# Layer 2 Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Layer 2", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

"Rethinking Ethereum's Value: The 'Vault Logic' Framework" Traditional valuation models incorrectly treat Ethereum as a company, valuing ETH based on transaction fees ("revenue"). This is flawed. Fees are network friction; a successful network aims to reduce them to zero. Ethereum's average fee has dropped from over $50 in 2021 to around $0.20 today, while transaction volume has tripled. Instead, view Ethereum as a digital vault securing ~$250 billion in on-chain assets (stablecoins, RWAs, L2 bridged funds, wBTC, etc.). Post-merge, Ethereum's security is directly purchased with its own asset: ETH. To attack the network, an attacker must acquire and control staked ETH. Therefore, the vault's security level is intrinsically tied to ETH's market value. Currently, the value of all staked ETH is only ~$72B, protecting ~$250B in assets—a dangerous imbalance. For robust security, the staked ETH securing the network should be valued significantly *higher* than the total value it protects. Applying a conservative security multiplier suggests ETH's fair value should be closer to ~$6,900 (vs. ~$2,070 currently). As on-chain asset value grows into the trillions, ETH's price must rise proportionally to maintain this security budget. Comparisons to free infrastructure like Linux or low-margin utilities like the DTCC are misguided. Their security is provided externally (community, law, banks). Ethereum's security is internal and must be purchased in the open market using ETH. ETH is not the clearinghouse; it is the collateral backing it. The model is not a short-term price predictor but a structural framework. The economic force for ETH appreciation grows monotonically with the adoption of Ethereum for settling value. The narrative that high fees are good is backwards; low fees enable more activity, which increases the value needing protection, thus demanding a more valuable ETH.

marsbit05/28 08:19

Reframing Ethereum's Valuation: Why the Fee Model is Wrong, and the 'Treasury Logic' is the Future?

marsbit05/28 08:19

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

Author David Hoffman, founder of Bankless, explains his decision to sell all his ETH, despite being a prominent figure in the Ethereum ecosystem. He clarifies that his move is not a bearish take on Ethereum itself, which he remains highly optimistic about as a network. His core argument is that the "ETH is money" thesis, which he helped popularize, has largely played out. Hoffman argues that ETH has achieved the market valuation it deserves based on Ethereum's current success and competitive position. He details several reasons for this view. First, the path for ETH to become global money required nearly flawless execution and sustained dominance across Ethereum's entire technical and social stack—a coordination challenge he now believes had a narrower window for success than anticipated. Second, market data shows a strong correlation between L1 chain activity/fees and the price of its native asset; Ethereum's fee dominance has been challenged by competitors like Solana. Third, the "strong version" of crypto (decentralized, native crypto economies) that ETH's monetary thesis relied upon has struggled to maintain a positive mainstream narrative and stable adoption beyond a brief period. Finally, Ethereum's architecture as a "giver"—providing secure block space and tokenization capabilities at cost to L2s and applications—means it doesn't capture premium value directly. Its rollup-centric roadmap further directs most profits to L2s and applications ("fat app theory"). In conclusion, Hoffman believes the opportunity for ETH to be revalued significantly upward as money has diminished. He sold not because ETH will fail, but because its monetary thesis has matured, and he seeks to allocate capital to other opportunities he finds more compelling.

链捕手05/27 02:11

Bankless Co-founder: Why I Sold All My ETH

链捕手05/27 02:11

Blockchain Capital Partner: The Structure of On-Chain Two-Tier Capital Is Still in the Early Stages of Value Discovery

Spencer Bogart, a general partner at Blockchain Capital, argues that the on-chain economy possesses unique features like programmability, composability, and global distribution, fostering an open and fast-paced innovation ecosystem. However, these very features create challenges for large, fiduciarily-responsible institutional capital, which requires robust risk assessment frameworks often difficult in a permissionless and adversarial environment. The proposed solution is the emergence of a two-tiered capital structure. The first, permissionless layer remains the crucible for innovation, where protocols are built, tested, and hardened with real capital. The second, "institutional" layer consists of chains (L1s, L2s, etc.) that, while based on similar code, incorporate risk-management features like the ability to pause or freeze transactions in extreme scenarios, making them suitable for large-scale institutional deployment. The synergy between these layers is key. Protocols proven resilient in the open, permissionless environment can then scale to the institutional layer, accessing deeper capital pools. This creates a lifecycle: build and launch permissionlessly, test and prove robustness publicly, then expand to an institutional-grade chain for scaled adoption. This architecture allows the open, experimental side to continue driving innovation with crypto-native capital, while the institutional layer provides the liquidity, stability, and trust required for mainstream adoption. The major challenge identified is the "cold start" problem: aligning where institutional capital prefers to go with where the most proven applications and network effects currently reside. How this dynamic resolves—whether through protocol migration, new protocol builds, or institutional adaptation—will be crucial to watch. Overall, this evolving structure aims to combine the strengths of open innovation and institutional depth within a shared on-chain ecosystem.

链捕手05/22 06:13

Blockchain Capital Partner: The Structure of On-Chain Two-Tier Capital Is Still in the Early Stages of Value Discovery

链捕手05/22 06:13

活动图片