Ripple Chiseled a Crack in the Wall, But Swift Tore Down the Entire Wall

深潮Published on 2025-12-23Last updated on 2025-12-23

Abstract

At the Sibos 2025 conference, Swift announced a major evolution of its financial infrastructure by integrating a blockchain-based shared ledger to support tokenized assets and enable secure, real-time, and interoperable global transactions. The new system, built on Consensys' Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea, uses zk-EVM rollup technology to reduce costs and settlement times while meeting banking security standards. Over 30 major banks, including JPMorgan and Citibank, are participating in the pilot. The article reflects on Ripple’s long-standing effort to challenge traditional cross-border payments using XRP and RippleNet, which has seen adoption in retail and corporate remittances despite earlier regulatory challenges. However, Swift’s move represents a broader and more systemic shift. Unlike Ripple’s XRP-dependent model, Swift’s ledger is asset-agnostic, supporting CBDCs, stablecoins, and fiat currencies, and leverages its existing network of over 11,000 institutions. This transition marks a convergence of traditional and decentralized finance, enabling 24/7 settlement, reducing reliance on pre-funded accounts, and potentially freeing up trillions in trapped capital. By adopting a neutral, interoperable, and highly scalable blockchain framework, Swift is positioned to redefine global value transfer—moving from a legacy telegraphic model to a digitally-native, mathematically-verified system.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

During the Sibos 2025 conference in Frankfurt, Swift's Chief Business Officer Thierry Chilosi and Standard Chartered Bank's Global Head of Transaction Banking, Michael Spiegel, discussed a major transformation in global finance. As tokenization moves from pilot programs to reality, Swift officially announced the addition of a blockchain-based shared ledger to its infrastructure, aiming to achieve trusted and interoperable digital finance on a global scale. This ledger will serve as a secure, real-time transaction record between financial institutions, using smart contracts to validate transaction sequences and execute agreed-upon rules. It is designed to complement existing systems and seamlessly bridge traditional finance with tokenized assets.

Image Source: Swift Official Website

Although Swift did not explicitly state the technical platform when initially announcing this major development to the banking industry, Consensys CEO Joe Lubin revealed at the Token2049 conference in Singapore that Swift is leveraging the Ethereum Layer 2 network Linea to build its new payment settlement platform. By adopting Linea's zk-EVM rollup technology, Swift can significantly reduce costs and latency while meeting the financial industry's stringent requirements for 24/7 real-time settlement and security. Currently, over 30 top financial institutions, including JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, and Citibank, are preparing to participate in the pilot of this new blockchain-based payment rail built on Linea.

Ripple's In-Depth Efforts and Current Status

Before discussing Swift, we must revisit the pioneer that challenged the old system for over a decade: Ripple.

In 2012, Ripple emerged with the XRP Ledger (XRPL), with the core goal of replacing the inefficient Swift correspondent banking model. During this period, Ripple successfully built the global payment network RippleNet, connecting over 300 financial institutions. In fragmented markets like Southeast Asia, its On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) service demonstrated that XRP, as a bridge currency, could reduce cross-border settlement times from several days to just 3 to 5 seconds.

By 2020, affected by the U.S. SEC lawsuit, Ripple faced a blockade and stagnation in the U.S. market due to securities allegations. However, its global scale continued to expand. By 2022, its business had reached over 40 payment markets, with total payment volume doubling to approximately $30 billion.

In 2023, Ripple saw a turning point when a court ruled that XRP itself is not a security, marking a milestone victory for Ripple and the industry.

In August 2025, with the SEC completely abandoning its appeal, the five-year legal battle came to an end. The full clarification of its status led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its official entry into mainstream institutional asset allocation portfolios.

Today, Ripple is conducting cross-border payment and receipt businesses in multiple real-world scenarios, ranging from retail remittances (To C) to enterprise-level payments (To B).

In the retail sector, Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to bridge real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia, significantly reducing the pre-funding costs for overseas workers. Santander Bank offers transparent real-time transfers to its customers through the One Pay FX app. Meanwhile, the Southeast Asian payment platform Tranglo has significantly improved the efficiency of peso and baht conversions with the support of Ripple ODL.

At the enterprise level, American Express and PNC Bank use RippleNet to optimize B2B trade settlements and international payment collection experiences.

Additionally, in national infrastructure, Ripple is collaborating with over 20 countries, including Palau, Montenegro, and Bhutan, to develop CBDC platforms, applying blockchain technology to the issuance and清算 systems of sovereign currencies.

Why Did Swift Choose Linea?

When giants in the industry布局 the Ethereum ecosystem, they have shown a high degree of consistency in their preference for Layer 2 technology: Coinbase's Base chain is built on OP Stack, while Robinhood announced earlier this year the launch of Robinhood Chain based on Arbitrum technology to support the tokenization and 24/7 trading of RWA.

This preference stems from L2's ability to leverage Ethereum's security while meeting high-performance demands through a modular architecture. Swift's choice of Linea over OP or Arbitrum lies in the core difference in underlying validation logic.

OP and Arbitrum use Optimistic Rollup, which operates on the logic of assuming transactions are valid by default and only verifying them if challenged. Asset withdrawals typically require a multi-day challenge period, which is a significant time cost for financial清算追求流动性.

