# Money Laundering Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Money Laundering", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

What Compliance Risks Lie Behind Trip.com's Overseas Version's USDT Payment?

Trip.com's overseas platform has introduced USDT payment, allowing users to book flights and hotels using the stablecoin. While this offers benefits like potential discounts from exchange rate differences and bypassing traditional cross-border payment fees and limits, it also carries significant compliance risks under Chinese regulations. For personal use, if the USDT comes from legal sources (e.g., mining or legitimate exchange purchases), occasional small transactions may not be criminally prosecuted but could still violate foreign exchange rules. A major risk is unknowingly using "black USDT" linked to illegal activities like fraud, which could lead to frozen bank accounts and lengthy legal investigations. Helping others book travel for profit, however, constitutes illegal business activity under Chinese law. Repeated or large-scale operations may lead to charges like illegal business operations or money laundering, especially if the USDT sources are suspicious. To stay compliant, users should ensure payment, booking, and user identities match exactly, retain proof of legitimate fund sources, and avoid profiting from exchange rate arbitrage. Engaging in "U booking" services for others is strongly discouraged due to high criminal liabilities. Ultimately, while USDT payments offer convenience, users must prioritize legal compliance to avoid severe financial and legal consequences.

深潮12/30 02:33

What Compliance Risks Lie Behind Trip.com's Overseas Version's USDT Payment?

深潮12/30 02:33

Beosin: 2025 Web3 Blockchain Security Landscape Report

The Beosin 2025 Web3 Blockchain Security Report, co-published with Footprint Analytics, reveals that total losses from hacks, phishing scams, and rug pulls reached $3.375 billion. A total of 313 major security incidents were recorded, including 191 hacking attacks causing approximately $3.187 billion in losses. While phishing and rug pull losses decreased significantly compared to 2024, hacking losses surged by 77.85%. Centralized exchanges (CEXs) were the most targeted by value, with 9 attacks resulting in $1.765 billion in losses (52.3% of the total), largely due to the $1.44 billion Bybit supply chain attack. DeFi remained the most frequently attacked sector, with 91 incidents leading to $621 million in losses. Ethereum was the chain with the highest losses ($2.254 billion across 170 incidents). The most common attack method was contract vulnerability exploitation (62 incidents), primarily logic flaws. Two major DeFi exploits were detailed: Cetus Protocol lost $224 million due to a shift operation error in its math library, and Balancer lost $116 million from a precision error in its StableSwap invariant calculation. The report also highlights anti-money laundering case studies, including a drug cartel using crypto to launder funds and the laundering path of funds from the $40 million GMX hack. Key trends include a shift from private key leaks to more complex attacks like supply chain compromises and sophisticated logic exploits. AI-driven social engineering and phishing are growing threats. The industry must focus on securing infrastructure and building a multi-layered defense system.

marsbit12/29 08:54

Beosin: 2025 Web3 Blockchain Security Landscape Report

marsbit12/29 08:54

活动图片