NEAR Doubles: 3 Major Trends Become the 'Engine' for Token Price Surge

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-25Last updated on 2026-05-25

Abstract

NEAR token price surged from around $1.24 in early May to over $2.5, with its market cap returning above $3 billion. This significant growth, occurring amidst broader market volatility, is attributed to three key factors. First, the AI narrative has been a major driver. NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a co-author of the seminal Transformer paper, the foundation of modern AI models like ChatGPT. NEAR has integrated AI capabilities into its ecosystem, notably through the Near.com super-app, positioning itself as a key decentralized AI infrastructure project. Endorsements from figures like Arthur Hayes further boosted market sentiment. Second, NEAR is enhancing its utility as a privacy-focused blockchain. With the launch of NEAR Intents for cross-chain transactions, privacy features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents have become critical to protect users from MEV attacks. These functionalities allow private transfers of assets like ETH and BTC across more than 35 chains, balancing privacy with usability and appealing to institutional and enterprise users. Third, a new tokenomics mechanism is providing buy-side pressure. Following the full unlocking of its initial supply in late 2025, NEAR now employs a fee-burn model. All protocol fees generated by the NEAR Intents layer are used to buy back and effectively remove NEAR tokens from circulation. With NEAR Intents TVL exceeding $80 million, this creates consistent monthly buybacks estimated around $3 million...

On May 25th, the price of the public blockchain NEAR's token stands at $2.37. Since early May, NEAR has surged from a low of $1.24 to a high of $2.5, with its market capitalization reclaiming a position above $3 billion.

While mainstream crypto assets like Bitcoin are fluctuating, NEAR has charted an independent course, standing out as one of the best-performing tokens alongside others like ZEC, ONDO, and HYPE. What is the underlying reason for this breakout?

AI Narrative

NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin is a veteran in the AI field. Illia is one of the eight co-authors of the Transformer paper, which includes other authors like Ashish Vaswani and Noam Shazeer, all from Google Brain/Google Research.

This paper proposed the Transformer architecture, which relies entirely on the attention mechanism, greatly improving parallel training efficiency and model scale. This is the origin of the framework for all mainstream large language models today, such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

NEAR has made AI a core strategy from the early days. In February this year, NEAR officially launched the Near.com super app, integrating cross-chain swapping, privacy tools, and smart contract management into one platform with built-in AI capabilities, supporting autonomous agent application scenarios. In November 2023, Illia also officially assumed the role of CEO at the NEAR Foundation, focusing primarily on the core AI narrative.

In May, Nvidia's earnings report spurred a general recovery in the AI sector. NEAR is seen as a representative of decentralized AI infrastructure, alongside others like TAO.

On May 22nd, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes mentioned NEAR alongside HYPE and ZEC in an article, directly igniting market sentiment.

Privacy-Focused Public Chain

The blockchain industry has long faced the privacy dilemma of "transparency equals publicity." The surge of privacy coins like ZEC and XMR has refocused industry attention on the privacy track, with various protocols, including public chains, beginning to add privacy features.

NEAR was founded in 2018. Its initial core positioning was not AI, but scalability. Its earliest developments also focused on continuously optimizing sharding technology, making it one of the popular "Ethereum killer" public chains at the time.

Because of this, NEAR's public sale on CoinList once caused the latter's website to crash. During the 2020-2021 bull market cycle, NEAR surged from $0.5 to a high of $20.59, becoming one of the most eye-catching star tokens of that era.

However, fast-forwarding to the current cycle, the vast majority of older tokens and new VC tokens have been largely abandoned by the market. Therefore, even in this bull cycle, NEAR only briefly reached a high of $9 in 2024 before declining, hitting a low of $0.84 in 2026.

After the official launch of NEAR Intents, privacy needs began to become very important. Intents are the core of cross-chain transactions, where users express their intent for execution. However, publicly conducting large transactions on-chain is vulnerable to MEV (Maximum Extractable Value) attacks. This drawback poses a significant obstacle for institutions, large holders, and ordinary DeFi users alike.

