Senate Ag Committee Unveils Crypto Market Structure Bill Draft, Markup Set For Jan. 27

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-01-23Last updated on 2026-01-23

Abstract

The Senate Agriculture Committee has unveiled a new draft of the crypto market structure bill (CLARITY Act) and scheduled a markup session for January 27. This version focuses on expanding the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) authority to regulate cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, allocating $150 million for implementation. Notably, it excludes regulations on stablecoin yields—a key point of contention that led Coinbase to withdraw support from the Senate Banking Committee's version. The Agriculture Committee's draft also provides a pathway for DeFi to avoid CFTC regulation and protects developers from liability. While the Agriculture Committee aims to advance the bill, the Banking Committee is expected to delay its portion of the legislation, potentially pushing broader discussions to late February or March.

Following the unsuccessful markup of the long-awaited crypto market Structure bill (CLARITY Act) by the Senate Banking Committee, the Senate Agriculture Committee unveiled a new draft of the bill, with a scheduled markup session for Tuesday, January 27.

Stablecoin Yield Regulations Excluded

The Agriculture Committee’s version of the bill primarily addresses regulations under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which would gain expanded authority to regulate cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).

In contrast, the Senate Banking Committee’s section of the legislation focuses on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and its oversight. Notably, the Agriculture draft allocates $150 million to support the CFTC in the implementation of the proposed law.

Market expert James Murphy reviewed the key provisions of the new draft and expressed optimism about its implications. He highlighted that the bill creates a pathway for decentralized finance (DeFi) to avoid CFTC regulation, providing important protections for developers and specific service providers from liability.

The Senate Agriculture Committee’s draft also excludes any regulations concerning stablecoin yields. This decision is significant, particularly as it addresses a critical provision that resulted in Coinbase (COIN) withdrawing its support for the Banking Committee’s version of the bill last week.

The Banking Committee’s version of the CLARITY Act aims to limit the yield that stablecoin platforms can offer. While banks support this approach due to concerns about deposits potentially flowing out, crypto firms oppose it, arguing that such restrictions hinder competition.

In contrast, the Agriculture Committee bill seeks to exempt stablecoins from CFTC regulations and relies on existing frameworks like the already passed stablecoin bill, or GENIUS Act, which mandates that stablecoins be fully backed.

Banking Committee Delays Crypto Bill’s Consideration

Senate Agriculture Chair John Boozman expressed appreciation for the collaborative efforts among lawmakers, particularly mentioning Senator Cory Booker and his staff for their contributions to consumer protections and CFTC authority.

Despite the remaining differences in fundamental policy issues with its Democratic counterpart, the Committee’s chair emphasized the importance of moving the bill forward:

While it’s unfortunate that we couldn’t reach an agreement, I am grateful for the collaboration that has made this legislation better. It’s time we move this bill, and I look forward to the markup next week.

But amid the broader cryptocurrency industry’s optimism surrounding the Agriculture Committee’s version of the market structure bill, the timeline for advancing the overall legislation remains uncertain.

Bloomberg reported that the Senate Banking Committee is expected to delay consideration of its own portion of the bill, which could push discussions into late February or even March.

The 1-D chart shows the total crypto market cap valuation currently at $2.9 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the key difference between the Senate Agriculture Committee's draft of the crypto market structure bill and the Banking Committee's version regarding regulatory authority?

AThe Agriculture Committee's version primarily addresses regulations under the CFTC, which would gain authority over cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, while the Banking Committee's section focuses on the SEC and its oversight.

QWhy did the Senate Agriculture Committee's draft of the bill exclude regulations on stablecoin yields, and why is this significant?

AThe exclusion of stablecoin yield regulations is significant because it addresses a key provision that caused Coinbase to withdraw its support for the Banking Committee's version, which aimed to limit the yields stablecoin platforms can offer.

QAccording to market expert James Murphy, what important protection does the Agriculture Committee's draft provide for the DeFi sector?

AJames Murphy highlighted that the bill creates a pathway for decentralized finance (DeFi) to avoid CFTC regulation, providing important protections for developers and specific service providers from liability.

QWhat did Senate Agriculture Chair John Boozman say about the collaboration on the bill despite not reaching a full agreement?

ASenator Boozman expressed appreciation for the collaborative efforts, stating that while it's unfortunate they couldn't reach an agreement, the collaboration made the legislation better, and it's time to move the bill forward.

QWhat is the reported timeline for the Senate Banking Committee's consideration of its portion of the crypto market structure bill?

ABloomberg reported that the Senate Banking Committee is expected to delay consideration of its portion of the bill, which could push discussions into late February or even March.

Related Reads

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals Prediction markets are playing a significant role in the 2026 NBA Finals, particularly around the New York Knicks' unexpected 2-0 series lead. Platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket have seen massive trading volumes, exceeding hundreds of millions of dollars on championship and related markets. Their influence extends beyond online trading. Kalshi's official partnership with Madison Square Garden has given it prominent physical branding at the arena. Furthermore, local businesses like The Jeffrey bar are using prediction market contracts to hedge the risk of game-result-based promotions, turning potential losses into manageable costs—a concept similar to the famous "Mattress Mack" strategy from traditional sports betting. These markets differentiate themselves by offering a wider, more entertainment-focused range of "event contracts" beyond typical game outcomes, such as predicting celebrity attendance. They also have broader accessibility across the U.S. compared to age- and location-restricted traditional sportsbooks. However, their rapid integration into sports raises regulatory and ethical questions. The NBA is cautiously engaging, discussing integrity frameworks with regulators like the CFTC. While the league permits minor investments like Giannis Antetokounmpo's stake in Kalshi, it advocates for strict rules to prevent insider trading. Many fans express concern on platforms like Reddit, fearing that the close ties between prediction markets, the league, and players could compromise the game's integrity. The NBA Finals has thus become a high-stakes testing ground, showcasing prediction markets' commercial potential while challenging traditional boundaries between financial trading, entertainment, and gambling.

marsbit2h ago

From Madison Square Garden to Kalshi: Prediction Markets Break into the NBA Finals

marsbit2h ago

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

The term "recursive self-improvement" (RSI), where AI improves itself autonomously, is gaining momentum in the AI industry. Startups like Recursive Superintelligence and projects such as Andrej Karpathy's Auto-Research aim to create systems where AI designs, implements, and validates its own research, moving toward superintelligence. While Google CEO Sundar Pichai cautions that such exponential acceleration is not yet a reality, progress is evident. For instance, Anthropic reported its Claude Code writes nearly 100% of the team's code, though it still lacks true self-direction. Analysts frame RSI development in stages: "adequacy" (systems functioning without humans), "parity" (matching human research quality), and "supremacy" (exceeding human-AI collaboration). Reaching parity could trigger rapid, unpredictable advancement due to AI's continuous operation. In China, companies like DeepSeek and Baidu incorporate self-optimization techniques without explicitly branding them as RSI, focusing on algorithmic efficiency and reinforcement learning. However, challenges remain, including "model collapse" from training on AI-generated data and the immense computational and open-collaboration requirements. Ultimately, RSI represents a trend of increasing automation in AI development, potentially reducing human oversight in the creation process itself.

marsbit2h ago

Recursive Self-Improvement AI Gains Traction, Google Pours Cold Water, While DeepSeek and Others Approach the Fringes

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片