Singapore's Regulatory Landscape Revealed: The Top Choice for Global Crypto Institutions 'Going Abroad' (Part 1)

比推Published on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Singapore is emerging as a global hub for cryptocurrency institutions, driven by its systematic regulatory framework established by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Key legislation includes the Payment Services Act (PSA), which regulates digital payment tokens (DPTs) and requires licensing for related services, and the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA), extending oversight to entities based in Singapore serving overseas clients. Core licenses include the Major Payment Institution (MPI) license for DPT services and the Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license for cross-border operations. As of now, MAS has granted MPI licenses to 36 international institutions, with strict compliance requirements ensuring financial stability and consumer protection. The regulatory approach emphasizes clarity, risk management, and anti-money laundering measures, positioning Singapore as a preferred jurisdiction for crypto businesses compared to fragmented regimes like the U.S. or high-cost environments like Europe. The article also highlights partnerships between licensed entities and local institutions, such as DBS Bank, in advancing stablecoin and digital payment solutions.

Amid the global wave of digital currencies, Singapore is emerging as an "overseas hub" for international crypto institutions. Whether it's stablecoin issuance, digital asset trading, or institutional-grade custody and payment clearing, global fintech companies are seeking compliant and stable landing paths here.

Behind this lies a systematic regulatory framework established by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS): clear legal frameworks, comprehensive licensing systems, and a regulatory philosophy that balances risk and innovation, setting Singapore apart from major jurisdictions worldwide. Unlike the fragmented regulatory environment in the United States and the high compliance costs in Europe, Singapore offers a predictable and actionable compliance path.

This series of reports will systematically interpret Singapore's digital asset ecosystem from five dimensions: regulatory framework, licensed institutions, financial institution practices, international cooperation, and institutional advantages, showing how its system attracts global institutions while providing reference for the Asia-Pacific and global markets.

Regulatory Framework and Main Licensing System

(I) Core Regulatory Authority

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is the unified regulatory authority for Singapore's digital asset and financial markets, fully responsible for the regulation of payment systems, digital currencies, fintech, and related financial services. MAS implements a management model combining functional regulation and risk-oriented regulation for digital asset activities through a combination of legislation and licensing systems.

(II) Regulatory Laws and Overall Framework

1. Payment Services Act (PSA)

The Payment Services Act is the foundational legal framework for digital asset regulation in Singapore. The act defines digital currencies/cryptocurrencies as "Digital Payment Tokens (DPTs)" and brings related services such as payment, exchange, transfer, and custody into the payment services regulatory system.

The act clarifies the following core requirements:

  • Digital Payment Token services require licensed operation;

  • Sets Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT) obligations;

  • Clarifies compliance standards such as capital adequacy, customer asset segregation, and risk management;

  • Ensures financial stability and consumer protection through continuous supervision.

2. Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA)

The Financial Services and Markets Act further expands Singapore's regulatory boundaries for digital asset activities on the basis of the PSA. Unlike the PSA's primary regulatory logic targeting "services provided to local Singaporean customers," the FSMA's regulatory scope extends to all institutions registered in Singapore or with business premises there, and which use Singapore as an operational base to conduct digital asset-related business, even if their service targets are located overseas. Specifically, any activity involving the issuance, trading, matching, custody, or related services of digital currencies through a Singapore entity falls under the FSMA's regulatory purview.

The act officially生效 (takes effect) from 2025. MAS has clearly required that any institution established in Singapore but providing digital asset services only to overseas customers must obtain the corresponding license within the specified period, otherwise facing high fines and even criminal liability, plugging the regulatory loophole of using Singapore as an "offshore channel" at the institutional level.

(III) License Types and Regulatory Division

Currently, the core licenses for the crypto asset field in Singapore mainly include the DPT (Digital Payment Token Service) license under the Payment Services Act and the DTSP (Digital Token Service Provider) license.

1. Licenses under the Payment Services Act (DPT System)

According to the Payment Services Act, entities involved in digital payments, remittances, e-money, or cryptocurrency services need to possess one of the following licenses:

(1) Standard Payment Institution (SPI) License – Applicable to payment service providers with smaller business scales;

(2) Major Payment Institution (MPI) License – Applicable to institutions with larger transaction volumes, involving cross-border payments or digital asset services.