The NEAR team began planning privacy as an important complement to Intents. In late May this year, the NEAR Intents team launched the Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents features, supporting private cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, SOL, and USDC across 35+ chains. The sender, amount, and path are all hidden, with only the result displayed on the target chain. The underlying technology uses a private shard + TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridge.

NEAR also opened a privacy mode, where user balances, transfers, and transaction activities are private by default. This prevents data leaks for ordinary users, enterprise users, and AI agents executing complex strategies. The Confidential Treasuries (Trezu) launched during the same period further supports private multi-signature, payroll, and cross-chain payments, having already processed $68 million in confidential transactions cumulatively.

Compared to pure privacy coins like Zcash, NEAR's balance between privacy and usability, as well as cross-chain functionality, is more practical. It also directly targets enterprise-level demands, driving a recovery in TVL and developer activity.

NEAR Intents Fee Buyback

In October 2025, NEAR completed the final batch of its initial supply unlock, with the circulation rate approaching 100%.

NEAR designed a dual mechanism of inflation + burning from the early days of its mainnet: a maximum annual inflation of 5% (permanently halved to 2.5% via an upgrade in October 2025), with 90% going to validators as rewards and 10% entering the protocol treasury. Entering 2026, the project has no major unlocks or linear unlock events, only regular epoch reward emissions (approximately 5.4 million NEAR released in the last 30 days, accounting for 0.4% of the total supply).

In addition, the fee revenue generated by NEAR Intents is used to directly buy back NEAR tokens on the market, also providing significant buying pressure.

NEAR's intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on its protocol allows users to simply express the desired outcome (e.g., swapping BTC for SOL), and the system provides the optimal execution path, supporting multi-chain transactions without the need for bridging/wrapped assets and with low fees.

NEAR Intents previously had two fee components: protocol fees and distribution fees (shared with third-party integrators). However, protocol fees now entirely go towards the buyback path. The repurchased NEAR is not necessarily burned immediately but is instead staked, locked, or removed from liquidity. It still counts towards the total supply, reducing circulating supply pressure while also earning staking rewards.

According to the latest data from defiLlama, the TVL of NEAR Intents has exceeded $80 million. Its daily generated fees fluctuate around $100,000, meaning the monthly buyback amount is approximately $3 million.

At the end of this month, its core development team, Near One, also announced the latest technological progress. The team will release dynamic resharding by the end of Q2 2026, significantly improving scalability. Additionally, the team will introduce NEAR's post-quantum secure signature scheme and related upgrades in June this year to enhance its resistance to quantum computing.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the three main factors driving NEAR's recent price surge according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the three main factors driving NEAR's recent price surge are: 1) The strong AI narrative due to its co-founder's background and strategic focus. 2) Its evolution into a privacy-focused blockchain with features like Confidential Payments and Confidential Intents. 3) The token buyback mechanism fueled by fees generated from the NEAR Intents protocol.

QWhat significant event occurred in May 2026 that contributed to NEAR's price movement in the AI context?

AIn May 2026, BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes published an article that listed NEAR alongside tokens like HYPE and ZEC, which directly ignited market sentiment and contributed to its price movement.

QHow has NEAR's token supply situation evolved by 2026, and what is a key ongoing mechanism affecting its circulation?

ABy 2026, NEAR had completed the final unlock of its initial token supply, achieving a circulation rate close to 100%. A key ongoing mechanism is the permanent reduction of its annual inflation rate to 2.5% and, more importantly, the buyback of NEAR tokens using the fee revenue generated by the NEAR Intents protocol, which reduces selling pressure on the circulating supply.

QWhat are NEAR Intents, and what key privacy features were recently launched for them?

ANEAR Intents is an intent-driven cross-chain transaction layer on the NEAR protocol. Recently, the NEAR Intents team launched 'Confidential Payments' and 'Confidential Intents' features. These enable private cross-chain transfers of assets like ETH, BTC, and USDC across over 35 chains by hiding the sender, amount, and transfer path, only revealing the result on the target chain. This privacy is achieved using private shards and TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) bridges.

