Strategy shrugs off Q4 loss: ‘Bitcoin must hit $8K to force a sale’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-07Last updated on 2026-02-07

Abstract

Strategy CEO Phong Le dismissed concerns over the firm's $17.4 billion Q4 2025 GAAP loss, stating it does not reflect a true cash loss. He emphasized that the company would only face issues if Bitcoin fell to $8,000 and remained there for an extended period. Le also highlighted a $2.52 billion cash reserve to support operations and dividend payments, countering criticism about leverage and fraud allegations from Bitcoin skeptic Peter Schiff. Despite Bitcoin's decline from $126K to $87K in Q4, treasury firms—including Strategy, which holds 713.5K of the total 813K BTC among peers—did not sell during the downturn. A recent rebound in BTC price led to a 26% surge in MSTR stock, illustrating its amplified exposure to Bitcoin.

Strategy CEO Phong Le has dismissed market fears about the firm’s stock, MSTR, and the recent Bitcoin price crash.

Le also emphasized that they were not worried about the $17.4 billion Q4 2025 loss, unless BTC slips to $8K. In a recent interview with CNBC, he said,

“($17.4B) GAAP loss is not really a true cash loss to the company. If Bitcoin goes down to $8K for five years, maybe that’s when we’ll start having issues, and whether we need to sell BTC. But the GAAP loss isn’t something we’re concerned about.”

Under U.S. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), crypto firms must recognize impairment losses or gains on their underlying holdings for the specified period covered by their reports.

The extended BTC price decline from $126K in October to $87K by the end of December led Strategy to shed over $17 billion from the value of its BTC holdings. But Le said it was ‘extremely unlikely’ for BTC to fall to $10K.

Strategy clarifies leverage and ‘fraud’ claims

Le further reinstated that they are not worried about leverage and the impact of dividend payments as BTC crashes, adding that,

“We have $2.52B cash reserve as a digital fortress to back up dividend payments. We’re not worried about the leverage, dividend payments, and are not concerned about BTC price right now.”

In response to ‘fraud’ claims made by Peter Schiff, a long-time Bitcoin critic, Michael Saylor, founder of Strategy, retorted that their products outperform all perceived alternatives.

Stretch (STRC) is one of the preferred stocks Strategy issues to raise capital for BTC buys.

In return, STRC offers an 11% yield to investors. However, Schiff wondered where the yield was being generated, slamming the overall capital-raising model as ‘fraud’ and a ‘ponzi’ scheme.

Treasury firms hold steady

Meanwhile, most Bitcoin treasury firms didn’t aggressively jump into dip-buying as BTC dumped to $60K. Even so, none panicked and sold their holdings.

According to Blockworks data, the treasury firms held a collective 813K BTC before and after the drawdown.

Strategy accounted for 713.5K BTC of the total holdings of Bitcoin treasury firms.

That said, the 12% relief bounce in BTC on Friday, from $60K to $71K, lifted MSTR stock by 26% to $134.9, reversing the 17% loss posted on Thursday. That’s a 2x outperformance against BTC.

This validated Saylor’s statement that MSTR is an ‘amplified wrapped BTC.’ However, it also dumps harder when BTC slips.


Final Thoughts

  • Strategy’s CEO Phong Le downplayed the impact of the recent BTC crash on the firm’s overall health and plans
  • Treasury firms held a collective of 813K BTC and didn’t reduce holdings during the sharp BTC price drop to $60K

Related Questions

QAccording to Strategy's CEO Phong Le, at what Bitcoin price would the company potentially need to consider selling its BTC holdings?

AIf Bitcoin goes down to $8,000 for five years, that's when they would start having issues and potentially need to sell BTC.

QWhat was the primary reason for Strategy's $17.4 billion GAAP loss in Q4 2025?

AThe extended BTC price decline from $126,000 in October to $87,000 by the end of December led to a $17 billion impairment loss on the value of its BTC holdings under U.S. GAAP accounting rules.

QHow did Michael Saylor respond to Peter Schiff's 'fraud' claims against Strategy's capital-raising model?

AMichael Saylor retorted that their products outperform all perceived alternatives.

QWhat is the total amount of cash reserves that Strategy holds as a 'digital fortress' to back up its dividend payments?

AStrategy has $2.52 billion in cash reserves.

QHow did the price of MSTR stock perform relative to Bitcoin during the Friday relief bounce from $60K to $71K?

AMSTR stock outperformed Bitcoin, rising 26% to $134.9, which is a 2x outperformance against BTC's 12% bounce.

Related Reads

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

The article "AI 'Transfer Station' Earns Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage" explores the emerging business of API token transfer stations, which profit from global AI service price disparities and access barriers. These intermediaries purchase low-cost tokens from overseas AI providers (e.g., OpenAI, Claude) through grey-market methods—such as exploiting enterprise credits, bulk accounts, or subscription benefits—and resell them to Chinese users at a markup. Key drivers include the high cost of using top AI models (e.g., Claude Code costs ~$5 per million tokens), the performance gap between domestic and foreign models, and mismatches between subscription and API pricing. However, the practice carries significant risks: upstream token sources may be unstable or illegal; user data passing through intermediaries can be harvested or injected with hidden prompts; and models might be downgraded without disclosure. The market is evolving, with some operators now exporting cheaper Chinese models (e.g., Qwen3.5 at ~$0.11 per million tokens) to overseas users, leveraging price gaps. Yet, sustainability is low due to compliance crackdowns, instability, and reputational risks. Users are advised to employ detection methods (e.g., prompt adherence tests) and avoid sensitive data usage. The authors caution that while transfer stations offer short-term arbitrage, they lack long-term reliability and security compared to official APIs.

marsbit30m ago

AI "Transfer Station" Earning Millions Monthly? Five Questions Uncover the Truth of Token Arbitrage

marsbit30m ago

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

This article analyzes the potential risks associated with MicroStrategy's (MSTR) use of structured financial products like STRC to leverage its BTC exposure. While these tools have enabled impressive returns (e.g., 11.5% annualized) and fueled significant capital inflows ($13.5B outstanding), they also create substantial annual dividend obligations (~$400M). The author argues that this structure, while effective in a bull market, could become a liability if BTC price stagnates or declines. The core risk is a potential negative feedback loop: the growing dividend burden from continued STRC issuance may eventually outweigh the benefits of increased BTC holdings. To meet these obligations, MicroStrategy might need to use new issuance proceeds for dividends instead of buying more BTC, which could disappoint equity investors. If the market capitalization (mNAV) falls below the value of its BTC holdings, the company could be forced to sell BTC instead of issuing new shares, potentially triggering a panic. The author estimates a potential inflection point in 6 months, where annual dividend costs reach $3-4B. At that stage, CEO Michael Saylor might face a difficult choice: sell BTC to meet obligations or sacrifice the credibility of the preferred shares by halting dividends. The article concludes that this financial engineering, while powerful, could ultimately "backfire" on MicroStrategy if market conditions turn.

marsbit1h ago

The Cost of an 11.5% Annualized Return: Will MicroStrategy's STRC Face a Moment of Reckoning?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片