NEAR goes live on Solana – Why $2 is possible ONLY IF…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-19Last updated on 2025-12-19

Abstract

NEAR Protocol's price fell below the key $1.83 support level amid persistent selling pressure, signaling a bearish trend. However, a potential reversal is indicated as the Stochastic RSI shows an oversold bounce. A new catalyst emerged with NEAR launching on Solana, boosting trading volume by $17.6 million to $83.5 million and expanding liquidity. This cross-chain exposure may increase volatility, with a significant liquidity pool near $2 acting as a potential upside target. For a sustained reversal, bulls must reclaim $1.83; otherwise, the bearish trend may continue.

NEAR Protocol [NEAR] has recorded a week of persistent selling pressure.

On the price chart, the token’s bears managed to push its price below the key support at $1.83, at press time, a support level that had initiated multiple reversals on the token’s most recent consolidation phase.

The same level served as a resistance during the months of ranging, but once broken, the overall bias turned bearish. After that, NEAR has struggled to find its footing, with selling pressure dominant in the shorter-term market.

However, the token’s Stochastic RSI defied all odds and was just bouncing off from an oversold region — a reversal sign as bears are out of gas.

That’s not all, a new catalyst has now been introduced. NEAR has gone live on Solana [SOL] trading, and much volatility is expected from the development.

NEAR debuts on Solana!

NEAR’s debut on Solana expanded the token into a new market and boosted its liquidity. Cross‐chain exposure often drives price volatility, particularly when a cryptocurrency is positioned at a critical technical level.

Early market trends reflect this shift. NEAR’s trading volume surged by about $17.6 million in the past day, reaching $83.5 million at press time. Listing announcements typically spark such increases as more participants enter the market.

The Solana listing could provide the catalyst for a potential reversal, with added liquidity and volatility flowing into NEAR.

Is $2 a key upside magnet?

Liquidity data from CoinGlass also brings useful insight. The liquidation heat map indicates a significant liquidity pool of about $839K at around the $2 price level. Such pools often become short-term magnets for prices, especially as volatility increases.

The cluster presence affirms the price level as a key market target if purchase momentum persists among NEAR bulls.

What’s next for NEAR?

The overall trend remains weak. While increased liquidity and trading could spark a reversal, strong demand is needed to push NEAR above its previous resistance.

Only then can the recent bearish momentum be rejected. For now, bulls must reclaim the $1.83 level for a new trend to take shape.

Market participants are watching closely. It remains uncertain whether NEAR’s new exposure on the Solana chain will shift sentiment or simply prove to be a temporary pause before its downward trend resumes.


Final Thoughts

  • NEAR price slipped below $1.83 after repeated rejections during long-term consolidation.
  • Trading volume jumped sharply following confirmation of Solana trading support, as liquidity data points to $2 as a near-term magnet amid rising volatility.

Related Questions

QWhat key support level did NEAR's price fall below, and why is it significant?

ANEAR's price fell below the key support level of $1.83. This level is significant because it had initiated multiple price reversals during the token's recent consolidation phase and previously served as a resistance level.

QWhat new development is expected to bring volatility to NEAR's price?

ANEAR has gone live on Solana trading, which is a new development that expands the token into a new market, boosts its liquidity, and is expected to drive significant price volatility.

QHow did NEAR's trading volume change following its listing on Solana?

ANEAR's trading volume surged by approximately $17.6 million in the past day, reaching $83.5 million at the time of the report.

QAccording to liquidity data, what price level is acting as a key upside magnet for NEAR?

ALiquidity data from CoinGlass indicates a significant liquidity pool of about $839,000 is clustered around the $2 price level, making it a key short-term upside magnet for the price.

QWhat must happen for NEAR's recent bearish momentum to be rejected and a new trend to form?

AFor the recent bearish momentum to be rejected, strong demand is needed to push NEAR above its previous resistance. Specifically, bulls must first reclaim the $1.83 support level for a new trend to take shape.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit3m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit3m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit10m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit10m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit19m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit19m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit22m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit22m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit24m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片