It is particularly important to note that currently, only MPI license holders are permitted to conduct Digital Payment Token (DPT) related business; SPI license holders have not yet been granted this permission.

Therefore, the so-called "DPT license" in the industry essentially refers to an MPI license that includes the scope of digital payment token services.

2. DTSP License (Digital Token Service Provider)

According to the provisions of the Financial Services and Markets Act, entities without a DTSP license are prohibited from providing any digital token-related services to overseas clients through their business premises in Singapore. The DTSP license primarily targets digital asset institutions providing "external services," its regulatory scope is broader than the DPT system, and its compliance requirements are also stricter.

After the implementation of the new DTSP policy, Singapore systematically cleaned up crypto enterprises characterized by "establishing local entities but lacking substantive operations." Except for a few institutions with genuine business and compliance capabilities, most substandard enterprises needed to cease related business or relocate their entities away from Singapore before June 30, 2025, effectively forming a round of regulatory clearance.

According to industry analysis, if an institution is already under the following regulatory frameworks, it usually does not need to apply for a DTSP license separately:

(1) Already holds a license under the Payment Services Act;

(2) Has obtained an exemption under the Payment Services Act;

(3) Already holds a relevant license under the Securities and Futures Act or the Financial Advisers Act.

It should also be noted that what is referred to as "DTSP licensed institutions" in media reports, in MAS's public information system, mostly corresponds to "MPI license holders including digital payment token services," rather than independently published DTSP license holders.

As of now, MAS has not publicly released a complete list of DTSP license holders; related information is mainly reflected through regulatory documents and policy explanations.

Singapore's Digital Asset Licensing System

As of the writing date, MAS has issued MPI licenses including the Digital Payment Token Service business scope to 36 institutions with international backgrounds.

In terms of the composition of licensed entities, although some institutions have US or other overseas backgrounds, or are controlled by multinational groups, they must use locally registered legal entities as the licensed主体 (subject) when conducting related business in Singapore. Relevant compliance obligations, regulatory responsibilities, and business scopes are all borne by this Singapore entity to MAS in accordance with the Payment Services Act, reflecting Singapore's consistent regulatory principle of "territorial regulation, entity responsibility."

(I) MPI Licensing/Exemption Status of Global Institutions

1. Licensed Status (List sorted A-Z)

2. Exempt Status (List sorted A-Z)

3. Unique Business Situations

  • December 2025: Coinbase launched prediction market features in the US, not applicable to Singapore users.

  • November 2024: Paxos Singapore and DBS Bank issued the USDG dollar stablecoin.

(II) MPI Licensing/Exemption Status of Local Singapore Institutions

1. Licensed Status (List sorted A-Z)

2. Exempt Status (List sorted A-Z)

3. Unique Business Situations

December 2025: Crypto platform Crypto.com announced cooperation with the largest local bank, DBS Group, to enhance fiat currency payment functions, allowing local users to more conveniently use SGD and USD deposit and withdrawal services. The same month, StraitX announced plans to launch its Singapore dollar stablecoin XSGD (issued in 2020) and US dollar stablecoin XUSD on the Solana public chain in early 2026.

  • November 2025: Grab and StraitsX developed a digital wallet supporting stablecoin payments.

  • September 2025: OKX Singapore launched stablecoin payment functionality at GrabPay merchants.

  • August 2025: Singapore's DBS Bank launched tokenized structured notes on Ethereum. The same month, Volkswagen Singapore cooperated with FOMO Pay to support digital currency payments.

So far, we have梳理 (sorted out) Singapore's digital currency regulatory framework, core laws, and licensing system, and also understood the composition of licensed institutions and market structure. It can be seen that Singapore is not simply "crypto-friendly," but has built a robust and attractive digital asset ecosystem through clear systems and strict license management.

