PIPPIN slides 37% as $43mln exits the market – What’s going on?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

Pippin (PIPPIN) experienced a sharp 37% price decline within 24 hours, coinciding with a massive $43 million drop in Open Interest. This indicates a wave of leveraged long positions were aggressively closed, signaling a severe loss of bullish conviction in derivatives markets. Despite a surge in trading volume of roughly $340 million, the data suggests this was driven by sell orders rather than buying. The token's market structure has turned bearish, characterized by lower highs and lows, and it is now trading below key indicators. The price is approaching a critical demand zone near $0.185. If this level fails to hold, further downside is likely as selling pressure persists.

Pippin [PIPPIN] saw a sharp sell-off as prices dropped roughly 37% over the past 24 hours.

The decline coincided with a $43 million drop in Open Interest, signaling a wave of position closures.

Such a sharp contraction often reflects traders exiting leveraged positions during falling prices. That shift suggested derivatives traders rapidly unwound bullish bets.

Open interest collapse signals position unwinding

Usually, a steep fall in Open Interest reflects aggressive position closures.

When Open Interest drops alongside price, long positions are often forced out of the market. That pattern indicated weakening bullish conviction across derivatives markets.

As a result, selling pressure intensified across PIPPIN’s structure.

Even so, the scale of the liquidation wave suggested leveraged longs absorbed the majority of the damage.

Trading volume spike raises concern

By contrast, Trading Volume surged sharply during the same period.

AMBCrypto’s analysis showed PIPPIN’s Trading Volume jumped by roughly $340 million.

At first glance, high volume suggests strong participation. However, Funding Rates indicate seller dominance.

This implies the spike may be driven largely by aggressive sell orders rather than accumulation.

Technical structure turns bearish

On the daily chart, PIPPIN’s market structure turned bearish. Lower highs and lower lows now defined the prevailing trend.

Price accelerated toward a key demand zone near $0.185. This area could trigger a short-term reaction from buyers.

However, persistent selling pressure could weaken any bounce attempt.

PIPPIN also traded below its Exponential Moving Average, reinforcing the bearish outlook.

What’s on the cards for Pippin

As it stands, market structure continues to favor the bears.

The recent 37% daily decline intensified distribution pressure across the token.

On the derivatives side, the $43 million Open Interest drop reinforced signs of capital exiting positions. That move aligned with declining Funding Rates and persistent sell-side pressure.

If momentum persists, the $0.185 zone becomes the next critical test. A weak reaction there could expose PIPPIN to deeper downside.

For now, the token remained under sustained distribution pressure.


Final Summary

  • PIPPIN plunged 37% in 24 hours, coinciding with a $43 million drop in Open Interest.
  • The Open Interest collapse suggested long liquidations, pointing to weakening bullish conviction in Derivatives markets.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage drop in PIPPIN's price and how much did Open Interest decrease?

APIPPIN's price dropped roughly 37% and Open Interest decreased by $43 million.

QWhat does a sharp drop in Open Interest alongside a falling price typically indicate?

AIt typically indicates that long positions are being forced out of the market, reflecting aggressive position closures and weakening bullish conviction.

QDespite the surge in Trading Volume, what did the Funding Rates suggest about market activity?

AThe Funding Rates indicated seller dominance, suggesting the volume spike was driven largely by aggressive sell orders rather than accumulation.

QWhat key price level is identified as a potential support zone for PIPPIN?

AThe key demand zone near $0.185 is identified as a potential area that could trigger a short-term reaction from buyers.

QWhat overall market structure does the article describe for PIPPIN on the daily chart?

AThe market structure is described as bearish, characterized by lower highs and lower lows, with the token trading below its Exponential Moving Average.

