct commercial value for his core assets. Political donations, in a sense, are also an investment—just the asset is policy, not tokens.

The timeline makes this judgment harder to ignore. Reform UK's public embrace of cryptocurrency occurred *after* receiving Harborne's large donations. Farage announced that if Reform UK came to power, it would introduce a "Crypto Assets and Digital Finance Act," promising to reduce crypto capital gains tax, allow tax payments in cryptocurrency, and establish a national Bitcoin reserve.

In June 2025, Reform UK became the first major UK political party to officially accept cryptocurrency political donations. Farage himself later personally invested £215,000 to acquire approximately 6.3% of the shares in the UK Bitcoin treasury company, Stack BTC.

Reform UK denies any direct connection between the two. The Liberal Democrats and Labour have called for an investigation.

The Hidden Logic

In the US, the story of the crypto industry spending big to support Trump and regain regulatory control has already been told. In the UK, the same script is being reenacted—only the actors have changed, the money is still flowing.

The impact of this bet is already partially visible. Reform UK raised £18.6 million in 2025, surpassing the Conservatives' £13.4 million and Labour's £8.2 million, becoming the top fundraising party in the UK. Farage's approval ratings continue to climb, with Reform UK topping several polls.

If this trajectory continues, a party explicitly friendly to cryptocurrency could potentially lead the UK government, and the biggest beneficiaries would be those who placed their bets early.

The US story provides a reference: In 2024, the crypto industry poured over $200 million into congressional candidates. After Trump's victory, the SEC changed leadership, crypto regulatory direction shifted abruptly, and the industry welcomed a long-awaited policy红利 (policy dividend).

The UK story is not yet finished.

Related Questions

QWho is Christopher Harborne and what is his significance in the UK political landscape?

AChristopher Harborne, also known as Chakrit Sakunkrit, is a dual UK-Thai national and a major shareholder in Tether's parent company. He is the largest individual donor to the UK Reform Party, having contributed over £12 million to support Nigel Farage, often called the 'British Trump,' and his political ambitions.

QWhat was the controversial financial move Christopher Harborne made following the 2016 Bitfinex hack?

AFollowing the 2016 Bitfinex hack, the exchange issued BFX tokens to users as IOUs. While most users sold them at a discount, Harborne aggressively bought them up, eventually accumulating a 12% stake in DigFinex, the parent company of Bitfinex and Tether.

QWhat new regulation is the UK Labour government introducing regarding political donations, and what prompted it?

AThe UK Labour government is introducing a new rule requiring companies that donate to political parties to declare the true individual identity behind the donation. This was prompted by a series of scandals involving foreign funds infiltrating British politics.

QWhat is the connection between Harborne's political donations and the UK Reform Party's policy on cryptocurrency?

AAfter receiving massive donations from Harborne, the UK Reform Party, led by Nigel Farage, publicly embraced cryptocurrency. They announced a 'Crypto Assets and Digital Finance Bill' promising to cut crypto capital gains tax, allow tax payments in crypto, and establish a national Bitcoin reserve.

QHow does the article draw a parallel between the US and UK political situations regarding cryptocurrency?

AThe article states that the same playbook used in the US, where the crypto industry spent over $200 million to support pro-crypto candidates like Trump and successfully swayed regulatory policy, is now being reenacted in the UK with Harborne's funding of the Reform Party.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片