# VC Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "VC", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Stanford Business School Internal Guide: Look Beyond the Reputation, How to Accurately Identify the 5% of Truly 'Top VCs'

"Stanford Business School Internal Guide: Beyond Reputation, How to Precisely Identify the Top 5% of 'Elite VCs'" Professor Ilya Strebulaev of Stanford Graduate School of Business, using data from 230,000 investments, reveals that the top 5% of venture capital firms generate approximately 90% of the industry's profits. For founders, choosing the wrong investor can mean a tenfold difference in returns. The article introduces the data-driven 2026 Strebulaev-Jackson VC Ranking, an alternative to lists like Forbes Midas. It scores nearly 13,000 investors across 30 years based on six factors: dilution-adjusted ownership, net profit (investment cost subtracted), value-add (e.g., lead investor/board role), and attribution of credit between firms and individual partners. Key findings from the top 100 firms: - Sequoia Capital leads with 10,158 points. - Performance follows a power law: the #1 firm scores ~41x more than #100. - Unicorn count is a poor performance proxy (e.g., SV Angel with 139 unicorns ranks #31). - 21 of the top 100 were founded in 2015 or later. - 23 firms have their top-scoring investment in frontier AI/AI infrastructure. - Geography remains concentrated: 62 in California, 19 in New York. The author cautions against using the rank order blindly. Founders must prioritize: 1. Strategic fit (stage, sector, involvement model) over raw rank. 2. Due diligence on the specific partner, not just the firm brand. 3. Recognizing that VC partnerships are long-term commitments akin to marriages. The ranking is a tool to identify the elite 5%, but the final choice requires deeper research into partner dynamics and how investors behave during a company's difficult times.

marsbit08/25 07:06

Stanford Business School Internal Guide: Look Beyond the Reputation, How to Accurately Identify the 5% of Truly 'Top VCs'

marsbit08/25 07:06

VCs Are Starting to Use AI to Predict the Future

Venture Capital Begins Predicting the Future with AI In July, DigClaw's prediction framework, Rhizome v1, achieved three spots (#1, #3, #7) on the FutureX evaluation platform using three different foundational models, including Kimi-K3 and DeepSeek-V4-Pro. It was the only participant to place multiple distinct base models in the top ranks on this benchmark of 59 real-world questions covering politics, economics, and technology, where data leakage is impossible. This result validates DigClaw's core thesis: predictive capability can be built *outside* of the base model itself. While base models provide general reasoning, the system architecture—handling search, reasoning, and probability inference separately—accumulates its own predictive assets. DigClaw argues that large language models (LLMs) are naturally weak at prediction, as they learn correlations, not causation. This leads to issues with causal direction, intervention reasoning, and probability calibration. Existing solutions like prediction markets or end-to-end LLM training also have limitations. The Rhizome framework addresses this through three key engineering decisions: 1. **Decoupling Search and Reasoning:** Separate specialized agents handle information retrieval (optimized for relevance) and structured reasoning, avoiding the contamination of each task. 2. **Trajectory Logging and Probability Calibration:** It maintains a complete, timestamped record of every prediction—evidence, reasoning steps, and final probability—before an event's outcome is known. After settlement, this data is used for systematic calibration (e.g., Platt scaling) to ensure predicted probabilities align with long-term frequencies. 3. **Causal-Chain-Aware Updates:** A novel Bayesian update framework under development identifies if new evidence belongs to an existing causal chain, preventing the same underlying cause from being counted multiple times and reducing overconfidence. DigClaw's technology powers Newborn Ventures, an AI-native VC firm that believes investment is fundamentally about prediction. The same verified predictive capability used on FutureX is applied internally for investment decisions and is offered externally to corporations, financial institutions, and government funds for strategic foresight and risk assessment.

marsbit08/25 02:44

VCs Are Starting to Use AI to Predict the Future

marsbit08/25 02:44

Unitree Investors Jointly Heavy Bet on an Embodied Team

Unibot's early investors, including Meituan, Sequoia Capital, and Matrix Partners, have jointly invested in MiaoDong Technology, another humanoid robotics startup. Founded by former DJI employees—CEO Gao Jianrong, a 9-year DJI veteran who led multiple core business units, and CTO Yang Shuo, who previously worked in Tesla's Optimus team—MiaoDong is known for its combined expertise in hardware productization and advanced robotics cognition. Their core strategy centers on in-house motor R&D and full-stack software-hardware capabilities. The company recently made headlines with its first product, Beni, a wheel-legged "camera robot" designed for low-angle, ground-level filming and personal companionship. Successfully launched on Kickstarter, Beni set a record for the highest fundraising amount in the platform's robotics category. It received a perfect 10/10 rating from influential tech reviewer Marques Brownlee (MKBHD). Beni features capabilities like autonomous obstacle avoidance, the ability to jump 25cm, and self-righting after a fall. MiaoDong plans to leverage the technological and user data feedback from Beni's consumer launch to inform the development of future home-use humanoid robots. The company emphasizes a product-first, user-centric approach, prioritizing real-world applications and reliability over rapid, demo-focused scaling. With Beni set for global release in October and an internal target to sell millions of units, MiaoDong aims to establish itself as a significant player in the embodied AI space through steady, product-driven growth.

marsbit08/24 10:01

Unitree Investors Jointly Heavy Bet on an Embodied Team

marsbit08/24 10:01

Is Venture Capital Dead? An 'Exit Letter' to All Soon-to-Be-Obsolete Fund Managers

This open letter, addressed to outdated fund managers, delivers a sharp, satirical critique of the modern venture capital landscape. It argues that the game is fundamentally over for small and midsize funds. The core issue is the downward expansion of massive multi-billion dollar funds into seed-stage investing. These giants, with their powerful brands and resources, consistently outcompete smaller funds for deals, even for stakes in two-person startups. Founders naturally gravitate toward established names. The letter states that relevance now hinges entirely on investing in the handful of "globally important" companies each year, like leading AI labs. If a fund misses these, it is irrelevant. It mockingly suggests that struggling funds should simply advise their portfolio companies to seek acquisition by these winners and invest through SPVs instead. The proposed "solution" of moving up to growth-stage investing is presented with equal irony. While seemingly simpler than seed investing, it means paying the same high prices once complained about. Furthermore, competition at this level involves extravagant perks (high-production podcasts, media companies, political connections) that smaller funds cannot match. The author cynically prescribes that the only remaining path is to go "all-in" on AI, as any other sector will be obliterated by imminent Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The letter concludes by reversing its own nihilism, ironically pointing out that the tech industry's real lesson is that innovation and competition, however difficult, are essential. The final signature, "A soon-to-be-obsolete fund manager," underscores the piece's satirical warning about consolidation, herd mentality, and the existential threat facing traditional VC models.

marsbit08/20 01:56

Is Venture Capital Dead? An 'Exit Letter' to All Soon-to-Be-Obsolete Fund Managers

marsbit08/20 01:56

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

**Title: Are Big VCs Monopolizing Seed Rounds? Is Giving Up the Only Path for Small VCs?** In a frank and critical commentary, the author argues that the venture capital landscape has shifted dramatically: large, multi-stage funds are aggressively moving into seed-stage investing, leveraging their brand recognition, massive capital, and resources to dominate deals. They outcompete smaller, specialized funds for stakes in even the earliest startups, as founders increasingly prefer established names. The piece asserts that success in VC now hinges almost entirely on securing a position in the handful of globally transformative companies each year (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic). For funds that miss these "winner-takes-most" opportunities, relevance fades. The author sarcastically suggests small fund managers should advise their portfolio companies to seek acquisition by such giants and then invest via SPVs, or abandon early-stage investing altogether to chase less ambiguous growth rounds. Further, the author claims the "best" founders—those from elite backgrounds—command premium valuations and align with top-tier funds, leaving little room for others. The relentless focus on AI is presented as another pressure point; not dedicating a fund entirely to AI is deemed a path to irrelevance, akin to missing prior cycles like SaaS or crypto. Ultimately, the letter delivers a cynical conclusion: with capital and power concentrating, true differentiation is nearly impossible. It suggests that for many small VCs, surrendering to this new reality—rather than evolving, competing, or trying something different—might be the most rational, if grim, course of action. The piece serves as a stark warning about capital concentration and the existential challenges facing smaller investment firms.

marsbit08/19 08:21

Are Big VC Funds Monopolizing the Seed Round, Leaving Small VCs with No Choice but to Give Up?

marsbit08/19 08:21

活动图片