In the next part, we will continue in-depth, taking you to understand how local financial institutions participate in digital asset practices, international cooperation and innovation trends, and the practical significance of Singapore's system for global institutions.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608574

Related Questions

QWhat is the core regulatory authority for digital assets in Singapore and what is its role?

AThe Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is the core regulatory authority. It is the unified regulator for Singapore's digital asset and financial markets, comprehensively responsible for overseeing the payment system, digital currencies, fintech, and related financial services. MAS implements a management model that combines functional regulation and risk-oriented supervision through legislation and a licensing system.

QWhat are the two key legislative acts that form Singapore's regulatory framework for digital assets?

AThe two key legislative acts are the Payment Services Act (PSA) and the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA). The PSA is the foundational legal framework that defines cryptocurrencies as 'Digital Payment Tokens' (DPTs) and regulates related services. The FSMA, effective from 2025, extends regulatory boundaries to include institutions based in Singapore that serve clients overseas.

QWhat are the main types of licenses for crypto asset services under Singapore's Payment Services Act?

AThe main licenses under the Payment Services Act are the Standard Payment Institution (SPI) license for smaller-scale payment service providers and the Major Payment Institution (MPI) license for larger institutions involved in cross-border payments or digital asset services. Importantly, only MPI license holders are currently permitted to conduct Digital Payment Token (DPT) related business.

QWhat is the purpose of the DTSP license introduced by the Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA)?

AThe Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP) license, introduced by the FSMA, targets digital asset institutions that provide services to overseas clients from a Singapore base. Its purpose is to regulate 'outbound services,' covering a broader scope than the DPT system and imposing stricter compliance requirements. It effectively closes the regulatory loophole for using Singapore as an 'offshore channel' without substantial operations.

QHow many institutions had received the MPI license with Digital Payment Token service permission as of the writing date, and what is the regulatory principle for these entities?

AAs of the writing date, MAS had granted the MPI license with Digital Payment Token service permission to 36 institutions with international backgrounds. The regulatory principle is 'territorial regulation, entity responsibility,' meaning that even if an institution has foreign backing, its Singapore-registered legal person is the license holder and is responsible for all compliance obligations and regulatory duties to MAS under the Payment Services Act.

Related Reads

Korean Youth, Making a 'Last Stand' in an Epic Bull Market

South Korea is experiencing an unprecedented stock market boom in the first half of 2026, with the KOSPI index doubling in six months, driven primarily by tech giants Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix. This "epic bull run," tied to the semiconductor cycle, has sparked a nationwide frenzy for stock trading. The country, with a population of just over 50 million, now has over 105 million securities accounts. The article, from the perspective of a Chinese national living in Seoul, explores how this speculative fever reflects deeper societal anxieties among Korean youth. Facing stagnant wages, high costs of living, housing pressures, and rigid social stratification, many young people see the volatile market as a "last chance" to alter their predetermined life trajectories and escape financial precarity. Stories include a young office worker investing her meager savings, a couple delaying marriage due to financial pressures, and a seasoned trader navigating exclusive social circles where market information is currency. However, the boom also exposes and exacerbates existing inequalities. While some achieve windfalls, others face devastating losses, with borrowing to invest reaching record highs. The narrative contrasts the illusion of equal opportunity with the harsh reality that the ability to absorb risk is unevenly distributed. Ultimately, the market frenzy is portrayed not as a solution, but as a symptom of a generation's struggle against a system offering limited upward mobility, where daily life is a precarious balance of bills, debts, and societal expectations.