QWhat role did NEAR co-founder Illia Polosukhin play in the AI field before NEAR?

ABefore co-founding NEAR, Illia Polosukhin was one of the eight co-authors of the seminal 'Attention Is All You Need' paper that introduced the Transformer architecture. This architecture, which relies entirely on attention mechanisms, became the foundation for all major large language models like ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. He and his co-authors were from Google Brain/Google Research.

Related Reads

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

"Token Repurchase and Burn: An Empty Promise? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity" Holding company stock grants shareholders residual claim rights - a legally enforceable entitlement to remaining assets after all other obligations are paid. This comes with rights like voting, dividends, and a share in sale proceeds. Crypto protocols have long promised token holders similar benefits: governance participation and a share of future growth. However, this narrative is fundamentally flawed and built on voluntary promises, not enforceable legal rights. The core difference is that token holders lack any legally enforceable claim to a protocol's underlying value or revenues. Common mechanisms like using protocol revenue to buy back and burn tokens are purely discretionary; the team can alter or stop the policy at any time. Token holders have no legal recourse. This rights gap becomes critically apparent when protocols introduce traditional equity alongside tokens, as seen with Venice AI's $65M funding round. Equity investors hold legal contracts with rights to company assets and profits, while token holders' benefits depend entirely on the continued goodwill of the protocol's management. The acquisition of Houdini Swap, where equity holders were paid while token holders received nothing, starkly illustrates this disparity. Upcoming legislation like the CLARITY Act threatens to eliminate the regulatory gray area that has allowed this ambiguous "pseudo-equity" narrative. The Act would classify tokens as either digital commodities (regulated by CFTC) or investment contract assets/securities (regulated by SEC). Protocols aiming for the "digital commodity" classification would be explicitly prohibited from granting token holders any legal claim to corporate revenue, profits, or assets. Promising that tokens will appreciate from protocol profits would likely classify them as securities. Projects like Aave are attempting technical solutions, such as its automated, on-chain "Aavenomics 3.0" buyback mechanism. However, this remains code that the governance body could still vote to change, not an immutable legal contract. The industry faces a clear fork: either acknowledge tokens as digital commodities and stop promising economic rights tied to corporate profits, or formally register tokens as securities and bear the associated compliance burden. The decade-long narrative equating tokens with ownership is built on unenforceable promises. The entry of traditional equity investors with real legal rights exposes this foundational weakness, which may unravel with the next major funding deal.

Foresight News1h ago

Buyback and Burn: Just Empty Promises? The Unbridgeable Rights Gap Between Tokens and Equity

Foresight News1h ago

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

The prediction market industry has grown significantly, with trading volumes exceeding $20 billion monthly by mid-2026, driven by sports, politics, and macroeconomics. Success now depends heavily on platform choice and execution logistics. This guide compares five leading networks: **Polymarket**: A high-volume, decentralized platform on Polygon, using USDC for international and crypto-native users. It offers diverse markets but lacks built-in risk tools. **Kalshi**: A CFTC-regulated U.S. exchange for institutional traders, using direct fiat. It leads in regulated volume, especially for major sports and economic events, but has limited contract listings. **Outpoll**: A CeDeFi platform for advanced traders, focusing on professional tools. It uniquely features built-in stop-loss/take-profit orders, 0.1% fees, and full API support, with settlement in USDC. **OG Predictive**: A CFTC-regulated, sports-focused platform from Crypto.com. It offers granular player props and a flat fee structure, appealing to long-term position traders. **Manifold Markets**: A play-money, no-KYC platform for casual users and developers. It allows user-generated markets on any topic with zero fees, serving as a sandbox for strategy testing. Key differentiators include regulatory models (regulated vs. decentralized), funding (fiat vs. crypto), order types, risk management features, API access, and mobile support. The conclusion emphasizes that in today's event trading, profitability hinges not just on accurate predictions but on optimizing execution through platform infrastructure, liquidity, fees, and risk tools.

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Navigating the World of Event Trading: Top 5 Prediction Markets for Every Type of User

TheNewsCrypto2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片