Pi Network nears crucial price point: Breakout or bull trap for PI?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-06Last updated on 2026-03-06

Abstract

Pi Network's PI token has shown strong performance, gaining 16.1% over the past week and 5% in the last 24 hours, contrasting Bitcoin's decline. However, the longer-term trend remains bearish. The price has reached a key psychological resistance at $0.20, which may be a bull trap rather than a sustainable breakout. Technical indicators like the OBV and Awesome Oscillator show buying pressure, but the CMF suggests underlying weakness. The daily chart structure is still bearish, and a break above $0.216 is needed to shift the trend bullishly. Traders are advised to watch for a close below $0.1857 to confirm bearish momentum. The breakout from the triangle pattern may be a retracement before further declines.

Pi Network [PI] has been a strong performer over the past week. According to CoinMarketCap data, it was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours.

This was encouraging news, especially when contrasted against Bitcoin’s [BTC] 1.4% plunge over the previous day.

This relative strength might give PI bulls the confidence to go long. Yet, as AMBCrypto reported earlier in the week, the altcoin’s longer-term trend might not favor the buyers in the coming days and weeks.

Are PI prices in a value area for traders?

On the daily chart, the price was back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone. The gains it has made over the past three weeks were a heartening sight to speculators, but it could be a trap.

The long-term trend remained bearish. The current rally was likely part of a retracement before the bearish move can continue. In the lower timeframes, a triangle pattern was spotted recently, which led to a strong breakout.

This breakout has reached the 78.6% retracement level at $0.197. The OBV has made higher highs during the rally, and the Awesome Oscillator was back above the zero line. Together, they indicated buying pressure and positive momentum.

On the other hand, the CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement. This was a contradictory sign, but it agreed with the longer-term price action- bulls were likely too weak to reverse the downtrend.

Traders, is it time to sell PI?

It was nearly time to sell PI. The H4 trend was bullish, exemplified by the break of the lower high at $0.1788 (cyan). The most recent higher low was at $0.1857 (green), while a local resistance level at $0.2055 (white) opposed further bullish expansion.

On this timeframe chart, the technical indicators were all bullish. Yet, the higher timeframe trends must be respected.

Traders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias. Meanwhile, a rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.


Final Summary

  • The Pi Network bullish breakout from the triangle pattern should not lull buyers into a false sense of security.
  • The longer-term swing structure remained bearish, and $0.216 must be breached to shift this swing structure in favor of the bulls.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price performance of Pi Network (PI) according to Bitcoin's recent movement?

APi Network was up by 16.1% over the past week and witnessed a 5% rally over the past 24 hours, while Bitcoin plunged 1.4% over the previous day.

QWhat key psychological supply zone is PI's price currently testing on the daily chart?

API's price is back at the psychological $0.20 supply zone.

QWhat contradictory signal does the CMF (Chaikin Money Flow) indicator show despite the recent rally?

AThe CMF has remained below -0.05 for most of the retracement, indicating potential weakness in buying pressure despite the rally.

QWhat price level needs to be breached to shift the 1-day structure to bullish according to the analysis?

AA rally beyond $0.216 is needed to shift the 1-day structure bullishly.

QWhat should traders wait for to confirm a bearish bias on the H4 timeframe?

ATraders can wait for an H4 session close below $0.1857 to confirm the bearish bias.

Related Reads

Hermes Agent Guide: Surpassing OpenClaw, Boosting Productivity by 100x

A guide to Hermes Agent, an open-source AI agent framework by Nous Research, positioned as a powerful alternative to OpenClaw. It is described as a self-evolving agent with a built-in learning loop that autonomously creates skills from experience, continuously improves them, and solidifies knowledge into reusable assets. Its core features include a memory system (storing environment info and user preferences in MEMORY.md and USER.md) and a skill system that generates structured documentation for complex tasks. The agent boasts over 40 built-in tools for web search, browser automation, vision, image generation, and text-to-speech. It supports scheduling automated tasks and can run on various infrastructures, from a $5 VPS to GPU clusters. Popular tools within its ecosystem include the Hindsight memory plugin, the Anthropic Cybersecurity Skills pack, and the mission-control dashboard for agent orchestration. Key differentiators from OpenClaw are its architecture philosophy—centered on the agent's own execution loop rather than a central controller—and its autonomous skill generation versus OpenClaw's manually written skills. Installation is a one-line command, and setup is guided. It integrates with messaging platforms like Telegram, Discord, and Slack. It's suited for scenarios requiring a persistent, context-aware assistant that improves over time, automates workflows, and operates across various deployment environments.

marsbit31m ago

Hermes Agent Guide: Surpassing OpenClaw, Boosting Productivity by 100x

marsbit31m ago

Brother Sun "Rights Protection" Stands Up Against the Trump Family, WLFI Is the Real Scythe in the Crypto Circle

The article details the controversy surrounding World Liberty Financial (WLFI), a cryptocurrency project linked to the Trump family. It reports that WLFI allegedly used the DeFi lending protocol Dolomite, whose co-founder is also a WLFI advisor, as a disguised channel to sell tokens by collateralizing around 5 billion WLFI tokens to borrow approximately $75 million in stablecoins. Despite WLFI's claims that the loans were for ecosystem development and posed no liquidation risk, critics argue it was a way for insiders to cash out, shifting risk to retail investors. The piece highlights WLFI's significant price decline—over 66% since its September 2025 launch—and suggests the Trump family and insiders are the main source of selling pressure, as they control nearly 74% of the token supply. It also revisits WLFI’s prior move to blacklist 272 addresses, including those of investor Justin Sun, under the pretext of preventing large-scale sell-offs, which now appears to be an effort to reduce competition for their own sales. Sun publicly accused WLFI of exploiting users, freezing assets, and treating the crypto community as a "personal ATM." WLFI countered by threatening legal action. The author notes that while Sun’s criticism may gain sympathy, a legal battle in the U.S. against the well-connected Trump family would be risky for him. Finally, the article concludes that WLFI exemplifies how powerful elites can exploit crypto’s regulatory gray areas for profit, and urges the community to reject such projects driven more by political privilege than genuine decentralized finance ideals.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Brother Sun "Rights Protection" Stands Up Against the Trump Family, WLFI Is the Real Scythe in the Crypto Circle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Tsinghua's Prediction 2 Years Ago Is Becoming Global Consensus: Meta and Two Other Major AI Institutions Have Reached the Same Conclusion

Summary: In a remarkable validation of Chinese AI research, Meta and METR have independently reached conclusions that align perfectly with the "Density Law" proposed by a Tsinghua University and FaceWall Intelligent team two years ago. Published in Nature Machine Intelligence in late 2025, the law states that the computational power required to achieve a specific level of AI performance halves every 3.5 months. This convergence was starkly evident in April 2026. METR reported that AI capabilities are doubling every 88.6 days, while Meta's new model, Muse Spark, demonstrated it could match the performance of a model from the previous year using less than one-tenth of the training compute. When plotted, the growth curves from all three sources—using different metrics (parameters, compute, task length)—show an almost identical exponential slope. The findings have profound implications: AI inference costs are collapsing faster than anticipated, powerful edge-computing AI is becoming rapidly feasible, and the industry's strategy of simply scaling model size is becoming economically inefficient. The Chinese team, which has been building its "MiniCPM" model series based on this law since 2024, is seen as having a significant two-year lead in practical engineering experience, marking a rare instance where Chinese researchers pioneered a fundamental predictive trend in AI.

marsbit1h ago

Tsinghua's Prediction 2 Years Ago Is Becoming Global Consensus: Meta and Two Other Major AI Institutions Have Reached the Same Conclusion

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片