NVDA Rises 4% but Still Undervalued? Morningstar Raises Fair Value to $310, Sole Weakness Revealed

Published on 2026-08-28Last updated on 2026-08-28

Abstract

Morningstar has raised Nvidia's fair value from $280 to $310, believing the market is underestimating its 70% growth outlook; however, rising memory prices may lead to a continued decline in gross margins.

70% Growth Forecast Becomes Biggest Surprise in Earnings Report

Morningstar believes the most important information in Nvidia's earnings report is not the better-than-expected Q2 revenue, but the company's forecast of approximately 70% revenue growth for fiscal 2028.

Second-quarter revenue was approximately $96 billion, a 106% year-over-year increase, surpassing the company's previous guidance of $91 billion. Nvidia expects third-quarter revenue to reach $108 billion, representing year-over-year growth of about 89%, also exceeding the market consensus of $105 billion compiled by FactSet.

The 70% growth forecast for the next fiscal year implies Nvidia's annual total revenue could approach $700 billion, whereas Morningstar and FactSet's previous estimates were around $570 billion. The company emphasized this is still a supply-constrained forecast, suggesting actual revenue could exceed the current outlook if supplier capacity ramps up faster.

Morningstar Raises Fair Value Estimate to $310

Morningstar has raised its fair value estimate for Nvidia from $280 to $310, assigning a four-star rating, a Wide Moat rating, and a 'Very High' Uncertainty Rating.

Despite the stock rising about 4% post-earnings, Morningstar still considers NVDA undervalued. The market appears to remain skeptical about the sustainability of AI capital expenditures, while Morningstar believes Nvidia's industry-leading AI equipment demand will remain robust for a longer period.

Nvidia projects that the AI capital expenditures of the top five U.S. hyperscale cloud customers next year will reach $1.3 trillion, higher than the previous market estimate of approximately $1 trillion. AI token usage continues to grow exponentially, and GPU rental prices remain elevated, indicating that AI accelerator supply remains tight.

Gross Margin Decline is the Only Apparent Flaw in the Report

Morningstar views the gross margin outlook as the only apparent shortcoming in this earnings report. Nvidia expects its gross margin to decline from 75% in the July quarter to 74% in the October quarter, further dropping to 71.5% in the January quarter, and averaging around 72.5% for fiscal 2028.

The gross margin pressure primarily stems from significant increases in memory prices. Memory is a crucial component of Nvidia's AI racks, and tight supply coupled with rising procurement costs could erode profit margins.

Therefore, NVDA's current core contradiction is clear: demand and revenue growth are stronger than market expectations, but memory costs and supply constraints may compress the quality of earnings. The $310 fair value provides an upside reference for the stock price, but the 'Very High' Uncertainty Rating also implies that any shortfall in capital expenditure or margins could trigger a significant pullback.

Related Reads

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

Solana's first formal on-chain governance vote concluded on August 27th, coinciding with SOL hitting a yearly high. Three key proposals aimed at reshaping the network's tokenomics were decided. Solana's core challenge is a massive usage-to-value capture gap. Despite processing 120x more transactions than Ethereum and leading in DEX volume, its fee revenue is significantly lower due to its fee structure. Currently, most fees (priority fees) go to validators, with only a small base fee partially burned. This results in high net inflation (approx. 6k SOL issued vs. ~650 burned daily). The three proposals seek to address this: **SGP-0001** establishes the formal governance framework. **SGP-0002** (Double Deflation Acceleration) proposes doubling the annual reduction rate of new SOL issuance from 15% to 30%, aiming to reach the terminal inflation rate by 2029 instead of 2032, reducing issuance by an estimated 18.9 million SOL. **SGP-0003** (Resource & Entry Fee Restructuring) would split the base fee into a fixed "entry fee" for block producers and a variable, fully burned "resource fee." This could increase daily SOL burns by ~14x to 7,500-9,000. Major stakeholders like Helius, Jupiter, and Jito support the changes. However, opposition exists, notably from Solana Company (HSDT), whose revenue is 99.4% from staking. They argue rapid changes could disrupt institutional adoption. Critics also highlight a potential conflict where validators can vote against reduced staking yields using delegated SOL without explicit voter consent. The outcome of these votes provides a directional mandate. If passed, they represent a significant step towards aligning Solana's immense network activity with tangible economic value for SOL holders.

marsbit3m ago

One Vote Could Make SOL's Daily Burn Rate Soar 14 Times

marsbit3m ago

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

Chinese Venture Capital: Shifting from "Picking Founders" to "Picking Cities" The article discusses a significant shift in China's venture capital (VC) landscape. Historically, VC investments heavily focused on the individual founder's vision, track record, and capability, as seen in early internet-era successes like Wang Xing (Meituan), Li Bin (Nio), and Li Xiang (Li Auto). The belief was that betting on exceptional people was the key to success. However, the rise of hard tech startups—in fields like semiconductors, robotics, AI, and biotech—has changed this calculus. These industries depend heavily on deep, localized ecosystems: specialized talent pools, established supply chains, manufacturing bases, and application scenarios. A city's industrial "resume" now significantly impacts a startup's chances. Examples include Shenzhen's dominance in robotics, Beijing's concentration of AI firms, Suzhou's biotech cluster, and Hefei's successful bet on semiconductor giant ChangXin. This shift is further driven by changes in funding sources. Government-guided funds and state-owned capital now dominate VC limited partners (LPs). These "patient capital" investors prioritize local economic development, job creation, and industrial chain growth alongside financial returns. Their early bets signal viability to other investors. Ultimately, the VC logic remains about managing risk and increasing the odds of success. In the hard tech era, a supportive city ecosystem provides crucial resources—talent, suppliers, R&D, and policy stability—that a single founder cannot easily assemble. The investment due diligence process has thus expanded from evaluating just the founder to also evaluating the founder's city. Consequently, capital is concentrating in a few regions with strong, focused industrial foundations, challenging other cities to build compelling, credible ecosystems to attract investment.

marsbit57m ago

Chinese Venture Capital Is Shifting from 'Selecting People' to 'Selecting Cities'

marsbit57m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片