Related Reads

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: A New, Life-or-Death Business on Hyperliquid Lasting Half a Year

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: Hyperliquid's High-Stakes, Six-Month Business Venture The article analyzes the nascent market for pre-IPO perpetual contracts on the Hyperliquid blockchain, exemplified by two contrasting teams: Trade.xyz and Ventuals. Trade.xyz, an anonymous team, successfully built the largest pre-market on Hyperliquid. Its strategy focused on near-term events, like the SpaceX IPO. By listing a SpaceX contract with a known launch date and price, the market had a tangible "anchor" (the eventual Nasdaq opening price) to converge upon, which kept speculation in check. This approach fueled significant growth. In stark contrast, Ventuals, backed by Paradigm, failed despite holding coveted contracts for OpenAI and Anthropic. Its critical flaw was its pricing mechanism for these companies, which have no imminent IPO. Ventuals' oracle price was half-derived from infrequent private market transactions and half from its own contract's moving average. This created a self-reinforcing loop where buying pressure artificially inflated the price, disconnecting it from real supply and demand. The market became illiquid and structurally skewed. Ventuals shut down nine months after launch, reportedly through an acquisition. Its final settlement prices—OpenAI at ~$1,341 and Anthropic at ~$1,618—were thus partially products of its flawed model. Ironically, some company employees and late-stage VCs reportedly used these prices for valuation reference, highlighting the desperate demand for price discovery in opaque private markets. The failure of Ventuals exposes the core challenge of this business: price for illiquid, non-public assets requires a robust, self-correcting market, which is absent without a definitive public listing event. Nevertheless, demand is driving major players like Coinbase and traditional finance (e.g., Citi) to enter the space, aiming to provide 24/7 trading for coveted private company shares. The venture's ultimate viability, however, hinges on solving the fundamental pricing problem Ventuals could not.

marsbit8m ago

Pricing OpenAI Pre-IPO: A New, Life-or-Death Business on Hyperliquid Lasting Half a Year

marsbit8m ago

M&A Deals in the Crypto Market Are Unusually Active

Title: M&A Activity in Crypto Market Becomes Unusually Active A rare signal is emerging in the crypto primary market: mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are nearing half of all financing deals. According to RootData, this month, M&A cases in the crypto industry reached 10, while financing rounds numbered only 14, meaning M&A accounts for approximately 42% of primary market transactions—the highest level in history. This does not signal a sudden industry boom. Instead, the rapid rise in M&A share primarily reflects the continued downturn in the financing market. Since November 2024, monthly crypto M&A deals have remained between 10-20, while financing deals have plummeted from around 100 to about 50, possibly hitting a new low this month. For project teams, this means the traditional path of relying on narratives, token expectations, and ecosystem subsidies to maintain valuations is narrowing. For leading companies, it presents a rare window to acquire teams, licenses, technology, liquidity, and market access at lower prices, with less competition and stronger bargaining power. Key active buyers include Coinbase, Kraken, Ripple, MoonPay, Polymarket, Kaiko, Sol Strategies, GSR, Keyrock, Jupiter, Paxos, and Ondo Finance. Their M&A logic is consistent: acquiring key capabilities at lower costs during the industry downturn. This is driven by more attractive valuations, reduced time and trial-and-error costs, the acquisition of licenses and compliance resources, and the integration of industry upstream and downstream segments. Current M&A focuses are concentrated in four areas: trading infrastructure (e.g., Coinbase acquiring Deribit, Kraken acquiring NinjaTrader), payments and stablecoins (e.g., MoonPay, Ripple expanding payment networks), compliance licenses, and asset issuance/distribution (e.g., acquisitions related to RWA and token issuance platforms like Coinbase's purchases of Liquifi and Echo). The rise in M&A is altering the primary market's exit logic. It provides an alternative path to the token-dependent model, encouraging teams to build tangible products, revenue, and strategic value that can be integrated. This could inject confidence into the market, showing that asset buyers and exit possibilities still exist, albeit with a stricter focus on real utility. However, this trend also indicates the crypto industry is becoming more centralized. As asset issuance, trading, market-making, custody, payments, and data gradually consolidate in the hands of a few major players, the industry's initial emphasis on openness and anti-monopoly is being reshaped by commercial realities. Coupled with rising compliance barriers, this signals the end of the low-barrier era for crypto entrepreneurship.

链捕手41m ago

M&A Deals in the Crypto Market Are Unusually Active

链捕手41m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片