Senator Cynthia Lummis Defends Clarity Act Against Elizabeth Warren’s Criticism

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-07-02Last updated on 2026-07-02

Abstract

Senator Cynthia Lummis defended the Clarity Act against Senator Elizabeth Warren's criticism that it contains loopholes for illicit cryptocurrency activities like money laundering. Warren cited concerns over an alleged $3.84 billion laundering case involving an Iranian company and a crypto exchange, arguing the bill weakens anti-money laundering rules and consumer protections. Lummis countered that the bill includes over sixteen provisions to combat illicit finance, such as applying Bank Secrecy Act rules to crypto (Section 201), sanctioning foreign jurisdictions like Iran (Section 303), and allowing temporary transaction freezes during investigations (Section 305). She called Warren's claims unfounded. The bill, which aims to clarify regulatory roles for the SEC and CFTC, faces ongoing debate in Congress with a 39% predicted chance of passage. Warren also urged stricter ethics rules following reports of a $1.4 billion crypto gain by former President Trump.

Senator Cynthia Lummis fiercely rebutted Senator Elizabeth Warren over her criticism of the Clarity Act regarding possible loopholes for illicit cryptocurrency activity. The exchange shows the current polarization in Congress, where lawmakers are still debating legislation related to digital assets before the end of the August recess. Those who support the bill continue to advocate for it, while opponents are mainly concerned about financial crimes, ethics, and consumer protections.

According to Warren, the present iteration of the Clarity Act may undermine the struggle against money laundering and sanctions evasion via cryptocurrencies. In her statement, she referenced reports according to which Iranian companies had laundered about $3.84 billion of money via the CoinEx cryptocurrency exchange. Furthermore, Warren stated that Congress had to improve anti-money laundering regulations rather than create new regulatory gaps. At the same time, Warren also raised her broader concerns about consumer protection, national security, and regulation in the cryptocurrency sector.

On the contrary, Lummis dismissed the allegations and claimed that the Clarity Act includes more than sixteen different measures aimed at the prevention of illicit finance. She described the criticism by Warren as groundless and suggested that Congress should familiarize itself with the law in order to avoid misunderstanding. According to Lummis, the act improves compliance obligations and expands the tools for the fight against unlawful financial activities.

The Bill Incorporates Anti-Money Laundering Provisions

The bill incorporates several features, which, according to Lummis, are intended to increase the ability of enforcement in tackling financial crimes. She mentions Section 201, which makes the Bank Secrecy Act and Anti-Money Laundering provisions applicable to certain activities relating to cryptocurrencies. Section 303 of the bill gives powers to impose sanctions on foreign jurisdictions engaged in illicit financing, including Iran. Also, Lummis mentions Section 305, which provides for the temporary freezing of certain digital asset transactions by cryptocurrency exchanges during an investigation.

Senators Continue Their Discussions

The Clarity Act is still experiencing delays in light of the ongoing discussions about banking issues, ethics, and cryptocurrencies. The bill aims to define the duties for the SEC and CFTC while offering greater protection for investors and consumers.

Warren, on the other hand, insisted that lawmakers should adopt more stringent ethics requirements in response to the disclosure of a $1.4 billion cryptocurrency gain by the current US President, Donald Trump. Prediction markets such as Polymarket estimate the chances of the Clarity Act adoption at about 39%.

Highlighted Crypto News:
Robinhood Launches Public Blockchain, AI Trading, and 24/7 Tokenized Stocks Globally

High-Yield, Debt-Free, and Non-Dilutive: Why Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Aggressively Promoting Preferred Share Financing

Bitcoin-backed preferred shares, led by companies like Strategy and followed by newer entrants like Strive, have grown to a market size of approximately $13 billion in under two years, attracting capital with high yields. A 2026 report from BitcoinTreasuries.net and Apyx projects this segment could grow from nearly 1% to 3-5% of the global $1.3 trillion preferred share market by 2030, with long-term potential reaching 10%. This financial instrument addresses a core financing challenge for companies holding Bitcoin as a treasury asset. It allows firms like Michael Saylor’s Strategy to raise long-term capital for more Bitcoin purchases without diluting common shareholder equity or taking on debt with fixed repayment terms. Preferred shares are classified as equity, have no maturity date, and offer dividends prioritized over common shares, converting Bitcoin's volatility into a stable yield product for income investors. Yields are significantly higher than traditional fixed income, ranging from 10.8% to 15.2% for top issuers. Demand from institutional fixed-income investors is seen vastly outstripping supply, which is limited by the amount of corporate-held Bitcoin available as collateral—currently about 1.26 million BTC ($83 billion), with Strategy holding 67%. A key safety feature is the high collateral coverage ratio of 3.8x to 4.5x, meaning each dollar of preferred equity is backed by $3.8-$4.5 in Bitcoin. Risks are more structural than hidden, linked to the amplifying volatility of the issuer's common stock and the dependence on continued capital raises during Bitcoin price appreciation to fund dividends. Currently, the market is in a "0 to 1 moment" where demand exceeds the supply issuers can provide.

