Polkadot’s price set to rally past $2? Possible, ONLY if…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-29Last updated on 2025-12-29

Abstract

Polkadot (DOT) has shown short-term bullish momentum, gaining 4.41% over the past week and breaking key resistance levels at $1.75 and $1.85 on the 4-hour chart. This suggests a potential rally toward the $2.00–$2.11 resistance zone, possibly even testing the weekly supply area at $2.50. However, the longer-term trend remains bearish since March 2025, with selling pressure and bearish momentum evident on higher timeframes. Traders may profit from the current bounce, but a drop below $1.82 would invalidate the bullish setup. Investors should exercise caution due to overall market fear and light demand.

Polkadot [DOT] has possessed a long-term bearish trend since March 2025. However, it has registered gains of 4.41% over the past week. This can be seen as good short-term performance, given the volatility around Bitcoin [BTC] and the fear prevalent across the crypto market.

Using multi-timeframe analysis to chart DOT’s trends

At the time of writing, the weekly trend of Polkadot was firmly bearish. The bearish structure breaks (orange) have been ongoing since September. The weekly swing structure has been bearish since March.

The A/D indicator showed steady selling pressure, and the Awesome Oscillator highlighted bearish momentum. The imbalance (white box) at $2.5 could be revisited as a supply zone before the next bearish leg on this timeframe.

The 4-hour chart underlined a bullish trend shift over the past week. Two bullish structural breaks were seen when the previous lower highs at $1.75 and $1.85 (cyan) were breached.

The A/D indicator was climbing higher, and the Awesome Oscillator showed bullish momentum in recent days. It appeared likely that the current H4 uptrend could take DOT’s price to the psychological $2-resistance level, and possibly even the $2.5 weekly supply zone.

The dangers for DOT bulls

The $90k-resistance zone has been a stern opposition to Bitcoin bulls in recent weeks. Despite booming liquidity, BTC traders have reason to remain cautious. This means that altcoins such as Polkadot might have a tough time rallying due to the lack of sustained demand.

The H4 and lower timeframe momentum were bullish at press time. However, that does not mean the higher timeframe trend will reverse. Long-term buyers should be wary of the prevailing bounce.

Traders’ call to action – Potential to profit from the bounce

Risk-averse traders can remain sidelined since the higher timeframe trend was bearish. The current H4 move looked likely to reach $2.11. The 30-day liquidation map underlined the heavy cumulative short liquidation leverage to the north.

This would be an attractive target for the price, since it gravitates towards liquidity. Traders can take profits at the $2.0-$2.1 area. A drop below $1.82 would be an invalidation of the long setup.


Final Thoughts

  • Polkadot’s short-term rally could be profitable for lower timeframe traders.
  • Investors should be wary of buying DOT in these conditions, as market-wide sentiment was fearful and demand was very light.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Related Reads

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

Investors Turn to Bilibili and Xiaohongshu to Source AI Projects The AI hardware boom is in full swing in 2025, with a surge in smart wearables like AI glasses, rings, toys, and companion robots. This frenzy has investors scrambling, not just sifting through business plans, but actively hunting for promising "under-the-radar" projects on youth and tech-enthusiast content platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. The logic is straightforward: for consumer-facing AI hardware, genuine user demand and potential pitfalls are often revealed earlier in public discussions, comments, and critiques on these communities than in formal pitches. As one industry insider notes, these products must ultimately be tested and understood by real people. This shift highlights a crucial challenge in the sector: user education. The success of AI hardware depends on moving beyond mere efficiency gains to fulfilling higher-order needs like "unleashing personal creativity." Products must convince users they are natural, unobtrusive additions to daily life. Early hype, as seen with devices like the Rabbit R1, often fades if the product fails to clearly solve real-world problems, leading to high return rates and market rejection. The market is now entering a shakeout phase. 2026 is seen as a year of commercial validation. Some projects have already stalled or been canceled due to market resistance, lack of differentiation, or financial woes. However, the long-term opportunity remains vast, with forecasts predicting a multi-trillion dollar global AI hardware market by 2030. The competition is intensifying. With giants like OpenAI and Meta preparing their own hardware, and Chinese companies launching diverse AI-powered products, the battle for user attention, product excellence, and market understanding is just beginning. The core principle endures: in the AI era, it remains a user-sovereign market.

marsbit10m ago

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

marsbit10m ago

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

Surprisingly, in the newly released "Agents' Last Exam" (ALE) benchmark from UC Berkeley, GPT-5.5 has outperformed the recently launched and highly-regarded Claude Fable 5. ALE tests AI agents on their ability to perform real-world tasks across 55 professional domains—such as 3D modeling in Siemens NX, creating game scenes in Unreal Engine, and visual effects work in Adobe After Effects—by granting them full GUI and command-line access. In the core task completion rate ranking, GPT-5.5 configurations secured the top two spots (24.0% and 23.0%), while Claude Fable 5 with Claude Code came in third (22.0%). Notably, the highest pass rate was only 24%, and the most difficult "Last-Exam" tier saw most top models, including GPT-5.5 and Fable 5, scoring zero. The benchmark also revealed significant cost and efficiency gaps: Fable 5 spent over four times more money than GPT-5.5's most expensive configuration for a slightly lower score, and was much slower. ALE differs from previous knowledge-based benchmarks by evaluating practical "ability to do" rather than static knowledge retrieval. Its tasks are derived from real expert projects, automatically scored, and designed to prevent cheating through a rotating pool of private challenges. The results suggest that high performance on traditional benchmarks does not necessarily translate to proficiency in complex, open-ended real-world work. The study also notes that agents often fail by prematurely declaring tasks complete without proper verification, and that no single model excels uniformly across all diverse domains.

marsbit16m ago

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

marsbit16m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片