# Hedging Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Hedging", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Finally, Aave Founder Also Buys a $30 Million Mansion

Aave founder Stani Kulechov has purchased a $30 million Victorian-style mansion in London's Notting Hill, as crypto wealth increasingly flows into real estate. The deal, completed in November 2025 amid Bitcoin's surge past $120,000, reflects a broader trend of crypto entrepreneurs diversifying digital gains into tangible assets during market peaks. Other notable transactions include Block.one CEO Brendan Blumer’s $170 million Italian villa, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s $133 million Los Angeles property, and multiple high-profile acquisitions by Stake.com founders and NFT collectors. Some purchases, like FTX’s Sam Bankman-Fried’s $240 million property spree, were later exposed as misappropriated funds. The shift isn’t limited to real estate. Tether, issuer of USDT, has accumulated approximately 140 tons of physical gold—worth about $24 billion—making it one of the largest non-governmental gold holders globally. The company continues buying 1-2 tons weekly, backing its gold-pegged token XAUT and signaling a strategic move toward stable, physical reserves. According to Sotheby’s 2026 Luxury Outlook Report, cryptocurrency is increasingly influencing luxury purchases in markets like Dubai, New York, and California. Regulatory developments may soon allow crypto assets to qualify for mortgage collateral, further integrating digital wealth into traditional finance. This trend underscores a lasting convergence between crypto wealth and conventional asset classes.

marsbit2 days ago 08:12

Finally, Aave Founder Also Buys a $30 Million Mansion

marsbit2 days ago 08:12

The World of Gold, the Dollar, and Debt: A Revaluation of the Balance Sheet

The article "The World of Gold, the Dollar, and Debt: A Revaluation of the Balance Sheet" argues that the fundamental, often hidden mechanism organizing modern society is not money itself, but the continuous extension of debtor-creditor relationships. Nations, communities, and individuals essentially trade the future for the present. Economic growth and consumption are fueled by an institutionalized consensus that the future can be allocated in advance, with debt being the technical instrument of this system. From this perspective, the core question becomes: who has the power to discount the future into the present and define that future? Money creation and contraction are merely expressions of this debt-based world. The true "magic" of finance is the intertemporal exchange of resources. The roles of the US dollar and gold are clarified through this lens. The dollar is not merely currency; it is the primary tool for coordinating and denominating global debt. The system functions as a massive intertemporal trade: the US provides future promises, while the world provides present productive capacity to承接 (undertake) that debt. Gold is unique as the only major financial asset with no corresponding liability; it is the ultimate settlement that requires no counterparty's promise. It is therefore often seen as inefficient in a healthy debt system but gains value when the future兑现 (fulfillment) of promises is doubted. The author posits that true避险 (risk aversion) is not about finding a permanently safe asset but about identifying healthy, sustainable balance sheets at different times. The fundamental risk is not volatility but structural debt imbalance. The rise of AI is identified as the key variable reshaping global balance sheets. AI creates a paradox: it drastically reduces the price of digital efficiency (software, information processing) while creating unprecedented rigid demand for physical capital (compute power, electricity, land, energy, minerals). This forces a recalibration of the debt system, as growth becomes tethered to physical constraints rather than financial engineering. Markets are thus pricing future production constraints, seen in the rise of silver and other commodities. The article concludes that while the dollar's network effect and its role as the deepest global asset pool (e.g., for settling trades and collateralizing loans) make it currently irreplaceable, its supremacy is not guaranteed. Its ability to discount the future is challenged by physical constraints. For the dollar to maintain its status, the US must lead in building AI infrastructure, making the dollar the essential token for purchasing the world's most powerful compute and efficient productivity. Failure to do so could lead to a slow, irreversible relative decline of the dollar system, until a new monetary anchor, better aligned with real productive capacity and technological leadership, emerges. Gold, while a temporary haven, is not a permanent solution as it generates no cash flow and cannot enhance productivity.

marsbit02/02 13:42

The World of Gold, the Dollar, and Debt: A Revaluation of the Balance Sheet

marsbit02/02 13:42

1-Minute Breakdown of Quantitative Models: High Rollers Hunt Down Trading Bots

In the emerging prediction markets, a mysterious trader known as a4385 executed a sophisticated attack against quantitative trading bots, netting $280,000 in 48 hours. These markets allow users to bet on short-term price movements of assets like XRP—for example, predicting whether the price will rise or fall within 15 minutes. Quant algorithms typically profit by exploiting散户情绪 and market inefficiencies with毫秒级 precision. On January 17, 2026, a4385 placed a "rise" bet in an XRP market when the price was below the starting price and the probability of success was only 36%. In the final minute before settlement, a4385 executed large market buy orders, artificially pumping XRP’s price just above the starting threshold at the exact moment of settlement—ensuring his bet paid out. The strategy relied on shallow order book depth (due to weekend trading and XRP’s lower liquidity), allowing a4385 to move the market with relatively modest volume (~$569,000 in the final minute. Each operation cost about $6,200 in fees, but yielded returns as high as $40,218 per round. To hedge against post-settlement price drops, a4385 held short positions of equivalent size, ensuring overall portfolio stability. This required significant capital—over a million dollars—highlighting that this was not luck or a散户 victory, but a calculated exploit of market structure, liquidity conditions, and quantitative model behavior.

marsbit01/21 04:45

1-Minute Breakdown of Quantitative Models: High Rollers Hunt Down Trading Bots

marsbit01/21 04:45

活动图片