Linea, on the other hand, uses zk-EVM, which provides instant validity proofs mathematically. For Swift and its partner banks, which need to process massive value settlements, zk-EVM not only offers faster finality but also ensures compliance verification while protecting transaction privacy.

Swift's choice of Linea embodies the first principle of capital operation: maximizing flow velocity.

Capital will flow like a fluid from low-velocity systems (requiring large amounts of idle准备金预存 in Nostro/Vostro accounts), high-friction systems (layers of correspondent bank fees), and slow-settlement systems (settlement taking days) of the traditional telegraphic instruction era to high-velocity, low-friction, fast-settlement blockchain digital systems.

Swift processes approximately $150 trillion in global payments annually. If it can achieve atomic-level reconciliation and 24/7 real-time settlement through Linea's technology stack, it means that trillions of dollars in准备金 currently积压 in the global financial system to hedge against清算 delays will be released and reinjected into the real economy.

As Consensys CEO Joe Lubin stated at the Token 2049 conference in Singapore, this is not merely a technological upgrade but the true convergence of TradFi and DeFi, marking the global value transfer protocol's official transition from the "Telegraphic Instruction Era" to the "Mathematical Verification Era."

The Significance of Swift Embracing Blockchain

As the global financial backbone network handling approximately $150 trillion in annual transaction volume, Swift's decision to build its ledger on Linea, an Ethereum Layer 2, signifies that blockchain technology will become the heart of mainstream finance.

Swift will eliminate fragmentation between different tokenized networks through unified technical standards, breaking down the long-standing barrier between TradFi and DeFi and implanting the efficiency genes of decentralized finance into the traditional清算 system.

Through a 24/7 operational real-time shared ledger, global financial institutions will no longer be limited by the cumbersome manual reconciliation and time-zone delays of the correspondent banking model. The massive amounts of idle capital currently积压 in correspondent bank accounts to hedge against清算 risk will be effectively released. This will enable the speed of capital flow to truly match the demands of the modern economy, ushering in a new era of global value transfer that is more transparent, lower cost, and更具互操作性.

Ripple struggled for a decade to build a new city based on the XRP Ledger outside the old system. However, the scale of financial institutions it currently connects appears势单力薄 compared to Swift's存量 network, which covers over 11,000 institutions across more than 200 countries.

The core threat from Swift lies in its "asset neutrality." Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which heavily relies on XRP as a bridge currency, Swift's blockchain ledger is designed to support multiple assets, including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs.

Banks within the Swift system can achieve instant settlement by upgrading their existing rails without bearing the volatility risk of a single asset. This combination of "存量优势 (incumbent advantage) + technical compliance" is giving Ripple its most bone-chilling challenge since its inception.

Related Questions

QWhat is the core technological difference between Swift's chosen Linea and other Layer 2 solutions like Optimistic Rollups?

AThe core difference lies in the underlying verification logic. Linea uses zk-EVM (Zero-Knowledge Ethereum Virtual Machine), which provides instant validity proofs for transactions. In contrast, Optimistic Rollups (like OP and Arbitrum) assume transactions are valid by default and only verify them if a challenge is issued, which introduces a multi-day withdrawal delay. For high-value financial settlements requiring speed and finality, zk-EVM's instant cryptographic verification is superior.

QHow did the resolution of Ripple's legal battle with the SEC in 2025 impact its business?

AThe resolution, with the SEC dropping its appeals in August 2025, provided full legal clarity for Ripple. This landmark victory led to the approval of an XRP spot ETF, marking its formal entry into the asset allocation lists of mainstream financial firms and solidifying its legitimacy in the market.

QWhat specific problem is Swift's new blockchain-based shared ledger designed to solve in global finance?

AIt is designed to solve the inefficiencies of the traditional correspondent banking model, including slow settlement times (taking days), high costs from intermediary fees, and the need for large amounts of pre-funded capital (Nostro/Vostro accounts) to hedge against settlement risk. The ledger enables secure, real-time, 24/7 settlement, releasing trapped capital and improving interoperability.

QWhy is Swift's approach considered a greater threat to Ripple than simply competing with its technology?

ASwift's threat stems from its 'asset neutrality' and immense existing network. Unlike Ripple's ODL model, which relies heavily on the XRP token as a bridge currency, Swift's ledger is designed to support multiple assets including fiat currencies, stablecoins, and CBDCs. This allows Swift's vast network of over 11,000 banks to upgrade for instant settlement without exposure to the volatility of a single asset, leveraging its massive existing infrastructure.

QName one retail and one corporate use case where Ripple's technology is currently being implemented.

ARetail: Japan's SBI Remit uses XRP to provide real-time remittance channels to the Philippines, Vietnam, and Indonesia. Corporate: American Express utilizes RippleNet to optimize its B2B trade settlement processes.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手5h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手5h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy USOIL

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL)After purchasing your WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL)Easily trade WTI Crude USOil/ CL (USOIL) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

626 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.05.25

How to Buy USOIL

HTX Learn: Learn USDD to Share 1000 USDT​

To enhance your understanding of USDD, we are rolling out various rewarding events. Join them now and bring home generous rewards through learning and trading.

27.7k Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.05.25

HTX Learn: Learn USDD to Share 1000 USDT​

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of A (A) are presented below.

活动图片