marsbit14m ago

Korean Youth, Making a 'Last Stand' in an Epic Bull Market

marsbit14m ago

Young South Koreans, Making a 'Last-Ditch Effort' in an Epic Bull Market

This article explores how an unprecedented stock market boom in South Korea during the first half of 2026, driven by the semiconductor industry, is transforming the lives of ordinary people, particularly the youth. The KOSPI index doubled in six months, fueled by giants Samsung and SK Hynix, leading to a frenzy of retail investing. With over 105 million stock accounts in a population of just over 50 million, a sense of "FOMO" (fear of missing out) is pervasive. Through the perspective of Li Yuning, a Chinese woman living in Seoul, the piece follows several young Koreans who see the market as a last chance to escape stifling economic pressures, high housing costs, and narrow social mobility. Individuals like Minji, a low-paid office worker, and Junho, saving for marriage, invest their limited savings, while experienced traders like Suhu navigate exclusive social circles. The narrative reveals that this speculative fever stems less from greed and more from deep-seated anxiety about being left behind in a society with growing wealth inequality and rigid class structures. However, the boom also exposes stark social divides. It exacerbates wealth gaps, as those with family support or existing capital fare better. The pressure to succeed is immense, with stories of devastating losses leading to personal tragedy. Ultimately, the article suggests the牛市 acts as a pressure valve and a temporary illusion of opportunity in a system where traditional paths to advancement seem increasingly closed, leaving young people to gamble on the market as a final, desperate bid for a better future.

链捕手20m ago

Young South Koreans, Making a 'Last-Ditch Effort' in an Epic Bull Market

链捕手20m ago

Doubao Charges More than GPT, While DeepSeek Slashes Prices Dramatically: Who Will Win?

The article discusses the divergent pricing strategies of two major Chinese AI companies. In May, Doubao (by ByteDance) began testing fees, with its professional tier priced higher than ChatGPT Plus. Meanwhile, DeepSeek permanently cut prices for its V4-Pro API to a quarter of the original, setting new global lows. Doubao, with high user traffic from ByteDance apps like TikTok, leads in monthly active users but faces massive compute costs from its free model. Its move to a freemium model targets heavy users, aiming to balance scale and monetization amid substantial investments. DeepSeek's price cut is attributed to architectural innovations that slash inference costs, adaptation to domestic hardware reducing dependency, and engineering optimizations. It focuses on the enterprise (B2B) market, aiming to become a leading model base. Both companies are currently unprofitable. The article contrasts their approaches with Anthropic, which is profitable by primarily serving enterprises with high-value use cases like coding and agents. It argues that sustainable AI business models require integrating AI into real workflows to deliver tangible ROI, rather than just offering chat services. DeepSeek's recent $7 billion funding round, including investments from Tencent, is noted to bolster its B2B position. The ultimate winner will be the player that successfully transforms AI into measurable returns, whether through consumer productivity ecosystems or enterprise platforms.

marsbit29m ago

Doubao Charges More than GPT, While DeepSeek Slashes Prices Dramatically: Who Will Win?

marsbit29m ago

Promised Year of Crypto IPOs? Only One Went Public in Six Months, Down 70%

The much-anticipated wave of crypto IPOs in 2026 has failed to materialize, with market conditions worsening dramatically. While SpaceX prepares for the largest IPO in history, raising $75 billion at a $1.75 trillion valuation, the crypto sector faces a frozen pipeline. The sole crypto IPO success this year, BitGo, serves as a cautionary tale. After launching on the NYSE in January at $18, its stock has plummeted approximately 70%. Other major contenders have stalled or delayed. Kraken, which secretly filed in late 2025, has put its plans on ice, seeing its valuation drop 33% to $13.3 billion. Consensys has postponed its filing until autumn at the earliest, and Bitpanda is poised to miss its self-imposed H1 deadline for a Frankfurt listing. This widespread retreat is driven by a severe liquidity crunch. Bitcoin has fallen below $60,000, with capital being diverted to AI stocks and the massive SpaceX offering. The poor performance of earlier crypto listings like Gemini and the stagnant price of Coinbase further dampen investor appetite. A key underlying pressure is the impending US midterm elections in November, which could alter the currently favorable regulatory landscape. Companies had hoped to go public during this window of policy certainty, but challenging market dynamics have overridden those plans. The transparency that comes with being a public company is now seen as a potential liability rather than a benefit in a down market. The industry's fate now hinges on a few critical watchpoints: whether Kraken restarts its process in H2, if Consensys files in the fall, and if SpaceX's debut can revitalize market liquidity. Otherwise, the promised "crypto IPO year" will likely be pushed beyond the election.

marsbit44m ago

Promised Year of Crypto IPOs? Only One Went Public in Six Months, Down 70%

marsbit44m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片