SpaceX Purchases Nearly One-Fifth of U.S. Cybertrucks, Musk's "Left Hand to Right Hand" Move Boosts Sales Over $100 Million

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-17Last updated on 2026-04-17

Abstract

A report by S&P Global Mobility reveals that in Q4 2025, SpaceX purchased 1,279 Cybertrucks, accounting for 18% of all U.S. registrations for the vehicle that quarter. Combined with purchases from xAI, The Boring Company, and Neuralink, companies owned by Elon Musk accounted for approximately 19% of the quarter's Cybertruck registrations. This internal purchasing, estimated at over $100 million, has drawn scrutiny. When these related-party transactions are excluded, the Cybertruck's Q4 registrations actually plummeted by 51% year-over-year. Data indicates Cybertruck sales have significantly declined, with 2025 U.S. sales falling 48% from 2024 figures to around 20,300 units, a mere 8.1% of Musk's initial annual production target of 250,000. The sales slump continued into Q1 2026, hitting a record low. The transactions have raised corporate governance questions, as a private company (SpaceX) is absorbing inventory from a public company (Tesla), with both sharing the same CEO. This practice, while not uncommon among Musk's ventures, is rare in the auto industry for offloading slow-selling models. Tesla, having lost its title as the world's top EV seller, is under pressure to stimulate genuine external demand for the Cybertruck.

Author: Friday, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao Guide: S&P Global Mobility registration data shows that SpaceX purchased 1,279 Cybertrucks in Q4 2025, accounting for 18% of all U.S. registrations during the same period.

Including purchases from companies like xAI, Musk's enterprises collectively absorbed approximately 19% of the quarter's sales. After stripping out related-party transactions, Cybertruck registrations for the quarter actually plummeted by 51% year-over-year.

Musk's companies are becoming the largest buyers of the Cybertruck.

According to a Bloomberg report on April 16, U.S. vehicle registration data provided by S&P Global Mobility shows that 7,071 Cybertrucks were registered in the U.S. in Q4 2025. SpaceX alone purchased 1,279 of them, representing over 18%. xAI, The Boring Company, and Neuralink purchased an additional 60 units during the same period, totaling 1,339 vehicles, accounting for about 19% of the total Q4 registrations. Based on the starting price of approximately $70,000 at the time, the total value of these related-party transactions likely exceeded $100 million.

Sam Fiorani, Vice President of Global Vehicle Forecasting at AutoForecast Solutions, told Bloomberg bluntly: "Tesla's Cybertruck is losing buyers." Tesla, Musk, and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment.

After Removing Related-Party Purchases, Cybertruck's Actual Drop Reaches 51%

If the purchases by Musk's companies are excluded, Cybertruck registrations in Q4 would have plummeted 51% year-over-year.

Electrek began tracking this phenomenon in October last year, when photos already showed large numbers of Cybertrucks being delivered to SpaceX's Starbase facility in Texas. Cybertruck chief engineer Wes Morrill had confirmed on social media that SpaceX was using Cybertrucks to "replace the support fleet." A documentary by the YouTube channel NASA Space Flight also captured rows of Cybertrucks parked inside SpaceX facilities.

Related-party purchases continued after Q4. According to the same dataset, Musk's companies registered an additional 158 vehicles in January 2026 and 67 in February.

From Nearly 40,000 Annual Sales to 20,000, Cybertruck Achieves Only 8% of Target

According to Cox Automotive data, the Cybertruck sold approximately 38,965 units in the U.S. for the full year 2024, making it the best-selling pure electric pickup truck in the U.S. that year. However, full-year 2025 sales plummeted to approximately 20,300 units, a decrease of 48.1% year-over-year, achieving only 8.1% of the 250,000 annual production target Musk promised in 2019.

The situation worsened entering 2026. Only 3,519 units were delivered in the U.S. in Q1, a record low since deliveries began, representing a 45.1% year-over-year decline. Although Tesla introduced its lowest-priced version ever starting at $59,990 in February, the first deliveries are not scheduled to begin until June, and current order estimates indicate delivery timelines stretching into 2027.

Related-Party Transactions Raise Governance Concerns

The controversy surrounding this transaction focuses on transparency. SpaceX is not a public company, so these purchases do not require public disclosure like fleet orders from Hertz or Uber. From an external perspective, a private company is absorbing the unsold inventory of a public company, and both companies share the same CEO.

There are precedents for business交叉 (crossover) between Musk's various companies: xAI uses Tesla Megapack batteries, Grok is integrated into Tesla vehicles, and Tesla and SpaceX are collaborating on chip projects. However, the large-scale sale of a slow-moving model to affiliated companies controlled by the same CEO remains rare in the automotive industry.

Tesla is facing the prospect of a third consecutive year of annual sales decline, having been overtaken by BYD last year to lose the title of global electric vehicle sales champion. Its stock price has fallen by about one-fifth since hitting a historical high in mid-December last year. Whether the $60,000 Cybertruck can truly activate external demand is the most critical test ahead.

Related Questions

QWhat percentage of Cybertruck's Q4 2025 US registrations were purchased by SpaceX and other Musk-owned companies combined?

ASpaceX and other Musk-owned companies (xAI, The Boring Company, Neuralink) combined purchased approximately 19% of the total Cybertruck registrations in the US for Q4 2025.

QBy what percentage did the actual Cybertruck registrations drop in Q4 2025 when the purchases by Musk's companies are excluded?

AWhen the purchases by Musk's companies are excluded, the Cybertruck registrations in Q4 2025 dropped by 51% year-over-year.

QWhat was the estimated total value of the Cybertrucks purchased by Musk's associated companies in Q4 2025?

AThe estimated total value of the Cybertrucks purchased by Musk's associated companies in Q4 2025 was likely over $100 million, based on a starting price of around $70,000.

QHow did the annual sales of the Cybertruck in the US change from 2024 to 2025?

AThe annual sales of the Cybertruck in the US dropped from approximately 38,965 units in 2024 to about 20,300 units in 2025, representing a decline of 48.1%.

QWhat is the main governance concern raised regarding the purchase of Cybertrucks by SpaceX and other Musk-owned companies?

AThe main governance concern is the lack of transparency, as a private company (SpaceX) is absorbing inventory from a public company (Tesla) that is struggling to sell it, and both companies share the same CEO, creating a potential conflict of interest.

Related Reads

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

Investors flock to a physical AI startup as the race for the "OpenAI of the physical world" heats up. Ji Jia Shi Jie (GigaWorld), a company dedicated to developing Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) for the physical world, has raised 3.5 billion RMB (approximately $490 million) in just three months, according to a report from investment media outlet Touzijie. The latest B2 funding round of 1 billion RMB attracted a wide range of top-tier investors, including sovereign wealth funds, industrial capital, and financial institutions. This brings the total funding for the young company, now valued over 10 billion RMB, to 3.5 billion RMB across three recent rounds. The company is led by Huang Guan, a post-90s Tsinghua University PhD with extensive experience in AI, autonomous driving, and entrepreneurship. Its core innovation is a "dual-pyramid" system comprising a five-layer data pyramid (from internet videos to real-world robot data) and a three-layer algorithm pyramid focused on world simulation, action alignment, and reinforcement learning. This system underpins its key models: the "World Action Model" (e.g., GigaBrain series for robot control) and the "World Generation Model" (e.g., GigaWorld series for simulating and understanding the physical world). Its models have reportedly achieved top rankings in global robotics benchmarks. Ji Jia Shi Jie argues that while current digital AGI excels in information processing, the next frontier is physical AGI—systems that can understand and interact with the real world. The company believes the field is approaching its "GPT-3 moment," a key inflection point in capability scaling. To achieve this, the company is pursuing a dual-market strategy. For the consumer (C) market, it launched the "SeeLight" brand and its S1 general-purpose humanoid robot, which has secured initial orders for deployment in real homes. For the business (B) market, it focuses on industrial automation with its Maker series robots, having signed agreements for large-scale deployment in factories, and its DriveDreamer world model for autonomous driving, which is already in use with over 30 automakers and tech companies. The report concludes that by bridging the gap between digital intelligence and physical action, Ji Jia Shi Jie aims to unlock a new wave of productivity, ultimately bringing physical AGI into everyday life.

marsbit13m ago

Three Months, 35 Billion Yuan: Investors Rush to Grab the OpenAI of the Physical World

marsbit13m ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手1h ago

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbit1h ago

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbit1h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinist6h ago

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinist6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片