Foresight News6m ago

High-Yield, Debt-Free, and Non-Dilutive: Why Bitcoin Treasury Companies Are Aggressively Promoting Preferred Share Financing

Foresight News6m ago

Why NEAR Protocol’s latest upgrade could matter beyond its 5% price rally

NEAR Protocol's 2.13 upgrade has gone live on testnet, introducing key features to address future cryptographic threats. The upgrade implements post-quantum-safe access keys using the NIST-approved FIPS-204 signing scheme to defend against potential quantum computer attacks. It also introduces dynamic resharding for automatic scalability. The market reacted positively to the news. NEAR's price rallied approximately 5.4%, finding support at $1.70 and climbing to $1.92. Spot and derivatives trading data showed increased buying pressure and market participation, with rising volume and open interest. Technical indicators like the RSI and DMI suggest growing bullish momentum, with the potential to challenge the $2 resistance level if demand persists.

ambcrypto6m ago

Why NEAR Protocol’s latest upgrade could matter beyond its 5% price rally

ambcrypto6m ago

Anyone Can Easily Create Prediction Markets, But Can Limitless' User-Generated Markets Last?

The article discusses the historical challenges of user-generated prediction markets in crypto, where previous attempts like Augur, Omen, Zeitgeist, and Manifold Markets failed due to fragmented liquidity, poor discoverability, and unreliable, slow settlement processes. These issues often led to platforms filled with inactive markets and low user engagement, prompting some, like Polymarket, to shift to a curated model. Limitless recently launched its User-Generated Market (UGM) feature, allowing anyone to create crypto price prediction markets. It addresses past failures through several key design choices: markets are limited to objective, oracle-based price questions (e.g., "Will Asset X be above $Y at time Z?") for instant, automatic settlement via Pyth and Chainlink, eliminating voting disputes. To combat spam and fragmentation, market creation requires burning 100-1000 LMTS tokens (a non-refundable cost), while creators earn 50% of the trading fees generated by their market, aligning incentives. The platform also benefits from an existing active user base and uses an order book model, removing the need for creators to provide initial liquidity. By tackling settlement reliability, liquidity fragmentation, and creator incentives, Limitless presents a new model for sustainable, permissionless prediction markets.

Foresight News58m ago

Anyone Can Easily Create Prediction Markets, But Can Limitless' User-Generated Markets Last?

Foresight News58m ago

Female Billionaire Becomes a VC

The article details how Zhou Qunfei, founder and chairwoman of Lens Technology and once China's "richest woman," has entered the venture capital (VC) space. Zhou's recent investment in the embodied AI unicorn Kuawei Intelligent, contributing several hundred million RMB from her personal funds, brought her VC activities into focus. Her investment vehicle, Changsha Qunxin Investment, has made 17 investments, targeting semiconductor and hard tech companies like ChipOne Technology. Meanwhile, Lens Technology, her listed company, has made strategic bets this year on AI startups such as BrainCo, Xinghai Tu, Qingtian Zu, and Pudu Robotics. Zhou's own story is one of remarkable ascent. Starting as a migrant factory worker in Shenzhen, she built Lens Technology into a powerhouse supplying glass for major tech clients like Apple, with a market cap surpassing 300 billion RMB. Her move mirrors a broader trend among China's self-made industrial tycoons. Figures like Liu Yi of iHealth Labs (an investor in DeepSeek) and Zhu Xingming of Inovance Technology are similarly redirecting family offices and corporate capital away from traditional sectors like real estate. Instead, they are placing strategic bets on frontier technologies—AI, embodied intelligence, brain-computer interfaces, and nuclear fusion—effectively funding China's next wave of technological innovation.

marsbit1h ago

marsbit1h ago

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Just before its highly anticipated U.S. listing, SK Hynix saw its share price plummet dramatically, losing over 14% in a single day. The sell-off was triggered by market fears of a potential slowdown in AI capital expenditure. This followed a news report suggesting Meta might sell "excess AI compute," which was later amended to remove the word "excess." The initial phrasing sparked a chain reaction in investor sentiment, linking it to a potential peak in AI demand. Despite the sharp downturn, the article argues this is likely an overreaction driven by market sentiment and structural de-leveraging, rather than a fundamental reversal of the AI trend. The author points out that even if Meta proceeds, it could be an optimization of existing assets, not a systemic demand contraction. SK Hynix is in the final stages of its U.S. IPO via an ADR listing on Nasdaq, aiming to raise approximately $29.4 billion—one of the largest such offerings ever. The funds are earmarked for expanding domestic Korean production capacity for HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) and advanced packaging. A key motivation for the U.S. listing is to achieve a valuation re-rating, escaping the so-called "Korea discount" and tapping into the higher valuation multiples typically given to AI-related semiconductor stocks in the U.S. market. In conclusion, the article views the current price drop as a potential buying opportunity, suggesting the long-term industry fundamentals for SK Hynix—particularly its leading position in the crucial HBM market—remain strong. The significant capital raised from the IPO is also seen as a factor that could provide underlying support for the stock post-listing.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

On the Eve of Its U.S. Journey, SK Hynix Plummets Sharply

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot