# Settlement Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Settlement", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Franklin Templeton's Latest Research: How to Understand RWA Tokenization

Franklin Templeton's research explores the rapid growth and structural evolution of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, which has expanded from $5 billion in 2023 to over $25 billion by early 2026. This surge is driven by clearer regulations and greater trust in blockchain technology. RWA tokenization covers assets like stocks, bonds, commodities, and real estate, distinguishing them from native cryptocurrencies. The market saw a turning point as tokenization expanded from government bonds to equities, with early movers like Robinhood, Kraken, and Ondo launching tokenized stock offerings. Traditional institutions, including DTCC, NYSE, and Nasdaq, have since announced significant tokenization initiatives, signaling a major shift in securities processing. The article identifies three tokenization models: 1. **Digital Native Tokens**: Direct ownership of the underlying asset with on-chain settlement (e.g., Franklin Templeton’s money market fund). 2. **Synthetic Asset Tokens**: Indirect economic exposure via special purpose vehicles, allowing broader DeFi utility but limited investor rights. 3. **Digital Mirror Tokens**: Tokenized receipts of off-chain assets, with legacy settlement systems and restricted transferability. Synthetic tokens are permissionless, requiring only KYT checks, while digital native and mirror tokens require full KYC/AML compliance. Each model offers distinct advantages in transparency, utility, and efficiency compared to traditional systems. Tokenization is driving convergence between crypto and traditional finance, with wallets emerging as a universal financial interface.

marsbit04/14 11:35

Franklin Templeton's Latest Research: How to Understand RWA Tokenization

marsbit04/14 11:35

Paying the Strait Transit Fee with Bitcoin: Is Iran Just Talking Big?

An article titled "Bitcoin Payment for Strait Transit Fees: Is Iran Just Making Empty Threats?" discusses Iran's announcement to potentially charge a $1 per barrel transit fee for oil tankers passing through the Strait of Hormuz, payable in Bitcoin, during a two-week ceasefire period. This news briefly drove Bitcoin's price above $73,000, highlighting its symbolic significance as a tool for extreme scenarios where traditional financial systems fail due to sanctions. Iran, facing severe U.S. sanctions and exclusion from SWIFT, views Bitcoin as a means to ensure untraceable and unconfiscatable transactions, despite its volatility and slower settlement times. However, the practicality of this move is questioned. The Strait of Hormuz closed shortly after the announcement, leading to skepticism about its implementation. Experts like Arthur Hayes emphasize the need for on-chain evidence to validate the claim, suggesting it may be more of a psychological tactic against Western financial systems than a feasible plan. Even if Iran collects Bitcoin, converting it to fiat for essential purchases remains challenging under current sanctions. The article concludes that Bitcoin’s role in this geopolitical drama—whether as a practical tool or a strategic signal—marks its entry into high-stakes international politics, reinforcing its relevance in a fragmented world.

Odaily星球日报04/09 08:52

Paying the Strait Transit Fee with Bitcoin: Is Iran Just Talking Big?

Odaily星球日报04/09 08:52

CoinFound × OSL Research Launches Stablecoin Research Collaboration, First Phase Focuses on USDGO

CoinFound and OSL Research have launched a stablecoin research partnership, with the initial phase centered on USDGO. The collaboration will conduct thematic research on the USDGO stablecoin ecosystem, utilizing on-chain data analysis and market structure observations. The study aims to explore the development path of stablecoins within the digital financial system and their application potential in trading, settlement, and on-chain financial scenarios. As stablecoins increasingly serve as a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain financial infrastructure, there is growing demand for research into their issuance mechanisms, liquidity structures, and ecosystem synergies. CoinFound and OSL Research will collaborate on building research frameworks and sharing industry insights. Their joint efforts will include co-developing research content, establishing data analysis frameworks, and publishing findings through reports, market observations, and thematic analyses. OSL Research, part of the OSL Group, focuses on in-depth digital asset research and provides forward-looking market insights. CoinFound specializes in Web3 data and research, offering analysis of asset structures and capital flow trends through on-chain analytics. Together, they aim to advance stablecoin research and provide clearer industry benchmarks for the digital asset market.

marsbit04/09 03:32

CoinFound × OSL Research Launches Stablecoin Research Collaboration, First Phase Focuses on USDGO

marsbit04/09 03:32

Prediction Markets Plunge into Major Controversy Again: Are You Trading Facts or Rules?

The prediction market sector, particularly platforms like Polymarket and Predict.fun, is facing significant controversy over event resolution rules that sometimes conflict with user expectations. Two recent cases highlight the issue. First, on Polymarket, a market asking “Will US forces enter Iran by a certain date?” was resolved as “Yes” after US special forces entered Iranian territory to rescue a downed pilot. While the rules technically defined such an operational entry as a qualifying "invasion," many users argued it contradicted the common-sense understanding of a military invasion, as the action was a limited humanitarian rescue, not a combat operation. Second, on Predict.fun, a market on “Will Polymarket launch a token?” was resolved as “Yes” after the platform announced a new stablecoin, Polymarket USD, pegged 1:1 to USDC. The rules defined a "token" as any fungible asset, but the community debated whether a stablecoin—a collateral tool rather than a governance or equity token—should truly count as the "launch" users were predicting, especially for a subsequent market on the project’s Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV). The core conflict is whether users are betting on real-world events or a platform’s specific, often technical, rules. These cases show that a high-probability bet can quickly become a loss if the rules are misinterpreted. The key takeaway for participants is to prioritize understanding the precise, written rules over their own assumptions to avoid unexpected outcomes.

marsbit04/08 03:37

Prediction Markets Plunge into Major Controversy Again: Are You Trading Facts or Rules?

marsbit04/08 03:37

活动图片